Skip to main content
Log in

Some regulatory lessons to be drawn from the financial crisis

  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article briefly outlines how the two major structural causes of the financial crisis have been a massive underestimation of the negative externalities potentially arising from malfunctioning of financial markets, and the policy decision to assign the production of an eminently public good, financial stability, to private parties. Both ideas have been a tenet of the so-called Greenspan doctrine. The crisis also shows that all regulators tend to be captured in the end, and thus any new legislation should contain bright-line rules, that might look inefficient when assessed with reference to the market they regulate, but are socially efficient, because it would be politically costly to alter them. Criminal sanctions, which after all are a social form of regulation, should also be strengthened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As new papers are published on a daily basis, it is difficult to provide here with a brief list of references. For an historical perspective, the papers presented in Banca d’Italia (2009) are, however, particularly useful, and on www.voxeu.org readers may find brief and up-to-date comments by authoritative European and American economists.

  2. Akerlof (1970).

  3. As quoted by The Wall Street Journal, 17 February 2009.

  4. BIS (1986).

  5. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYJZOB_gZi0I&refer=home.

  6. Dodd (2008).

  7. Greenspan (2004), emphasis added.

  8. Kuttner (2007).

  9. The issue is discussed in many textbooks on regulation. For a general treatment see, and many, Kahn (1971) or Viscusi et al. (2000). A classic formal treatment is given by Laffont and Tirole (1991).

References

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The market for ‘Lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banca d’Italia (2009) Conference on financial market regulation after the financial crises: the historical experience, Roma 16–17 April

  • BIS (1986) Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee: the management of banks’ off-balance-sheet exposures: a supervisory perspective, March

  • Dodd R (2008) Over the counter markets: what are they? International Monetary Fund, Finance and Development, June

  • Greenspan A (2004) Risk and uncertainty in monetary policy. Remarks by Chairman Alan Greenspan at the Meetings of the American Economic Association, San Diego, California, January 3, 2004

  • Kahn A (1971) The economics of regulation: principles and institutions. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner R (2004) Testimony before the committee on financial services. U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., 27 October 2007

  • Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1991) The politics of government decision making. A theory of regulatory capture. Q J Econ 106(4):1089–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler G (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Man Sci 2:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi K, Vernon J, Harrington J (2000) Economics of regulation and antitrust. MIT Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Prosperetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prosperetti, L. Some regulatory lessons to be drawn from the financial crisis. Int Rev Econ 56, 265–273 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-009-0077-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-009-0077-6

JEL Classification

Navigation