Skip to main content
Log in

Polymicrobial biofilms by diabetic foot clinical isolates

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a major chronic disease that continues to increase significantly. One of the most important and costly complications of diabetes is foot ulceration that may be colonized by pathogenic and antimicrobial resistant bacteria, which may express several virulence factors that could impair treatment success. These bacterial communities can be organized in polymicrobial biofilms, which may be responsible for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) chronicity. We evaluated the influence of polymicrobial communities in the ability of DFU isolates to produce biofilm, using a microtiter plate assay and a multiplex fluorescent in situ hybridization, at three time points (24, 48, 72 h), after evaluating biofilm formation by 95 DFU isolates belonging to several bacterial genera (Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter). All isolates were biofilm-positive at 24 h, and the amount of biofilm produced increased with incubation time. Pseudomonas presented the higher biofilm production, followed by Corynebacterium, Acinetobacter, Staphylococcus and Enterococcus. Significant differences were found in biofilm formation between the three time points. Polymicrobial communities produced higher biofilm values than individual species. Pseudomonas + Enterococcus, Acinetobacter + Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium + Staphylococcus produced higher biofilm than the ones formed by E. faecalis + Staphylococcus and E. faecalis + Corynebacterium. Synergy between bacteria present in dual or multispecies biofilms has been described, and this work represents the first report on time course of biofilm formation by polymicrobial communities from DFUs including several species. The biological behavior of different bacterial species in polymicrobial biofilms has important clinical implications for the successful treatment of these infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bessman AN, Geiger PJ, Canawati H (1992) Prevalence of Corynebacteria in diabetic foot infections. Diabetes Care 15:1531–1533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling FL, Jude EB, Boulton AJ (2009) MRSA and diabetic foot wounds: contaminating or infection organisms? Curr Diabetes Rep 9:440–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brogden KA, Guthmiller JM, Taylor CE (2005) Human polymicrobial infections. Lancet 365:253–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burmølle M, Webb JS, Rao D, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Kjelleberg S (2006) Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in multispecies biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3916–3923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:167–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd SE, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Smith E, Rhoads D (2008) Polymicrobial nature of chronic diabetic foot ulcer biofilm infections determined using bacterial tag encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). PLoS One 3:e3326. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Espinal P, Martí S, Vila J (2012) Effect of biofilm formation on the survival of Acinetobacter baumannii on dry surfaces. J Hosp Infect 80:56–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim NH, Somily AM, Bassyouni RH, Zain El-Aabedien A (2012) Comparative study assessing the effect of tigecycline and moxifloxacin in prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm. Life Sci J 9:1016–1024

    Google Scholar 

  • James JA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, Pulcini ED, Secor P, Sestrich J, Costerton JW, Stewart PS (2008) Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 16:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malik A, Mohammad Z, Ahmad J (2013) The diabetic foot infections: biofilms and antimicrobial resistance. Diabetes Metab Sindr 7:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes JJ, Marques-Costa A, Vilela C, Neves J, Candeias N, Cavaco-Silva P, Melo-Cristino J (2012) Clinical and bacteriological survey of diabetic foot infections in Lisbon. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 95:153–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed JA, Huang DB (2007) Biofilm formation by enterococci. J Med Microbiol 56:1581–1588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira M, Nunes SF, Carneiro C, Bexiga R, Bernardo F, Vilela CL (2007) Time course of biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis mastitis isolates. Vet Microbiol 124:187–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otto M (2008) Staphylococcal Biofilms. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 322:207–228

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit RK, Weber CA, Kean MJ, Hoffmann H, Pettit GR, Tan R, Franks KS, Horton ML (2005) Microplate Alamar blue assay for Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemoter 49:2612–2617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richard JL, Lavigne JP, Sotto A (2012) Diabetes and foot infection: more than double trouble. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 28:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sivanmaliappan TS, Sevanan M (2011) Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from diabetes patients with foot ulcers. Int J Microbiol 2011:605195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanović S, Cirković I, Ranin L, Svabić-Vlahović M (2004) Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:428–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swarna SR, Madhavan R, Gomathi S, Devaraj, Thamaraiselvi S (2012) A study of Biofilm on Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Int J Res Pharm Biomed Sci 3:1809–1814

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton RB, Rigby PJ, Wiertsema SP, Filion P, Langlands J, Coates HL, Vijayasekaran S, Keil AD, Richmond PC (2011) Multi-species bacterial biofilm and intracellular infection in otitis media. BMC Pediatr 11:94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization Geneva (2011) Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. WHO Library. 164 pp. ISBN 978 92 4 068645 8

  • Xu L, McLennan SV, Lo L, Natfaji A, Bolton T, Liu Y, Twigg SM, Yue DK (2007) Bacterial load predicts healing rate in neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 30:378–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Liu Y, Wu H, Hóiby N, Molin S, Song ZJ (2011) Current understanding of multi-species biofilms. Int J Oral Sci 3:74–81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with the financial support of the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT Project PTDC/SAU-MIC/122816/2010-Biofilms in diabetic foot: microbial virulence characterization and cross-talk of major isolates). Carla Mottola holds a PhD fellowship (SFRH/BD/72872/2010) from FCT, Portugal.

Compliance with ethical standards

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mottola, C., Mendes, J.J., Cristino, J.M. et al. Polymicrobial biofilms by diabetic foot clinical isolates. Folia Microbiol 61, 35–43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-015-0401-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-015-0401-3

Keywords

Navigation