Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of relational goods

  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a model of social relationships in which relational goods are the results of individual joint efforts and past attitudes toward socialising. We show the effect of individual different inclinations toward social relationships on the dynamic properties of the system either assuming homogeneous or heterogeneous individuals. Particularly, we show the role assumed by the environment and past experience of individuals on the dynamic outcome. We use a triangular finite-different system to investigate these issues. We analyse the conditions for the convergence of the system to a low-socialising trap and we propose a few policy corrections to get out of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Gui (2002), Sugden (2005) and Uhlaner (1989) commonly agree with them.

  2. A dynamic triangular system with n variables is represented by \(\left\{\begin{array}{l} x_{1t+1}=f_{1}(x_{1t}) \\ x_{2t+1}=f_{2}(x_{1t},x_{2t}) \\ \vdots \\ x_{it+1}=f_{i}(x_{1t},\ldots ,x_{it}) \\ \vdots \\ x_{nt+1}=f_{n}(x_{1t},\ldots ,x_{tn}) \end{array}\right.\)

  3. We are assuming that individuals are non-satiated in the consumption of socialising. Empirical evidence supports this assumption (see, e.g., Bruni and Stanca 2007).

References

  • Antoci A, Sacco P, Vanin P (2005) On the possible conflict between economic growth and social development. In: Gui B, Sugden R (eds) Economics and social interactions: accounting for interpersonal relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoci A, Sacco P, Vanin P (2007) Social capital accumulation and the evolution of social participation. J Socio-Econ 36:128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni L, Stanca L (2007) Watching alone. Relational goods, happiness and television. JEBO (in press)

  • Bruni L, Naimzada A, Randon E (2006) Il bene relazionale: un modello dinamico. In: Sacco P, Zamagni S (eds) Teoria economica e relazioni interpersonali. Il Mulino, Bologna, pp 219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneo G (2005) Work and television. Eur J Polit Econ 21:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank R (2005) Does absolute income matter? In: Bruni L, Porta PL (eds) Economics and happiness. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui B (2002) Più che scambi incontri. La teoria economica alle prese con i fenomeni relazionali. In: Sacco P, Zamagni S (eds) Complessità relazionale e comportamento economico. Il Mulino, Bologna, pp 15–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard R (2005) Rethinking public economics: the implication of rivarly and habits. In: Bruni L, Porta PL (eds) Economics and happiness. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R (2005) Fellow-feeling. In: Gui B, Sugden R (eds) Economics and social interactions: accounting for interpersonal relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner CJ (1989) Relational goods and participation: incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice 62:253–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuela Randon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Randon, E., Bruni, L. & Naimzada, A. Dynamics of relational goods. Int. Rev. Econ. 55, 113–125 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-008-0043-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-008-0043-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation