Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Core Structures on Low-Velocity Impact Response of PEEK Sandwich Panels Manufactured by FDM

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the dynamic performance of sandwich panels, a bamboo bio-inspired core structural sandwich panel was designed, and two other general structures of sandwich panels, namely, cubic and honeycomb, were designed for comparison. These structural sandwich panels were manufactured using the fused deposition modeling technique. The dynamic responses of sandwich panels with different core structures under 5, 10, and 15 J of impact energy were evaluated and compared through low-velocity impact (LVI) tests. Finally, the non-destructive characterization method was employed to analyze the failure mechanism. Results indicate that the bamboo structural sandwich panels achieved maximum load capacity and absorbed the most energy among the three structural sandwich panels. The bamboo structure exhibited the best performance as the core structure of sandwich panels in resisting LVI. That is, the higher the impact energy and velocity are, the stronger and more brittle the sandwich are.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.K. Gummadi, A. Saini, J.S. Owusu-Danquah, and P. Sikder, Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Porous Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Orthopedic Scaffolds, Jom, 2022, 74, p 3379–3391. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Lumkemann, M. Eichberger, and B. Stawarczyk, Bonding to Different PEEK Compositions: The Impact of Dental Light Curing Units, Materials, 2017, 10(1), p 67. (in English)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. A.D. Schwitalla, F. Botel, T. Zimmermann, M. Sutel, and W.D. Muller, The Impact of Argon/Oxygen low-Pressure Plasma on Shear Bond Strength Between a Veneering Composite and Different PEEK Materials, Dent. Mater., 2017, 33(9), p 990–994. (in English)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A.R. Zanjanijam, I. Major, J.G. Lyons, U. Lafont, and D.M. Devine, Fused Filament Fabrication of PEEK: A Review of Process-Structure-Property Relationships, Polym. Basel, 2020, 12(8), p 1665. (in English)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. El Magri, K. El Mabrouk, S. Vaudreuil, H. Chibane, and M.E. Touhami, Optimization of Printing Parameters for Improvement of Mechanical and Thermal Performances of 3D Printed Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Parts, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2020, 137(37), p 49087. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Zheng, J. Kang, C. Sun, C. Yang, L. Wang, and D. Li, Effects of Printing Path and Material Components on Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Polyether-Ether-Ketone/Hydroxyapatite Composites, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed., 2021, 118, 104475. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Wang, S. Yu, J. Mao, Y. Wang, M. Li, and X. Li, Effect of Basalt Fiber on Tribological and Mechanical Properties of Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Composites, Compos. Struct., 2021, 266, 113847. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Chen, J. Su, H. Wang, L. Yang, H. Cai, M. Li, and Y. Shi, Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Characteristics of Lattice-Surfaced PEEK Cage Fabricated by High-Temperature Laser Powder Bed Fusion, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2022, 125, p 105–117. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Garcia-Gonzalez, M. Rodriguez-Millan, A. Rusinek, and A. Arias, Investigation of Mechanical Impact Behavior of Short Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced PEEK Composites, Compos. Struct., 2015, 133, p 1116–1126. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S.A. Muhsin, P.V. Hatton, A. Johnson, N. Sereno, and D.J. Wood, Determination of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Mechanical Properties as a Denture Material, Saudi Dent. J., 2019, 31, p 382–391. (in English)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. M.V. Hosur, M. Abdullah, and S. Jeelani, Manufacturing and Low-Velocity Impact Characterization of Hollow Integrated Core Sandwich Composites with Hybrid Face Sheets, Compos. Struct., 2004, 65, p 103–115. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Karahan, H. Gül, J. Ivens, and N. Karahan, Low Velocity Impact Characteristics of 3D Integrated Core Sandwich Composites, Text. Res. J., 2012, 82(9), p 945–962. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Liu, W. Zhuang, and D. Wu, Performance and Damage of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Tubes Under Low-Velocity Transverse Impact, Thin Wall Struct., 2020, 151, 106727. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Zhang, L. Yan, C. Zhang, and S. Guo, Low-Velocity Impact Response of Tube-Reinforced Honeycomb Sandwich Structure, Thin Wall Struct., 2021, 158, 107188. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M.S. Azmi, R. Hasan, R. Ismail, and N.A. Rosli, Static and Dynamic Analysis of FDM Printed Lattice Structures for Sustainable Lightweight Material Application, Prog. Indust. Ecol., 2018, 12(3), p 247–259. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Ye, H. Bi, L. Chen, and Y. Hu, Compression and Energy Absorption Performances of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Lattice Core Sandwich Structures, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf., 2019, 6(6), p 333–343. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Liu, H. Song, Z. Wang, J. Wang, and C. Huang, Improving Mechanical Performance of Fused Deposition Modeling Lattice Structures by a Snap-Fitting Method, Mater. Des., 2019, 181, 108065. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Kumar, L. Collini, A. Daurel, and J.Y. Jeng, Design and Additive Manufacturing of Closed Cells from Supportless Lattice Structure, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 33, 101168. (in English)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Zheng, H. Zhao, E. Dong, E. Kang, J. Liu, C. Sun, and L. Wang, Additively-Manufactured PEEK/HA Porous Scaffolds with Highly-Controllable Mechanical Properties and Excellent Biocompatibility, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2021, 128, 112333. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Chen, Q. Luo, M. Meng, Q. Li, and G. Sun, Low Velocity Impact Behavior of Interlayer Hybrid Composite Laminates with Carbon/Glass/Basalt Fibers, Compos. Part B-Eng., 2019, 176, 107191. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. D.S. Gemi, Ö.S. Şahin, and L. Gemi, Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Diameter Upon Low Velocity Impact Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Composite Pipes, Compos. Struct., 2021, 275, 114428. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Liu, W. Hu, R. Zhu, B. Safaei, B. Qin, and F. Chu, Dynamic Responses of Corrugated Cylindrical Shells Subjected to Nonlinear Low-Velocity Impact, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2022, 121, 107321. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Stephen, B. Shivamurthy, M. Mohan, A.H.I. Selvam, and B.H.S. Thimmappa, Low Velocity Impact Behavior of Fabric Reinforced Polymer Composites—A Review, Eng. Sci., 2022, 18, p 75–97. (in English)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Tuo, Z. Lu, X. Ma, J. Xing, and C. Zhang, Damage and Failure Mechanism of Thin Composite Laminates Under Low-Velocity Impact and Compression-After-Impact Loading Conditions, Compos. Part B-Eng., 2019, 163, p 642–654. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Q. Ma, H. Cheng, K.I. Jang, and H. Luan, A Nonlinear Mechanics Model of Bio-inspired Hierarchical Lattice Materials Consisting of Horseshoe Microstructures, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2016, 90, p 179–202. (in English)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Tan, J. Zou, S. Li, P. Jamshidi, A. Abena, and M.M. Attallah, Additive Manufacturing of Bio-inspired Multi-scale Hierarchically Strengthened Lattice Structures, Int. J. Mach. Tool Manuf., 2021, 167, 103764. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. X. Gao, D.J. Zhu, S.T. Fan, and M.Z. Rahman, Structural and Mechanical Properties of Bamboo Fiber Bundle and Fiber/Bundle Reinforced Composites: A Review, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2022, 19, p 2458–2469. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C.O. Ufodike, H. Wang, M.F. Ahmed, and G. Dolzyk, Design and Modeling of Bamboo Biomorphic Structure for In-Plane Energy Absorption Improvement, Mater. Des., 2021, 205, 109736. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Z. Sartip, E. Jayantha, F. Wahid, and J. Leng, Behavior of Continuous Fiber Composite Sandwich Core under Low-Velocity Impact, Thin Wall Struct., 2021, 158, 107157. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Imad, A. Ronald, X. Xiao, and M.D. Sangid, Comparing Non-destructive 3D X-ray Computed Tomography with Destructive Optical Microscopy for Microstructural Characterization of Fiber Reinforced Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2019, 184, 107843. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Elena, N. Michele, D. Fabio, and M. Zarrelli, High Resolution X-ray Computed Tomography: A Versatile Non-destructive Tool to Characterize CFRP-Based Aircraft Composite Elements, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2020, 192, 108093. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Florence, M.A. Jaswin, and A.P. Pandi, Drop-Weight Impact Behavior of Hybrid Fiber/Epoxy Honeycomb Core Sandwich Composites under Hemi-Spherical Impactor, Fiber Polym., 2020, 21, p 1152–1162. (in English)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. T. Iman and F. Abdolhossein, Non-destructive Evaluation of Damage Modes in Nanocomposite Foam-Core Sandwich Panel Subjected to Low-Velocity Impact, Compos. Part B-Eng., 2016, 103, p 51–59. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. W.T. He, J.X. Liu, and B. Tao, Experimental and Numerical Research on the Low Velocity Impact Behavior of Hybrid Corrugated Core Sandwich Structures, Compos. Struct., 2016, 158, p 30–43. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J.J. Andrew, S.M. Srinivasan, and A. Arockiarajan, Parameters Influencing the Impact Response of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Materials: A Critical Review, Compos. Struct., 2019, 224, 111107. (in English)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhou Wen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, Z., Li, M., He, L. et al. Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Core Structures on Low-Velocity Impact Response of PEEK Sandwich Panels Manufactured by FDM. J. of Materi Eng and Perform (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09433-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09433-3

Keywords

Navigation