Abstract
In the present study, we investigated the species richness and species composition in relation to light and management regime in remnants of wooded meadows within the riparian forests along the middle Drava River in Slovenia. 41 plots of still managed and, at different time periods (<5 yrs, 5–15 yrs, >15 yrs), abandoned riparian wooded meadows (RWM) were sampled. In addition to vegetation relevés, light intensity (PAR) was also measured in plots. Within the still-managed RWM, two floristically distinct types were recognized using TWINSPAN analysis: meadow-like and forest-like. Light intensity differed significantly between types. The CCA of active RWM showed a significant relation between species composition and light conditions. The number of species per relevé on active RWM was negatively correlated with light intensity – in contrast to North European wooded grasslands. This could be explained by the influence of species-rich riparian hornbeam forests that contribute many understorey species, in contrast to naturally mesotrophic meadows. CCA of both active and abandoned RWM demonstrated that light was a good predictor of RWM species composition and that abandonment caused profound changes in floristic composition. The species turnover during succession was more pronounced in less shaded meadow-like RWM where more light-requiring (grassland) species occurred. Species richness was the highest in active forest-like RWM. There were no significant differences in species richness between active meadow-like RWM and groups of abandoned RWM. The remains of riparian forests stretching along the flood plains of Central and Eastern Europe are considered one of the most natural ecosystems in the prevailing agricultural landscape. But naturalness could be in many cases only the consequence of abandonment of ancient land-use practices, like grazing of livestock, cutting between the trees, litter collecting, etc. Examination of the middle Drava River in Slovenia suggests the need to recognize the remains of ancient cultural landscape.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accetto M (1990) Floristične zanimivosti iz subpanonskega sveta v Sloveniji. Biol Vestn 38:42–47
Bakker JP (1989) Nature management by grazing and cutting. On the ecological significance of grazing and cutting regimes applied ti restore former species-rich grassland communities in the Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Springer Verlag, Wien
Dierschke H (1994) Pflanzensoziologie: Grundlage und Methode. Verlag Ulmer, Stuttgart
Einarsson A, Milberg P (1999) Species richness and distribution in relation to light in wooded meadows and pastures in southern Sweden. Ann Bot Fennici 36:99–107
Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Ed. 5. Verlag Ulmer, Stuttgart
Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Dull R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Datenbank. Scripta Geobot 18:1–258
Hansson M, Fogelfors H (2000) Management of a semi-natural grassland; results from a 15-year-old experiment in Southern Sweden. J Veg Sci 11:31–38
Hill MO (1979) DECORANA: A Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Department of Ecology & Systematics, Cornell University Ithaca, New York
Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58
Hill MO, Šmilauer P (2005) TWINSPAN for Windows version 2.3. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology & University of South Bohemia, Huntingdon & České Budějovice.
Huhta AP (1996) Vegetation changes in semi-natural meadows after abandonment in coastal northern Finland. Nordic J Bot 16:457–472
Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Klimeš L (1995) Small-scale distribution of species richness in a grassland (Bílé Karpaty Mountains, Czech Republic). Folia Geobot Phytotax 30:499–510
Klimeš L (1997) Druhové bohatství luk v Bílých Karpatech. Sborn Přír Klubu v Uherském Hradišti 2:31–42
Klimeš L (1999) Small-scale plant mobility in a species-rich grassland. J Veg Sci 10:209–219
Klimeš L, Dančák M, Hájek M, Jongepierová I, Kučera T (2001) Scale-dependent biases in species counts in a grassland. J Veg Sci 12:699–704
Kotiluoto R (1998) Vegetation changes in restored semi-natural meadows in the Turku Archipelago of SW Finland. Pl Ecol 136:53–67
Köppen W (1923) Die Klimate der Erde. De Gruyter Berlin, Leipzig
Kramberger B, Klemenčič S (2003) Effect of harvest date on the chemical composition and nutritive value of Cerastium holosteoides. Grass Forage Sci 58:12–16
Kukk T, Kull K (1997) Puisniidud (Wooded meadows). Estonia Marit 2:1–249
Kull K, Zobel M (1991) High species richness in an Estonian wooded meadow. J Veg Sci 2:15–718
Martinčič A, Wraber T, Jogan N, Podobnik A, Turk B, Vreš B (2007) Mala flora Slovenije. Ključ za določanje praprotnic in semenk (Flora of Slovenia in brief. Identification key for the ferns and flowering plants). Tehniška založba Slovenije, Ljubljana
Mitlacher K, Poschlod P, Rosén E, Bakker JP (2002) Restoration of wooded meadows – a comparative analysis along a chronosequence on Öland (Sweden). Appl Veg Sci 5:63–73.
Mlinšek D (1996) Quality in forestry – an attempt at integrated forestry. In Potočnik (ed) Kakovost v gozdarstvu. Department of Forestry and Department of Wood Technology Ljubljana, pp 29–45
Mucina L, Grabherr G, Ellmauer T (eds) (1993) Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Teil I. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena
Paal J (1998) Rare and threatened plant communities of Estonia. Biodiversity Conserv 7:1027–1049
Pärtel M, Kalamees R, Zobel M, Rosén E (1998) Restoration of species-rich limestone grassland communities from overgrown land: the importance of propagule availability. Ecol Engin 10:275–286
Sjörs H (1954) Meadows in Grangärde Finnmark, SW Dalarna, Sweden. Acta Phytogeogr Suecica 34:135
Spjotvoll E, Stoline MR (1973) An extension of the T-method of multiple comparisons to include the cases of unequal sample size. J Amer Statist Assoc 68:976–978
SPSS Inc (2006) SPSS Base 15.00 User’s Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago IL
Škornik S, Kaligarič M (2002) Variety of dry and semi-dry secondary grasslands (Festuco-Brometea) in Slovenia – contact area of different geoelements. Razpr SAZU 3:227–246
ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvalue technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179
ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and canodraw for windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power Ithaca, NY, USA
van der Maarel E (1979) Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39:97–114
Westhoff V, van der Maarel E (1973) The Braun-Blanquet approach. In Whittaker RH (ed) Ordination and classification of vegetation. Handbook of Vegetation Science 5, Junk, The Hague, pp 156–172
Zobel M, Suurkask M, Rosén E, Pärtel M (1996) The dynamics of species richness in experimentally restored calcareous grassland. J Veg Sci 7:203–210
Žiberna I (2000) Geografski oris slovenskega Podravja (Geographical outline of the Slovenian region of Podravje). In Mauch P (ed) Drava nekoč in danes: zemljepisne, zgodovinske in etnološke značilnosti sveta ob Dravi; splavarstvo in energetika (Drava River in the past and present: geographical, historical and ethnological characteristics of the Drava River area; timber rafting and energetics). Založba Obzorja Maribor, pp 19–65
Acknowledgements
The research for this paper was funded by the program group “Biodiversity” (P1–0078) and the research project “Biodiversity gradient in relation to biogeographic, altitudinal and ecological factors” (J1–6577) both headed by B. Kryštufek and granted fby the Slovenian Research Agency. We are grateful to our ex-students Helena Rižnar and Melita Caf, who performed some measurements and collaborated in the field work. We wish to express our gratitude to ornithologist Borut Štumberger, an expert on the Drava region, who introduced us to the area of RWM and encouraged us to do further research. We also thank the three anonymous referees for constructive comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
A list of 129 vascular plant species recorded in the herb layer of the 41 relevés of riparian wooded meadows (RWM) along the Drava River in Slovenia
| Active | Abandoned | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1 | G2 | <5 yr | 5–15 yr | >15 yr | ||
Grassland communities | ||||||
Valeriana officinalis | Val off | 43 | . | . | . | . |
Serratula tinctoria | Ser tin | 14 | . | . | 13 | . |
Thalictrum flavum | Tha fla | 29 | . | 13 | 13 | . |
Arabidopsis thaliana | Ara tha | 71 | 9 | 25 | 63 | 43 |
Angelica sylvestris | Ang syl | 57 | 9 | 13 | 13 | 29 |
Centaura carniolica | Cen car | 71 | 36 | 50 | 38 | 14 |
Ajuga reptans | Aju rep | 86 | 73 | 63 | 25 | 43 |
Galium mollugo | Gal mol | 71 | 82 | 75 | 63 | 43 |
Cirsium oleraceum | Cir ole | 57 | 27 | 38 | 25 | 14 |
Colchicum autumnale | Col aut | 57 | 55 | 88 | 38 | 57 |
Heracleum sphondylium | Her sph | 57 | 18 | 38 | 25 | 29 |
Brachypodium pinnatum | Bra pin | 43 | 91 | 63 | 63 | 71 |
Pimpinella major | Pim maj | 14 | 73 | 25 | 50 | 29 |
Anthriscus sylvestris | Ant syl | 29 | 18 | . | . | . |
Filipendula ulmaria | Fil ulm | 29 | 9 | 50 | 38 | 14 |
Vicia cracca | Vic cra | 29 | 27 | 25 | 13 | 29 |
Orchis militaris | Orc mil | 29 | 45 | 25 | . | 25 |
Plantago lanceolata | Pla lan | 29 | 55 | 13 | 13 | . |
Crepis biennis | Cre bie | 14 | 9 | 13 | . | . |
Euphorbia cyparissias | Eup cyp | 14 | 27 | 25 | 13 | 14 |
Prunella vulgaris | Pru vul | 14 | 45 | 25 | . | . |
Ranunculus acris | Ran acr | 14 | 91 | 50 | . | . |
Trifolium pratense | Tri pra | 14 | 64 | . | . | . |
Arrhenatherum elatior | Arr ela | . | 100 | 13 | . | . |
Achillea millefolium | Ach mil | . | 73 | 38 | . | . |
Briza media | Bri med | . | 55 | . | . | . |
Trifolium repens | Tri rep | . | 55 | . | . | . |
Centaurea jacea | Cen jac | . | 45 | . | . | . |
Plantago media | Pla med | . | 45 | 13 | . | . |
Bromopsis erecta | Bro ere | . | 36 | . | . | . |
Lathyrus pratensis | Lat pra | . | 36 | . | . | . |
Pimpinella saxifraga | Pim sax | . | 27 | . | . | . |
Trifolium montanum | Tri mon | . | 27 | . | . | . |
Leucanthemum ircutianum | Leu irc | . | 18 | . | . | . |
Linum catharcticum | Lin cat | . | 18 | . | . | . |
Lotus corniculatus | Lot cor | . | 18 | . | 14 | |
Salvia pratensis | Sal pra | . | 18 | . | . | . |
Agrimonia eupatoria | Agr eup | . | 9 | 13 | . | . |
Knautia arvensis | Kna arv | . | 9 | . | . | . |
Sanguisorba officinalis | San off | . | 9 | . | . | . |
Woodland and shrubland communities | ||||||
Humulus lupulus | Hum lup | 14 | . | . | 13 | 29 |
Euphorbia epithymoides | Eup epi | 29 | . | . | . | . |
Polygonatum latifolium | Pol lat | 43 | . | 13 | . | . |
Festuca gigantea | Fes gig | 43 | . | . | 13 | 14 |
Geum urbanum | Geu urb | 43 | . | . | 25 | 29 |
Paris quadrifolia | Par qua | 43 | . | 13 | 13 | 29 |
Cerastium sylvaticum | Cer syl | 71 | . | 13 | 13 | . |
Galeobdolon montanum | Gal mon | 71 | . | 63 | 13 | . |
Stachys sylvatica | Sta syl | 71 | . | 13 | 25 | 29 |
Anemone ranunculoides | Ane ran | 71 | 18 | 13 | 13 | . |
Asarum europaeum | Asa eur | 71 | 18 | 75 | 75 | 71 |
Viola riviniana | Vio riv | 71 | 9 | . | 13 | . |
Brachypodium sylvaticum | Bra syl | 100 | 18 | 75 | 63 | 100 |
Galanthus nivalis | Gal niv | 100 | 18 | 13 | 38 | 14 |
Pulmonaria officinalis | Pul off | 100 | 18 | 38 | 63 | 57 |
Salvia glutinosa | Sal glu | 86 | 45 | 75 | 75 | 71 |
Knautia drymea | Kna dry | 71 | 55 | 50 | 25 | 29 |
Clematis vitalba | Cle vit | 71 | 45 | 13 | 63 | 43 |
Cruciata glabra | Cru gla | 57 | 18 | 75 | 25 | 29 |
Dryopteris filix-mas | Dry fil | 43 | 9 | 13 | 13 | . |
Lunaria rediviva | Lun red | 43 | 36 | . | 25 | . |
Symphytum tuberosum | Sym tub | 43 | 27 | 25 | 13 | 29 |
Gagea lutea | Gag lut | 29 | 27 | 13 | . | 29 |
Fragaria vesca | Fra ves | 14 | 9 | 38 | 13 | 14 |
Anemone trifolia | Ane tri | 14 | 9 | . | 13 | . |
Cyclamen purpurascens | Cyc pur | 14 | 18 | 13 | 13 | . |
Listera ovata | Lis ova | 14 | 9 | 13 | . | . |
Primula vulgaris | Pri vul | 29 | 82 | 63 | 50 | 14 |
Leontodon incanus | Leo inc | . | 100 | 13 | . | . |
Viola hirta | Vio hir | . | 64 | 25 | 13 | 43 |
Geranium phaeum | Ger pha | . | 36 | . | . | |
Clinopodium vulgare | Cli vul | . | 18 | 13 | . | 14 |
Peucedanum oreoselinum | Peu ore | . | 9 | 13 | . | . |
Carex alba | Car alb | . | 9 | 13 | 25 | 14 |
Corydalis cava | Cor cav | . | 9 | 13 | 25 | 43 |
Rubus fruticosus | Rub fru | . | 9 | 25 | 38 | 43 |
Vinca minor | Vin min | . | 9 | . | 13 | 14 |
Euonymus europaea juv. | Euo eur | . | . | 38 | 75 | 71 |
Ligustrum vulgare juv. | Lig vul | . | . | 25 | 25 | 43 |
Crataegus monogyna juv. | Cra mon | . | . | . | 50 | 29 |
Ulmus laevis juv. | Ulm lae | . | . | 13 | 13 | 29 |
Fraxinus excelsior juv. | Fra exc | . | . | . | 13 | 43 |
Prunus padus juv. | Pru pad | . | . | . | 13 | 29 |
Quercus robur juv. | Que rob | . | . | . | 25 | 14 |
Acer campestre juv. | Ace cam | . | . | . | 13 | 14 |
Rhamnus catharticus juv. | Rha cat | . | . | 13 | . | 14 |
Frangula alnus juv. | Fra aln | . | . | . | . | 29 |
Populus alba juv. | Pop alb | . | . | 25 | . | . |
Lythrum salicaria | Lyt sal | . | . | . | 13 | . |
Cornus sanguinea juv. | Cor san | . | . | 25 | 13 | 29 |
Disturbed habitats | ||||||
Impatiens glandulifera | Imp gla | 14 | . | 25 | . | 14 |
Eupatorium cannabinum | Eup can | 29 | . | 13 | 13 | . |
Stelaria montana | Ste mon | 100 | . | 50 | 50 | 14 |
Erigeron anuus | Eri anu | 71 | 9 | 75 | 25 | 14 |
Cardamine impatiens | Car imp | 71 | . | 25 | 13 | . |
Alliaria petiolata | All pet | 86 | 18 | . | 25 | 43 |
Solidago gigantea | Sol gig | 100 | 45 | 75 | 100 | 86 |
Aegopodium podagraria | Aeg pod | 86 | 100 | 88 | 50 | 100 |
Cruciata laevipes | Cru lae | 43 | 18 | 13 | 13 | 14 |
Rudbeckia laciniata | Rud lac | 57 | 18 | 63 | 63 | 14 |
Oxalis corniculata | Oxa cor | 43 | 9 | . | . | . |
Carex hirta | Car hir | 29 | 18 | . | 13 | . |
Glechoma hederacea | Gle hed | 23 | 73 | 38 | 13 | 14 |
Cardamine hirsuta | Car hir | . | 18 | . | . | . |
Lamium maculatum | Lam mac | . | 9 | . | 13 | . |
Pastinaca sativa | Pas sat | . | 9 | . | . | . |
Urtica dioica | Urt dio | . | . | 38 | 50 | . |
Indifferent habitat preference | ||||||
Oxalis acetosella | Oxa ace | 14 | . | 13 | . | 14 |
Lysimachia vulgaris | Lys vul | 43 | . | 25 | 13 | 100 |
Melica nutans | Mel nut | 71 | . | 75 | 38 | 57 |
Rubus caesius | Rub cae | 86 | . | 25 | 38 | 43 |
Dactylis glomerata | Dac glom | 86 | 82 | 50 | 13 | . |
Anemone nemorosa | Ane nem | 71 | 64 | 38 | 13 | 29 |
Taraxacum officinale | Tar off | 71 | 27 | 13 | . | . |
Ficaria verna | Fic ver | 43 | 18 | 13 | . | 14 |
Galeopsis tetrahit | Gal tet | 43 | 9 | 25 | 13 | 43 |
Hedera helix | Hed hel | 43 | 27 | . | 25 | 57 |
Lysimachia nummularia | Lys num | 43 | 27 | . | 13 | 14 |
Symphytum officinale | Sym off | 43 | 9 | . | . | 14 |
Vicia sepium | Vic sep | 14 | 9 | 13 | . | . |
Cardaminopsis arenosa | Car are | . | 27 | . | . | 29 |
Ranunculus repens | Ran rep | . | 36 | . | . | . |
Solanum dulcamara | Sol dul | . | 18 | . | 13 | . |
Sambucus nigra juv. | Sam nig | . | . | 13 | . | 14 |
Robinia pseudacacia juv. | Rob pse | . | . | 13 | 25 | 29 |
Deschampsia cespitosa | Des cae | . | . | 38 | 13 | . |
Calamagrosits arundinacea | Cal aru | . | . | . | 25 | . |
Campanula persicifolia | Cam per | . | . | 25 | . | . |
Dactlylorhiza maculata | Dac mac | . | . | 13 | 13 | . |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Škornik, S., Šajna, N., Kramberger, B. et al. Last Remnants of Riparian Wooded Meadows along the Middle Drava River (Slovenia): Species Composition Is a Response to Light Conditions and Management. Folia Geobot 43, 431–445 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-008-9024-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-008-9024-7