Abstract
Oscillation of solutions of \(f^{(k)} + a_{k-2} f^{(k-2)} + \cdots + a_1 f' +a_0 f = 0\) is studied in domains conformally equivalent to the unit disc. The results are applied, for example, to Stolz angles, horodiscs, sectors, and strips. The method relies on a new conformal transformation of higher order linear differential equations. Information on the existence of zero-free solution bases is also obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction and Results
The classical univalence criterion due to Nehari [12] states that a locally univalent meromorphic function f in the unit disc \(\mathbb {D}\) is one-to-one if its Schwarzian derivative \(S_f = (f''/f')'-(1/2)(f''/f')^2\) satisfies \(|S_f(z)|(1-|z|^2)^2\le 2\) for all \(z\in \mathbb {D}\). Nehari’s proof is based on the representation \(a=S_{(f_1/f_2)}/2\) of the analytic coefficient of
in terms of the quotient of its two linearly independent solutions \(f_1\) and \(f_2\). The proof further uses a transformation of (1) into
where T maps \(\mathbb {D}\) conformally onto \(\mathbb {D}\) and the functions \((f_1\circ T)(T')^{-1/2}\) and \((f_2\circ T)(T')^{-1/2}\) form a solution base of (2). In fact, this method is independent of the underlying regions, and can be performed between any two conformally equivalent domains. Such transformations have turned out fundamental in many applications in the theory of differential equations, and appear in [8, p. 394] whose English edition was published in 1926.
Our first objective is to transform the differential equation
with analytic coefficients in a domain \(\varOmega _1\), to another differential equation
where the coefficients are analytic in a domain \(\varOmega _2\), which is conformally equivalent to \(\varOmega _1\). This transformation is given in terms of the incomplete exponential Bell polynomials
where \(i\ge n\) and the sum is taken over all sequences \(j_1,j_2, \dotsc , j_{i-n+1}\) of non-negative integers satisfying the equations
For example, by a straight-forward computation
and
Theorem 1
Let T map \(\varOmega _2\) conformally onto \(\varOmega _1,\) and let \(h=(T')^{(1-k)/2}\). Suppose that \(\{f_1,\dotsc ,f_k\}\) is a solution base of the differential equation (3), where the coefficients \(a_0, \dotsc , a_{k-2}\) are analytic in \(\varOmega _1\). Then \(\{(f_1 \circ T) h,\dotsc ,(f_k \circ T) h \}\) is a solution base of (4), where the coefficients \(b_0,\dotsc , b_{k-2}\) are analytic in \(\varOmega _2\). Moreover,
for any \(\ell \in \{ 1, \dotsc , k-2\},\) and
With appropriate modifications, the method of proof of Theorem 1 applies, for example, in the case of real differential equations.
The representation (6) for \(\ell =k-2\) simplifies to
The particular case \(k=2\) of this identity reduces to the situation in (2) and reveals the well-known connection between Bell polynomials and Schwarzian derivatives.
Let T be a conformal map from \(\mathbb {D}\) into \(\mathbb {C}\). The standard functions in Nevanlinna theory for a function f meromorphic in \(T(\mathbb {D})\) are defined to be the corresponding functions for \(f \circ T\). In particular,
where N(r, a, g) is the standard integrated counting function for the a-points of g in the disc \(D(0,r)=\{z\in \mathbb {C}: |z|<r\}\).
Our second objective is to quantify the phenomenon that local growth of any coefficient of (3) implies local oscillation for some non-trivial solutions. In the proof we apply Theorem 1 in the case when \(\varOmega _2=\mathbb {D}\).
Theorem 2
Let T map \(\mathbb {D}\) conformally into \(\mathbb {C},\) \(0<b<1\) and \(s(r)=1-b(1-r)\) for \(0\le r <1\). Suppose that \(\{f_1,\ldots ,f_{k}\}\) is a solution base of (3), where \(a_0,\ldots ,a_{k-2}\) are analytic in \(T(\mathbb {D})\). Then there exists a constant \(K=K(b)\) such that, for any \(j\in \{0,\ldots ,k-2\},\)
outside a possible exceptional set \(E \subset [0,1)\) for which \(\int _E\mathrm{d}t/(1-t)<\infty \).
By [1, Lemma C], for a sufficiently small \(0<b<1\) the statement of Theorem 2 is valid without any exceptional set. We may also suppose
for some \(j\in \{ 0,\dotsc , k-2\}\), for otherwise the assertion is trivially valid. The condition (8) guarantees the existence of a solution of (3) having more zeros in \(T(\mathbb {D})\) than any non-admissible analytic function in \(\mathbb {D}\). Recall that a function f is non-admissible if \(T(r,f) = O(\log (e/(1-r)))\) as \(r\rightarrow 1^-\).
Corollary 3
Under the assumptions of Theorem 3, there exists \(0<b<1\) and \(K=K(b)\) such that
for all \(0 \le r <1\).
Connections between the oscillation of solutions and the growth of analytic coefficients have been thoroughly studied in the cases of \(\mathbb {D}\) and \(\mathbb {C}\). However, the existing literature contains only scattered results on local oscillation of solutions in standard regions such as Stolz angles, horodiscs, sectors, and strips. We next show that, for appropriate choices of T, Theorem 2 yields new information in these particular regions.
Stolz angles. Fix \(0<\alpha <1\) and \(\zeta \in \partial \mathbb {D}\), and let \(T(z)=\zeta ( 1 - (1-z\overline{\zeta }\, )^\alpha )\) for all \(z\in \mathbb {D}\). Then \(T(\mathbb {D})\subset \mathbb {D}\) and \(\partial T(\mathbb {D})\) takes the form of a petal which has a corner of opening \(\alpha \pi \) at \(T(\zeta )=\zeta \). In particular, the domain \(T(\mathbb {D})\) can be seen as a Stolz angle with vertex at \(\zeta \). In this case \(|T'(T^{-1}(z))| = \alpha \, | \zeta - z|^{1-1/\alpha }\) for all \(z\in T(\mathbb {D})\).
Horodiscs. Fix \(\zeta \in \partial \mathbb {D}\), and let \(T(z) = \zeta + (1-|\zeta |) z\) for all \(z\in \mathbb {D}\). Then \(T(\mathbb {D}) \subset \mathbb {D}\) and \(\partial T(\mathbb {D})\) is a circle internally tangent to \(\partial \mathbb {D}\) at \(\zeta \). Now \(|T'(T^{-1}(z))| = 1-|\zeta |\) for all \(z\in T(\mathbb {D})\).
Sectors. Fix \(\varphi \in \mathbb {R}\) and \(0<\alpha <2\), and let \(T(z) = \mathrm{e}^{i\varphi } ( (1+z)/(1-z))^\alpha \) for all \(z\in \mathbb {D}\). Then \(T(\mathbb {D})\) is a sector of opening \(\alpha \pi /2\), in the direction \(\varphi \), and
Strips. Fix \(\varphi \in \mathbb {R}\) and \(0<\alpha <\infty \), and let \(T(z) = \alpha \mathrm{e}^{i\varphi } \log ((1+z)/(1-z))\) for all \(z\in \mathbb {D}\). Then \(T(\mathbb {D})\) is a strip of width \(\alpha \pi \), and
The next result combined with [2, p. 356] shows that the solutions \(f_1,\dotsc , f_k\) in Theorem 2 can be zero-free, while the coefficients may grow arbitrarily fast. This implies, in particular, that the second sum in the upper bound cannot be removed.
Theorem 4
Suppose that \(f_1\) and \(f_2\) are linearly independent solutions of \(f''+af=0,\) where the coefficient a is analytic. For any \(k\ge 2\), the functions \(f_1^{k-1}, \, f_1^{k-2} f_2, \dotsc , f_1 f_2^{k-2}, \, f_2^{k-1}\) are linearly independent solutions of (3) with analytic coefficients \(a_0,\dotsc , a_{k-2}\). Moreover,
In general, if all solutions of
are meromorphic, then the coefficients \(a_0, \dotsc , a_{k-1}\) are uniquely determined meromorphic functions which can be represented in terms of Wronskian-type determinants of any k linearly independent solutions [11, Proposition 1.4.6]. In particular, if \(f_1\) and \(f_2\) are linearly independent solutions of \(f''+af=0\), then [9, Proposition D] implies that \(f_1^2,f_1 f_2, f_2^2\) are linearly independent solutions of \(f''' + 4a f' + 2 a' f =0\). By a straight-forward computation, it can be verified that \(f_1^3,f_1^2f_2,f_1 f_2^2,f_2^3\) are linearly independent solutions of
which reveals the exact coefficients in the case \(k=4\).
The remaining part of this paper is organized as follows. Theorem 1 is proved in Sect. 2. Section 3 contains auxiliary results, which are needed in the proof of Theorem 2 in Sect. 4. Sharpness of Theorem 2 is illustrated in Sect. 5. Theorem 4 is proved in Sect. 6.
2 Proof of Theorem 1
In the following argument some details related to straight-forward calculations are omitted. Let f be a solution of (3) and let \(g = (f \circ T) h\), where \(h= (T')^{(1-k)/2}\). Since
by the general Leibniz rule, Faà di Bruno’s formula gives
We proceed to determine the coefficients \(b_0, \dotsc , b_{k-1}\) such that
On one hand, the differential equation (11) implies
On the other hand, by applying (10) for \(g^{(k)}\) and then taking advantage of (3), we deduce
By comparing the coefficients of \(f^{(k-1)} \circ T\), we get
where the right-hand side reduces to
Therefore \(b_{k-1}\equiv 0\) and (11) reduces to (4). By comparing the coefficients of \(f^{(\ell )} \circ T\) for \(\ell \in \{ 1, \dotsc , k-2\}\), we get
Since \(B_{k,k}(T') = (T')^{k-\ell } (T')^\ell \), we deduce (6) for any \(\ell \in \{ 1, \dotsc , k-2\}\). By comparing the coefficients of \(f \circ T\), we get
which implies (7). Since the statement concerning solution bases is trivial, Theorem 1 is now proved.
3 Auxiliary Results
The proof of Theorem 2 depends on three auxiliary results, which are considered next.
Lemma 5
Let j and k be integers with \(k>j\ge 0,\) and let f be a meromorphic function in \(\mathbb {D}\) such that \(f^{(j)}\not \equiv 0\). Let \(0<b<1,\) and write \(s(r)=1-b(1-r)\) for \(0\le r <1\). Then there exists a constant \(K=K(b)>0\) such that
Proof
For \(0<r_1<r_2<1\), let \(A(r_1,r_2)=\{z \in \mathbb {D}: r_1< |z|\le r_2\}\). Let \(0<d<1\) be a constant which will be fixed later, and define \(R_\nu = R_\nu (d) = 1-d^{\nu }\) for \(\nu \in \mathbb {N}\). The proof of [6, Theorem 2.3(b)] gives
where \(C_1=C_1(d,j,k)\) is a constant. Let \(R_1< r < 1\) and take \(\mu =\mu (d) \in \mathbb {N}\) such that \(R_\mu <r\le R_{\mu +1}\), which is equivalent to
The reasoning used in the proof of [4, Theorem 5] yields
where \(C_2=C_2(d)\) is a constant independent of \(\nu \). By (12) and (13), we deduce
where \(C_3=C_3(d)\) is a constant such that \(C_3=C_2\cdot \max \{ 1/(1-d),-1/\log d \}\).
Next we use the Hölder inequality and (14) to conclude that
where \(C_4=C_4(d,j,k)\) is a constant. Note that
Choose \(0<d<1\) such that \(b=d^4\). The assertion follows. \(\square \)
For \(1\le \alpha <\infty \), let
If \(\alpha =1\), then f is an atomic singular inner function and the Nevanlinna characteristic of f and all its derivatives are bounded. Therefore all terms in the statement of Lemma 5 are asymptotically comparable to \(-\log (1-r)\) as \(r\rightarrow 1^-\). Meanwhile, if \(\alpha >1\), then both sides are of growth \((1-r)^{1-\alpha }\) as \(r\rightarrow 1^-\). This illustrates the sharpness of Lemma 5.
The following result allows us to represent the coefficients in terms of quotients of linearly independent solutions.
Theorem A
([10, Theorem 2.1]) Let \(g_1,\ldots ,g_k\) be linearly independent solutions of (4), where \(b_0,\ldots ,b_{k-2}\) are analytic in \(\mathbb {D}\). Let
and
Then
where \(\delta _{kk}=0\) and \(\delta _{ki}=1\) otherwise.
We also need an estimate in the spirit of Frank–Hennekemper and Petrenko.
Lemma 6
Let \(g_1,\ldots , g_k\) be linearly independent meromorphic solutions of (11) with coefficients \(b_0,\ldots ,b_{k-1}\) meromorphic in \(\mathbb {D},\) and let \(0<b<1\). Then there exists a constant \(K=K(b)>0\) such that
for all \(j=0,\ldots ,k-1\).
The statement in Lemma 6 for the equation \(g^{(k)}+b_0g=0\) follows immediately from Lemma 5 and the fact that
The general case is a modification of [3, Lemma 11] or of [11, Lemma 7.7]. Recall that the notation \(a\asymp b\) is equivalent to the conditions \(a\lesssim b\) and \(b\lesssim a\), where the former means that there exists a positive constant C such that \(a\le Cb\) and the latter is defined analogously.
4 Proof of Theorem 2
Let \(h=(T')^{(1-k)/2}\). If f is a solution of (3), then \(g=(f\circ T)h\) is a solution of (4). Based on this transformation, let \(\{g_1,\ldots ,g_k\}\) be a solution base of (4) corresponding to the solution base \(\{f_1,\ldots ,f_k\}\) of (3). By the conformal change of variable,
for \(j=0,\ldots ,k-2\).
Case \(j=0\). From (7), we have
Since T is univalent, it belongs to the Hardy space \(H^p\) for \(0<p<1/2\) by [5, Theorem 3.16], and hence T is of bounded Nevanlinna characteristic. Therefore all derivatives are non-admissible in the sense that
Thus h and all of its derivatives are non-admissible as well. Using Lemma 5, we obtain
Hence, making use of (20) and Hölder’s inequality with conjugate indices \(p=k/(k-j)\) and \(q=k/j\), we infer
where the sums are empty if \(k=2\). Let \(y_1,\ldots ,y_{k-1}\) be defined by (15). By restating [11, Proposition 1.4.7] with the aid of some basic properties satisfied by Wronskian determinants [11, Chap. 1.4], we see that the functions \(1,y_1,\ldots , y_{k-1}\) are linearly independent meromorphic solutions of the differential equation
where \(W_j\) are defined by (16). From Lemma 6 we now conclude
for \(i=1,\ldots , k-1\). Moreover, Lemma 5 yields
where i and j are as in (17), and where (18) has been used with \(y_l\) in place of g. Writing the coefficients \(b_j\) in the form (17), we deduce
Finally, we make use of (22) and (23) together with Hölder’s inequality with conjugate indices \(p=(k-j)/i\) and \(q=(k-j)/(k-i-j)\), \(1\le i< k-j\), (\(i=k-j\) is a removable triviality), and conclude
Substituting this into (21) we obtain
According to the second main theorem of Nevanlinna,
where \(S(r,y_l)=O\!\left( \log ^+ T(r,y_l)-\log (1-r)\right) \), \(l\in \{1,\ldots ,k-1\}\) and the exceptional set E satisfies \(\int _E\mathrm{d}t/(1-t)<\infty \). Thus
for \(l\in \{1,\ldots ,k-1\}\). Combining this with (24), the assertion in the case \(j=0\) follows.
Case \(j=\ell \), \(1\le \ell \le k-2\). From (6), we have
We apply Hölder’s inequality to estimate
and content ourselves with writing details on the integration of the final term (25) only. Since the Bell indices \(j_1,j_2, \dotsc , j_{k-\ell +1}\) satisfy (5) for \(i=k\) and \(n=\ell \), we obtain
Note that \(k-\ell = j_2 + 2 j_3 + \cdots + (k-\ell ) j_{k-\ell +1}\). The following application of Hölder’s inequality is presented in the case that all Bell indices \(j_1,j_2, \dotsc , j_{k-\ell +1}\) are non-zero. If there are zero indices, then the argument should be modified appropriately. Choose the Hölder exponents
which satisfy
By Hölder’s inequality,
The remaining part of the proof is similar to that above. This completes the proof of Theorem 2.
5 Sharpness Discussion
The following examples illustrate the sharpness of Theorem 2.
Example 1
For \(\alpha > 1\), let
Then a is analytic in the right half-plane, and \(f''+af=0\) has linearly independent zero-free solutions
The function \(T(z)=(1+z)/(1-z)\) maps \(\mathbb {D}\) onto the right half-plane, and it is clear that its Schwarzian derivative vanishes identically. Moreover, by (2), the functions
are linearly independent zero-free solutions of \(g''+bg=0\), where
From (19),
Meanwhile, the zeros of \(g_1+g_2=(g_1/g_2+1)g_2\) are the points \(z_n\in \mathbb {D}\) at which
or equivalently
In particular, the points \(w_n\) are located on the imaginary axis. This means that the points \((1+z_n)/(1-z_n)\) are located on a finite number of rays on the right half-plane emanating from the origin, which in turn implies that the points \(z_n\) lie in a Stolz angle with vertex at 1. Thus
where the comparison constants are independent of n. It follows that the small counting function n(r) for the points \(\{z_n\}\) satisfies \( n(r)\asymp (1-r)^{-\alpha }, \) so that
This shows that Theorem 2 is sharp up to a multiplicative constant in this case. \(\diamond \)
Example 2
Let \(a_0,\ldots , a_{k-2}\in \mathbb {R}\setminus \{0\}\) be such that the characteristic equation
has k distinct roots \(r_1,\ldots ,r_k\in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{0\}\). Then the functions \(f_j(z)=\mathrm{e}^{r_jz}\), \(j=1,\ldots ,k\), form a zero-free solution base for (3) with constant coefficients. For \(\alpha \in (1,2]\), let
Then T maps \(\mathbb {D}\) onto the sector \(|\arg (z)|<\alpha \pi /2\) for \(\alpha \in (1,2)\), and onto \(\mathbb {C}\) minus the real interval \((-\infty ,0]\) for \(\alpha =2\). Now the functions \(g_j=(f_j \circ T )\, (T')^{(1-k)/2}\), \(j=1,\ldots ,k\), form a zero-free solution base for (4) in \(\mathbb {D}\). From (19) we find
for \(j\in \{0,\ldots ,k-2\}\).
Let f be a non-trivial linear combination of at least two exponential terms \(f_j\). Without loss of generality, we may suppose that \(f=C_1f_1+\cdots + C_mf_m\), where \(2\le m\le k\) and \(C_1,\ldots ,C_m\in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{0\}\). Let
denote the corresponding solution of (4).
Let \(W=\{\overline{r}_1,\ldots ,\overline{r}_m\}\), and let \({\text {co}}(W)\) denote the convex hull of W. Then \({\text {co}}(W)\) is either a line segment or a closed convex polygon in \(\mathbb {C}\). Let \(\varTheta \subset (-\pi ,\pi ]\) denote the set of angles that the outer normals of \({\text {co}}(W)\) form with the positive real axis. If \({\text {co}}(W)\) has s vertex points, then it has s outer normals, and \(\varTheta \) has s elements, say
For example, if \({r}_1,\ldots ,{r}_m\in \mathbb {R}\), then \(\varTheta =\{\pm \pi /2\}\). In general \(2\le s\le m\), and if \(s=m\), then each point \(\overline{r}_j\) is a vertex point of \({\text {co}}(W)\). Set \(\theta _{s+1}=\theta _1+2\pi \). Since clearly \(\theta _{j+1}-\theta _j\le \pi \) for all \(j\in \{1,\ldots ,s\}\), and since \(\sum _{j=1}^s (\theta _{j+1}-\theta _j)=2\pi \), it follows that at least one of the rays \(\arg (z)=\theta _j\) lies entirely in \(T(\mathbb {D})\). We also point out that, for a suitable set of roots \({r}_1,\ldots ,{r}_m\), all of the rays \(\arg (z)=\theta _j\) lie in \(T(\mathbb {D})\).
Based on the work of Pólya and Schwengeler in the 1920s, we state some facts about the zero distribution of the exponential sum f. The exact references as well as the proofs can be found in [7]. For any \(\varepsilon >0\), the zeros of f are in the union of \(\varepsilon \)-sectors \(W_j=\{z\in \mathbb {C}: |\arg (z)-\theta _j|<\varepsilon \}\), with finitely many possible exceptions. In fact, the zeros of f are in logarithmic strips around the rays \(\arg (z)=\theta _j\). Each sector \(W_j\) is zero-rich in the sense that the number of zeros in \(W_j\cap D(0,r)\) is asymptotically comparable to r. In particular, the exponent of convergence for the zeros of f in each sector \(W_j\) is equal to one, same as the order of f.
Let \(\arg (z)=\theta _j\) be one of the rays that lies in \(T(\mathbb {D})\). Taking \(\varepsilon >0\) small enough, the sector \(W_j\) lies in \(T(\mathbb {D})\) as well. The pre-image of \(W_j\) is a circular wedge in \(\mathbb {D}\) having vertices of opening \(\varepsilon /\alpha \) at the points \(z=\pm 1\). Thus all zeros of g are in such wedges, except possibly finitely many. The zeros of g can accumulate to 1 and nowhere else. Since g has Nevanlinna order \(\alpha -1\) and finite type, it follows that
Combining this with (26) shows that in this case Theorem 2 is sharp up to a multiplicative constant. In addition, since the functions \(f_1,\ldots ,f_k\) are zero-free, the second sum in Theorem 2 involving the linear combinations \(f_j+f_k\) is necessary. \(\diamond \)
6 Proof of Theorem 4
The proof relies on elementary properties of Wronskian determinants, which can be found, for example, in [11, Chap. 1.4]. We first show that \(W(f_1^{k-1}, \, f_1^{k-2} f_2, \dotsc , f_1 f_2^{k-2}, \, f_2^{k-1})\) is a non-zero complex constant, in which case \(\{f_1^{k-1}, \, f_1^{k-2} f_2, \dotsc , f_1 f_2^{k-2}, \, f_2^{k-1}\}\) forms a solution base of (3) with analytic coefficients by [11, Propositions 1.4.6 and 1.4.8]. In fact, we prove that
where \(W(f_1,f_2)\in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{0\}\) and
We proceed by induction. The identity (27) is clearly true for \(k=2\) as both sides reduce to \(W(f_1,f_2)\). Suppose that (27) is valid for some \(k\ge 2\). It is well known that \(w=f_1/f_2\) is a locally univalent meromorphic function such that \(w' = -W(f_1,f_2)/f_2^2\). Then
and the substitution back gives
The induction hypothesis (27) gives
Therefore (27) holds for all \(k\ge 2\).
Let \(h_1,\dotsc , h_{k-1}\) be functions such that each is either \(f_1\) or \(f_2\). The products \(h_1\cdots h_{k-1}\) give a complete description for functions in the solution base obtained above, and hence
for any choices of \(h_1,\dotsc , h_{k-1}\). Recall that the coefficients \(a_0,\dotsc , a_{k-2}\) are uniquely determined by the solution base. We compare the representation
obtained by the general Leibniz rule, to the other terms in (28). The sum in (29) extends over all non-negative integers \(s_1,\dotsc , s_{k-1}\) for which \(s_1+\cdots + s_{k-1}=k\). Similarly,
where the sum is taken over all non-negative integers \(j_1,\dotsc , j_{k-1}\) for which \(j_1+\cdots + j_{k-1}=k-2\). The sum (30) contains terms which are exceptional in relation to the other terms. For example, consider the term corresponding to indices \(j_1=\cdots = j_{k-2}=1\) and \(j_{k-1}=0\). Since \(j_1+\cdots +j_{k-1}=k-2\), the analogous representations for \((h_1\cdots h_{k-1})^{(n)}\), \(0\le n \le k-3\), do not have terms of the type \(h_1' h_2' \cdots h_{k-2}' h_{k-1}\). This means that all other terms of this type are obtained from (29) by using the fact
There are \(k-1\) possible sets of indices in (29) which are transformed to \((1,\dotsc , 1,0)\) in this way, and they are
By a careful comparison of (29) and (30), and then taking (28) into account, we see that the coefficient of \(h_1' h_2' \cdots h_{k-2}' h_{k-1}\) must satisfy
Solving this identity for \(a_{k-2}\) gives (9) and completes the proof.
We point out that the Theorem 4 admits the following meromorphic counterpart: suppose that \(f_1\) and \(f_2\) are linearly independent meromorphic solutions of \(f''+af=0\), where the coefficient a is meromorphic. For any \(k\ge 2\), the functions \(f_1^{k-1}, \, f_1^{k-2} f_2, \dotsc , f_1 f_2^{k-2}, \, f_2^{k-1}\) are linearly independent meromorphic solutions of (3) with meromorphic coefficients \(a_0,\dotsc , a_{k-2}\) whose poles are among the poles of \(f_1\) and \(f_2\), ignoring multiplicities. The identity (9) extends also to the meromorphic case.
References
Bank, S.: A general theorem concerning the growth of solutions of first-order algebraic differential equations. Compos. Math. 25, 61–70 (1972)
Bank, S., Laine, I.: On the oscillation theory of \(f^{\prime \prime }+Af=0\) where \(A\) is entire. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 273(1), 351–363 (1982)
Chyzhykov, I., Gröhn, J., Heittokangas, J., Rättyä, J.: Description of growth and oscillation of solutions of complex LDE’s, submitted preprint. arXiv:1905.07934
Chyzhykov, I., Heittokangas, J., Rättyä, J.: Finiteness of \(\varphi \)-order of solutions of linear differential equations in the unit disc. J. Anal. Math. 109(1), 163–198 (2009)
Duren, P.: Theory of \(H^p\) Spaces. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 38. Academic, New York (1970)
Heittokangas, J., Rättyä, J.: Zero distribution of solutions of complex linear differential equations determines growth of coefficients. Math. Nachr. 284(4), 412–420 (2011)
Heittokangas, J.J., Wen, Z.-T.: Generalization of Pólya’s zero distribution theory for exponential polynomials, and sharp results for asymptotic growth. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 21(2), 245–270 (2021)
Ince, E.L.: Ordinary Differential Equations. Dover Publications. Inc., New York (1944)
Ishizaki, K.: On the complex oscillation of linear differential equations of third order. Complex Var. Theory Appl. 24(3–4), 289–300 (1994)
Kim, W.J.: The Schwarzian derivative and multivalence. Pac. J. Math. 31, 717–724 (1969)
Laine, I.: Nevanlinna Theory and Complex Differential Equations. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1993)
Nehari, Z.: The Schwarzian derivative and Schlicht functions. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 55, 545–551 (1949)
Acknowledgements
The second author is supported in part by the Academy of Finland Project #286877. The fourth author is supported in part by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain, Projects MTM2014-52865-P and MTM2015-69323-REDT, and La Junta de Andalucía, Project FQM210.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Eastern Finland (UEF) including Kuopio University Hospital.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chyzhykov, I., Gröhn, J., Heittokangas, J. et al. Oscillation of Solutions of LDE’s in Domains Conformally Equivalent to Unit Disc. J Geom Anal 32, 71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-021-00802-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-021-00802-1