Abstract
We analyze the lower semicontinuous envelope of the curvature functional of Cartesian surfaces in codimension one. To this aim, following the approach by Anzellotti–Serapioni–Tamanini, we study the class of currents that naturally arise as weak limits of Gauss graphs of smooth functions. The curvature measures are then studied in the non-parametric case. Concerning homogeneous functions, some model examples are studied in detail. Finally, a new gap phenomenon is observed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acerbi, E., Dal Maso, G.: New lower semicontinuity results for polyconvex integrals. Calc. Var. 2, 329–372 (1994)
Acerbi, E., Mucci, D.: Curvature-dependent energies: a geometric and analytical approach. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 147A, 449–503 (2017)
Acerbi, E., Mucci, D.: Curvature-dependent energies: the elastic case. Nonlinear Anal. 153, 7–34 (2017)
Allard, W.K.: First variation of a varifold. Ann. Math. 95, 417–491 (1972)
Ambrosio, L., Fusco, N., Pallara, D.: Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems. Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford (2000)
Anzellotti, G.: Functionals depending on curvatures. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Pol. Torino. Fascicolo speciale 1989: P.D.E. and Geometry, pp. 47–62 (1988)
Anzellotti, G., Serapioni, R., Tamanini, I.: Curvatures, Functionals, Currents. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 39, 617–669 (1990)
Ball, J.M.: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 63, 337–403 (1977)
Buttazzo, G., Mizel, V.J.: Interpretation of the Lavrentiev phenomenon by relaxation. J. Funct. Anal. 110, 434–460 (1992)
Dal Maso, G.: Integral representation on \(\text{ BV }({\varOmega })\) of \(\text{ GG }\)-limits of variational integrals. Manuscr. Math. 30, 387–416 (1980)
Dal Maso, G., Fonseca, I., Leoni, G., Morini, M.: A higher order model for image restoration: the one dimensional case. Siam J. Math. Appl. 40(6), 2351–2391 (2009)
De Giorgi, E., Letta, G.: Une notion générale de convergence faible pour des fonctions croissantes d’ensemble. Ann. S.N.S. Pisa Cl. Sci. 4, 61–99 (1977)
Delladio, S.: Special generalized Gauss graphs and their application to minimization of functionals involving curvatures. J. Reine Angew. Math. 486, 17–43 (1997)
Federer, H.: Geometric Measure Theory. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 153. Springer, New York (1969)
Federer, H., Fleming, W.: Normal and integral currents. Ann. Math. 72, 458–520 (1960)
Giaquinta, M., Modica, G., Souček, J.: Cartesian currents, weak diffeomorphisms and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 106, 97–159 (1989). Erratum and addendum. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 109, 385–392 (1990)
Giaquinta, M., Modica, G., Souček, J.: Cartesian Currents in the Calculus of Variations, vol. I. Ergebnisse Math. Grenzgebiete (III Ser) 37. Springer, Berlin (1998)
Giusti, E.: Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variations. Birkauser, Boston (1984)
Hutchinson, J.E.: Second fundamental form for varifolds and existence of surfaces minimizing curvature. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 35, 45–71 (1986)
Krantz, S.G., Parks, H.R.: Geometric Integration Theory. Cornerstones. Birkhäuser, Boston (2008)
Mantegazza, C.: Curvature varifolds with boundary. J. Differ. Geom. 43, 807–843 (1996)
Müller, S.: Det = det. A remark on the distributional determinant. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 311, 13–17 (1990)
Simon, L.: Lectures on Geometric Measure Theory. Proc. C.M.A. 3, Australian National University, Canberra (1983)
Sullivan, J.M.: Curvature of smooth and discrete surfaces. In: Bobenko, A.I., Schröder, P., Sullivan, J.M., Ziegler, G.M. (eds.) Discrete Differential Geometry. Oberwolfach Seminars, vol. 38. Birkäuser, Boston (2008)
Sullivan, J.M.: Curves of finite total curvature. In: Bobenko, A.I., Schröder, P., Sullivan, J.M., Ziegler, G.M. (eds.) Discrete Differential Geometry. Oberwolfach Seminars, vol. 38. Birkäuser, Boston (2008)
Truesdell, C.: The influence of elasticity on analysis: the classical heritage. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 9, 293–310 (1983)
Willmore, T.: Note on embedded surfaces. An. Stiint. Univ. “Al. I. Cusa” Iasi Sect. I A Math. II, 443–446 (1965)
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank E. Acerbi and A. Saracco for several useful discussions. The author is a member of the “Gruppo Nazionale per l’Analisi Matematica, la Probabilità e le loro Applicazioni” (GNAMPA) of the INdAM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Homogeneous Functions
Assume \(u:B^2\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) satisfies \(u(x)=u(x/|x|)\) for each \(x\in B^2\setminus \{0_{{\mathbb {R}}^2}\}\), whence we can write \(u(x)=f(\theta )\) for some function \(f:[0,2\pi ]\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\), where \(x=(\rho \,\cos \theta ,\rho \,\sin \theta )\). Denoting for simplicity \(s:=\sin \theta \) and \(c:=\cos \theta \), we formally compute on \(B^2\setminus \{0_{{\mathbb {R}}^2}\}\)
and hence, setting \(F:=\rho ^2+{\dot{f}} ^2\), we get
This yields to
and hence
Setting moreover for simplicity \(A_j:=\left| \begin{array}{cc} \partial _1u &{} \partial _2u \\ \partial _1{{{\nu }}_u}^j &{} \partial _2{{{\nu }}_u}^j \end{array}\right| \), we also compute
so that
Also, setting \(B_{jk}:=\left| \begin{array}{cc} \partial _1{{{\nu }}_u}^j &{} \partial _2{{{\nu }}_u}^j \\ \partial _1{{{\nu }}_u}^k &{} \partial _2{{{\nu }}_u}^k \end{array}\right| \), we compute
so that
On account of (2.15) and (2.18), we, thus, obtain
Now, by the formulas (2.11) and (2.12) we infer the explicit expressions of the Gauss and mean curvatures
and hence, we readily recover the expressions of the three terms \(|\xi _u^{(i)}|\) given by the formulas (2.18). In particular, we get
We also compute
Therefore, for f smooth, on account of (2.8) by the area formula we obtain
Remark A.1
Notice that \(|\xi _u|\in L^1(B^2)\) if and only if \(|\xi _u^{(i)}|\in L^1(B^2)\) for \(i=0,1,2\), and we get
Moreover, since \(|\xi _u|=\sqrt{g_u}\,\sqrt{(1-\mathbf{K}_u)^2+(2\,\mathbf{H}_u)^2}\) we have
where, we recall,
and hence, we deduce that \(|\xi _u|\in L^1(B^2)\) if and only if
Appendix B: An Energy Computation
We compute the energy of the various components of the current \(\widetilde{\varSigma }_u\) in (8.1), referring to Example 8.1.
The Absolutely continuous term has energy \(\mathrm{E}(GG_u^a)={{\mathcal {E}}}(u)\), and it is given by the sum of the three integrals in Remark A.1, with f given by (8.4). The Cantor component \(GG_u^C\) is equal to zero.
The Jump component is \( GG_u^J=\varPhi ^J_\#{[\![\, I\times I\, ]\!]}\), see (8.7). Consider the 2-vector \(\overrightarrow{\xi }:=\partial _s \varPhi ^J\wedge \partial _\lambda \varPhi ^J\). The mass of \(GG_u^J\) agrees with the area of the Gauss graph surface \(\varPhi ^J({I\times I})\). Moreover, the stratification \(\overrightarrow{\xi }=\xi ^{(0)}+\xi ^{(1)}+\xi ^{(2)}\) gives \(\xi ^{(2)}=0\) and
where \(\gamma _0(s):=(s,0)\), \(\mathbf{{t}}(s)=(\mathbf{{t}}_1,\mathbf{{t}}_2)\) is the unit tangent vector to the jump set, \(\sigma _u(s):=\mathrm{sgn}[u(\gamma _0(s))]^\pm \) is the sign of the Jump, and \(\mathbf{{k}}(s)\) the signed curvature, whence \(\mathbf{{t}}(s)\equiv (1,0)\)), \(\sigma _u(s)\equiv 1\), \(\mathbf{{k}}(s)\equiv 0\). We, thus, have \(\mathrm{E}_2(GG_u^J)=0\), whereas by the area formula, we get
The Jump-edge component is \( S_u^{Je}= \varPhi ^{Je}_{+\,\#}{[\![\, I\times I\, ]\!]} - \varPhi ^{Je}_{-\,\#}{[\![\, I\times I\, ]\!]} \), whence the mass decomposition
and a similar energy splitting hold. Furthermore, using the formulas after equation (8.10), we get
and hence, we may decompose \(\overrightarrow{\xi }:= \partial _s{\varPhi ^{Je}_\pm }\wedge \partial _\lambda {\varPhi ^{Je}_\pm }=\xi ^{(0)}+\xi ^{(1)}+\xi ^{(2)}\), where this time the first stratum \(\xi ^{(0)}=0\) and
We, thus, get
and hence,
where \(\mathrm{E}_0(\varPhi ^{Je}_{\pm \,\#}{[\![\, I\times I\, ]\!]})=0\) and, again by the area formula,
where we used that \(\partial _\mathbf{{t}}u^\pm (\gamma _0(s))\equiv 0\), whereas
and correspondingly
Finally, the Edge component is \(S_u^{e}= \sum _{k=1}^2 {\varPhi ^{e}_k}_\#{[\![\, I\times I\, ]\!]} \), see (8.13). We compute:
where for \(k=1,2\) we have \(\mathrm{E}_0({\varPhi ^{e}_k}_\#{[\![\, I\times I\, ]\!]})=0\),
with \(\gamma _1(s):=(0,s)\) and \(\gamma _2(s):=(0,s-1)\), and
whereas concerning the mass, we get
By (8.14), we check \(|\partial _\lambda {\phi ^{e}_1(s,\lambda ))}|=(\pi /2-\arctan s)\), \(|\partial _\lambda {\phi ^{e}_2(s,\lambda ))}|=\pi /2-\arctan (1-s)\), and \(J_2 \phi ^{e}_k\equiv 0\), whereas \(\partial _\mathbf{{t}}u(\gamma _k(s))\equiv 0\). We, thus, conclude that for \(k=1,2\)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mucci, D. On the Curvature Energy of Cartesian Surfaces. J Geom Anal 31, 8460–8519 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-020-00601-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-020-00601-0