Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do institutions matter for economic growth?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a unique dataset assembled from several sources, we examine the effects of democracy, corruption, and economic freedom on economic growth for over one hundred countries. To allow for heterogeneous effects, we use a quantile regression approach. Our results support some findings in the literature, but also provide some new conclusions. In many cases, quantile regression estimates are quite different from those from GMM. We find that the positive effect of democracy is lower for the countries with a higher growth rate of GDP per capita, which may sound counter-intuitive to conventional wisdom. Likewise, we find that corruption “sands the wheels” (“greases the wheels”) for the lowest (highest) GDP per capita growth countries. Economic freedom shows a positive effect on GDP per capita growth rate. Our results suggest that since democratic status is hard to change in the short run, certain current corruption control measures as well as economic freedom adjustment policies may be reconsidered, especially among the fastest and slowest growing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The D-8 Organization for Economic Cooperation, also known as Developing-8, is an organization for development co-operation among the following countries: Bangladesh, Egypt, Nigeria, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Turkey.

  2. The same set of 1,712 observations is utilized in all the specifications in Table 3. It is the sample containing the maximum number of observations that could be used by the column (7) regression.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA, Yared P (2008) Income and democracy. Am Econ Rev 983:808–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, Robinson JA (2019) Democracy does cause growth. J Political Econ 127:47–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 582:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2013) Econometric analysis of panel data econometric analysis of panel data (5 ). Chichester, UKJohn Wiley & Sons

  • Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 1062:407–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1996) Democracy and growth. J Econ Growth 11:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billger S, Goel R (2009) Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling corruption? cross-Country Quantile Regression Estimates. J Dev Econ 90:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebula RJ, Clark J, Mixon FG Jr (2013) The impact of economic freedom on per capita real GDP: a study of OECD nations. J Reg Anal Policy 43:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervellati M, Jung F, Sunde U, Vischer T (2014) Income and democracy: comment. Am Econ Rev 1042:707–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucouliagos H, Ulubaşoğlu MA (2008) Democracy and economic growth: a meta-analysis. Am J Polit Sci 521:61–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury AC, Krieckhaus J, Lusztig M (2006) Corruption, democracy, and economic growth. Int Polit Sci Rev 27(2):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckelman J (2000) Economic freedom and economic growth: a short-run causal investigation. J Appl Econ III:71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain ME, Haque M (2016) Impact of economic freedom on the growth rate: a panel data analysis. Economies 42:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 461:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 1103:681–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo PH (2001) Corruption and economic growth. J Comp Econ 29(1):66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JA (2006) Economic development and democracy. Ann Rev Polit Sci 9:503–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir G (2017) Corruption, democracy and economic growth: does conditionality matter? Pakistan Econ Soc Rev 55:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Corruption. Q J Econ 1083:599–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Gordillo M, Álvarez-Arce JL (2003) Economic growth and freedom: a causality study. Cato J 232:199–215

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingyang Li.

Ethics declarations

Financial or Non-financial

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Conflict of interest

Mingyang Li declares that he has no conflict of interest. Subal C. Kumbhakar declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors would like to thank Ivan Korolev, Qiankun Zhou, Shunan Zhao, and Christopher Hanes for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. We, alone, are responsible for any remaining errors.

Appendix

Appendix

Notes:

  1. 1.

    World Development Indicators (WDI) is the primary World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized international sources. It presents the most current and accurate global development data available and includes national, regional and global estimates.

  2. 2.

    GDP is the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or for depletion and degradation of natural resources. Data are in constant 2010 U.S. dollars.

  3. 3.

    Transparency International is an international non-governmental organization whose non-profit purpose is to take action to combat global corruption with civil societal anti-corruption measures and to prevent criminal activities arising from corruption.

  4. 4.

    The Polity IV dataset covers all major, independent states in the global system over the period 1800-2017 (i.e., states with a total population of 500,000 or more in the most recent year; currently 167 countries).

  5. 5.

    The operational indicator of democracy is derived from codings of the competitiveness of political participation, the openness and competitiveness of executive recruitment, and constraints on the chief executive using certain weights.

  6. 6.

    The mission of The Heritage Foundation is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.

  7. 7.

    Economic freedom is the fundamental right of every human to control his or her own labor and property. In an economically free society, individuals are free to work, produce, consume, and invest in any way they please. In economically free societies, governments allow labor, capital, and goods to move freely, and refrain from coercion or constraint of liberty beyond the extent necessary to protect and maintain liberty itself. Economic freedom is measured based on 12 quantitative and qualitative factors, grouped into four broad categories, or pillars, of economic freedom: (1) Rule of Law (property rights, government integrity, judicial effectiveness) (2) Government Size (government spending, tax burden, fiscal health) (3) Regulatory Efficiency (business freedom, labor freedom, monetary freedom) (4) Open Markets (trade freedom, investment freedom, financial freedom) Each of the twelve economic freedoms within these categories is graded on a scale of 0 to 100. A country’s overall score is derived by averaging these twelve economic freedoms, with equal weight being given to each (Tables 9, 10).

Table 9 Variable Definitions and Data Sources
Table 10 Median GDP Per Capita Growth Rate by Country over 1995 - 2018

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Kumbhakar, S.C. Do institutions matter for economic growth?. Int Rev Econ 69, 465–485 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00400-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00400-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation