Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical comparison of ECMS and PMP-based optimal control strategy in hybrid vehicles

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last decade, the equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS) and the Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle (PMP)-based optimal control strategy have been developed for power management of hybrid vehicles, and it has been noticed that there are some similarities between the two strategies. Establishing their exact relationship and distinguishing their fundamental differences have become necessary for further development in the field of power management strategy. The two strategies are numerically compared and their relationship is established in this research. The two strategies are applied to a fuel cell hybrid vehicle (FCHV) in a computer simulation environment and the simulation results of the two strategies are also compared. It is concluded that the numerical comparison result depends on the open-circuit-voltage (OCV) of the battery model. As a result, the ECMS and the PMP-based optimal control strategy can numerically have the same solutions for non-plug-in hybrid vehicles by adjusting two parameters. Differences between the two strategies are also discussed and the superiority of the PMP-based optimal control strategy is emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernard, J., Delprat, S., Buechi, F. and Guerra, T. M. (2006). Global optimization in the power management of a fuel cell hybrid vehicle (FCHV). Proc. IEEE Veh. Power Propuls. Conf., 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J., Delprat, S., Buechi, F. and Guerra, T. M. (2009). Fuel-cell hybrid powertrain: Toward minimization of hydrogen consumption. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 58, 3168–3176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J., Delprat, S., Guerra, T. M. and Buechi, F. (2010). Fuel efficient power management strategy for fuel cell hybrid powertrains. Control Eng. Pract., 18, 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasse, A. and Sciarretta, A. (2011). Supervisory control of hybrid powertrains: An experimental benchmark of offline optimization and online energy management. Control Eng. Pract., 19, 1253–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehsani, M., Gao, Y. M. and Emadi, A. (2010). Modern Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Fuel Cell Vehicles. 2nd edn. CRC Press. Boca Raton. 459–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. J. and Peng, H. (2007). Power management and design optimization of fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicles. J. Power Sources, 165, 819–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. W. (2009). Energy Management Strategy for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle. Ph. D. Dissertation. Seoul National University. Seoul. Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. W. and Rousseau, A. (2012). Sufficient conditions of optimal control based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle for use in hybrid electric vehicles. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D-J. Automob. Eng., 226, 1160–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. W., Cha, S. W. and Peng, H. (2011). Optimal control of hybrid electric vehicles based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 19, 1279–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D. E. (1970). Optimal Control Theory. Prentice-hall. New York. 184–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, W. Y., Aziz, J. A., Idris, N. R. N. and Saidur, R. (2013). Electrical model to predict curren-voltage behaviours of lithium ferro phosphate batteries using a transient response correction method. J. Power Sources, 221, 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musardo, C. and Rizzoni, G. (2005). A-ECMS: An adaptive algorithm for hybrid electric vehicle energy management. 44th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, and the European Control Conf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paganelli, G., Delprat, S., Guerra, T. M., Rimaux, J. and Santin, J. J. (2002). Equivalent consumption minimization strategy for parallel hybrid powertrains. Vehicular Technology Conf., 2076–2081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paganelli, G., Tateno, M., Brahma, A., Rizzoni, G. and Guezennec, Y. (2001). Control development for a hybridelectric sport-utility vehicle: Strategy, implementation and field test results. American Control Conf., 5064–5069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisu, P. and Rizzoni, G. (2007). A comparative study of supervisory control strategies for hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 15, 506–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukrushpan, J. T., Peng, H. and Stefanopoulou, A. G. (2004). Control-oriented modeling and analysis for automotive fuel cell systems. Trans. ASME, 126, 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscher, M. and Sauer, D. (2011). Dynamic electric behavior and open-circuit-voltage modeling of LiFePO4-based lithium ion secondary batteries. J. Power Sources, 196, 331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, G., Sinoquet, D. and Rouchon, P. (2007). Constrained optimization of energy management for a mild-hybrid vehicle. Oil Gas Sci. Technol., 62, 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciarretta, A. and Guzzella, L. (2007). Control of hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Control System Magazine, 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciarretta, A., Back, M. and Guzzella, L. (2004). Optimal control of parallel hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 12, 352–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrao, L., Onori, S. and Rizzoni, G. (2009). ECMS as a realization of Pontryagin’s minimum principle for HEV control. American Control Conf., 3964–3969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serro, L. and Rizzoni, G. (2008). Optimal control of power split for a hybrid electric refuse vehicle. American Control Conf., 4498–4503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thele, M., Bohlen, O., Sauer, D. and Karden, E. (2008). Development of a voltage-behavior model for NiMH batteries using an impedance-based modeling concept. J. Power Sources, 175, 635–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahidi, A., Stefanopoulou, A. G. and Peng, H. (2006). Current management in a hybrid fuel cell power system: A model-predictive control approach. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 14, 1047–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L. F., Li, J. Q., Hua, J. F., Li, X. J. and Ouyang, M. G. (2009). Optimal vehicle control strategy of a fuel cell/battery hybrid city bus. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34, 7323–7333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C. H., Kim, N. W. and Cha, S. W. (2012). Optimal control in the power management of fuel cell hybrid vehicles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37, 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C. H., Oh, C. E., Park, Y. I. and Cha, S. W. (2012). Fuel economy evaluation of fuel cell hybrid vehicls based on equivalent fuel consumption. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37, 1790–1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Q. Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, C.H., Xu, G.Q., Cha, S.W. et al. Numerical comparison of ECMS and PMP-based optimal control strategy in hybrid vehicles. Int.J Automot. Technol. 15, 1189–1196 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0124-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0124-5

Key words

Navigation