Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of fairness on tax morale in South Korea: a framed question approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines how the perceptions of fairness in tax regimes influence tax morale. We empirically demonstrate the importance of the perception of fairness in shaping tax morale and the subsequent attitudes by examining data on approximately 7300 taxpayers by the National Survey of Tax and Benefit of South Korea. To estimate the tax moral inherent in taxpayers, we adopt the framed and hypothetical tax evasion question method. We find that taxpayers are more likely to pay taxes if they perceive the tax system as fair in terms of vertical, horizontal, exchange, and distributive fairness, while procedural fairness is not statistically significant. Our results also indicate that the peer effect and trust in government have an essential positive correlation with tax morale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a more detailed explanation, the tteokbokki (spicy stir-fried rice cakes) is one of the most popular Korean street foods; tteokbokki shops are common in Korea and can be found nearly everywhere. After deducting a series of expenses—such as rental fees, labor, and material costs—80 million South Korean won (approximately 73,000 dollars) is an ordinary sales figure in South Korea in 2016.

References

  • Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, pp 267–99

  • Allingham MG, Sandmo A (1972) Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. In: James S (ed) Taxation: critical perspectives on the world economy, 3rd edn. Routledge, pp 323–338

  • Alm J, Antoine M (2020) 40 years of tax evasion games: a meta-analysis. Exp Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09679-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm J, Benno T (2006) Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. J Econ Psychol 27:224–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm J, Gary HM, Schulze WD (1992) Why do people pay taxes? J Public Econ 48:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm J, Betty RJ, Michael M (1993) Fiscal exchange, collective decision institutions, and tax compliance. J Econ Behav Organ 22(3):285–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm J, Isabel S, Ana D (1995) Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. KYKLOS-BERNE- 48:3–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr A, Danila S (2009) The effects of externalities and framing on bribery in a petty corruption experiment. Exp Econ 12:488–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batrancea L, Anca N, Jerome O, Christoph K, Erich K, Erik H, Avi W et al (2019) Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. J Econ Psychol 74:102191

  • Chander P, Louis LW (1998) A General characterization of optimal income tax enforcement. Rev Econ Stud 65:165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings RG, Jorge M, Michael M, Benno T (2009) Tax morale affects tax compliance: evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 70:447–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyan MR, Antonios MK, Jorge M (2016) The Determinants of tax morale in Pakistan. J Asian Finance Econ Bus 47(December):23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijke M, Peter V (2010) Trust in Authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance. J Econ Psychol 31:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel C, Luigi M, Azzurra M (2020) Tax morale and fairness in conflict an experiment. J Econ Psychol 81(December):102314

  • Erzo FP, Lutterman FP, Monica S (2014) Tax Morale. J Econ Perspect 28:149–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro CM, Ilde R (2014) Tax compliance under horizontal and vertical equity conditions: an experimental approach. Int Tax Public Finan 21:560–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin B, Guy L, Marie-Claire V (2007) Tax evasion and social interactions. J Public Econ 91:2089–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobena LB, Marius V (2016) Power, justice, and trust: a moderated mediation analysis of tax compliance among Ethiopian business owners. J Public Econ 52:24–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartner M, Silvia R, Erich K, Alfred S (2008) Procedural fairness and tax compliance. Econ Anal Policy 38:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Steven JH, Ara N (2010) Most people are Not WEIRD. Nature 466:29–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann E, Erik H, Erich K (2008) Preconditions of voluntary tax compliance: knowledge and evaluation of taxation, norms, fairness, and motivation to cooperate. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie 216(4):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemet N, Luchini S, Rosaz J, Shogren JF (2019) Truth telling under oath. Manage Sci 65:426–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemet N, Luchini S, Malézieux A, and Shogren JF (2020) “Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical Evidence From Tax Evasion Games. Eur Econ Rev 124(103369):103369

  • Kastlunger B, Edoardo L, Erich K, Alfred S (2013) Powerful authorities and trusting citizens: the slippery slope framework and tax compliance in Italy. J Econ Psychol 34(February):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CK (2002) Does fairness matter in tax reporting behavior? J Econ Psychol 23:771–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y (2021) Politics, religion, and tax incentives for charitable giving in South Korea. KER 37:141–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey KA, Harold GG (1993) Did the Tax Reform Act of 1986 improve compliance? Three studies of pre- and post-TRA compliance attitudes. Law & Policy 15:293–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler E (2007) The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press

  • Kirchler E, Erik H, Ingrid W (2008) Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: the ‘slippery slope’ framework. J Econ Psychol 29:210–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay IK (2016) Tax fairness by convention: a defense of horizontal equity. Fla Tax Rev 19:79

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazar N, On A, Dan A (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. J Mark Res 45:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickiewicz T, Anna R, Arnis S (2019) To pay or not to pay? Business owners’ tax morale: testing a neo-institutional framework in a transition environment. J Bus Ethics 157:75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikesell JL, Liucija B (2007) The tax compliance puzzle: evidence from theory and practice. Int J Public Adm 30:1045–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser DV, John HE, Chung KK (1995) The effects of horizontal and exchange inequity on tax reporting decisions. Account Rev 70:619–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K, Tom T (2008) Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: the mediating role of emotions. J Appl Soc Psychol 38:652–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Oladele R, Foluso OA, Ahmodu AO, Yusuff SA, Alade M (2019) Tax enforcement tools and tax compliance in Ondo State. Nigeria Acad J Interdiscip 8:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts ML, Peggy AH (1994) Progressive taxation, fairness, and compliance. Law & Policy 16:27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Justicia D, Theilen B (2018) Education and tax morale. J Econ Psychol 64:18–48

  • Spicer MW, Lee AB (1980) Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: an experimental approach. Natl Tax J 33:171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler B (2003b) Tax morale, rule-governed behaviour and trust. Const Political Econ 14:119–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler B (2016) Tax compliance and data: what is available and what is needed. Aust Econ Rev 49:352–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler B (2002) Vertical and exchange equity in a tax morale experiment. Citeseer. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.200.5116&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Torgler B (2003a) Tax morale and institutions. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.663686

  • Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verboon P, Sjoerd G (2009) The role of fairness in tax compliance. Neth J Psychol 65:136–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel M (2002) The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: the role of taxpayers’ identity. J Appl Soc Psychol 87:629–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel M (2003) Tax compliance and the psychology of justice: mapping the field. W: V. Braithwaite (red.), taxing democracy: understanding tax avoidance and evasion (s. 41--69).Ashgate, Aldershot.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable remarks. The datasets generated during the current study are available in the National Survey of Tax and Benefit repository, https://www.kipf.re.kr/panel/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YoungRok Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Tables 7 and 8 .

Table 7 Descriptive statistics of the categorical variables
Table 8 Correlation matrix of the tax fairness factors

Appendix B

See Tables 9 and 10.

Table 9 Regression results: Ordered probit estimation for tax morale (11-point scale)
Table 10 Regression results of the OLS estimation for tax morale (11-point scale)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Wan, H. The effect of fairness on tax morale in South Korea: a framed question approach. Int Rev Econ 69, 103–123 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00387-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00387-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation