Skip to main content
Log in

Breast cancer surveillance: nothing has changed in the past decades (?)

  • short review
  • Published:
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the well-developed countries, breast cancer-related mortality rates show decreasing tendency. Relapse occurs only in about one-fourth of all patients. According to randomized studies, no survival benefit is provided in these cases by practising intensive follow-up including instrumental studies to actively search for distant metastases. The most important role of patient surveillance is to detect early-stage, potentially curable isolated local/regional relapses or second primary breast cancers. More and more attention is given to the early detection and treatment of the side-effects of the therapy on the other hand. Even a “minimalist” follow-up practice maintains the relationship with the patient that is important for getting reassurance for compliance with adjuvant endocrine therapies, assistance in case of symptoms of metastasis, or if medical or social decisions are to be made. Sometimes psychological problems occur, which necesitate special support. In routine practice, regular visits including patient history, physical examination, and breast imaging studies on a 6–12 monthly basis for up to 5 years and yearly thereafter with the maintenance of a supportive relationship with the patient are recommended. Chest, abdominal or bone imaging studies, laboratory or tumor marker tests are justified only in suspicion of relapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:961–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aebi S, Davidson T, Gruber G, Cardoso F. Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2011;22 (suppl 6):vi12–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. NCCN. 2013. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. version 1.2014.

  4. Partridge AH, Winer EP, Burstein HJ. Follow-up care of breast cancer survivors. Semin Oncol. 2003;30:817–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A, Ciatto S, Pacini P, Distante V. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. JAMA. 1994;271:1593–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, et al. Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer Follow-up. JAMA. 1999;281:1586.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. GIVIO. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality oflife in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271:1587–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grunfeld E, Mant D, Yudkin P, et al. Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1996;313:665–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kokko R, Hakama M, Holli K. Follow-up cost of breast cancer patients with localized disease after primary treatment: a randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;93:255–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, Fossati R, et al. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD001768.

  11. Winchester DP, Sener SF, Khandekar JD, et al. Symptomatology as an indicator of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 1979;43:956–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schapira DV, Urban N. A minimalist policy for breast cancer surveillance. JAMA. 1991;265:380–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JE, Park SS, Han W, et al. The clinical use of staging bone scan in patients with breast carcinoma: reevaluation by the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Cancer. 2005;104:499–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5287–312.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mille D, Roy T, Carrère MO, et al. Economic impact of harmonizing medical practices: compliance with clinical practice guidelines in the follow-up of breast cancer in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1718–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gulliford T, Opomu M, Wilson E, Hanham I, Epstein R. Popularity of less frequent follow up for breast cancer in randomised study: initial findings from the hotline study. BMJ. 1997;314:174–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Loprinzi CL, Hayes D, Smith T. Doc, shouldn’t we be getting some tests? J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2345–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:1707–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kahán Z, Hideghéty K, Varga Z. Breast cancer, a heterogeneous disease entity. The very early stages. Springer, Dordrecht; 2011. Chap. 10, the risks of radiotherapy, and how to avoid them. pp. 241–68.

  20. Liljegren G, Lindgren A, Bergh J, et al. Risk factors for local recurrence after conservative treatment in stage I breast cancer. Definition of a subgroup not requiring radiotherapy. Ann Oncol. 1997;8:235–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holmberg L, Wong YN, Tabár L, et al. Mammography casting-type calcification and risk of local recurrence in DCIS: analyses from a randomised study. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:812–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dorr W, Bertmann S, Herrmann T. Radiation induced lung reactions in breast cancer therapy. Modulating factors and consequential effects. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005;181:567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johansen J, Overgaard J, Rose C, et al. Cosmetic outcome and breast morbidity in breast-conserving treatment. Acta Oncol. 2002;41:369–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Darby SC, Cutter DJ, Boerma M, et al. Radiation-related heart disease: current knowledge and future prospects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:656–65.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Darby S, McGale P, Taylor CW, Peto R. Long-term mortality from heart disease and lung cancer after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: prospective cohort study of about 300 000 women in US SEER cancer registries. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:557–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cuzick J, Stewart H, Rutqvist L, et al. Cause-specific mortality in long-term survivors of breast cancer who participated in trials of radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:447–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kahán Z. Breast cancer, a heterogeneous disease entity. The very early stages. Springer, Dordrecht; 2011. Chap. 12, systemic therapy: selection of patients. Endocrine therapy. pp. 283–304.

  28. Pagani O, Partridge A, Korde L, et al. Breast International Group; North American Breast Cancer Group Endocrine Working Group. Pregnancy after breast cancer: if you wish, ma’am. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;129:309–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Balmaña J, Díez O, Rubio IT, Cardoso F, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. BRCA in breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2011;22 (Suppl 6):vi31–4. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr373.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kwast AB, Drossaert CH, Siesling S; follow-up working group. Breast cancer follow-up: from the perspective of health professionals and patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013;22:754–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zsuzsanna Kahán MD, DSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kahán, Z. Breast cancer surveillance: nothing has changed in the past decades (?). memo 7, 22–26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-014-0136-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-014-0136-x

Keywords

Navigation