Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Last Remnants of Riparian Wooded Meadows along the Middle Drava River (Slovenia): Species Composition Is a Response to Light Conditions and Management

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the species richness and species composition in relation to light and management regime in remnants of wooded meadows within the riparian forests along the middle Drava River in Slovenia. 41 plots of still managed and, at different time periods (<5 yrs, 5–15 yrs, >15 yrs), abandoned riparian wooded meadows (RWM) were sampled. In addition to vegetation relevés, light intensity (PAR) was also measured in plots. Within the still-managed RWM, two floristically distinct types were recognized using TWINSPAN analysis: meadow-like and forest-like. Light intensity differed significantly between types. The CCA of active RWM showed a significant relation between species composition and light conditions. The number of species per relevé on active RWM was negatively correlated with light intensity – in contrast to North European wooded grasslands. This could be explained by the influence of species-rich riparian hornbeam forests that contribute many understorey species, in contrast to naturally mesotrophic meadows. CCA of both active and abandoned RWM demonstrated that light was a good predictor of RWM species composition and that abandonment caused profound changes in floristic composition. The species turnover during succession was more pronounced in less shaded meadow-like RWM where more light-requiring (grassland) species occurred. Species richness was the highest in active forest-like RWM. There were no significant differences in species richness between active meadow-like RWM and groups of abandoned RWM. The remains of riparian forests stretching along the flood plains of Central and Eastern Europe are considered one of the most natural ecosystems in the prevailing agricultural landscape. But naturalness could be in many cases only the consequence of abandonment of ancient land-use practices, like grazing of livestock, cutting between the trees, litter collecting, etc. Examination of the middle Drava River in Slovenia suggests the need to recognize the remains of ancient cultural landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accetto M (1990) Floristične zanimivosti iz subpanonskega sveta v Sloveniji. Biol Vestn 38:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker JP (1989) Nature management by grazing and cutting. On the ecological significance of grazing and cutting regimes applied ti restore former species-rich grassland communities in the Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Springer Verlag, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierschke H (1994) Pflanzensoziologie: Grundlage und Methode. Verlag Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsson A, Milberg P (1999) Species richness and distribution in relation to light in wooded meadows and pastures in southern Sweden. Ann Bot Fennici 36:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Ed. 5. Verlag Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Dull R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Datenbank. Scripta Geobot 18:1–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson M, Fogelfors H (2000) Management of a semi-natural grassland; results from a 15-year-old experiment in Southern Sweden. J Veg Sci 11:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1979) DECORANA: A Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Department of Ecology & Systematics, Cornell University Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Šmilauer P (2005) TWINSPAN for Windows version 2.3. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology & University of South Bohemia, Huntingdon & České Budějovice.

  • Huhta AP (1996) Vegetation changes in semi-natural meadows after abandonment in coastal northern Finland. Nordic J Bot 16:457–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L (1995) Small-scale distribution of species richness in a grassland (Bílé Karpaty Mountains, Czech Republic). Folia Geobot Phytotax 30:499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L (1997) Druhové bohatství luk v Bílých Karpatech. Sborn Přír Klubu v Uherském Hradišti 2:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L (1999) Small-scale plant mobility in a species-rich grassland. J Veg Sci 10:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L, Dančák M, Hájek M, Jongepierová I, Kučera T (2001) Scale-dependent biases in species counts in a grassland. J Veg Sci 12:699–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiluoto R (1998) Vegetation changes in restored semi-natural meadows in the Turku Archipelago of SW Finland. Pl Ecol 136:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köppen W (1923) Die Klimate der Erde. De Gruyter Berlin, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramberger B, Klemenčič S (2003) Effect of harvest date on the chemical composition and nutritive value of Cerastium holosteoides. Grass Forage Sci 58:12–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kukk T, Kull K (1997) Puisniidud (Wooded meadows). Estonia Marit 2:1–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull K, Zobel M (1991) High species richness in an Estonian wooded meadow. J Veg Sci 2:15–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinčič A, Wraber T, Jogan N, Podobnik A, Turk B, Vreš B (2007) Mala flora Slovenije. Ključ za določanje praprotnic in semenk (Flora of Slovenia in brief. Identification key for the ferns and flowering plants). Tehniška založba Slovenije, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitlacher K, Poschlod P, Rosén E, Bakker JP (2002) Restoration of wooded meadows – a comparative analysis along a chronosequence on Öland (Sweden). Appl Veg Sci 5:63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlinšek D (1996) Quality in forestry – an attempt at integrated forestry. In Potočnik (ed) Kakovost v gozdarstvu. Department of Forestry and Department of Wood Technology Ljubljana, pp 29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Grabherr G, Ellmauer T (eds) (1993) Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Teil I. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena

  • Paal J (1998) Rare and threatened plant communities of Estonia. Biodiversity Conserv 7:1027–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pärtel M, Kalamees R, Zobel M, Rosén E (1998) Restoration of species-rich limestone grassland communities from overgrown land: the importance of propagule availability. Ecol Engin 10:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjörs H (1954) Meadows in Grangärde Finnmark, SW Dalarna, Sweden. Acta Phytogeogr Suecica 34:135

    Google Scholar 

  • Spjotvoll E, Stoline MR (1973) An extension of the T-method of multiple comparisons to include the cases of unequal sample size. J Amer Statist Assoc 68:976–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc (2006) SPSS Base 15.00 User’s Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago IL

  • Škornik S, Kaligarič M (2002) Variety of dry and semi-dry secondary grasslands (Festuco-Brometea) in Slovenia contact area of different geoelements. Razpr SAZU 3:227–246

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvalue technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and canodraw for windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power Ithaca, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel E (1979) Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff V, van der Maarel E (1973) The Braun-Blanquet approach. In Whittaker RH (ed) Ordination and classification of vegetation. Handbook of Vegetation Science 5, Junk, The Hague, pp 156–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M, Suurkask M, Rosén E, Pärtel M (1996) The dynamics of species richness in experimentally restored calcareous grassland. J Veg Sci 7:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žiberna I (2000) Geografski oris slovenskega Podravja (Geographical outline of the Slovenian region of Podravje). In Mauch P (ed) Drava nekoč in danes: zemljepisne, zgodovinske in etnološke značilnosti sveta ob Dravi; splavarstvo in energetika (Drava River in the past and present: geographical, historical and ethnological characteristics of the Drava River area; timber rafting and energetics). Založba Obzorja Maribor, pp 19–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research for this paper was funded by the program group “Biodiversity” (P1–0078) and the research project “Biodiversity gradient in relation to biogeographic, altitudinal and ecological factors” (J1–6577) both headed by B. Kryštufek and granted fby the Slovenian Research Agency. We are grateful to our ex-students Helena Rižnar and Melita Caf, who performed some measurements and collaborated in the field work. We wish to express our gratitude to ornithologist Borut Štumberger, an expert on the Drava region, who introduced us to the area of RWM and encouraged us to do further research. We also thank the three anonymous referees for constructive comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitja Kaligarič.

Additional information

Plant nomenclature For taxa Martinčič et al. (2007) and for syntaxa Mucina et al. (1993)

Appendix

Appendix

A list of 129 vascular plant species recorded in the herb layer of the 41 relevés of riparian wooded meadows (RWM) along the Drava River in Slovenia

 

Active

Abandoned

G1

G2

<5 yr

5–15 yr

>15 yr

Grassland communities

Valeriana officinalis

Val off

43

.

.

.

.

Serratula tinctoria

Ser tin

14

.

.

13

.

Thalictrum flavum

Tha fla

29

.

13

13

.

Arabidopsis thaliana

Ara tha

71

9

25

63

43

Angelica sylvestris

Ang syl

57

9

13

13

29

Centaura carniolica

Cen car

71

36

50

38

14

Ajuga reptans

Aju rep

86

73

63

25

43

Galium mollugo

Gal mol

71

82

75

63

43

Cirsium oleraceum

Cir ole

57

27

38

25

14

Colchicum autumnale

Col aut

57

55

88

38

57

Heracleum sphondylium

Her sph

57

18

38

25

29

Brachypodium pinnatum

Bra pin

43

91

63

63

71

Pimpinella major

Pim maj

14

73

25

50

29

Anthriscus sylvestris

Ant syl

29

18

.

.

.

Filipendula ulmaria

Fil ulm

29

9

50

38

14

Vicia cracca

Vic cra

29

27

25

13

29

Orchis militaris

Orc mil

29

45

25

.

25

Plantago lanceolata

Pla lan

29

55

13

13

.

Crepis biennis

Cre bie

14

9

13

.

.

Euphorbia cyparissias

Eup cyp

14

27

25

13

14

Prunella vulgaris

Pru vul

14

45

25

.

.

Ranunculus acris

Ran acr

14

91

50

.

.

Trifolium pratense

Tri pra

14

64

.

.

.

Arrhenatherum elatior

Arr ela

.

100

13

.

.

Achillea millefolium

Ach mil

.

73

38

.

.

Briza media

Bri med

.

55

.

.

.

Trifolium repens

Tri rep

.

55

.

.

.

Centaurea jacea

Cen jac

.

45

.

.

.

Plantago media

Pla med

.

45

13

.

.

Bromopsis erecta

Bro ere

.

36

.

.

.

Lathyrus pratensis

Lat pra

.

36

.

.

.

Pimpinella saxifraga

Pim sax

.

27

.

.

.

Trifolium montanum

Tri mon

.

27

.

.

.

Leucanthemum ircutianum

Leu irc

.

18

.

.

.

Linum catharcticum

Lin cat

.

18

.

.

.

Lotus corniculatus

Lot cor

.

18

 

.

14

Salvia pratensis

Sal pra

.

18

.

.

.

Agrimonia eupatoria

Agr eup

.

9

13

.

.

Knautia arvensis

Kna arv

.

9

.

.

.

Sanguisorba officinalis

San off

.

9

.

.

.

Woodland and shrubland communities

Humulus lupulus

Hum lup

14

.

.

13

29

Euphorbia epithymoides

Eup epi

29

.

.

.

.

Polygonatum latifolium

Pol lat

43

.

13

.

.

Festuca gigantea

Fes gig

43

.

.

13

14

Geum urbanum

Geu urb

43

.

.

25

29

Paris quadrifolia

Par qua

43

.

13

13

29

Cerastium sylvaticum

Cer syl

71

.

13

13

.

Galeobdolon montanum

Gal mon

71

.

63

13

.

Stachys sylvatica

Sta syl

71

.

13

25

29

Anemone ranunculoides

Ane ran

71

18

13

13

.

Asarum europaeum

Asa eur

71

18

75

75

71

Viola riviniana

Vio riv

71

9

.

13

.

Brachypodium sylvaticum

Bra syl

100

18

75

63

100

Galanthus nivalis

Gal niv

100

18

13

38

14

Pulmonaria officinalis

Pul off

100

18

38

63

57

Salvia glutinosa

Sal glu

86

45

75

75

71

Knautia drymea

Kna dry

71

55

50

25

29

Clematis vitalba

Cle vit

71

45

13

63

43

Cruciata glabra

Cru gla

57

18

75

25

29

Dryopteris filix-mas

Dry fil

43

9

13

13

.

Lunaria rediviva

Lun red

43

36

.

25

.

Symphytum tuberosum

Sym tub

43

27

25

13

29

Gagea lutea

Gag lut

29

27

13

.

29

Fragaria vesca

Fra ves

14

9

38

13

14

Anemone trifolia

Ane tri

14

9

.

13

.

Cyclamen purpurascens

Cyc pur

14

18

13

13

.

Listera ovata

Lis ova

14

9

13

.

.

Primula vulgaris

Pri vul

29

82

63

50

14

Leontodon incanus

Leo inc

.

100

13

.

.

Viola hirta

Vio hir

.

64

25

13

43

Geranium phaeum

Ger pha

.

36

.

.

 

Clinopodium vulgare

Cli vul

.

18

13

.

14

Peucedanum oreoselinum

Peu ore

.

9

13

.

.

Carex alba

Car alb

.

9

13

25

14

Corydalis cava

Cor cav

.

9

13

25

43

Rubus fruticosus

Rub fru

.

9

25

38

43

Vinca minor

Vin min

.

9

.

13

14

Euonymus europaea juv.

Euo eur

.

.

38

75

71

Ligustrum vulgare juv.

Lig vul

.

.

25

25

43

Crataegus monogyna juv.

Cra mon

.

.

.

50

29

Ulmus laevis juv.

Ulm lae

.

.

13

13

29

Fraxinus excelsior juv.

Fra exc

.

.

.

13

43

Prunus padus juv.

Pru pad

.

.

.

13

29

Quercus robur juv.

Que rob

.

.

.

25

14

Acer campestre juv.

Ace cam

.

.

.

13

14

Rhamnus catharticus juv.

Rha cat

.

.

13

.

14

Frangula alnus juv.

Fra aln

.

.

.

.

29

Populus alba juv.

Pop alb

.

.

25

.

.

Lythrum salicaria

Lyt sal

.

.

.

13

.

Cornus sanguinea juv.

Cor san

.

.

25

13

29

Disturbed habitats

Impatiens glandulifera

Imp gla

14

.

25

.

14

Eupatorium cannabinum

Eup can

29

.

13

13

.

Stelaria montana

Ste mon

100

.

50

50

14

Erigeron anuus

Eri anu

71

9

75

25

14

Cardamine impatiens

Car imp

71

.

25

13

.

Alliaria petiolata

All pet

86

18

.

25

43

Solidago gigantea

Sol gig

100

45

75

100

86

Aegopodium podagraria

Aeg pod

86

100

88

50

100

Cruciata laevipes

Cru lae

43

18

13

13

14

Rudbeckia laciniata

Rud lac

57

18

63

63

14

Oxalis corniculata

Oxa cor

43

9

.

.

.

Carex hirta

Car hir

29

18

.

13

.

Glechoma hederacea

Gle hed

23

73

38

13

14

Cardamine hirsuta

Car hir

.

18

.

.

.

Lamium maculatum

Lam mac

.

9

.

13

.

Pastinaca sativa

Pas sat

.

9

.

.

.

Urtica dioica

Urt dio

.

.

38

50

.

Indifferent habitat preference

Oxalis acetosella

Oxa ace

14

.

13

.

14

Lysimachia vulgaris

Lys vul

43

.

25

13

100

Melica nutans

Mel nut

71

.

75

38

57

Rubus caesius

Rub cae

86

.

25

38

43

Dactylis glomerata

Dac glom

86

82

50

13

.

Anemone nemorosa

Ane nem

71

64

38

13

29

Taraxacum officinale

Tar off

71

27

13

.

.

Ficaria verna

Fic ver

43

18

13

.

14

Galeopsis tetrahit

Gal tet

43

9

25

13

43

Hedera helix

Hed hel

43

27

.

25

57

Lysimachia nummularia

Lys num

43

27

.

13

14

Symphytum officinale

Sym off

43

9

.

.

14

Vicia sepium

Vic sep

14

9

13

.

.

Cardaminopsis arenosa

Car are

.

27

.

.

29

Ranunculus repens

Ran rep

.

36

.

.

.

Solanum dulcamara

Sol dul

.

18

.

13

.

Sambucus nigra juv.

Sam nig

.

.

13

.

14

Robinia pseudacacia juv.

Rob pse

.

.

13

25

29

Deschampsia cespitosa

Des cae

.

.

38

13

.

Calamagrosits arundinacea

Cal aru

.

.

.

25

.

Campanula persicifolia

Cam per

.

.

25

.

.

Dactlylorhiza maculata

Dac mac

.

.

13

13

.

  1. G1 – Twinspan cluster Nr. 1; G2 – Twinspan cluster Nr. 2. Species are grouped according to habitat preferences by Ellenberg et al. (1992).
  2. Species values are percentage frequencies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Škornik, S., Šajna, N., Kramberger, B. et al. Last Remnants of Riparian Wooded Meadows along the Middle Drava River (Slovenia): Species Composition Is a Response to Light Conditions and Management. Folia Geobot 43, 431–445 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-008-9024-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-008-9024-7

Keywords

Navigation