Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison Process Between Wet Lay-Up, Single Vacuum Bagging and Double Vacuum Bagging Toward Natural Fibre (Palm, Coconut and Kenaf) Reinforced Epoxy Composite Laminates

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanical properties of palm, coconut, and kenaf fibre-reinforced epoxy composite laminates were evaluated using tensile (ASTM D3039) and flexural (ASTM D790) tests. The laminates were fabricated using different methods such as double vacuum bagging, single vacuum bagging, and wet lay-up. Results indicate that double vacuum bagging produced superior mechanical properties (up to 54.12% higher flexural modulus) compared to single vacuum bagging and wet lay-up methods. SEM images showed complete impregnation of fibres and a good interface between fibre and matrix in the composites produced via the double vacuum bagging method. This process creates a denser sample and allows the resin to penetrate the plies and core, eliminating voids in the laminate structure. Additionally, kenaf fibre-reinforced epoxy composite laminates exhibited higher mechanical properties (up to 104.82% higher tensile strength) compared to palm and coconut fibre-reinforced epoxy composite laminates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available on request from the authors.

References

  1. V.K. Balla, K.H. Kate, J. Satyavolu, P. Singh, J.G.D. Tadimeti, Compos. Part B Eng. 174, 106956 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Saba, M. Jawaid, O.Y. Alothman, M.T. Paridah, Constr. Build. Mater. 106, 149 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Huang, Q. Fu, L. Yan, B. Kasal, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 13, 1441 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Rajeshkumar, S. Arvindh Seshadri, G.L. Devnani, M.R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, J. Prakash Maran, N.A. Al-Dhabi, P. Karuppiah, V.A. Mariadhas, N. Sivarajasekar, A. Ronaldo Anuf, J. Clean. Prod. 310, 127483 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.R. Sanjay, P. Madhu, M. Jawaid, P. Senthamaraikannan, S. Senthil, S. Pradeep, J. Clean. Prod. 172, 566 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Li, Y. Pu, V.M. Thomas, C.G. Yoo, S. Ozcan, Y. Deng, K. Nelson, A.J. Ragauskas, Compos. Part B Eng. 200, 108254 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Peças, H. Carvalho, H. Salman, M. Leite, J. Compos. Sci. 2, 66 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Dixit, R. Goel, A. Dubey, P.R. Shivhare, T. Bhalavi, Polym. Renew. Resour. 8, 71 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Hallonet, E. Ferrier, L. Michel, B. Benmokrane, Constr. Build. Mater. 205, 679 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Amirkhosravi, M. Pishvar, M.C. Altan, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 98, 227 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.-W. Shi, W.-H. Cao, L. Chen, A.-L. Li, Constr. Build. Mater. 238, 117664 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S.G.K. Schechter, T. Centea, S. Nutt, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 130, 105723 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Levy, J. Kratz, P. Hubert, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 68, 365 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Mujahid, N. Sallih, M.Z. Abdullah, Advances in Manufacturing Engineering (Springer, Singapore, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Alam Khan, A.H. Mahmood, S. Ahmed, R.J. Day, Polym. Compos. 34, 942 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Gardiner, Double-bag infusion: 70% fiber volume? (CompositesWorld, 2010), https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/double-bag-infusion-70-fiber-volume. Accessed 14 April 2023

  17. Y. Reneta Nafu, J. Foba-Tendo, E. Njeugna, G. Oliver, K. Omar Cooke, J. Appl. Chem. 2015, 750818 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Muensri, T. Kunanopparat, P. Menut, S. Siriwattanayotin, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 42, 173 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N.I.S. Anuar, S. Zakaria, S. Gan, C.H. Chia, C. Wang, J. Harun, Ind. Crops Prod. 127, 55 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Widnyana, I.G. Rian, I.W. Surata, T.G.T. Nindhia, Mater. Today: Proc. 22, 300 (2020)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. G.K. Indu, P. Senthilkumar, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 11, 1879 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for Fundamental Research Grant Scheme with Project Code: FRGS/1/2022/TK04/USM/03/7 and Universiti Sains Malaysia for sponsoring the postdoctoral fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Shukur Zainol Abidin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zakaria, M.R., Ahmad Thirmizir, M.Z., Zainol Abidin, M.S. et al. A Comparison Process Between Wet Lay-Up, Single Vacuum Bagging and Double Vacuum Bagging Toward Natural Fibre (Palm, Coconut and Kenaf) Reinforced Epoxy Composite Laminates. Fibers Polym 24, 2107–2116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00204-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00204-w

Keywords

Navigation