Skip to main content
Log in

Risk allocation and uncertainty: some unpleasant outcomes of financial innovation

  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Financial innovation introduces the possibility of exchange on wider time-events sets. In this way, market incompleteness should be reduced with an overall advantage. The existence of this advantage also depends on other elements, like the degree of market competition, the level of information, and the presence of inefficiencies generated by moral hazard. One kind of behavior which has been widely common among banks consists in the reduction of risk taking in relation to credit activity. Credit risk tends to be covered through the packaging of credits into securities. This situation means that since the bank is not shouldering the risk, it does not invest in the acquisition of knowledge regarding the borrower, but only regarding his/her generic characteristics which are reflected in the evaluation of the assets in which the credits are packaged. Moreover, financial innovation was developed, in particular by investment banks, with non-standardized products, exchanged over-the-counter, and substantially lacking secondary markets. The greatest problems derive from the low liquidity of these products and from the uncertainty over their returns. This is why it would be good to stimulate the introduction of standardized products, whose risks are easy to determine, to be exchanged on organized markets, instead of complex products, which are substantially illiquid and exchanged over-the-counter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. About financial innovation see, for instance, Tufano (2003).

  2. Jenkinson (2008) points out the role of uncertainty (indicated as Knightian uncertainty) in the financial market. The incompleteness of financial markets in presence of uncertainty aversion is presented in general terms by Mukerji and Tallon (2001), the reduction of trading volumes by Montesano (2008).

  3. On the subprime crisis, see, for instance, Blundell-Wignall (2008). For a view of the mortgage market before the crisis, see Greenspan and Kennedy (2007).

  4. For instance, Roubini (2008).

References

  • Blundell-Wignall A (2008) The subprime crisis: size, deleveraging and some policy options. Finan Market Trends, OECD

  • Greenspan A, Kennedy JE (2007) Sources and uses of equity extracted from houses. FEDS Working Paper No 2007-20

  • Jenkinson N (2008) Financial innovation: what have we learnt? Bank for International Settlements, Central bankers speeches, 24 July 2008

  • Montesano A (2008) Effects of uncertainty aversion on the call option market. Theor Decis 65:97–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji S, Tallon J-M (2001) Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of financial markets. Rev Econ Stud 68:883–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubini N (2008) Ten fundamental issues in reforming financial regulation and supervision in a world of financial innovation and globalization. RGE Monitor, March 31, 2008

  • Tufano P (2003) Financial innovation. In: Costantinides G, Stulz RM, Harris M (eds) Handbook of the economics of finance, vol I, part I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 307–335

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldo Montesano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montesano, A. Risk allocation and uncertainty: some unpleasant outcomes of financial innovation. Int Rev Econ 56, 243–250 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-009-0074-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-009-0074-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation