Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Curve for Uniportal VATS Anatomical Pulmonary Resections: the Activity Monitor Operating Characteristic Method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to analyze the learning process of the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS), the most up-to-date approach in VATS, to determine the learning curve cut-off value and to share the technical details in our application. Fifty patients who underwent anatomical pulmonary resection with the uVATS technique in our institute between May 2020 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The cut-off point in the learning curve (patient 26) was determined with the activity monitor operating characteristic (AMOC) method, which was developed for monitoring the most sensitive changes in the timeline. Patients were divided into two groups based on this cut-off value (group 1: first 25 patients vs. group 2: established phase, 25 patients) and compared. Comparison of groups (group 1 vs. 2) revealed a median resection time of 200 vs. 110 min (p < 0.001) and median bleeding amount of 50 vs. 30 cc (p = 0.033). Duration of pulmonary resection was statistically significantly correlated with lymph node dissection time (r = 0.698; p < 0.001) and hospital stay (r = 0.437; p = 0.029) in group 1. The most common complication was prolonged air leak (16%). The uVATS technique has video features very different from the tri-port and bi-port VATS methods. Our study using the AMOC method to compare two groups of uVATS in a continuous timeline over approximately 1 year (May 2020–June 2021) showed that, with increasing experience, resection times and bleeding amounts decreased significantly between the groups. Thus emphasizing the learning curve required for uVATS, anatomical pulmonary resection could be adequately and safely performed in all patients in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All authors have made a declaration of data availability, which is clearly stated in the letter to the editor.

References

  1. Gonzalez, D., Paradela, M., Garcia, J., & Dela Torre, M. (2011). Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 12(3), 514–515. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2010.256222

  2. DE LA Torre, M., González-Rivas, D., Fernández, R., Delgado, M., Fieira, E., & Méndez, L. (2016). Uniportal VATS lobectomy. Minerva Chirurgica, 71(1), 46–60.

  3. Gonzalez-Rivas, D., & Sihoe, A. D. L. (2017). Important technical details during uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic major resections. Thoracic Surgery Clinics, 27(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2017.06.004

  4. Li, W. H., Cheng, H., Gan, X. F., Li, X. J., Wang, X. J., Wu, X. W., et al. (2022). Learning curve of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an analysis of the proficiency of 538 cases from a single centre. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 34(5), 799–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivab378

  5. Martin-Ucar, A. E., Aragon, J., Bolufer Nadal, S., Galvez Munoz, C., Luo, Q., Perez Mendez, I., et al. (2017). The influence of prior multiport experience on the learning curve for single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy: a multicentre comparative study†. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 51(6), 1183–1187. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx003

  6. Stamenovic, D., Messerschmidt, A., & Schneider, T. (2019). Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Learning Curve for Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Lymphadenectomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, 29(7), 914–920. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0802

  7. Vieira, A., Bourdages-Pageau, E., Kennedy, K., & Ugalde, P. A. (2020). The learning curve on uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery: An analysis of proficiency. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 159(6), 2487–2495.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.006

  8. Han, D., Cao, Y., Wu, H., Wang, H., Jiang, L., Zhao, D., et al. (2020). Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: a consensus report from Chinese Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (CSTCVS) and Chinese Association of Thoracic Surgeons (CATS). Translational Lung Cancer Research, 9(4), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-576

  9. Igai, H., Kamiyoshihara, M., Furusawa, S., Ohsawa, F., Yazawa, T., & Matsuura, N. (2021). The learning curve of thoracoscopic surgery in a single surgeon and successful implementation of uniportal approach. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 13(7), 4063–4071. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-500

  10. Fawcett T, Provost F (1999) Activity monitoring: noticing interesting changes in behavior. In: Proceedings of the fifth AC SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. Association for Computing Machinery, San Diego, California, USA. p. 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/312129.312195

  11. Bertolaccini, L., Rocco, G., Viti, A., & Terzi, A. (2013). Geometrical characteristics of uniportal VATS. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3), S214–S216. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.04.06

  12. Hernandez-Arenas, L. A., Lin, L., Purmessur, R. D., Zhou, Y., Jiang, G., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic early learning curve for major lung resections in a high volume training center. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(Suppl 31), S3670–S3677. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.04.16

  13. Chen L, Shen Y, Duan S, Jin X, Wang Y, Sang Y, Chen Y. (2022). Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy. Annals of Translational Medicine, 10(1):12. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6113

  14. Drevet G, Ugalde Figueroa P. (2016). Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: safety, efficacy and learning curve during the first 250 cases in Quebec Canada. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 5(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2016.03.05

  15. Wang L, Liu D, Lu J, Zhang S, Yang X et al. (2017). The feasibility and advantage of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pulmonary lobectomy. BMC Cancer, 17(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3069-z

  16. Gonzalez-Rivas D. (2013). Evolving thoracic surgery: from open surgery to single port thoracoscopic surgery and future robotic. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 25(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2012.11.02

  17. Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. (2005). Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 28(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.039

  18. Liu X, Chen X, Shen Y, Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, D’Amico TA et al. (2018). Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy-results from 120 consecutive patients. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(8):5100–5107. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.08.87

  19. Nachira, D., Meacci, E., Porziella, V., Vita, M. L., Congedo, M. T., Chiappetta, M., et al. (2018). Learning curve of uniportal video-assisted lobectomy: analysis of 15-month experience in a single center. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(Suppl 31), S3662–S3669. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.03.133

  20. Bertolaccini L, Batirel H, Brunelli A, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Ismail M, Ucar AM et al. (2019). Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: a consensus report from the Uniportal VATS Interest Group (UVIG) of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 56(2), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz133

  21. Cao C, Frick AE, Ilonen I, McElnay P, Guerrera F, Tian DH et al. (2018). European questionnaire on the clinical use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Interactive Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery, 27(3), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy062

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Naci Murat for his assistance in the statistical analysis of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

    Selcuk Gurz, Necmiye Gul Temel, Aysen Taslak Sengul, Yasemin Buyukkarabacak, Mehmet Gokhan Pirzirenli & Ahmet Basoglu

  2. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Göğüs Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, Kurupelit Yerleşkesi, 55270, Körfez, Atakum, Samsun, Turkey

    Selcuk Gurz

Authors
  1. Selcuk Gurz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Necmiye Gul Temel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aysen Taslak Sengul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yasemin Buyukkarabacak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mehmet Gokhan Pirzirenli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ahmet Basoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.G. designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. N.G.T and A.T.S. collected and verified the data. Y.B. and M.G.P. analyzed and interpreted the data. A.B. designed the study, interpreted the data, revised the manuscript, and made the decision to submit for publication. All authors actively contributed to the discussion of the results from the study and reviewed and approved the final version to be released.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selcuk Gurz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A version of this study was presented as an oral presentation (SB-039) at the 11th National Congress of the Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gurz, S., Temel, N.G., Sengul, A.T. et al. Learning Curve for Uniportal VATS Anatomical Pulmonary Resections: the Activity Monitor Operating Characteristic Method. Indian J Surg 85 (Suppl 2), 434–441 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03667-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03667-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation