Abstract
A hollow fiber poses great potential as it can provide superior performance at low weight and low cost. Its unique properties come from its geometry, the presence of void and air inclusion, but controlling it is a challenging problem. This study explores how the geometry of a die influences fiber hollowness. Fibers were extruded from dies with four segmented arcs, 4-C, which had varying die wall thickness and constant inner diameter. The effects of die wall thickness on wall-shear rate, solidification, spinnability, and hollow fiber geometry are evaluated under various processing conditions. Both processing parameters and die wall thickness influence hollow fiber dimensions and hollowness, but die wall thickness has the largest impact. Reduction of die wall thickness decreases fiber wall thickness, increases the outer and inner diameter, and increases hollowness. It can be explained by higher die hollowness and faster extrudate solidification. However, the thinnest die shows reduced spinnability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. P. Aneja, D. G. Bennie, R. J. Collins, H. R. E. Frankfort, S. B. Johnson, B. H. Knox, and E. E. Most, U.S. Patent, 5585182 (1996).
S. Omeroglu, E. Karaca, and B. Becerir, Text. Res. J., 80, 1180 (2010).
A. Suzuki and H. Ohnishi, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 102, 2600 (2006).
M. S. Lee and S. Y. Kim, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81, 2170 (2001).
A. de Rovère and R. L. Shambaugh, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40, 176 (2001).
T. H. Oh, M. S. Lee, S. Y. Kim, and H. J. Shim, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 68, 1209 (1998).
V. T. Marla, R. L. Shambaugh, and D. V. Papavassiliou, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45, 2331 (2006).
Y. Y. Su, S. P. Rwei, L. Y. Wu, Y. T. Lin, T. C. An, W. P. Lin, S. P. Chien, and L. Y. Lin, Polym. Eng. Sci., 51, 704 (2011).
T. H. Oh, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 104, 2522 (2007).
S. J. Rwei, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 82, 2896 (2001).
R. Hufenus, Y. Yan, M. Dauner, and T. Kikutani, Materials, 13, 4298 (2020).
K. Kim, S. J. Doh, J. N. Im, W. Y. Jeong, H. J. An, and D. Y. Lim, Fiber. Polym., 14, 639 (2013).
T. Oh, Polym. Eng. Sci., 46, 609 (2006).
E. E. Most, U.S. Patent, 4444710 (1984).
W. Takarada, H. Ito, T. Kikutani, and N. Okui, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 80, 1575 (2001).
R. Ruckdashel and E. Shim, J. Eng. Fibers Fabrics, 15, 155892501989968 (2020).
J. A. Brydson, “Flow Properties of Polymer Melts”, 2nd ed., pp.21–34, Godwin in Association with the Plastics and Rubber Institute, London, 1981.
W. Takarada, H. Ito, T. Kikutani, and N. Okui, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 80, 1582 (2001).
K. W. Hutchenson, D. D. Edie, and D. M. Riggs, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 29, 3621 (1984).
D. Petrulis, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 92, 2017 (2004).
C. M. A. Joansson, “The Physics of Melt Spinning”, University of Leeds, England, 1966.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Nonwovens Institute at North Carolina State University for funding this work and their technical staff for their assistance on hollow fiber production.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruckdashel, R., Shim, E. Hollowness Variation with Die Wall Thickness in Melt-Spinning of Polypropylene Hollow Fibers. Fibers Polym 23, 1256–1265 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-022-4498-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-022-4498-0