Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Two search methods of quadratic permutation polynomials (QPP) for interleavers used in turbo codes are proposed. These methods lead to larger minimum distances and smaller multiplicities compared to the interleavers proposed by Takeshita in (Takeshita 1). The search is accomplished in a limited set of polynomials, that is, those for which the spreading factor and Ω′ metric are maximum. The minimum distance is computed by means of Garello algorithm in which the maximum weight of information sequence is 3 or 4, reducing the search time. The results obtained for two particular component codes show the efficiency of the proposed methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takeshita YO (2007) Permutation polynomial interleavers: an algebraic-geometric perspective. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 32(6):2116–2132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Sun J, Takeshita YO (2005) Interleavers for turbo codes using permutation polynomial over integers rings. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 51(1):101–119

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Takeshita YO (2006) Maximum contention-free interleavers and permutation polynomials over integers rings. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(3):1249–1253

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryu J, Takeshita YO (2006) On quadratic inverses for quadratic permutation polynomials over integers rings. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(3):1254–1260

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Crozier S (2000) New High-spread high-distance interleavers for turbo-codes, 20th Biennial Symposium on Communications. Kingston, Ontario, Canada, pp 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CY (1958) Some properties of nonbinary error-correcting codes. IRE Transactions on Information Theory IT-4(2):77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heegard C, Wicker SB (1999) Turbo coding. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Trifina L, Munteanu V, Tărniceriu D (2006) Welch-costas interleaver with cyclic shifts on groups of elements. Electron Lett 42(24):1413–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Divsalar D, Pollara F (1995) Turbo codes for PCS applications. Proceedings of ICC 1995, Seattle, WA, pp 54–59

  10. Garello R, Pierleoni P, Benedetto S (2001) Computing the free distance of turbo codes and serially concatenated codes with interleavers: algorithms and applications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 19(5):800–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The Turbo Code Minimum Distance Algorithm. http://www.tlc.polito.it/garello/turbodistance/turbodistance.html

  12. Rosnes E, Takeshita YO (2006) Optimum distance quadratic permutation polynomial-based interleavers for turbo codes. Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Seattle, USA, pp 1988–1992

  13. Guinand P, Lodge J (1994) Trellis termination for turbo encoders. Proc. 17th Biennial Symposium on Communications, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada, pp 389–392

  14. Trifina L, Balta HG (2005) Decresing of the turbo MAP decoding time using an iteration stopping criterion. Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, 2005, Iasi, pp 371–374

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Tarniceriu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tarniceriu, D., Trifina, L. & Munteanu, V. About minimum distance for QPP interleavers. Ann. Telecommun. 64, 745 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-009-0120-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-009-0120-3

Keywords

Navigation