Abstract
Burst abdomen is a grave complication of laparotomy. X-suturing has been developed as a new method for reducing risk of burst abdomen. Five randomised controlled trials were conducted comparing X-suture with continuous suture in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The analysis of pooled data is presented. Data from five randomised controlled trials were collated. Data on individual patients were obtained from each centre on an Excel database format. A total of 1005 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were studied. Of these 494 patients were randomised to X-suture arm and 511 to the continuous suture arm. The occurrence of burst abdomen was the main outcome of interest and the suture technique the main predictor of burst. The continuous suture group was considered the reference category. Risk ratio, risk difference, attributable proportion in exposed and prevented fraction in the exposed were calculated. Burst abdomen occurred in 9.31% patients in the X-suture group and in 20.35% patients in the continuous suture group. The risk difference (11%) and relative risk = 0.45 were highly significant (p = 0.0001) with a prevented fraction = 54%. Presence of diabetes, intraperitoneal sepsis, uraemia, and raised serum bilirubin were associated with increased risk of burst abdomen. The risk of burst abdomen can be substantially reduced with the use of X-suture in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shukla HS, Kumar S, Misra MC, Naithani YP (1981) Burst abdomen and suture material: a comparison of abdominal wound closure with monofilament nylon and chromic catgut. Ind J Surg 43:487–491
Srivastava A, Roy S, Sahay KB, Seenu V, Kumar A, Chumber S, Bal S, Mehta SN (2004) Prevention of burst abdominal wound by a new technique: a randomized trial comparing continuous versus interrupted X-suture. Ind J Surg 66:19–27
Challa V, Dhar A, Anand S, Srivastava A (2009) Chapter 11, Abdominal wounddehiscence: thescience and art ofitsoccurrence and prevention. In: Gupta RL (ed) Recent Advances in SurgeryNumber 11. JaypeeBrothers, New Delhi, pp 225–250
Aggarwal CS, Tewari P, Mishra S, Rao A, Hadke NS, Adhikari S, Srivastava A (2012) Interrupted abdominal closure prevents burst: randomized controlled trial comparing interrupted-X and conventional continuous closures in surgical and gynecological patients. Ind J Surg 24:1–7
Hennekens CH, Buring JE (1987) Epidemiology in medicine; Chapter 4 -Measures of disease frequency and association. Pub -Little Brown and company, Boston, pp 54–98
Miettinen O (1974) Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention. Am J Epidemiol 99(5):325–332
Pérez Lara FJ, Zubizarreta Jimenez R, MoyaDonoso FJ, Hernández Gonzalez JM, Prieto-PugaArjona T, Marín Moya R, Pitarch MM (2021) Novel suturing technique, based on physical principles, achieves a breaking point double that obtained by conventional techniques. World J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1039–1049
Ahi KS, Khandekar S (2017) Prevention of burst abdomen by interrupted closure: a comparative study of conventional continuous versus interrupted-X-type versus hughes far-and-near interrupted abdominal fascial closure in surgical patients. IOSR J Dental Medic Sci 16:21–30
Khan AA, Khan N, Qayyum A, AbbasiSaira HJ (2018) Comparison of continuous versus interrupted X-suturing technique for abdominal wall closure in emergency midline laparotomy wound. J Postgrad Med Inst 32(4):390–394
Belim O, Gohil K (2014) Evaluation of wound dehiscence of midline laparotomy wounds on comparing continuous interlocking and interrupted X-suturing methods of closure. Int J Res Med 3(2):19–26
Roy A, Mukhopadhyay M, Rahman QM (2016) Abdominal closure with interrupted ‘X’ sutures prevent burst abdomen better when compared with continuous mass closure: a randomised trial in patients with perforative peritonitis. Hellenic J Surg 88:405–409
Shashikala V, Abhilash SB, Abhishek G, Fernandes PS (2018) A comparative study between continuous and x-interrupted sutures in emergency midline laparotomies. Int Surg J 5:1753–1757
Kunju RD, Thakkannavar V, Shrivathsa MK, Sachin HG, Netto A, Pawar SJ, PM. (2017) A clinical study of continuous and interrupted fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy at a tertiary care centre. Int Surg J 4:2014–2017
Sharma AC, Gupta AK, Singh N, Maurya AK, Singla M (2019) Comparison of continuous versus interrupted abdominal fascia closure using polydioxanone suture in laparotomy. Int Surg J 6:2832–2836
Islam B, Islam S, Roy SK, Alam NK, Rahaman T, Sarkar MH (2017) Interrupted midline fascial closure to prevent burst abdomen in emergency laparotomy: comparison between continuous and interrupted closure. TAJ 30:69–75
Tandara AA, Mustoe TA (2004) Oxygen in wound healing—more than a nutrient. World J Surg 28:294–300
Yip WL (2015) Influence of oxygen on wound healing. Int Wound J 12(6):620–624
Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, Franck A, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Knaebel HP (2009) Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg 249(4):576–82
Kursh ED, Klein L, Schmitt J, Kayal S, Persky L (1977) The effect of uremia on wound tensile strength and collagen formation. J Surg Res 23(1):37–42
Maroz N, Simman R (2014) Wound healing in patients with impaired kidney function. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec 5(1):2–7
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to following investigators for kindly sharing their data: Swapandeep Roy (AIIMS, New Delhi); Sujoy Negi (RJ Kar Medical College Kolkota); B.K. Jain (UCMS, Delhi); Upendra Shrivastava (UCMS Delhi); Vibhor Mahendru (RJ Kar Medical College Kolkata); Dilip Chakrabarty (RJ Kar Medical College Kolkata); Shibajyoti Ghosh (RJ Kar Medical College Kolkata); Mosin Mustaq (Government Medical College Srinagar); Shahid Anjum Awan (Government Medical College Srinagar); Farooq Ahmed (Government Medical College Srinagar).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Presentation: Annual Meeting of Association of Surgeons of India, Kolkota, December 2012.
Appendix 1: Suturing Technique
Appendix 1: Suturing Technique
The technique of “X”-suturing is described in detail by Srivastava et al. [2] in Indian Journal of Surgery and in the book “Recent Advances in Surgery” edited by Dr Roshan Lall Gupta Number 11 [3].
The first bite is started at 2 cm from cut edge of linea alba with needle entering at point “1” (see Fig. 1). The needle emerges at point “2”on opposite side of wound 4 cm cranially or caudally at 2 cm from edge. Two ends of suture strands are crossed and needle enters at point “3” on a diagonally opposite direction 4 cm away from previous bite and 2 cm from edge. The needle emerges at point “4” diagonal to point “3”. A “right angle” forceps is passed behind the “X” on back of linea alba and two ends of suture are fastened with two double throws alternating with two single throws. The smaller end of suture is next pulled by the “right angle” forceps deep to the linea alba passing behind the “X” like cross of suture. Four more throws are fastened (alternating single and double throws) to complete a secure central reef knot. This central knot fixes the 4 limbs of “X” and acts like a pivot for free movement of four limbs of “X”. The suture ends are held with an artery forceps and suture cut at one centimeter from the knot. The free ends of suture are insinuated between edges of linea alba to prevent any sinus formation. The final result is a “two “X” configurations”—one on surface and other on deeper aspect of linea alba, hence the name “double X suture”. The next X-suture is placed at a distance of 1 cm from the previous one. Any gap between the sutures admitting a finger is reinforced with a simple interrupted suture to prevent any Richter’s hernia of bowel.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mishra, P.R., Kumar, S., Mishra, S. et al. Interrupted X-Suture Prevents Burst Abdomen: Analysis of 5 Randomised Controlled Trials from India. Indian J Surg 85, 233–240 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03411-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03411-6