Introduction

Pancreatic carcinoma is a digestive malignant tumor that is difficult to diagnose early and has a poor prognosis. Its incidence has increased in recent years without significant progress in therapeutic treatment. The general 5 year survival rate is as low as 5–10 %, and the improved 5 year survival rate is about 20–40 % after successive whipple operation [1]. Early diagnosis is critical for successful surgical treatment [2].

Significant progress has been made recently in genetic diagnosis and the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma using new biological techniques [35]. Antisense gene therapy is now an important strategy of gene therapy [6, 7]. The AUG start site or 5′ cat site are usually selected as target gene sequences for the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma [79], but few reports have selected the mute gene as a target. This study investigated the effect of an antisense oligonucleotide specific to point mutated K-ras on the apoptosis of human pancreatic carcinoma cells in vitro.

Methods

The human pancreatic carcinoma cell line PC-2 was cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum in a humidified atmosphere with 5 % CO2. Cells were divided into two groups with 16 wells of cells each. For the experimental group, PC-2 cells were transfected with an antisense oligonucleotide (5′ CTA CGC CAC GAG CTC CA 3′) specific to a K-ras point mutation and then incubated for 24 h. For the control group, PC-2 cells were transfected with a sense oligonucleotide (5′TGG AGC TCG TGG CGT AG 3′) and then incubated for 24 h. Oligonucleotides were transfected by lipofectamine, and cells were cultured for 24 h followed by total medium exchange after 8 h.

Flow Cytometric Analysis

Cells in logarithmic growth were digested, washed, resuspended as single cells and then cultured in a 100 ml culture bottle. Culture medium was exchanged every 48 h, and oligonucleotides were transfected by lipofectamine at 60 % confluence. Culture medium was completely exchanged after 8 h of culture. Cells were then digested, washed, resuspended as single cells and fixed with 75 % alcohol for 2 h at 4 °C. The cell cycle, apoptotic peak and percentage were detected by flow cytometry after staining.

TUNEL Detection

Cells in logarithmic growth were digested, washed, resuspended and then cultured in 24-well culture plates with 600 μl medium/well at 3 × 105 cells/ml. After 24 h, oligonucleotides were transfected by lipofectamine. Culture medium was completely exchanged after 8 h of culture. Cells were then stained and photographed after 48 h according to the TUNEL protocol.

Phase Contrast Microscopy

Cells in logarithmic growth were harvested and cultured in a 100 ml culture bottle. Culture medium was exchanged every 48 h, and oligonucleotides were transfected by lipofectamine at 60 % confluence. Culture medium was completely exchanged after 8 h of culture. After 48 h, apoptotic bodies were detected and photographed under an inverted phase contrast microscope. According to the number of labeled cells, labeled was designated as – (0), + (1–5), ++ (6–10), and +++ (>10). The number of apoptotic cells was analyzed by SPSS 10.0 statistical software.

Results

Flow Cytometer Results

There was an apparent apoptotic peak before the G1 phase of the cell cycle in the experimental group. The apoptotic rate was 31.8 % in the experimental group. There was no apparent apoptotic peak in the control group (Figs. 1 and 2). Most cells in the experimental group were arrested at the G1 phase, and the number of S phase cells was decreased compared with that of the control group (P = 0.038) (Table 1), indicating an increase in apoptotic cells and a decrease of cell proliferation after transfection with the antisense oligonucleotide.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cell cycle distribution histogram of the control group (There was no apparent apoptotic peak before G1 phase in the cell cycle)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cell cycle distribution histogram of the experimental group (There was an apparent apoptotic peak before G1 phase in the cell cycle)

Table 1 Cell cycle distribution

TUNEL Results

The characteristics of apoptotic cells were observed under a microscope after TUNEL, in which labeled cells showed brown yellow granules in the nucleus. Five fields of vision were selected randomly for each group under × 400 magnification, and labeled cells were counted and averaged. The number of apoptotic cells in the experimental group increased compared with that of the control group (P = 0.026) (Table 2, Fig. 3 and 4).

Table 2 Comparison of cell apoptosis between the two groups
Fig. 3
figure 3

Apoptotic cells in the control group (TUNEL, ×400)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Apoptotic cells in the experimental group (TUNEL, ×400)

Phase Contrast Microscopy Results

Apoptotic bodies were observed under an inverted phase contrast microscope after 48 h of culture. The number of cells with apoptotic bodies in the experimental group increased compared with that of the control group. The shape of apoptotic cells became atrophic and rounded, and some little froth or ball-shaped apoptotic bodies were observed on the apoptotic cell surface. Some cells detached from the culture vessel and were suspended in the medium (Figs. 5 and 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Apoptotic bodies in the experimental group (Phase contrast microscopy, ×100)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Apoptotic bodies in the control group (phase contrast microscopy, ×100)

Discussion

Excessive cell proliferation and abnormal differentiation are major reasons of tumor occurrence, and deregulation of cell death is a major factor for the occurrence of carcinoma. Cell proliferation and cell death are accurately balanced under a normal condition, and carcinoma occurs once this balance is disrupted.

Cell death is generally classified into two types, necrosis and apoptosis. Cell apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death and occurs when cells receive certain signals or stimulation. Moreover, cell apoptosis is a method of clearing injured or nonfunctioning cells from the body without changing the function of the tissue. Cell apoptosis plays an important regulatory role under normal and pathological conditions.

Previous studies have mainly focused on the excessive proliferation of carcinoma cells as the mechanism of carcinoma occurrence. It has been recently found that cell apoptosis participates in the occurrence of carcinoma at several phases. Excessive cell proliferation may trigger excessive cell cloning whereas apoptosis can restrain it.

It has been reported that cell apoptosis is blocked in the early stage of carcinoma occurrence [10], indicating that it may be possible to treat carcinoma by inducing cell apoptosis. Under normal condition, cell apoptosis can clear DNA-injured and potentially malignant cells. Disruption of apoptotic function can promote the development of carcinoma [11]. Inducing apoptosis may reduce DNA-injured and potentially malignant cells and thus prevent or inhibit carcinoma growth. In contrast, inhibition of apoptosis may facilitate pre-carcinoma cells. Arya et al. reported that stimulating cell apoptosis can be an anti-carcinoma strategy [12]. Inducing apoptosis in carcinoma cells appears to be more physiological than killing carcinoma cells directly because it avoids the side effects of chemotherapeutic drugs. The dynamic balance between cell proliferation and cell apoptosis has a major effect on the initiation of pre-carcinoma and carcinoma cells, and cell apoptosis has an important function in the non-transmissibility of carcinogenic course.

Cell apoptosis is regulated by two mechanisms, namely programmed gene regulation such as the replacement of old cells with new cells under a physiological condition, and non-gene regulation in which injury factors, such as TGF-β and TNF, damage DNA directly or indirectly and thereby disturb cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis.

Most studies of cell apoptosis have focused on the effect of apoptotic genes on apoptosis. Few studies have focused on the effect of the cancer gene on cell apoptosis. It has been reported that cell apoptosis is related to the expression level of the cancer gene. A potential approach to restrict the expression of the cancer gene may be via inducing cell apoptosis [13]. Many reports have shown that the ras gene can increase cell proliferation [14, 15], but few studies show the effect of the ras gene on cell apoptosis. We have previously reported an antisense oligonucleotide specific to a K-ras point mutation, which can inhibit the expression of the ras gene [16]. Our study showed that the experimental group had significantly increased apoptosis.

It has been reported that the ras protein not only regulates cell proliferation and differentiation, but also promotes carcinoma occurrence by inhibiting cell apoptosis17. Kinoshita et al. reported that apoptosis of hematogenous cells is inhibited after transfection of the of k-ras gene in vitro. Further study showed that this effect is caused by an increase in bcl-2 gene expression [15]. Ward et al. reported that the decrease in cell apoptosis is closely related to activation of the k-ras gene [17, 18]. The first mechanism may be early genetic changes that desensitize cells to apoptotic stimuli, and then silenced gene expression is easily transferred to the next generation [19]. The second mechanism may involve activation of the ras protein, which may inhibit apoptosis directly or indirectly. Mizukami et al. reported that farnesylamine can inhibit the ras protein on the membrane and the ras signaling pathway to promote cell apoptosis [20]. It has been shown that the ras protein plays an important role in the regulation of cell apoptosis.

The ras gene plays an important role in the multiple steps of carcinoma development. The ras gene regulates the expression of many other genes that have important functions in regulating the mutual effect between carcinoma and the host. Fenton et al. reported that the fas mRNA level in cells transfected with the ras gene decreases significantly, indicating that the ras gene can restrict the expression of fas via several mechanisms [21]. Fushida et al. reported that human pancreatic carcinoma cells transfected with the ras gene lose fas receptor function at various levels of the fas signal transduction pathway [22]. Gulbins et al. reported that apoptosis induced by the fas gene is mediated by the ras signaling pathway, and activation of the ras gene is the key step in this apoptotic pathway because apoptosis induced by the fas gene can be inhibited by an antibody that inhibits or counteracts ras gene mutation [23]. Moreover, blocking the fas gene can stimulate the sphingomyelin signaling pathway to produce acyl sphingosine that can activate the ras gene and induce apoptosis. It has been shown that ras and fas genes are inter-regulated to induce cell apoptosis. However, the ras gene can promote tumor occurrence by inhibiting tumor cell apoptosis by several mechanisms.

Our study indicates that an antisense oligonucleotide specific to a K-ras point mutation can promote apoptosis of the human pancreatic carcinoma cell line PC-2 in vitro, which is likely mediated by inhibition of ras gene expression.