Summary
Cancer stem cells, also known as leukemic stem cells (LSC) in the context of leukemias, are an emerging topic in translational oncology and hematology. The Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology (LBI HO) was established in 2008 with the aim to translate LSC concepts into clinical practice. Major specific aims of the LBI HO are to identify LSC in various blood cell disorders and to improve anti-leukemic therapies by establishing LSC-targeting and LSC-eradicating approaches with the ultimate aim to translate these concepts into clinical practice. In addition, the LBI HO identified a number of diagnostic and prognostic LSC markers in various blood cell malignancies. Members of the LBI HO have also developed precision medicine tools and personalized medicine approaches around LSC in applied hematology. As a result, diagnosis, prognostication and therapy have improved in the past 10 years. Major disease models are myeloid leukemias and mast cell neoplasms. Finally, the LBI HO consortium launched several projects in the field of open innovation in science where patient-derived initiatives and their input supported the scientific community. Key aims for the future of the LBI HO are to develop LSC-related concepts and strategies further, with the long-term vision to cure more patients with hematologic malignancies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Historical overview and background
In the past 3 decades, cancer-initiating stem cells have been recognized as an emerging new target in applied oncology and hematology [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Initially, these cancer stem cells (CSC) have been identified and characterized in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [7,8,9,10]. In the context of leukemia, CSC are termed leukemia-initiating (propagating) stem cells or leukemic stem cells (LSC). The concept of CSC/LSC is based on the assumption that each neoplasm (solid or liquid) consists of two distinct fractions of cells, (i) the CSC/LSC and (ii) more mature clonal cells [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In contrast to more mature neoplastic cells, CSC/LSC have the ability to propagate clonal, neoplastic (cancer/leukemia) cells in vivo for unlimited time periods. The long-term disease-propagating ability of CSC/LSC is associated with specific stem cell functions, including self-renewal, the ability of asymmetrical cell division, some (limited) differentiation capacity, and the related ability to propagate one or more sub-clones in a given neoplasm [1,2,3,4,5,6]. As a result, the CSC/LSC pool exhibits an unlimited capacity to form the bulk of ‘more mature’ cells in a given malignancy. Finally, in common with normal stem cells, CSC/LSC have advanced self-protection capabilities, which prevents their exhaustion and contributes to their resistance against toxins and drug therapies [1,2,3,4,5,6].
As mentioned, the concept of CSC/LSC was first established in AML [7,8,9,10]. However, the LSC concept can also be applied to other forms of leukemia, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL), or mast cell leukemia (MCL) [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
In chronic leukemias, such as CML, the clonal hierarchy and ‘LSC-dependence’ of disease evolution and diversification into subclones, are obvious features. However, the concept of LSC is also relevant in acute leukemias. Over the years, the CSC hypothesis has also been tested in diverse solid tumors, myeloma, and malignant melanomas [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. To a degree, clonal evolution and stem cell hierarchies can also be demonstrated in these cancer models. However, in advanced (metastatic) cancers and treatment refractory acute leukemias, the stem cell hierarchy is gradually diminishing and the pool of CSC/LSC may increase rapidly over time [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Another important point is that in advanced neoplasms, CSC/LSC are becoming more and more heterogeneous cell populations, and, depending on stage and type of malignancy, ‘stemness’ may be, or may become, a ‘reversible functional feature’ or a ‘newly acquired functional feature’ of neoplastic (precursor) cells [32,33,34,35,36,37].
In the past 10 years, a number of markers, driver pathways, and targets have been identified and characterized in CSC/LSC in various disease models. As a result, CSC/LSC have been identified as major target cell population in various cancer models [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].
CSC/LSC research has also been promoted by several groups in Vienna, many of them within the Vienna Cancer Stem Cell Club (VCSCC) and its major ‘research-driver’, the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology (LBI HO) [46, 47]. Indeed, the LBI HO contributed substantially to LSC research between 2008 and 2023 [46].
In 2023, members of the LBI HO celebrated its 15-year anniversary and organized a 15-year jubilee meeting in Vienna. In the current article, we provide an update of the LBI HO and provide information on major aims and project lines as well as research highlights.
Origin and structure of the LBI HO
The initial research cluster, the Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster Oncology (LBC ONC), was established in 2008 by merging two Ludwig Boltzmann Institutes working in the field of hematology and oncology: the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Leukemia Research and Hematology at the Hanusch Hospital, and the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical and Experimental Oncology located at the Medical University of Vienna [46]. In the first 10 years, the LBC ONC conducted a series of major projects in the field of LSC research and expanded substantially. In 2018, the structure of the LBC ONC was refined, and the name changed to LBI HO. During the past 5 years, the LBI HO was able to attract several additional academic partners in Vienna, including the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna in 2017 and the Children’s Cancer Research Institute (CCRI) in 2018 (Table 1). In addition, the LBI HO started several fruitful partnerships and collaborations with industrial partners.
The LBI HO consortium is based on a partner board that includes major representatives of all participating partner institutions, including academic partners and industrial partners. In addition, the LBI HO has established a scientific advisory board (SAB) consisting of 3 international experts in the field. The SAB members have been visiting the LBI HO once a year and provide essential input and valuable scientific advice to the LBI HO.
The LBI HO runs seven core facility platforms (CF-PF) in collaboration with academic partner institutions [46]. These platforms focus on management and administration (CF-PF1), flow cytometry and cell sorting (CF-PF2), molecular studies and genetic tests (CF-PF3), mouse xenotransplantation experiments (CF-PF4), education (CF-PF5), clinical investigations (CF-PF6), and viral-mediated gene delivery and cell line models (CF-PF7). The CF-PF are interconnected with each other and with all project lines of the LBI HO and form an essential basis for the successful conduct of research projects within the LBI HO.
The LBI HO is embedded in an active multidisciplinary scientific network in various partner institutions, including the Medical University of Vienna where the LBI HO is interacting with the VCSCC, local core facility units, the division of hematology and hemostaseology, a local stem cell transplantation unit, several collaborating research laboratories, a central routine laboratory, and the Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) of the Medical University of Vienna [46]. The LBI HO is also embedded in a robust communication system that interconnects LBI partner institutions and promotes continuous networking and scientific cooperations as well as project discussion. Internal communications in the LBI HO and interactions with external partners are guided and coordinated by the administration team of the LBI. Members of the LBI HO meet regularly in weekly progress report meetings [46]. These meetings are joint meetings with the VCSCC and represent a suitable platform for ongoing scientific discussions and collaborations [46, 47].
Major aims and project lines in the LBI HO
The general scientific goals of the LBI HO are to identify and characterize LSC in various blood cell malignancies, to characterize and validate clinically important (diagnostic and prognostic) markers and therapeutic targets in these cells, and to determine the efficacy of various targeted drugs and drug combinations on proliferation and survival of LSC. During the past 15 years, the LBI HO made significant progress in the phenotypic and functional characterization of LSC in various leukemia models (Table 2). In addition, members of the LBI HO were able to identify and characterize pre-leukemic (premalignant) neoplastic stem cells (pre-L-NSC) in various indolent (premalignant) hematologic disease states, including myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and systemic mastocytosis (SM) (Table 2). In these projects, the LBI HO consortium was also able to identify and to validate several most promising markers and therapeutic targets in neoplastic stem cells (Table 2). A key aim of the LBI HO is to establish a solid basis for the development of novel LSC-eradicating treatment concepts and to translate these concepts into clinical practice [46]. A long-term vision of the LBI HO is to introduce new curative approaches for patients by applying drugs and drug-combinations or immunotherapies that can eliminate LSC (or even LSC and pre-L-NSC) in these malignancies.
When launching the LBI HO (LBC ONC) in 2008, 4 project lines (PL) were established, one for myeloid neoplasms, one for lymphoid neoplasms, one for solid tumors, and one for skin cancer and mast cell neoplasms [46]. Over the years, the focus of the LBI HO shifted more and more to myeloid neoplasms and mast cell neoplasms, based on project development and scientific performance as well as recommendations provided by the partner board, the SAB, and the evaluation reports. From 2022, scientific projects of the LBI HO are conducted in 2 project lines, one dedicated to myeloid neoplasms in basic research and translational research and one on mast cell neoplasms in basic research and translational research.
The overarching strategic aim of the LBI HO is to establish a multi-disciplinary platform for interactive collaborative research on pre-L-NSC and LSC, and to provide this platform to interested experts and groups in various partner institutions and also to new collaboration partners [46]. In fact, the LBI HO is seeking new collaboration partners, including strong academic partners and suitable industrial collaboration partners. To fertilize the development of cooperative research projects, members of the LBI HO have also organized a series of international meetings and conferences on LSC in the past 15 years.
Another important aim of the LBI HO is to attract top scientists, to educate young scientists interested in LSC research and to shape their career, and to promote junior group leaders and professors working in the field of stem cell research and translational hematology [46]. The LBI HO is also promoting gender medicine aspects in hematopoietic neoplasms, and is also particularly inviting and integrating female researchers in LBI projects.
Finally, an important strategic aim of the LBI HO is to translate research results and concepts into clinical practice [46]. This goal is particularly followed at the Medical University of Vienna and Hanusch Hospital, where clinical markers and targets as well as targeted drugs are tested in observational studies, registry studies and clinical trials, and at the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, where clinical concepts and studies are developed in dogs and other domestic animals. In many of these studies, concepts are established in animal and the corresponding human neoplasms in parallel, following the principles of comparative oncology within the LBI HO consortium [46]. At the Medical University of Vienna, clinical concepts are developed in collaboration with the CCC, VCSCC, and industrial collaboration partners [46].
During the first 10 years, the LBI HO focused primarily on preclinical models and projects, whereas from 2018, the LBI HO is focusing more and more on translational hematology and the development of clinical concepts around markers and targets displayed by LSC [46]. An overview of projects performed by members of the LBI HO is provided in Table 3.
Examples of contributions of the LBI HO to basic LSC research
Identification of ‘stem cell signatures’ in patients with premalignant clonal conditions and patients with minimal residual disease during therapy
To test the hypothesis that pre-L-NSC are detectable in patients with early clonal conditions and patients who are successfully treated with anti-leukemic therapy, we examined the phenotype of putative stem cells and related molecular aberration profiles. In a substantial number of patients with early clonal conditions, such as age-related clonal hematopoiesis (ARCH), idiopathic cytopenia with unknown significance (ICUS), or clonal cytopenia with unknown significance (CCUS), bone marrow-derived and circulating CD34+/CD38− stem cells display low but detectable levels of CD25 and/or CD123 [48]. Similarly, the residual CD34+/CD38− stem cells that can be detected in patients with Ph+ CML who are successfully treated with BCR::ABL1 TKI, often express CD25 and less frequently CD26. Such residual pre-L-NSC that escape TKI therapy may or may not display BCR::ABL1 mRNA. In some of these patients BCR::ABL1 is not detectable, but ARCH-type mutations can be identified. The resulting hypothesis is that residual early pre-L-NSC (pre-BCR::ABL1 stage of CML) express these mutations. As a result of successful therapy with BCR::ABL1-targeting drugs, most dominant subclones are eliminated, whereas pre-L-NSC, bearing ARCH mutations, often persist. Since these mutations also predispose to the occurrence of vascular occlusive events, members of the LBI HO defined the actual risk in these cases. Indeed, there is a correlation between the presence of ARCH mutations and vascular adverse events in CML patients treated successfully with nilotinib, regardless of BCR::ABL1 mRNA levels [49].
When following patients with early (indolent) myeloid neoplasms, the expression levels of CD25 often increase when the disease is progressing to an aggressive neoplasm/leukemia. For example, in CMML, LSC display low or negligible levels of CD25, whereas in patients with secondary AML (sAML) following CMML, LSC express large amounts of CD25 [22]. In patients with primary (de novo) AML, LSC exhibit CD25 in roughly 50% of all cases, whereas in CML, CD25 is almost invariably expressed on LSC in all patients [48]. In the disease models analyzed, including Ph+ CML, CD25 expression on leukemic cells apparently depends on STAT5-activation [50].
Identification of specific aberrant (diagnostic) phenotypes of LSC in myeloid leukemias
During the past 15 years, members of the LBI HO screened over 5000 samples of patients with myeloid neoplasms (as well as control samples) for expression of cell surface markers and targets on stem- and progenitor cells by flow cytometry [14, 19, 21, 22, 48, 50, 51]. In these studies, the LBI HO team was able to identify a number of aberrant surface antigens that are specifically expressed on pre-L-NSC or LSC in various types of myeloid neoplasms, including Ph+ CML, Ph-MPN, CMML, MDS, AML, SM, and MCL. In Ph+ CML, putative LSC display CD25, CD26, CD33, CD93, CD123, and IL-1RAP [48, 50, 51]. In AML, LSC often express CD25, CD96, and CD371 (CLL-1) [48]. In addition, in FLT3-mutated AML, LSC may also express CD26 [48]. In most myeloid neoplasms, including MPN and CML, pre-L-NSC and LSC also display low levels of CD274 (PD-L1) [45, 52,53,54]. When exposed to interferon-gamma (IFN-G) and/or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-A), pre-L-NSC and LSC express significant amounts of this resistance-mediating checkpoint antigen [45, 52,53,54]. It is also important to note that pre-L-NSC and LSC also display several other major (resistance-related) checkpoint antigens, such as CD47 and also several known drug targets, such as CD9, CD44, or CD52 [48].
Overall, LSC phenotyping revealed disease-specific cell surface profiles, which forms the basis for diagnostic stem cell phenotyping (LSC typing) and for the development of LSC-targeting (improved curative) therapies.
Identification of the osteoblast as a major site of LSC resistance in ph+ CML
In myeloid neoplasms, the stem cell niche in the bone marrow is composed of various structural cells, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages, other stromal cells, and endosteal-lining cells (osteoblasts) [55,56,57]. These niche-forming cells reportedly are involved in the differentiation, distribution, and function of normal and neoplastic stem cells and contribute to LSC resistance [55,56,57]. Whereas stromal cells have repeatedly been reported to contribute to LSC resistance in CML and AML, little is known about the role of other niche cells. More recently, members of the LBI HO found out that osteoblastic cells (endosteal cells) play a major role in resistance of LSC against BCR::ABL1-targeting TKI in patients with Ph+ CML [58]. In fact, when co-cultured with these cells, CML LSC can no longer be driven into apoptosis by nilotinib or ponatinib [58]. Osteoblast-mediated resistance of LSC in Ph+ CML is dependent on several oncogenic pathways, including the PI3-Kinase-mTOR pathway and the BRD4-MYC axis [58, 59].
The BRD4-MYC axis as a driver of LSC resistance in myeloid neoplasms
Drug resistance of LSC against targeted drugs and other therapies remains a problem in applied hematology. During the past 10 years, members of the LBI HO have examined the mechanisms of LSC resistance and developed strategies to overcome LSC resistance by applying drug combinations and by disrupting key pathways and targets contributing to resistance. In these studies, the BRD4-MYC pathway turned out to be a key driver of LSC resistance in several malignancies, including AML and CML [58, 60,61,62]. For example, in Ph+ CML, BRD4 and MYC contribute to niche-induced resistance of LSC as well as to intrinsic LSC resistance, acquired (mutation-induced) resistance, and immunologic resistance [58]. Similar data have been collected in other myeloid neoplasms, including AML. Members of the LBI HO were also able to show that BRD4 degraders can completely disrupt the BRD4-MYC pathway in LSC, which is important as these cells frequently have or develop resistance against small molecule type BRD4 inhibitors [58].
Examples of contributions of the LBI HO to clinical translation
From KIT to KIT-targeting treatment concepts
During the past 15 years, members of the LBI HO have established the anti-neoplastic activity profiles of various KIT-targeting drugs in the context of advanced SM and mast cell activation. The first compound tested, imatinib, turned out to be less effective, since the KIT mutation D816V confers resistance against this TKI [63, 64]. However, midostaurin (PKC412) was found to exert profound effects on KIT D816V as well as growth and survival of neoplastic mast cells obtained from patients with advanced SM [63, 65]. In addition, members of the LBI HO were able to show that neoplastic stem cells in SM display KIT and KIT D816V and that midostaurin is also able to suppress the growth and viability of these stem cells [21]. Finally, members of the LBI HO were able to demonstrate that midostaurin blocks IgE-mediated histamine secretion in human mast cells and basophils [66, 67]. Based on these results and other data obtained in other major research laboratories, midostaurin was further developed in preclinical and clinical studies [68] and was finally approved for the treatment of patients with advanced SM. In subsequent studies, the LBI HO also examined the activity profiles of other KIT D816V-targeting drugs, including avapritinib [69]. Similar to midostaurin, avapritinib is able to suppress the growth and survival of neoplastic mast cells and IgE-mediated histamine release in neoplastic mast cells and basophils [69]. However, compared to midostaurin, avapritinib is a stronger inhibitor of KIT D816V and a more potent agent regarding its inhibitory effects on mast cell expansion in advanced SM. The LBI HO is also continuing to test the efficacy profiles of novel KIT-targeting drugs.
Identification of CDK4/CDK6 as key vulnerability of BCR::ABL1 T315I-transformed cells
In Ph+ CML, a remaining challenge is the occurrence (selection) of the multi-resistant mutant form T315I of BCR::ABL1, especially when expressed together with other BCR::ABL1 mutations in compound configuration. In the past 10 years, several attempts have been made to overcome BCR::ABL1 T315I-mediated resistance in CML. A first clue to the critical mechanisms was the observation that BCR::ABL1 T315I is a weak (even growth-inhibitory) oncogene that needs additional pro-oncogenic machineries to expand clonal stem and progenitor cells [70]. Subsequently, members of the LBI HO were able to show that BCR::ABL1 T315I-mediated resistance of CML cells is triggered by activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK), especially CDK4 and CDK6 [71]. In addition, the team of the LBI HO found that the CDK4/6-targeting drug palbociclib as well as hydroxyurea (HU), a potent inhibitor of CDK4/6 expression, counteract growth and survival of CML cells and Ba/F3 cells exhibiting BCR::ABL1 T315I alone or BCR::ABL1 T315I in compound configuration with other mutant forms of BCR::ABL1 [71, 72]. In addition, HU was found to induce selective, complete and long-lasting suppression of BCR::ABL1 T315I-bearing subclones in patients with TKI-resistant CML [71]. Finally, members of the LBI HO were also able to show that CDK-targeting drugs cooperate (or even synergize) with BCR::ABL1 T315I-targeting drugs (ponatinib and asciminib) in inhibiting the growth and viability of CML cells expressing the T315I mutant [71, 72].
Dissection of niche-targeting effects of BCR::ABL1-directed TKI
The other unsolved issue in Ph+ CML is the avoidance of TKI-induced adverse side effects, especially TKI-related cardiovascular events [49, 73]. During the past few years, members of the LBI HO screened for potential adverse effects of novel and established BCR::ABL1 TKI in various in vitro models. Whereas nilotinib and ponatinib turned out to exert pro-atherogenic and growth-inhibitory effect on vascular endothelial cells [49], bosutinib and dasatinib were less effective, and asciminib did not show any inhibitory or pro-atherogenic effects on human endothelial cells [59]. This observation has recently been confirmed in smaller and larger clinical trials, suggesting that the LBI HO-based pre-testing of targeted drugs, including BCR::ABL1-directed TKI is of clinical value and of predictive significance.
Immunotherapies directed against LSC to improve curative treatment approaches
During the past 10 years, a number of immunotherapy approaches have been developed, including targeted antibody-based therapies, bi-specific engager antibodies, and CAR-T cell therapies. In addition, several efforts have been made to improve stem cell transplantation (SCT) approaches. Indeed, in most myeloid and mast cell neoplasms, SCT still remains the only established curative therapeutic approach. By contrast, only very few studies have shown encouraging effects of antibody-based or CAR-T cell therapies in myeloid neoplasms.
One example is gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), an antibody-toxin conjugate (CD33 + γ-calicheamicin) that exerts major anti-neoplastic effects in myeloid stem and progenitor cells. Members of the LBI HO were able to show that AML LSC and CML LSC as well as LSC in advanced mast cell neoplasms display CD33, and that GO is able to induce apoptosis in these cells [21, 45, 48, 54, 74,75,76]. Unfortunately, however, normal hematopoietic stem cells also display CD33, albeit at a lower level compared to LSC. This small therapeutic window allows for treatment with GO at moderate doses, but may not allow for CAR-T cell-based therapy unless a SCT rescue is applied. Indeed, GO at higher doses reportedly induces severe and long-lasting cytopenia, especially when combined with poly-chemotherapy.
Currently, the LBI HO is seeking more specific LSC targets that can be employed in CAR-T cell-based treatment approaches or antibody-based therapy using high doses of the drug.
Major conferences and other meetings organized by the LBI HO
During the past 15 years, members of the LBI HO organized a series of international scientific meetings, including several working conferences and workshops on CSC/LSC and/or on personalized medicine and precision medicine in hematology (Table 4). In these meetings, international top experts participated and exchanged concepts, data and expert opinion, with the aim to establish or refine (update) definitions and nomenclatures around CSC/LSC, pre-L-NSC, and to discuss the emerging new fields of personalized medicine and precision medicine in hematology. Some of these meetings focused on distinct types of myeloid neoplasms, such as MDS, mastocytosis or CMML.
Additional important topics discussed in these meetings were premalignant stages of cancer/leukemia, the development of curative cell therapies and immune therapies, comparative oncology, and open innovation in science (OIS). In each meeting, the first day was open for students and the interested public and consisted of several education sessions, whereas the following days were closed and essentially restricted to the faculty of the meeting. With regard to CSC/LSC definitions and terminologies, the most important and most influential working conference was organized in 2011, the ‘Year 2011 Working Conference on CSC’ (Table 4). In this conference, major authorities in the field discussed the definitions and terminologies as well as the heterogeneity of neoplastic stem cells, including CSC and LSC [5]. In addition, stem cell assays and limitations in currently used xenotransplantation models were discussed in this conference [5]. Finally, the faculty presented a proposal for the classification of NSC into premalignant NSC and malignant NSC. In the context of a leukemia, these cells are classified as pre-L-NSC and LSC [5, 77]. This concept is also consistent with the assumption that CSC/LSC evolution is a stepwise process that takes several years or even decades and is triggered by molecular drivers and co-driving passenger mutations in one, more, or many different sub-clones [5]. This concept has several clinical implications and explains nicely the biology of a multi-mutated neoplasm, including genomic plasticity and the heterogeneity of primary and secondary cancer lesions, lineage switches of cancer cells, and the unique molecular features of relapsing disease [5, 43, 77].
In 2015, members of the LBI HO and VCSCC organized a meeting to discuss and establish a global classification of clonal conditions, from early clonal lesions to fully developed, overt malignancies (Table 4). In this project, the faculty members extended the basic concept of dividing neoplastic stem cells into premalignant and malignant (cancerous) stem cells, to diseases in general, resulting in the delineation of neoplasms into premalignant (indolent) neoplasms and malignant (aggressive) neoplasms [78] which is in line with the classification of hematologic and non-hematologic neoplasms provided by the WHO.
In 2018, the members of the LBI HO organized a 10-year jubilee meeting of the LBI HO, at that time named still LBC ONC [46]. In June 2023, members of the LBI HO celebrated the 15-year jubilee of the LBI HO in Vienna (Table 4).
Summary and future perspectives
During the past 15 years, the LBI HO has established the phenotype and target expression profiles of pre-L-NSC and LSC in various blood cell malignancies, including myeloid leukemias, MDS and MPN as well as mast cell neoplasms, including MCL. Based on these achievements, members of the LBI HO were also able to isolate NSC to define major functional and immunological vulnerabilities through which these cells can be detected and can be eliminated using specific targeted drugs. As a result, the diagnostic and prognostic impact of LSC has been assessed in various cancer models, and improved LSC-eradicating (more curative) drug therapies have been developed. Several of these therapies are based on drug combinations directed against cooperative signaling pathways representing key vulnerabilities when blocked together, or antibody-based therapeutic approaches to overcome multiple forms of LSC resistance and even LSC dormancy. In addition, the LBI HO validated diagnostic LSC-based tools and new prognostic stem cell markers and patterns, including genetic abnormalities, serologic parameters and flow cytometry-patterns detecting key markers or minimal residual (LSC-containing) disease. The LBI HO has also defined premalignant phases and cells in various myeloid malignancies. Finally, the LBI HO identified mechanisms underlying resistance of pre-L-NSC and LSC in various disease models and developed strategies to overcome stem cell resistance. In the next few years, the LBI HO will continue to define the clinical value of druggable vulnerabilities of NSC/LSC in various hematopoietic neoplasms and will try to translate diagnostic, prognostic and LSC-eradicating treatment concepts into clinical application.
References
Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001;414:105–11.
Pardal R, Clarke MF, Morrison SJ. Applying the principles of stem-cell biology to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:895–902.
Polyak K, Hahn WC. Roots and stems: stem cells in cancer. Nat Med. 2006;12:296–300.
Nguyen LV, Vanner R, Dirks P, Eaves CJ. Cancer stem cells: an evolving concept. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(2):133–43.
Valent P, Bonnet D, De Maria R, et al. Cancer stem cell definitions and terminology: the devil is in the details. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:767–75.
Vetrie D, Helgason GV, Copland M. The leukaemia stem cell: similarities, differences and clinical prospects in CML and AML. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(3):158–73.
Lapidot T, Sirard C, Vormoor J, Murdoch B, Hoang T, Caceres-Cortes J, et al. A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature. 1994;367:645–8.
Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med. 1997;3:730–7.
Hope KJ, Jin L, Dick JE. Acute myeloid leukemia originates from a hierarchy of leukemic stem cell classes that differ in self-renewal capacity. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:738–43.
Long NA, Golla U, Sharma A, Claxton DF. Acute myeloid leukemia stem cells: origin, characteristics, and clinical implications. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2022;18(4):1211–26.
Kavalerchik E, Goff D, Jamieson CH. Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2911–5.
Copland M. Chronic myelogenous leukemia stem cells: What’s new? Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2009;4:66–73.
Sloma I, Jiang X, Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. Insights into the stem cells of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2010;24(11):1823–33.
Shehata M, Hubmann R, Hilgarth M, et al. Partial characterization and in vitro expansion of putative CLL precursor/stem cells which are dependent on bone marrow microenvironment for survival. Blood. 2010;116(21):2433 (abstract).
Kikushige Y, Ishikawa F, Miyamoto T, et al. Self-renewing hematopoietic stem cell is the primary target in pathogenesis of human chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:246–59.
Cobaleda C, Gutiérrez-Cianca N, et al. A primitive hematopoietic cell is the target for the leukemic transformation in human Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2000;95:1007–13.
Kong Y, Yoshida S, Saito Y. et al. CD34+ CD38+CD19+ as well as CD34+ CD38-CD19+ cells are leukemia-initiating cells with self-renewal capacity in human B‑precursor ALL. Leukemia. 2008;22:1207–13.
le Viseur C, Hotfilder M, Bomken S, et al. In childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, blasts at different stages of immunophenotypic maturation have stem cell properties. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:47–58.
Blatt K, Menzl I, Eisenwort G, et al. Phenotyping and target expression profiling of CD34+/CD38− and CD34+/CD38+ stem- and progenitor cells in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Neoplasia. 2018;20(6):632–42.
Zhang Y, He L, Selimoglu-Buet D, et al. Engraftment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia cells in immunocompromised mice supports disease dependency on cytokines. Blood Adv. 2017;1(14):972–9.
Eisenwort G, Sadovnik I, Schwaab J, et al. Identification of a leukemia-initiating stem cell in human mast cell leukemia. Leukemia. 2019;33(11):2673–84.
Eisenwort G, Sadovnik I, Keller A, et al. Phenotypic characterization of leukemia-initiating stem cells in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2021;35(11):3176–87.
Huff CA, Matsui W. Multiple myeloma cancer stem cells. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2895–900.
Johnsen HE, Bøgsted M, Schmitz A, et al. The myeloma stem cell concept, revisited: from phenomenology to operational terms. Haematologica. 2016;101(12):1451–9.
Ricci-Vitiani L, Lombardi DG, Pilozzi E, et al. Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells. Nature. 2007;445:111–5.
O’Brien CA, Pollett A, Gallinger S, Dick JE. A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature. 2007;445:106–10.
Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5821–8.
Prince ME, Sivanandan R, Kaczorowski A, et al. Identification of a subpopulation of cells with cancer stem cell properties in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci (usa). 2007;104:973–8.
Schatton T, Murphy GF, Frank NY, et al. Identification of cells initiating human melanomas. Nature. 2008;451:345–9.
Zabierowski SE, Herlyn M. Melanoma stem cells: the dark seed of melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2890–4.
Quintana E, Shackleton M, Sabel MS, et al. Efficient tumour formation by single human melanoma cells. Nature. 2008;456:593–8.
Roesch A, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Schmidt EC, et al. A temporarily distinct subpopulation of slow-cycling melanoma cells is required for continuous tumor growth. Cell. 2010;141:583–94.
Jamieson CH, Ailles LE, Dylla SJ, Muijtjens M, Jones C, Zehnder JL, Gotlib J, Li K, Manz MG, Keating A, Sawyers CL, Weissman IL. Granulocyte-macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:657–67.
Eaves CJ. Cancer stem cells: Here, there, everywhere? Nature. 2008;456:581–2.
Taussig DC, Miraki-Moud F, Anjos-Afonso F, et al. Anti-CD38 antibody-mediated clearance of human repopulating cells masks the heterogeneity of leukemia-initiating cells. Blood. 2008;112:568–75.
Quintana E, Shackleton M, Foster HR, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity among tumorigenic melanoma cells from patients that is reversible and not hierarchically organized. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:510–23.
Goardon N, Marchi E, Atzberger A, et al. Coexistence of LMPP-like and GMP-like leukemia stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:138–52.
Al-Hajj M, Becker MW, Wicha M, Weissman I, Clarke MF. Therapeutic implications of cancer stem cells. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004;14:43–7.
Guzman ML, Jordan CT. Considerations for targeting malignant stem cells in leukemia. Cancer Control. 2004;11:97–104.
Schulenburg A, Ulrich-Pur H, Thurnher D, et al. Neoplastic stem cells: a novel therapeutic target in clinical oncology. Cancer. 2006;107:2512–20.
Trumpp A, Wiestler OD. Mechanisms of Disease: cancer stem cells-targeting the evil twin. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5:337–47.
Helgason GV, Young GA, Holyoake TL. Targeting chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2010;5:81–7.
Valent P. Targeting of leukemia-initiating cells to develop curative drug therapies: straightforward but nontrivial concept. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2011;11:56–71.
McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Abrams SL, et al. Targeting the cancer initiating cell: the ultimate target for cancer therapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:1784–95.
Valent P, Bauer K, Sadovnik I, et al. Cell-based and antibody-mediated immunotherapies directed against leukemic stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia: perspectives and open issues. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9(11):1331–43.
Valent P, Hadzijusufovic E, Grunt T, et al. Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster Oncology (LBC ONC): first 10 years and future perspectives. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018;130(17–18:517–29.
Valent P, Sadovnik I, Peter B, et al. Vienna Cancer Stem Cell Club (VCSCC): 20 year jubilee and future perspectives. Expert Rev Hematol. 2023;16(9):659–70.
Herrmann H, Sadovnik I, Eisenwort G, et al. Delineation of target expression profiles in CD34+/CD38− and CD34+/CD38+ stem and progenitor cells in AML and CML. Blood Adv. 2020;4(20):5118–32.
Hadzijusufovic E, Albrecht-Schgoer K, Huber K, et al. Nilotinib-induced vasculopathy: identification of vascular endothelial cells as a primary target site. Leukemia. 2017;31(11):2388–97.
Sadovnik I, Hoelbl-Kovacic A, Herrmann H, et al. Identification of CD25 as STAT5-dependent growth regulator of leukemic stem cells in Ph+ CML. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:2051–61.
Herrmann H, Sadovnik I, Cerny-Reiterer S, et al. Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (CD26) defines leukemic stem cells (LSC) in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2014;123:3951–62.
Milosevic Feenstra JD, Jäger R, et al. PD-L1 overexpression correlates with JAK 2-V617F mutational burden and is associated with 9p uniparental disomy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol. 2022;97(4):390–400.
Ivanov D, Milosevic Feenstra JD, et al. Phenotypic characterization of disease-initiating stem cells in JAK 2- or CALR-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol. 2023;98(5):770–83.
Valent P, Sadovnik I, Eisenwort G, et al. Immunotherapy-based targeting and elimination of leukemic stem cells in AML and CML. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(17):4233.
Konopleva MY, Jordan CT. Leukemia stem cells and microenvironment: biology and therapeutic targeting. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:591–9.
Schulenburg A, Blatt K, Cerny-Reiterer S, et al. Cancer stem cells in basic science and in translational oncology: can we translate into clinical application? J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8:16.
Zhou HS, Carter BZ, Andreeff M. Bone marrow niche-mediated survival of leukemia stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia: Yin and Yang. Cancer Biol Med. 2016;13:248–59.
Peter B, Eisenwort G, Sadovnik I, et al. BRD4 degradation blocks expression of MYC and multiple forms of stem cell resistance in Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2022;97(9):1215–25.
Filik Y, Bauer K, Hadzijusufovic E, et al. PI3-kinase inhibition as a strategy to suppress the leukemic stem cell niche in Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia. Am J Cancer Res. 2021;11(12):6042–59.
Zuber J, Shi J, Wang E, et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2011;478(7370):524–8.
Herrmann H, Blatt K, Shi J, et al. Small-molecule inhibition of BRD4 as a new potent approach to eliminate leukemic stem- and progenitor cells in acute myeloid leukemia AML. Oncotarget. 2012;3(12):1588–99.
Rathert P, Roth M, Neumann T, et al. Transcriptional plasticity promotes primary and acquired resistance to BET inhibition. Nature. 2015;525(7570):543–7.
Gleixner KV, Mayerhofer M, Aichberger KJ, et al. PKC412 inhibits in vitro growth of neoplastic human mast cells expressing the D816V-mutated variant of KIT: comparison with AMN107, imatinib, and cladribine (2CdA) and evaluation of cooperative drug effects. Blood. 2006;107(2):752–9.
Ma Y, Zeng S, Metcalfe DD, et al. The c‑KIT mutation causing human mastocytosis is resistant to STI571 and other KIT kinase inhibitors; kinases with enzymatic site mutations show different inhibitor sensitivity profiles than wild-type kinases and those with regulatory-type mutations. Blood. 2002;99(5):1741–4.
Valent P, Akin C, Hartmann K. Midostaurin: a magic bullet that blocks mast cell expansion and activation. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(10):2367–76.
Krauth MT, Mirkina I, Herrmann H, Baumgartner C, Kneidinger M, Midostaurin VP. (PKC412) inhibits immunoglobulin E-dependent activation and mediator release in human blood basophils and mast cells. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39:1711–20.
Peter B, Winter GE, Blatt K, et al. Target interaction profiling of midostaurin and its metabolites in neoplastic mast cells predicts distinct effects on activation and growth. Leukemia. 2016;30:464–72.
Gotlib J, Kluin-Nelemans HC, George TI, Akin C, Sotlar K, Hermine O, et al. Efficacy and safety of Midostaurin in advanced systemic mastocytosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2530–41.
Degenfeld-Schonburg L, Gamperl S, Stefanzl G, et al. Antineoplastic efficacy profiles of avapritinib and nintedanib in KIT D816V+ systemic mastocytosis: a preclinical study. Am J Cancer Res. 2023;13(2):355–78.
Griswold IJ, MacPartlin M, Bumm T, et al. Kinase domain mutants of Bcr-Abl exhibit altered transformation potency, kinase activity, and substrate utilization, irrespective of sensitivity to imatinib. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(16):6082–93.
Schneeweiss-Gleixner M, Byrgazov K, Stefanzl G, et al. CDK4/CDK6 inhibition as a novel strategy to suppress the growth and survival of BCR-ABL1T315I+ clones in TKI-resistant CML. EBioMedicine. 2019;50:111–21.
Sponseiler I, Bandian AM, Pusic P, Lion T. Combinatorial treatment options for highly resistant compound mutations in the kinase domain of the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene in Ph-positive leukemias. Am J Hematol. 2024;99(1):E9–E11.
Valent P, Hadzijusufovic E, Schernthaner GH, Wolf D, Rea D, le Coutre P. Vascular safety issues in CML patients treated with BCR/ABL1 kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2015;125(6):901–6.
Hauswirth AW, Florian S, Printz D, Sotlar K, Krauth MT, Fritsch G, et al. Expression of the target receptor CD33 in CD34+/CD38−/CD123+ AML stem cells. Eur J Clin Invest. 2007;37:73–82.
Herrmann H, Cerny-Reiterer S, Gleixner KV, et al. CD34(+)/CD38(−) stem cells in chronic myeloid leukemia express Siglec‑3 (CD33) and are responsive to the CD33-targeting drug gemtuzumab/ozogamicin. Haematologica. 2012;97(2):219–26.
Appelbaum FR, Bernstein ID. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2017;130:2373–6.
Valent P, Bonnet D, Wöhrer S, Andreeff M, Copland M, Chomienne C, Eaves C. Heterogeneity of neoplastic stem cells: theoretical, functional, and clinical implications. Cancer Res. 2013;73(3):1037–45.
Valent P, Akin C, Arock M, Bock C, George TI, Galli SJ, et al. Proposed terminology and classification of pre-malignant neoplastic conditions: a consensus proposal. EBioMedicine. 2017;26:17–24.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
P. Valent, E. Hadzijusufovic, I. Sadovnik, T.W. Grunt, B. Peter, M. Willmann, H. Herrmann, D. Ivanov, G. Eisenwort, H. Karlic, G. Greiner, K.V. Gleixner, T. Rülicke, M. Dahlhoff, P. Staber, W.R. Sperr, M. Pfeilstöcker, T. Lion, F. Keil and G. Hoermann declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Valent, P., Hadzijusufovic, E., Sadovnik, I. et al. 15 years Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology (LBI HO): achievements and future perspectives. memo (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-024-00966-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-024-00966-w