Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Qualitative Research in Surgical Disciplines: Need and Scope

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a deficient application of qualitative research methods in surgical specialties. The concerned researchers largely focus on quantitative estimates like: health risk, burden, surgical management and objective outcomes. Without qualitative assessment important aspects like: patient’s preparation, perception, satisfaction, coping ability, well-being and functional outcomes are not addressed. In quantitative research, evaluation of pre-set variables is done to primarily study the process and outcomes of healthcare interventions. However, in qualitative research, patient’s experience, emotions, self-image, decision-making, pain perception, coping mechanism and quality of life (QoL) can be assessed. With time, surgeons are emphasizing more on the importance of functional recovery and QoL after surgery in multidisciplinary board discussions, and before making treatment decisions. Qualitative research employs purposive sampling and a meticulous data collection using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) etc. Collected data is analysed using statistical tools post transcription and coding and is suitably presented. Like other research designs, qualitative methods also have uniform criteria’s and standards for quality management. Adoption of qualitative research is critical in filling gaps of patient and surgeon’s perspective and experience of process of surgical care for clinical policy decisions. Integration of qualitative evidence in shared decision-making process will further improve standards and practice of surgical care and enhance doctor-patient relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frampton SB, Guastello S, Hoy L, Naylor M, Sheridan S, Johnston-Fleece M (2017). Harnessing evidence and experience to change culture: a guiding framework for patient and family engaged care National Academy Of Medicine 1-38

  2. Hsing CY, Wong YK, Wang CP, Wang CC, Jiang RS, Chen FJ, Liu SA (2011) Comparison between free flap and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients–a quality of life analysis. Oral Oncol 47(6):522–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Viana TSA, de Barros Silva PG, Pereira KMA, Mota MRL, Alves APNN, de Souza EF, Sousa FB (2017) Prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing primary surgery for oral cancer: preoperative and postoperative analysis. Asian Pacific Journal Of Cancer Prevention: APJCP 18(8):2093–2100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shauver MS, Chung KC (2010) A guide to qualitative research in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(3):1089–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa P, Cardoso JM, Louro H, Dias J, Costa L, Rodrigues R, Espiridião P, Maciel J, Ferraz L (2018) Impact on sexual function of surgical treatment in rectal cancer. International Braz J Urol 44(1):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sibeoni J, Picard C, Orri M, Labey M, Bousquet G, Verneuil L, Revah-Levy A (2018) Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 18(1):951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vogel RI, Strayer LG, Ahmed RL, Blaes A, Lazovich D (2017) A qualitative study of quality of life concerns following a melanoma diagnosis. Journal of Skin Cancer 2017:2041872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. US Department of Health and Human Services (2018). Qualitative methods in implementation science. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Cancer Institute, 1–31

  9. Sandelowski M, Leeman J (2012) Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res 22(10):1404–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tracy SJ (2010) Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq 16(10):837–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hannes, K. (2011). Chapter 4: critical appraisal of qualitative research. Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions. Version, 1, 1–14

  12. Beaton DE, Clark JP (2009) Qualitative research: a review of methods with use of examples from the total knee replacement literature. JBJS 91(Supplement_3):107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright JG, McKeever P (2000) Qualitative research: its role in clinical research. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 33:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen D, Crabtree B (2006). Qualitative research guidelines project. Evaluative criteria. http://qualres.org/HomeGuid-3934.html. Accessed 2020 April 18

  15. Polit DF, Beck CT (2009) Essentials of nursing research 7th edition: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 489–513

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research:105–117

  17. Connelly LM (2016) Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nurs 25(6):435–437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tong A, Morton RL, Webster AC (2016) How qualitative research informs clinical and policy decision making in transplantation: a review. Transplantation 100(9):1997–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Konecny, L. M. (2010). Quality of life, social support, and uncertainty among Latina and Caucasian breast cancer survivors: a comparative study. In Oncology Nursing Forum (Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 93). Oncology Nursing Society

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Jakhetiya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meena, J.K., Jakhetiya, A. & Pandey, A. Qualitative Research in Surgical Disciplines: Need and Scope. Indian J Surg 83, 3–8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02280-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02280-1

Keywords

Navigation