Abstract
Chiral catalysis has turned out to be the most efficient of the strategies to obtain enantiomerically pure compounds and, as an evidence, even nature uses chiral catalysts called enzymes. On the other hand, in the last years, numerous supported chiral catalysts have been prepared to try to reproduce the results obtained with homogeneous catalysts at the same time that they provide advantages such as recycling and stability. However, these advantages are not frequently enough to justify the use of supported catalysts. Nanostructured solids with well-controlled surfaces and pores may act as nanoreactors, hindering or even blocking some of the reaction channels and hence, modifying the different types of selectivity, including enantioselectivity. This effect is conceptually well assumed with three-dimensional supports, as chirality is normally explained in three dimensions; however, chirality is possible in any dimensional space and support effects have been also observed with two-dimensional supports. The example described here shows the use of supports to improve or even change the selectivity is an emerging interesting field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaser H-U, Pugin B (1995) Scope and limitations of the application of heterogeneous enantioselective catalysts. In: Jannes G, Dubois V (eds) Chiral reactions in heterogeneous catalysis. Plenum Press, New York, pp 33–57
Castillo MR, Fousse L, Fraile JM, García JI, Mayoral JA (2007) Supported ionic liquid films (SILF) as bidimensional nanoreactors for enantioselective reactions: surface-mediated selectivity modulation (SMSM). Chem Eur J 13:287–291
Castillo MR, Fraile JM, Mayoral JA (2012) Structure and dynamic of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate phases on silica and laponite: from liquid to solid behavior. Langmuir 28:11364–11375
Corma A, Iglesias M, del Pino C, Sánchez F (1991) New rhodium complexes anchored on modified USY zeolites. A remarkable effect of the support on the enantioselectivity of catalytic hydrogenation of prochiral alkenes. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1253–1255
De Vos DE, Vankelecom IFJ, Jacobs PA (2000) Chiral catalysts immobilization and recycling. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Diddams P (1992) Inorganic supports and catalysts: an overview. In: Smith K (ed) Solid supports and catalysis in organic synthesis. Ellis Horwood-PTR Prentice Hall, New York, pp 3–39
Fabra MJ, Fraile JM, Herrerías CI, Lahoz FJ, Mayoral JA, Pérez I (2008) Surface-enhanced stereoselectivity in Mukaiyama aldol reactions catalyzed by clay-supported bis(oxazoline)–copper complexes. Chem Commun 5402–5404
Fernández AI, Fraile JM, García JI, Herrerías CI, Mayoral JA, Salvatella L (2001) Reversal of enantioselectivity by change of solvent with clay-immobilized bis(oxazoline)–copper catalysts. Catal Commun 2:165–170
Fraile JM, García JI, Martínez-Merino V, Mayoral JA, Salvatella L (2001) Theoretical (DFT) insights into the mechanism of copper-catalyzed cyclopropanation reactions. Implications for enantioselective catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 123:7616–7625
Fraile JM, García JI, Harmer MA, Herrerías CI, Mayoral JA, Reiser O, Werner H (2002) Immobilisation of bis(oxazoline)-copper complexes on clays and nanocomposites. Influence of different parameters on activity and selectivity. J Mater Chem 12:3290–3295
Fraile JM, García JI, Mayoral JA, Roldán M (2007) Simple and efficient heterogeneous copper catalysts for enantioselective C–H carbene insertion. Org Lett 9:731–733
Fraile JM, García JI, Jiménez-Osés G, Mayoral JA, Roldán M (2008) Surface confinement effects on enantioselective cyclopropanation. Reactions with supported chiral 8-oxazolinyl quinoline-copper complexes. Organometallics 27:2246–2251
Fraile JM, García JI, Mayoral JA (2009) Non-covalent immobilization of enantioselective catalysts. Chem Rev 109:360–417
Fraile JM, García JI, Mayoral JA (2011a) Chiral catalysts. In: Zecchina A, Bordiga S, Gropp E (eds) Selective nanocatalysts and nanoscience: concepts for heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysis. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 193–235
Fraile JM, de López-Ram Viu P, Mayoral JA, Roldán J, Santafé- Valero J (2011b) Enantioselective C–H carbene insertions with heterogeneous and immobilized copper complexes. Org Biomol Chem Rev 9:6075–6081
García JI, Jiménez-Osés G, Martínez-Merino V, Mayoral JA, Pires E, Villalba I (2007) QM/MM modeling of enantioselective pybox-ruthenium and box-copper-catalyzed cyclopropanation reactions. Scope, performance and applications to ligand design. Chem Eur J 13:4064–4073
García JI, López-Sánchez B, Pires E, Villalba I (2008) Surface confinement effects in enantioselective catalysis: design of new heterogeneous chiral catalysts based on C1-symmetric bisoxazolines and application to cyclopropanation reactions. J Catal 258:378–385
Heitbaum M, Glorius F, Escher I (2006) Asymmetric heterogeneous catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:4732–4762
Jacobsen EN, Pfaltz A, Yamamoto H (1999) Comprehensive asymmetric catalysis. Springer, Berlin
Johnson BFG, Raynor SA, Shephard DS, Maschmeyer T, Thomas JM, Sankar G, Bromley S, Oldroyd RD, Gladden L, Mantle MD (1999) Superior performance of a chiral catalyst confined within mesoporous silica. Chem Commun 1167–1168
Jones MD, Raja R, Thomas JM, Johnson BFG, Lewis DW, Rouzaud J, Harris KDM (2003) Enhancing the enantioselectivity of novel homogeneous organometallic hydrogenation catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed 42:4326–4331
Macchioni A (2005) Ion pairing in transition-metal organometallic chemistry. Chem Rev 105:2039–2073
O’Leary P, Krosveld NP, De Jong KP, van Koten G, Gebbink RJMK (2004) Facile and rapid immobilization of copper(II) bis(oxazoline) catalysts on silica: application to Diels–Alder reactions, recycling, and unexpected effects on enantioselectivity. Tetrahedron Lett 45:3177–3180
Raja R, Thomas JM, Jones MD, Johnson BFG, Vaughan DEW (2003) Constraining asymmetric organometallic catalysts within mesoporous supports boosts their enantioselectivity. J Am Chem Soc 125:14982–14983
Thomas JM, Raja R (2008) Exploiting nanospace for asymmetric catalysis: confinement of immobilized, single-site chiral catalysts enhances enantioselectivity. Acc Chem Res 41:708–720
Thomas JM, Johnson BFG, Raja R, Sankar G, Midgley PA (2003) High-performance nanocatalysts for single-step hydrogenations. Acc Chem Res 36:20–30
Wang H, Li X, Xia H, Liu P, Gao J, Ying P, Xiao J, Li C (2006) Asymmetric Diels–Alder reactions with hydrogen bonding heterogeneous catalysts and mechanistic studies on the reversal of enantioselectivity. Tetrahedron 62:1025–1032
Xu B, Tao C, Cullen WG, Reut-Robery JE, Williams ED (2005) Chiral symmetry breaking in two-dimensional C60-ACA intermixed systems. Nano Lett 5:2207–2211
Yang H, Li J, Yang J, Lin Z, Yang Q, Li C (2007a) Asymmetric reactions on chiral catalysts entrapped within a mesoporous cage. Chem Commun 1086–1088
Yang H, Zhang L, Zhong L, Yang Q, Li C (2007b) Enhanced cooperative activation effect in the hydrolytic kinetic resolution of epoxides on [Co(salen)] catalysts confined in nanocages. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:6861–6865
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Project CTQ2011-28124) and the Diputación General de Aragón (E11 Group co-financed by the European Regional Development Funds) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrerías, C.I., Mayoral, J.A. Selectivity modulation through immobilization of chiral catalysts on nanostructured supports. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 24, 227–237 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-013-0237-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-013-0237-1