Skip to main content
Log in

The Analysis and Comparison of the Needle-puncture Property of Four Types of Silkworm Cocoons

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Silkworm cocoons display outstanding properties in many aspects, such as thermal protection, biocompatibility and mechanical resistance and so on. In this paper, we focus on the puncture properties without detailed exploration of four types of cocoons (three domesticated cocoon and Eri silkworm). Different sections, end and middle, as well as different directions, puncturing from inner and outer surface, of four types of aforementioned cocoons were systematically analyzed and compared. The results of present research show that the middle section exhibits a relatively greater needle-puncture resistance compare with end section for three B. mori silkworm cocoons. With regard to different puncture directions, from external and internal surface, puncturing from internal surface exhibits a relatively higher needle-puncture load as well as fracture displacement tendencies compared with needle-puncture performance from external surface no matter in middle or end sections. Combining physical parameter assessment, statistical analysis and needle-puncture performance, this research inspires a clear-cut frame to design a composite with high puncture resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. J. Dai, W. Sun, and Z. Zhang, J. Prot., 192, 366 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Kaur, R. Rajkhowa, T. Tsuzuki, and X. Wang, Mater. Des., 88, 236 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Varadarajan, Modern Asian Studies, 3, 561 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. L. K. Hazarika, C. N. Saikia, A. Kataky, S. Bordoloia, and J. Hazarikab, Bioresour. Technol., 1, 67 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Guan, W. Zhu, B. Liu, K. Yang, F. Vollrath, and J. Xu, Acta Biomaterialia, 47, 60 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Zhang, J. Li, X. Jin, S. Du, J. Kaur, and X. G. Wang, Compos. Commun., 4, 1 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Chen, D. Porter, and F. Vollrath, J. Royal Society Interface, 74, 2299 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Chen, D. Porter, and F. Vollrath, Acta Biomaterialia, 7, 2620 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Chen, D. Porter, and F. Vollrath, Mater. Sci. Eng.: C, 32, 772 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Shan, J. Li, Z. Jin, and X. G. Wang, Mater. Des., 65, 766 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Zhang, R. Rajkhowa, J. L. Li, X. Y. Liu, and X. G. Wang, Mater. Des., 49, 842 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Shi, M. Li, X. Li, X. Zhang, G. Zhang, D. Guo, L. Wang, and B. N. Wei, Mater. Des., 88, 115 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Yu, G. Lan, B. Lu, J. Liu, J. Chen, F. Dai, and D. Wu, J. Mater. Sci., 9, 5435 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Zhang, J. Kaur, R. Rajkhowa, J. L. Li, X. Y. Liu, and X. G. Wang, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 6, 3206 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Wang, L. Chen, L. Du, T. Shen, F. Li, L. Huang, Z. Li, and D. Wu, Mater. Des., 134, 132 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. H. Lee, Y. S. Bae, D. G. Bae, S. J. Kim, D. W. Song, Y. H. Park, D. G. Bae, J. H. Choi, and L. C. Um, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 106, 39 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. H. W. Kwak, H. Lee, M. E. Lee, and H. J. Jin, J. Clean. Prod., 200, 1034 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. W. Kwak, J. Eom, S. Y. Cho, M. E. Lee, and H. Jin, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 127, 146 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Ghods, S. Murcia, E. A. Ossa, D. Arola, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 90, 451 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. B. Mayo, E. D. Wetzel, M. V. Hosur, and S. Jeelani, Int. J. Impact Eng., 9, 1095 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Q. Wang, R. Sun, X. Tian, M. Yao, and Y. Feng, Results in Physics, 6, 554 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11602156), Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Grant No. 18KJB540003), Jiangsu province industry university research cooperation project (Grant No. BY2018173), Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Soochow University (Grant No. 2018xj049), Foundation project of Jiangsu Advanced Textile Engineering Technology Center (Grant No. XJFZ/2018/03) and the Open Project Program of Key Laboratory of Eco-textiles, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University (Grant No. KLET1701).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ping Wang or Pibo Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Chen, H. et al. The Analysis and Comparison of the Needle-puncture Property of Four Types of Silkworm Cocoons. Fibers Polym 21, 1868–1877 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-020-1184-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-020-1184-y

Keywords

Navigation