Abstract
It has been clearly established that the Portuguese introduced coconuts to the Cape Verde islands in 1499, and these supplied the Atlantic coasts and the Caribbean in the 1500s. By contrast, early 16th century reports of coconuts on the Pacific coast of Panama are controversial. Recent DNA analysis of modern coconut populations there shows them to be similar to Philippine varieties, agreeing with morphometric analysis. Hence, coconuts must have been brought by boat from the western Pacific, but no archaeological, ethnobotanical or linguistic evidence for pre-Columbian coconuts has been found. Thus, the most parsimonious explanation is that coconuts were introduced to Panama after Spanish conquest, as supported by DNA analysis and historical records of Spanish voyages. New collections along the Pacific coast, from Mexico to Colombia, are increasing the sampling for genetic analysis, and further work in the Philippines is suggested to test probable origins. Unless new archaeological discoveries prove otherwise, the strong hypothesis of Philippine origin should direct future research on the sources of American Pacific coast coconuts.
Resumen
Cocoteros en las Américas
Los portugueses introdujeron el cocotero a las islas de Cabo Verde en 1499, y este se distribuyó a las costas del Atlántico y el Caribe. Sin embargo los registros del cocotero en siglo XVI en la costa del Pacífico de Panamá son polémicos. Los análisis recientes de ADN de poblaciones modernas de coco muestran que son similares a las variedades Filipinas, lo que está de acuerdo con los análisis morfo-métricos previos. Por lo tanto, el cocotero debe haber sido llevado en barco desde el Pacífico Occidental, pero no hay evidencias arqueológicas, etnobotánicas o lingüísticas precolombinas. La explicación más parsimoniosa es que fue introducido después de la conquista española. Esto es apoyado por los análisis de ADN y los registros históricos de los viajes españoles con cocos. Nuevas colectas a lo largo de las costas del Pacífico desde México hasta Colombia mejorarán el muestreo para el análisis genético, y se sugieren nuevos trabajos en Filipinas para confirmar los orígenes precisos. A menos de que nuevos restos arqueológicos se encuentren que demuestren lo contrario, esta hipótesis puede orientar nuevas investigaciones sobre los orígenes del cocotero en la Costa del Pacífico americano.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Acosta, J. 1940. Historia natural y moral de las Indias. Fondo Cultural Económica, Imprensa Manuel León Sánchez, México. [Revised by Edmundo O’Gorman from the 1st Edition published in Sevilla, Spain]
Allen, P. H. 1965. Oviedo, on “Cocos”. Principes 9: 62–66.
Alzina, F. I. 1668. On the palms which are called Cocos and their great usefulness (Translated by L. B. Uichanco, 1931). Philippine Agriculturalist 20: 435–446.
Anglería, P. M. 1944. Décadas del Nuevo Mundo. Editorial Bajel, Buenas Aires.
Ballard, C., P. Brown, R. M. Bourke & T. Harwood (eds.). 2005. The sweet potato in Oceania: a reappraisal. Ethnology Monographs 19, Pittsburgh; Oceania Monograph, 56, Sydney.
Bardy, W. 1914. Prospectus for Gorgona Island Coconut Estate Ltd. BT 31/22185/135025 UK Public Record Office, London.
Battuta, I. 1929. Travels in Asia and Africa 1325–1354 (Translated and edited by H. A. R. Gibb). Broadway House, London. Online: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/1354-ibnbattuta.asp
Baudouin, L. & P. Lebrun. 2009. Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) DNA studies support the hypothesis of an ancient Austronesian migration from Southeast Asia to America. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 257–262.
Beccari, O. 1917. The origin and dispersal of Cocos nucifera. Philippines Journal of Science, C. Botany 12: 27–43.
Brown, C. H. 1994. Lexical acculturation in Native American languages. Current Anthropology 35: 95–117.
——— 1999. Lexical acculturation in Native American languages. Oxford University Press, New York.
——— 2006a. Glottochronology and the chronology of maize in the Americas. Pp 647–663. In: J. E. Staller, R. H. Tykot, & B. F. Benz (eds). Histories of maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, biogeography, domestication, and evolutions of maize. Elsevier, San Diego.
——— 2006b. Prehistoric chronology of the common bean in the New World: The linguistic evidence. American Anthropologist 108: 507–516.
——— 2010. The development of agriculture in prehistoric Mesoamerica: The linguistic evidence. Pp 71–107. In: J. E. Staller & M. Carrasco (eds). Pre-Columbian foodways: Interdisciplinary approaches to food, culture, and markets in Mesoamerica. Springer, Berlin.
Bruman, H. J. 1944. Some observations on the early history of the coconut in the New World. Acta Americana 2: 220–43.
——— 1945. Early coconut culture in western Mexico. The Hispanic American History Review 25: 212–223.
——— 1947. A further note on coconuts in Colima. The Hispanic American History Review 27: 572–573.
de Candolle, A. 1855. Géographie botanique raisonnée, vols. 1–2. Masson, Paris.
——— 1883. Origine des plantes cultivées. Germer Baillière, Paris [first English translation: 1884. Origin of cultivated plants. Kegan, London].
Clement, C. R. 1995. Pejibaye (Bactris gasipaes). Pp 383–388. In: J. Smartt & N. W. Simmonds (eds). Evolution of crop plants, ed. 2nd. Longman, London.
Columbus, C. 1893. The Journal of Christopher Columbus (during his first voyage 1492–1493). Translation by C.R. Markham, The Hakluyt Society, London. On-line: http://www.archive.org/details/journalchristop01markgoog
Constenla Umaña, A. 1981. Comparative Chibchan phonology. Ph.D. diss. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Cook, D. F. 1910. History of the coconut palm in America. Contributions to the US National Herbarium 14: 271–342.
Cooke, R. G. & A. J. Ranere. 1992. Prehistoric human adaptations to the seasonally dry forest of Panama. World Archaeology 24: 114–133.
Copeland, E. B. 1914. The coconut. Macmillan & Co., London.
D’Arcy, P. 2006. The people of the sea: Environment, identity and history in Oceania. University of Hawai‘i Press, Honolulu.
Darwin, C. 1860 Journal of researches into the natural history and geology of the countries visited during the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle round the world under the command of Capt. Fitz Roy, R.N. [2nd ed.] J. Murray, London.
Dennis, J. V. & C. R. Gunn. 1971. The case against trans-Pacific dispersal of the coconut by ocean currents. Economic Botany 25: 407–413.
Dickau, R. 2010. Microbotanical and macrobotanical evidence of plant use and the transition to agriculture in Panama. Pp 99–134. In: A. M. VanDerwarker & T. M. Peres (eds). Integrating zooarchaeology and paleoethnobotany: A consideration of issues, methods, and cases. Springer, New York.
Edmondson, C. H. 1941. Viability of coconut after floating in sea. Occasional Papers Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 16: 293–304.
Finney, B. R. 1979. Hokule’a: The way to Tahiti. Dodd, Mead and Co, New York.
——— 1985. Anomalous westerlies, El Niño, and the colonization of Polynesia. American Anthropologist 87: 9–26.
Fitzpatrick, S. M. & R. Callaghan. 2009. Examining dispersal mechanisms for the translocation of chicken (Gallus gallus) from Polynesia to South America. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 214–223.
Gladwin, T. 1970. East is a big bird: Navigation and Logic on Puluwat Atoll. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Gongora, J., N. J. Rawlence, V. A. Mobegi, H. Jianlin, J. A. Alcalde, J. T. Matus, O. Hanotte, C. Moran, J. J. Austin, S. Ulm, A. J. Anderson, G. Larson & A. Cooper. 2008. Indo-European and Asian origins for Chilean and Pacific chickens revealed by mtDNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 105: 10308–10313.
———, et al. 2008b. Reply to Storey et al.: More DNA and dating studies needed for ancient El Arenal-1 chickens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: E100.
Green, R. C. 2005. Sweet potato transfers in Polynesian prehistory. Pp. 43–62. In: C. Ballard, P. Brown, R. M. Bourke & T. Harwood (eds.). The sweet potato in Oceania: a reappraisal. Ethnology Monographs 19, Pittsburgh; Oceania Monograph, 56, Sydney.
Gunn, B. F. 2004. The phylogeny of Cocoeae (Arecaceae) with an emphasis on Cocos nucifera. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 91: 505–522.
———, L. Baudouin & K. M. Olsen. 2011. Independent origins of cultivated coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) in the Old World Tropics. PLoS ONE 6: e21143.
Harries, H. C. 1971. Coconut varieties in America. Oleagineux 26: 235–242.
——— 1977. The Cape Verde region (1499 to 1549): The key to coconut culture in the Western Hemisphere? Turrialba 27: 227–231.
——— 1978. The evolution, dissemination and classification of Cocos nucifera. Botanical Review 44: 265–320.
——— 1981. Germination and taxonomy of the coconut palm. Annals of Botany 48: 873–883.
——— 1995. Coconut. Cocos nucifera L. (Palmae). Pp 389–395. In: J. Smartt & N. W. Simmonds (eds). Evolution of crop plants, ed. 2nd. Longman, New York.
———. Key to coconut cultivation on the Pacific coast of America: the Manila-Acapulco galleon route (1565–1815). Palms (J. Int. Palm. Soc.) 56(2): 72–77.
Harries, H. C. & D. H. Romney. 1974. Maypan: an F1 hybrid coconut variety for commercial production in Jamaica. World Crops 26: 110–111.
Henderson, A., G. Galeano & R. Bernal. 1995. Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Hezel, F. X. 1983. The first taint of civilization. A history of the Caroline and Marshall Islands in pre-colonial Days, 1521–1885. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Hill, A. W. 1929. The original home and mode of dispersal of the coconut. Nature 124(3117): 133–134 & 151–153.
Holman, E. W., C. H. Brown, S. Wichmann, A. Müller, V. Velupillai, H. Hammarström, S. Sauppe, H. Jung, D. Bakker, P. Brown, O. Belyaev, M. Urban, R. Mailhammer, J.-M. List & D. Egorov. 2011. Automated dating of the World’s language families based on lexical similarity. Current Anthropology 52: 841–875.
Horridge, A. 1995. The Austronesian conquest of the sea—upwind. Pp 143–160. In: P. Bellwood, J. J. Fox, & D. Tryon (eds). The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives. Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, ANU, Canberra.
Hubisz, M. J., D. Falush, M. Stephens & J. K. Pritchard. 2009. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1322–1332.
Irwin, G. 1992. The prehistoric exploration and colonisation of the Pacific. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jones, T. L., A. A. Storey, E. A. Matisoo-Smith & J. M. Ramirez-Aliago (eds). 2011. Polynesians in America: Pre-Columbian contacts with the New World. AltaMira Press, Lanham.
Kaufman, T. 1994. The languages of South America. Pp 46–76. In: C. Moseley & R. E. Asher (eds). Atlas of the world’s languages. Routledge, New York.
Lebot, V. 2009. Tropical roots and tuber crops: Cassava, sweet potato, yams and aroids. CAB International, Oxford, UK.
Levison, M., R. G. Ward & J. W. Webb. 1973. The settlement of Polynesia: A computer simulation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Lewis, D. 1972. We, the navigators: The ancient art of landfinding in the Pacific. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Lewis, M. P. 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 16th edition. SIL International, Dallas. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com/
Locascio, W. A. 2010. Communal tradition and the nature of social inequality among the prehistoric households of El Hatillo (HE-4). Panama. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Margery, E. 1989. Diccionario Cabécar- Español Español-Cabécar. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica, San José.
Matisoo-Smith, E. A. & J. M. Ramírez. 2010. Human skeletal evidence of Polynesian presence in South America? Metric analyses of six crania from Mocha Island, Chile. Journal of Pacific Archaeology 1: 76–88.
Merrill, E. D. 1937. On the significance of certain oriental plant names in relation to introduced species. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 78: 112–146.
——— 1954. The botany of Cook’s voyages. Chronica Botanica 14: 161–384.
Morcote-Rios, G. & R. Bernal. 2001. Remains of palms (Palmae) at archaeological sites in the New World: A review. The Botanical Review 67: 309–350.
Nei, M., F. Tajima & Y. Tateno. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19: 153–170.
Oviedo y Valdés, G. F. 1526. Sumario de la natural historia de las Indias. Remor de Petras, Toledo. [1995. Edición de N. del Castillo Mathieu, Universidad de Bogotá “Jorge Tadeo Lozano”, Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia.
——— 1535. La historia general de las Indias. Juan Cromberger, Sevilla [1851–1855. J. A. de los Rios y Serrano (ed.). Imprenta de la Real Academia de Historia, Madrid]
Patiño, V. M. 1963. Plantas cultivadas e animales domesticos en America Equinoccial. Tomo II. Frutales. Imprenta Departamental, Cali, Colombia.
——— 1970. Plantas cultivadas e animals domesticos en America Equinoccial. Tomo V. Animales domesticos introducidos. Imprenta Departamental, Cali, Colombia.
——— 2002. Historia y dispersión de los frutales nativos del Neotrópico. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali.
Piperno, D. R. & D. M. Pearsall. 1998. The origins of agriculture in the lowland Neotropics. Academic, New York.
Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens & P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.
Purseglove, J. W. 1972. Tropical crops: Monocotyledons. Longman, London.
Quesada Pacheco, M. Á. & C. Rojas Chaves. 1999. Diccionario Boruca-Español Español-Boruca. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa. Rica, San José.
Rainbird, P. 2004. The archaeology of Micronesia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ramírez-Aliaga, J. M. 2011. The Mapuche connection. Pp 95–110. In: T. L. Jones, A. A. Storey, E. A. Matisoo-Smith, & J. M. Ramirez-Aliago (eds). Polynesians in America: Pre-Columbian contacts with the New World. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.
Rensch, C. R. 1989. An etymological dictionary of the Chinantecan languages. The Summer Institute of Linguistics. Arlington, Texas.
Reyne, A. 1948. De Cocospalm. Pp 427–525. In: C. J. J. van Hall & C. van de Koppel (eds). De Landbouw in den Indischen Archipel, Vol. 2A. S-Gravenhage, Van Hoeve.
Roullier, C., G. Rossel, D. Tay, D. McKey & V. Lebot. 2011. Combining chloroplast and nuclear microsatellites to investigate origin and dispersal of New World sweet potato landraces. Molecular Ecology 20: 3963–3977.
Roullier, C., L. Benoit, D. B. McKey & V. Lebot. 2013. Historical collections reveal patterns of diffusion of sweet potato in Oceania obscured by modern plant movements and recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 110(6): 2205–2210.
Scaglion, R. 2005. Kumara in the Ecuadorian Gulf of Guayaquil? Pp. 35–41. In: C. Ballard, P. Brown, R. M. Bourke & T. Harwood (eds.). The sweet potato in Oceania: a reappraisal. Ethnology Monographs 19, Pittsburgh; Oceania Monograph, 56, Sydney.
Sevilla del Rio, F. 1977. Provança de la Villa de Colima: Documentos originales del Archivo Municipal de la Ciudad de Colima 1612–1724. Textos paleográficos de F. Sevilla del Rio. Ed. Jus, Ciudad de Mexico, D.E.
Small, J. K. 1929. The Coconut Palm—Cocos nucifera. Journal of the New York Botanical Garden 30(355): 153–161. and (356): 194–203.
Smith, C. E., Jr. 1980. Plant remains from the Chiriqui sites and ancient vegetational patterns. Pp 151–174. In: O. F. Linares & A. J. Ranere (eds). Adaptive radiations in prehistoric Panama, Peabody Museum Monographs, Vol. 5. Harvard University, Cambridge.
Smith, H. H. & F. A. G. Pape. 1914. Coco-nuts: The consols of the East, ed. 2nd. Tropical Life Publ, London.
Storey, A. A., J. M. Ramírez, D. Quiroz, D. V. Burley, D. J. Addison, R. Walter, A. J. Anderson, T. L. Hunt, J. S. Athens, L. Huynen & E. A. Matisoo-Smith. 2007. Radiocarbon and DNA evidence for a pre-Columbian introduction of Polynesian chickens to Chile. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 10335–10339.
———, D. Quiróz & E. A. Matisoo-Smith. 2011a. A reappraisal of the evidence for pre-Columbian introduction of chickens to the Americas. Pp 139–170. In: T. L. Jones, A. A. Storey, E. A. Matisoo-Smith, & J. M. Ramirez-Aliago (eds). Polynesians in America: Pre-Columbian contacts with the New World. AltaMira Press, Lanham.
———, A. C. Clarke & E. A. Matisoo-Smith. 2011b. Identifying contact with the Americas: A commensal-based approach. Pp 111–138. In: T. L. Jones, A. A. Storey, E. A. Matisoo-Smith, & J. M. Ramirez-Aliago (eds). Polynesians in America: Pre-Columbian contacts with the New World. AltaMira Press, Lanham.
Thomas, S. D. 1987. The last navigator. Henry Holt & Co., New York.
Vargas, A. & F. A. Blanco. 2000. Fruit characterization of Cocos nucifera L. (Arecaceae) cultivars from the Pacific coast of Costa Rica and the Philippines. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47: 483–487.
Varthema, L. 1510. The itinerary of Ludovico di Varthema of Bologna from 1502 to 1508. Translated from the original Italian edition of 1510 by John Winter Jones in 1863. Reprinted by Asian Educational Services, New Delhi.
Vavilov, N. I. 1951. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, MA.
Ward, R. G. & B. J. Allen. 1980. The viability of floating coconuts. Science in New Guinea 7: 69–72.
——— & M. Brookfield. 1992. The dispersal of the coconut: Did it float or was it carried to Panama? Journal of Biogeography 19: 467–480.
Witkowski, S. R. & C. H. Brown. 1983. Marking-reversals and cultural importance. Language 59: 569–582.
Yen, D. E. 1974. The sweet potato in Oceania: An essay in ethnobotany. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Zeder, M. A., D. G. Bradley, E. Emschwiller & B. D. Smith (eds). 2006. Documenting domestication—New genetic and archaeological paradigms. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Zhang, D., G. Rossel, A. Kriegner & R. Hijmans. 2004. AFLP assessment of diversity in sweet potato from Latin America and the Pacific region: Its implications on the dispersal of the crop. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 115–120.
Zizumbo-Villarreal, D. 1996. History of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) in Mexico: 1539–1810. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 505–515.
——— & P. Colunga-GarcíaMarín. 2001. Morpho-physiological variation and phenotypic plasticity in Mexican populations of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48: 547–554.
———, ——— & H. J. Quero. 1998. Re-evaluation of early observations on coconut in the New World. Economic Botany 52: 68–77.
———, M. Fernández-Barrera, N. Torres-Hernández & P. Colunga-GarcíaMarín. 2005. Morphological variation of fruit in Mexican populations of Cocos nucifera L. (Arecaceae) under in situ and ex situ conditions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 421–434.
——— & P. Colunga-GarcíaMarín. 2008. Early coconut distillation and the origins of mescal and tequila liquor in western Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 493–510.
Acknowledgements
Our special thanks to Luc Baudouin, CIRAD, Montpellier, France, for information about the samples chosen for coconut genetic analysis and for stimulating our reconsideration of pre-Columbian coconuts; to Madhavan Nayar, formerly Director, Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, India, for providing bibliographic material; to Michael G. Price, Michigan Center, Michigan, Kenneth M. Olsen, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, Lalith Perera, Coconut Research Institute, Sri Lanka, for reading the manuscript in draft and making numerous useful suggestions, about the Philippines, the genetic analysis and the presentation; and to Pamela Brown, Pensacola, Florida, for careful review of the language.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clement, C.R., Zizumbo-Villarreal, D., Brown, C.H. et al. Coconuts in the Americas. Bot. Rev. 79, 342–370 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-013-9121-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-013-9121-z