Abstract
This paper presents an experimental and finite element (FE) simulation study on back face bulge formation in p-aramid composite, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) composite and p-aramid/UHMWPE hybrid composite under normal projectile impact. The experimental evaluation revels that the back face deformation in p-aramid/UHMWPE hybrid composite has been found 75–80 % and 16–18 % lower than the back face deformation in UHMWPE and p-aramid composite respectively. The hybrid composite with UHMWPE striking faces showed 7–13 % more deformation as compared to with p-aramid striking face. The average percentage difference in finite element simulation and experimental results has been found around 10 %. Further, it has been observed almost 20 % and 38 % more deformations for the hybrid composite of UHMWPE layers at the front and middle position respectively as compared to UHMWPE layers at back end.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. E. Shalin, “Polymer Matrix Composite”, Soviet Advanced Composites Technology Series 4, pp.12–22, Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg, 2012.
M. A. Meyers, “Dynamic Behavior of Materials”, 2nd ed., pp.31–38, Wiley Publications, New York, 1994.
G. B. Dor, A. Dubinsky, and T. Elperin, Int. J. Prot. Struct., 3, 275 (2012).
G. B. Dor, A. Dubinsky, and T. Elperin, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 33, 185 (2000).
W. J. Cantwell and J. Morton, Composites, 22, 347 (1991).
D. Fernández, R. Zaera, and J. Fernández, Comput. Struct., 89, 2316 (2011).
N. L. Hancox, “Fibre Composite Hybrid Material”, pp.211–220, Applied Science Press, London, 1981.
W. K. Hong, U. S. Patent, 6676884 (2004).
R. Marissen, Mater. Sci. Appl., 2, 319 (2011).
I. N. Ward and N. H. Ladizesky, Pure Appl. Chem., 57, 1641 (1985).
X. Chen, F. Zhu, and G. Wells, Compos. Part B: Eng., 45, 1508 (2013).
P. K. Porwal and S. L. Phoenix, J. Mech. Mater. Struct., 3, 627 (2008).
G. A. Thomas, “Non-woven Fabrics for Military Applications. In: Military Textiles”, 1st ed. (E. Wilusz Ed.), pp.17–67, CRC Press, Cambridge, 2008.
M. Karahan, A. Kus, and R. Eren, Int. J. Impact Eng., 35, 499 (2008).
B. Harris and A. R. Bunsell, Composites, 6, 197 (1975).
B. Z. Jang, L. C. Chen, C. Z. Wang, H. T. Lin, and R. H. Zee, Compos. Sci. Technol., 34, 305 (1989).
M. Grujicic, B. Pandurangan, K. L. Koudela, and B. A. Cheeseman, Appl. Surface Sci., 253, 730 (2006).
P. J. Hazell and T. G. Appleby, Compos. Struct., 91, 103 (2009).
X. Chen, Y. Zhou, and G. Wells, Compos. Part B: Eng., 58, 35 (2014).
R. J. Muhi, F. Najim, and D. Moura, Compos. Part B: Eng., 40, 798 (2009).
A. K. Singh, D. K. Shukla, and N. E. Prasad, Proc. Structural Integrity, India, 14, 720 (2019).
User’s Manual, “}ANSYS Autodyn 19.0”}, Century Dynamics Inc., 201
Theory Manual, “}AUTODYN 4.0”}, Century Dynamics Inc., 199
T. Lassig, L. Nguyen, M. May, W. Riedel, U. Heisserer, H. Werff, and S. Hiermaier, Int. J. Impact Eng., 75, 110 (2015).
M. Ansari and A. Chakrabarti, Compos. Part B: Eng., 95, 462 (2016).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mechanical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur (India) for generous support in carrying out the experimental work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, A.K., Shukla, D.K. & Prasad, N.E. Deformation Behaviour of Polymeric Hybrid Composite under Impact Loading. Fibers Polym 23, 2042–2051 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-022-2082-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-022-2082-2