Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing White Mold of Potatoes in a Rainfed Environment

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this research was to evaluate the management techniques of cultivar selection, fungicide application number, fungicide spray timing, and nitrogen rate management. Cultivars of Superior, Shepody, and Russet Burbank were observed to differ in disease severity and yield. White mold was observed to be a yield limiting factor for Superior with r2 values of 0.65 and 0.66 for the relationship between white mold severity and total and marketable yield, respectively. In contrast, Russet Burbank and Shepody had only 2 % to 4 % of yield variation explained by white mold severity. Superior showed significant yield responses to two boscalid applications as opposed to one or zero, and was the only cultivar to show a response to fungicide application number. Analysis of fungicide application timing showed discrepancies between responses of severity (quadratic effect) and yields (linear effect). Lowest severity was modeled to be at applications made at peak flowering, while highest yields were modeled to be at applications made prior to. Nitrogen rates were observed to affect white mold incidence whereby disease counts were elevated at nitrogen application rates below 134 kg/ha as compared to application rates in excess of 134 kg/ha.

Resumen

La meta de esta investigación fue evaluar las técnicas de manejo de selección de variedades, número de aplicación de fungicidas, tiempos en la aspersión de fungicidas y el manejo del nivel de nitrógeno. Se observaron las variedades Superior, Shepody y Russet Burbank para diferenciarlas en severidad de enfermedad y rendimiento. Se observó que el moho blanco era un factor limitante en el rendimiento para Superior con valores de r2 de 0.65 y 0.66 para la relación entre la severidad de moho blanco y rendimiento total y comercial, respectivamente. En contraste, Russet Burbank y Shepody tuvieron solamente de 2 % a 4 % de variación en el rendimiento adjudicable a la severidad del moho blanco. Superior mostró respuestas de rendimiento significativas a dos aplicaciones de boscalid, en oposición a una o cero, y fue la única variedad en mostrar una respuesta al número de aplicaciones del fungicida. El análisis sobre el tiempo de aplicación del fungicida mostró discrepancias entre respuestas a severidad (efecto cuadrático) y rendimientos (efecto lineal). Se observó que la severidad más baja estuvo con aplicaciones hechas en plena floración, mientras que los rendimientos más altos se observaron con aplicaciones previas. Se observó que los niveles de nitrógeno afectaron la incidencia del moho blanco, en donde las lecturas de enfermedad fueron elevadas a niveles de aplicación de nitrógeno abajo de 134 kg/ha, en comparación con los niveles de aplicación excediendo los 134 kg/ha.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrivon, D., J.-M. Lucas, C. Guerin, and B. Jouan. 1998. Colonization of roots, stolons, tubers and stems of various potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars by the black-dot fungus Colletotrichum coccodes. Plant Pathology 47: 440–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atallah, Z.K., and D.A. Johnson. 2004. Development of Sclerotinia stem rot in potato fields in south-central Washington. Plant Disease 88: 419–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atallah, Z.K., and D.A. Johnson. 2006. Timing fungicide applications for managing Sclerotinia stem rot of potato. Plant Disease 90: 755–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, M.D., B.P.H.J. Thomma, and B.D. Nelson. 2006. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary: Biology and molecular traits of a cosmopolitan pathogen. Molecular Plant Pathology 7: 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.B., and A.B. Forsythe. 1974. Robust tests for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69: 364–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., D. Milbourne, L. Ramsay, R. Meyer, C. Chatot-Balandras, P. Oberhagemann, W. De Jong, C. Gebhardt, E. Bonnel, and R. Waugh. 1999. QTL for field resistance to late blight in potato are strongly correlated with maturity and vigor. Molecular Breeding 5: 387–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuomo, G.J., D.G. Johnson, and W.A. Head Jr. 2001. Interseeding kura clover and birdsfoot trefoil into existing cool-season grass pastures. Agronomy Journal 93: 458–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, D.D., and S.R. Rimmer. 2005. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: When “to be or not to be” a pathogen? FEMS Microbiology Letters 251: 177–184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, A., and H.D. Thurston. 1990. The effect of cultivar maturity on the resistance of potatoes to early blight caused by Alternaria solani. American Potato Journal 67: 615–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, W.W., K.J. Felcher, D.S. Douches, J. Coombs, J.M. Stein, K.M. Baker, and R. Hammerschmidt. 2001. Effect of host plant resistance and reduced rates and frequencies of fungicide application to control potato late blight. Plant Disease 85: 1113–1118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kora, C., M.R. McDonald, and G.J. Boland. 2003. Sclerotinia rot of carrot: An example of phenological adaptation and bicyclic development by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Disease 87: 456–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kora, C., M.R. McDonald, and G.J. Boland. 2005. Lateral clipping of canopy influences the microclimate and development of apothecia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in carrots. Plant Disease 89: 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupinsky, J.M., K.L. Bailey, M.P. McMullen, B.D. Gossen, and T.K. Turkington. 2002. Managing plant disease risk in diversified cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 94: 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, A.B., and D.H. Lambert. 2005. Control of white mold on Irish Potato using fungicides at full bloom, 2004. Fungicide and Nematicide Tests, 60: V083. Online publication. doi:10.1094/FN60.

  • Plant, A.B., and D.H. Lambert. 2013. Host traits influencing severity of white mold of potatoes in a rainfed environment. American Journal of Potato Research. doi:10.1007/s12230-013-9327-y.

  • Sands, P.J., C. Hackett, and H.A. Nix. 1979. A model of the development and bulking of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Field Crops Research 2: 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, P., A. Plant, S.B. Johnson, and J. Jemison. 2007. Effect of a mustard green manure on potato yield and disease incidence in a rainfed environment. Crop Management. doi:10.1094/CM-2007-0122-02-RS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visker, M.H.P.W., H.M.G. van Raaij, L.C.P. Keizer, P.C. Struik, and L.T. Colon. 2004. Correlation between late blight resistance and foliage maturity type in potato. Euphytica 137: 311–323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, P., and W. Kirk. 2007. Michigan potato diseases: White mold. Michigan State University, Online. Extension Bulletin E-2989.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the help and support of Erica and Albert Fitzpatrick, Bruce and Brandon Roope, Steve Gray, Gregory Alley-Violette, Elbridge Giggie, and James Dwyer. This work was supported by a grant from the Maine Potato Board Research Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew B. Plant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plant, A.B., Lambert, D.H. & Porter, G.A. Managing White Mold of Potatoes in a Rainfed Environment. Am. J. Potato Res. 90, 378–385 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9315-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9315-2

Keywords

Navigation