Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The emergence of innovative location-oriented services and the great advances in mobile computing and wireless networking motivated the development of positioning systems in indoor environments. However, despite the benefits from location awareness within a building, the implicating indoor characteristics and increased user mobility impeded the implementation of accurate and time-efficient indoor localizers. In this paper, we consider the case of indoor positioning based on the correlation between location and signal intensity of the received Wi-Fi signals. This is due to the wide availability of WLAN infrastructure and the ease of obtaining such signal strength (SS) measurements by standard 802.11 cards. With our focus on the radio scene analysis (or fingerprinting) positioning method, we study both deterministic and probabilistic schemes. We then describe techniques to improve their accuracy without increasing considerably the processing time and hardware requirements of the system. More precisely, we first propose considering orientation information and simple SS sample processing during the training of the system or the entire localization process. For dealing with the expanded search space after adding orientation-sensitive information, we suggest a hierarchical pattern matching method during the real-time localization phase. Numerical results based on real experimental measurements demonstrated a noticeable performance enhancement, especially for the deterministic case which has additionally the advantage of being less complex compared to the probabilistic one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. S i can be any of the \(\mathbf{S}_i^a, \ \mathbf{S}_i^b\), or \(\mathbf{S}_i^c\) RM representations.

  2. A design parameter to be discussed in Section 5.1.

References

  1. Hightower J, Borriello G (2001) A survey and taxonomy of location systems for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Comput 34:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trimble, Inc. (2006) GPS tutorial. http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.shtml. Accessed November 2008

  3. Want R, Hopper A, Falcao V, Gibbons J (1992) The active badge location system. ACM Trans Inf Syst 10(1):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ladd AM, Bekris KE, Rudys A, Kavraki LE, Wallach DS (2005) Robotics-based location sensing using wireless ethernet. Wirel Netw 11(1–2):189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bahl P, Padmanabhan VN (2000) RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In: INFOCOM, pp 775–784

  6. Youssef M, Agrawala AK (2005) The Horus WLAN location determination system. In: MobiSys, pp 205–218

  7. King T, Kopf S, Haenselmann T, Lubberger C, Effelsberg W (2006) COMPASS: a probabilistic indoor positioning system based on 802.11 and digital compasses. In: Proceedings of the first ACM international workshop on wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation and characterization (WiNTECH) (September 2006), pp 34–40

  8. Papapostolou A, Chaouchi H (2009) WIFE: wireless indoor positioning based on fingerprint evaluation. In: Networking, pp 234–247

  9. Ekahau (2010) Ekahau Wi-Fi based RTLS tracking and communication solutions. http://www.ekahau.com/. Accessed November 2008

  10. Thongthammachart S, Olesen H (2003) Bluetooth enables in-door mobile location services. In: VTC, vol 10, pp 2023–2027

  11. Ni LM, Liu Y, Lau YC, Patil AP (2004) LANDMARC: indoor location sensing using active RFID. Wirel Netw 10(6):701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ubisense Unlimited (2004) Ubisense. http://www.ubisense.net/. Accessed November 2008

  13. Niculescu D (2004) Positioning in ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Netw 18(4):24–29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Noh AS-I, Lee WJ, Ye JY (2008) Comparison of the mechanisms of the zigbee’s indoor localization algorithm. In: SNPD. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ward A, Jones A, Hopper A (1997) A new location technique for the active office. IEEE Pers Commun 4(5):42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Priyantha NB, Chakraborty A, Balakrishnan H (2000) The cricket location-support system. In: MOBICOM, pp 32–43

  17. Youssef M, Agrawala AK (2004) Handling samples correlation in the Horus system. In: INFOCOM

  18. Chen Y-C, Chiang J-R, Chu H-H, Huang P, Tsui AW (2005) Sensor-assisted Wi-Fi indoor location system for adapting to environmental dynamics. In: MSWiM, pp 118–125

  19. Bahl P, Padmanabhan VN (2000) Enhancements to the RADAR user location and tracking system. Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-12, Microsoft Research

  20. CRAWDAD (2008) A community resource for archiving wireless data at dartmouth. http://crawdad.cs.dartmouth.edu/meta.php?name=mannheim/compass. Accessed 4 January 2009

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the authors of COMPASS [7] for offering their experimental data to the public and [20] for the provision of easy access to similar data and tools.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apostolia Papapostolou.

Appendix: Experiment description

Appendix: Experiment description

Details regarding the experimental testbed are provided below.

1.1 A.1 Indoor environment description

The test environment where the experiment was performed corresponds to the hallway of an office building on the campus of the University of Mannheim. The floor plan of the operation area is nearly 15 × 36 m2.

1.2 A.2 Hardware and software specifications

As described in [7] and [20], the test environment is equipped with five Linksys/Cisco WRT54GS and four Lancom L-54g APs. All APs support 802.11b and 802.11g. One Lancom and all Linksys APs are located on the same floor with the testing area whereas three Lancom APs are located in other places inside the building.

As a client, a Lucent Orinoco Silver PCMCIA network card supporting 802.11b was used. This card was plugged into an IBM Thinkpad R51 running Linux kernel 2.6.13 and Wireless Tools 28pre. To collect signal strength samples, the implemented framework contained two parts: a library cooperating with the network card driver to perform scans and capture internal driver information and an easy-to-use application that stores this information in a file together with additional data such as the physical position and a timestamp. Further, the application configures the library to select a scan frequency and scan technique for the signal strength measurements. For these experiments, active scanning was used. Active scanning is defined in the 802.11 standard1, and it is a technique to find a suitable gateway to the Internet by measuring the SS of APs within communication range. Therefore, the available data we had and used for testing our systems were multiple scans with the following information:

  • t: timestamp in milliseconds

  • id: MAC address of the scanning device

  • pos: the physical coordinate of the scanning device

  • degree: orientation of the user carrying the scanning device in degrees

  • MAC i : MAC address of a responding peer i (e.g., an AP or a device in ad hoc mode) with the corresponding values for signal strength in decibels per milliwatt, the channel frequency, and its mode (access point = 3, device in ad hoc mode = 1).

For keeping consistency throughout the paper, we did not discriminate between the cases of whether the responding peer is an access point or a device in ad hoc mode, i.e., mode 1 or mode 3. Thus, we refer to each responding peers as an access point, leading to an operational area covered in total by 17 APs (the total number of unique MAC addresses).

To obtain the orientation of the user, the Silicon Laboratories C8051F350 Digital Compass Reference Design Board was used. This device provides a USB-to-Serial bridge to access the data and is powered by the USB electricity supply. The compass in the middle of the operation area was calibrated. In a closer area around the calibration point, a variation of 1° was measured. However, variations up to 23° were rarely detected at a few points of the testing area. These measurement errors occurred always close to electromagnetic objects such as high-voltage power lines and electronic devices.

1.3 A.3 Data collection

A grid of reference points was applied to the operation area including 166 points with a spacing of 1 m. During the offline phase, the signal strength was measured at these reference points for different orientations. At each reference point and for each orientation, 110 signal strength measurements were collected. This led to 146,080 measurements for the offline phase. Almost 10 h was spent to collect all the data. For the online phase, 60 coordinates and orientations were randomly selected, and at each one of them, 110 signal strength measurements were sampled, leading to 6,600 measurements in total.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Papapostolou, A., Chaouchi, H. Scene analysis indoor positioning enhancements. Ann. Telecommun. 66, 519–533 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-010-0220-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-010-0220-0

Keywords

Navigation