Abstract
It has been suggested that local equilibrium determinacy can be achieved by applying active monetary policies combined with passive fiscal policies in discrete-time New Keynesian (NK) models that include a fiscal policy rule with a time lag in the policy response. However, indeterminacy can occur even under such policies in models with money in the production function. In this paper, we first confirm that these results hold in a continuous-time NK model without a policy lag. Furthermore, we present the case of a fiscal policy lag that is capable of avoiding indeterminacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As a future extension, it would be interesting to examine the case wherein government expenditure enters the utility or production function with additively non-separable forms, as done in Barro’s (1990) endogenous growth models.
Refer to Blanchard and Kiyotaki (1987) for details.
The price revision costs can be interpreted as psychological stresses caused by price negotiations.
A similar specification of the utility function can be found in Carlstrom and Fuerst (2003).
Here, the price revision cost is specified in a quadratic equation consistent with that outlined by Rotemberg (1982).
Although the assumption of symmetry is widely used in the whole class of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) models, we should be conscious of an underlying problem of the assumption; that is, it confines the analysis to a particular and only limited conditions of an economy, where all household–firm units choose identical sequences of consumption, asset holdings, and prices. Specifically, when the products are heterogeneous, as assumed in this model, its reasonability should be examined carefully. However, this problem would exceed the scope of this study. Hence, we employ the same assumptions as in existing literature.
We used Eq. (18) for the derivations of \(P_1\) and \(P_2\).
The assumption of MIUF is valid as it focuses on the precautionary motive for money demand by households; the assumption of MIPF is also justified as it focuses on the transaction motive for money demand by firms.
For example, refer to Chapter 18 in Gandolfo (2010).
Refer to Chapter 3 in Bellman and Cooke (1963).
We can assume that \(\omega >0\) without losing generality because the pure imaginary roots will always be conjugated.
We can ignore the term \(-\theta /i\omega _+\) as it is clearly an imaginary number.
References
Annicchiarico B, Giammarioli N, Piergallini A (2012) Budgetary policies in a DSGE model with finite horizons. Res Econ 66(2):111–130
Barro RJ (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J Political Econ 98(5):S103–S125
Bellman RE, Cooke KL (1963) Differential-difference equations. Academic Press, New York
Benhabib J, Schmitt-Grohé S, Uribe M (2003) Backward-looking interest-rate rules, interest-rate smoothing, and macroeconomic instability. J Money Credit Bank 35(6):1379–1412
Beretta E, Kuang Y (2002) Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems with delay dependent parameters. SIAM J Math Anal 33(5):1144–1165
Blanchard OJ, Kiyotaki N (1987) Monopolistic competition and the effects of aggregate demand. Am Econ Rev 77(4):647–666
Carlstrom CT, Fuerst TS (2003) Comment on “backward-looking interest-rate rules, interest-rate smoothing, and macroeconomic instability” by Jess Benhabib. J Money Credit Bank 35:1413–1423
Deng W, Yujiang W, Li C (2006) Stability analysis of differential equations with time-dependent delay. Int J Bifurc Chaos 16(2):465–472
Feenstra RC (1986) Functional equivalence between liquidity costs and the utility of money. J Monet Econ 17(2):271–291
Friedman M (1948) A monetary and fiscal framework for economic stability. Am Econ Rev 38(3):245–264
Galí J (2008) Monetary policy, inflation, and the business cycle: an introduction to the New Keynesian framework. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gandolfo G (2010) Economic dynamics, 4th edn. Springer, NewYork
Gliksberg B (2009) Monetary policy and multiple equilibria with constrained investment and externalities. Econ Theory 41(3):443–463
Gu K, Niculescu SI, Chen J (2005) On stability crossing curves for general systems with two delays. J Math Anal Appl 311(1):231–253
Gu K, Naghnaeian M (2011) Stability crossing set for systems with three delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(1):11–26
Guerrini L, Sodini M (2013) “Dynamic properties of the Solow model with increasing or decreasing population and time-to-build technology. Abstract and applied analysis, vol 2013. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Cairo
Kumhof M, Nunes R, Yakadina I (2010) Simple monetary rules under fiscal dominance. J Money Credit Bank 42(1):63–92
Leeper EM (1991) Equilibria under ‘active’ and ‘passive’ monetary and fiscal policies. J Monet Econ 27(1):129–147
Lin X, Wang H (2012) Stability analysis of delay differential equations with two discrete delays. Can Appl Math Q 20(4):519–533
Matsumoto A, Szidarovszky F (2012) An elementary study of a class of dynamic systems with two time delays. Cubo (Temuco) 14(3):103–113
Matsumoto A, Szidarovszky F (2015a) Nonlinear multiplier-accelerator model with investment and consumption delays. Struct Change Econ Dyn 33:1–9
Matsumoto A, Szidarovszky F (2015b) Nonlinear cournot duopoly with implementation delays, Vol. 240. IERCU Discussion Paper, 2015
Meng Q, Yip CK (2004) Investment, interest rate rules, and equilibrium determinacy. Econ Theory 23(4):863–878
Rotemberg JJ (1982) Sticky prices in the United States. J Political Econ 90(6):1187–1211
Schmitt-Grohé S, Uribe M (2007) Optimal simple and implementable monetary and fiscal rules. J Monet Econ 54(6):1702–1725
Tsuzuki E (2014) A New Keynesian model with delay: monetary policy lag and determinacy of equilibrium. Econ Anal Policy 44(3):279–291
Tsuzuki E (2015) Determinacy of equilibrium in a New Keynesian model with monetary policy lag. Int J Econ Behav Org Spec Issue Recent Dev Econ Theory Appl 3(2–1):15–22
Walsh CE (2010) Monetary theory and policy, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Woodford M (2003) Interest and prices: foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Acknowledgments
The author appreciates the helpful comments and suggestions received from anonymous referees and Professors Akio Matsumoto and Toichiro Asada (Chuo University).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Direction of crossing
Appendix: Direction of crossing
Differentiating equation \(F(\lambda )=0\) with respect to \(\theta \), we obtain the following:
or equivalently,
Next, we use equation \(F(\lambda )=0\) to express \(e^{-\theta \lambda }\) as follows:
Thus,Footnote 14
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsuzuki, E. Fiscal policy lag and equilibrium determinacy in a continuous-time New Keynesian model. Int Rev Econ 63, 215–232 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-016-0250-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-016-0250-7