Catalytic conversion of CO2 into chemicals and fuels is a viable method to reduce carbon emissions and achieve carbon neutrality. Through thermal catalysis, electrocatalysis, and photo(electro)catalysis, CO2 can be converted into a wide range of valuable products, including CO, formic acid, methanol, methane, ethanol, acetic acid, propanol, light olefins, aromatics, and gasoline, as well as fine chemicals. In this mini-review, we summarize the recent progress in heterogeneous catalysis for CO2 conversion into chemicals and fuels and highlight some representative studies of different conversion routes. The structure–performance correlations of typical catalytic materials used for the CO2 conversion reactions have been revealed by combining advanced in situ/operando spectroscopy and microscopy characterizations and density functional theory calculations. Catalytic selectivity toward a single CO2 reduction product/fraction should be further improved at an industrially relevant CO2 conversion rate with considerable stability in the future.
Since the industrial revolution, the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has been rapidly increasing because of fossil fuel utilization and human activities, resulting in severe climate change due to the significant greenhouse effect of CO2. To address this issue, global carbon emissions need to be reduced, and China has set its goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an important emission reduction technology that can effectively utilize highly concentrated CO2 emitted by industrial activities. Among the CCUS processes, CO2 utilization via catalytic conversion is promising as it provides a viable solution to close the carbon cycle [1,2,3,4,5,6].
Generally, the CO2 molecule is thermodynamically stable and kinetically inert; thus, CO2 activation is an important scientific challenge. CO2-conversion-related chemical reactions require remarkable energy input in the chemical, thermal, or electrical form. If the energy comes from fossil fuels, then the process would not achieve the net reduction of CO2. Therefore, CO2 conversion should be driven by nonfossil energy sources, such as nuclear energy and renewable energy, such as solar and wind. Catalysis is an efficient method to activate and convert inert molecules and plays a crucial role in CO2 conversion into valuable chemicals and fuels (e.g., CO, formic acid, methanol, methane, ethanol, acetic acid, propanol, light olefins, aromatics, and gasoline). The substantial amount of hydrogen needed in the production of chemicals and fuels from catalytic CO2 conversion (mainly CO2 reduction) should come from water indirectly in thermal catalysis or directly in electrocatalysis and photo(electro)catalysis .
To date, many research institutions in the world have devoted tremendous efforts to the field of catalytic CO2 conversion. As one of the leading research institutions for fundamental and applied catalysis in the world, the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP) started its research on heterogeneous catalysis for CO2 conversion in the early 1990s in the field of thermal catalysis  and has expanded the research to electrocatalytic and photo(electro)catalytic CO2 conversion in the past decade [8, 9] (Fig. 1). Some important concepts (e.g., nanoconfined catalysis and single-atom catalysis) in heterogeneous catalysis proposed by our institute have also been applied to catalytic CO2 conversion [10, 11]. In this review, we summarize our recent progress in heterogeneous catalysis for CO2 conversion into chemicals and fuels in different conversion routes and highlight some representative studies of thermal catalysis, electrocatalysis, and photo(electro)catalysis.
Thermocatalytic CO2 Conversion
CO2 conversion via thermal catalysis involves a large group of catalytic reactions, including CO2 hydrogenation, dry reforming of methane with CO2, and nonreductive CO2 conversion into fine chemicals. Of these routes, direct CO2 hydrogenation to valuable chemicals and fuels is most promising. As more than 90% of industrial hydrogen is currently produced from fossil fuels via steam reforming of natural gas and coal gasification, which in turn produce substantial CO2, CO2 hydrogenation should proceed using hydrogen produced in a manner free of CO2 emission. Obtaining hydrogen via water electrolysis powered by renewable energy sources provides a viable solution to this issue, thus making CO2 hydrogenation attractive.
CO2 Hydrogenation to C1 Products
Methanol, formic acid, methane, and CO are the four main C1 products synthesized from CO2 hydrogenation. In light of the reaction thermodynamics (Table 1), CO2 hydrogenation to most C1 products is exothermic, except for CO production via an endothermic reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction. Although the ∆G0298 K value of CO2 hydrogenation to formic acid is positive, in most studies adding a base to the reaction medium shifts the reaction equilibrium forward, thereby making the reaction easier and yielding formate as the final product. The generation of methanol, methane, and CO from CO2 hydrogenation is often concurrent under their required reaction conditions, thereby developing efficient catalysts with high selectivity toward the desired C1 products and considerably improving activity and stability.
Methanol synthesis from CO2 and hydrogen is the first target based on the concept of “liquid sunshine” proposed by Bai and coworkers . Methanol can be used as either liquid fuel or platform molecule for subsequent upgrading to higher-value chemicals via emerging technologies, such as the methanol to olefins process . CO2 hydrogenation to methanol occurs at 200 °C to 300 °C and 3–10 MPa, under which conditions the RWGS and CO2 methanation reactions are also thermodynamically favorable. Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 is an industrial catalyst for traditional methanol synthesis from syngas (CO + H2). This catalyst is also applied to methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation. However, Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 is also an active catalyst for the RWGS reaction, resulting in a low methanol selectivity. Moreover, CO2 hydrogenation produces more water, which causes severe sintering and deactivation of Cu catalysts . The methanol selectivity is usually lower than 50% at a considerable CO2 conversion (i.e., > 10%) over traditional Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts .
The reactivity and stability of Cu-based catalysts can be improved by stabilizing active Cu species via metal–support interaction enhancement. Cu catalysts supported by alternative oxides (e.g., SiO2, ZrO2, CeO2, and Ce1−xZrxO2) have been developed [16,17,18,19]. Sun and coworkers  developed a Cu+-enriched Cu/SiO2 catalyst using the flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) method. This catalyst achieved a methanol selectivity of 79% at a CO2 conversion rate of 5.2%. A unique shattuckite-like structure with slightly distorted Cu–O–Si texture in the FSP-prepared catalyst was considered to enrich the Cu+ species. High-pressure in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) showed that the Cu+ species could stabilize and facilitate the hydrogenation of the *CO intermediate to methanol via an RWGS + CO hydrogenation pathway.
Apart from Cu-based catalysts, researchers also considered non-Cu catalytic materials, such as Pd nanoparticles (NPs) confined in carbon nanotubes, Pd/ZnO/Al2O3, Pt/In2O3, MoS2, ZnO–ZrO2 solid solution, and TiO2-supported Cd cluster [15, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Li and coworkers  reported a ZnO–ZrO2 solid solution catalyst, which achieved a methanol selectivity of 86% to 91% and excellent stability for 500 h at a CO2 conversion of more than 10% under the investigated reaction conditions (Fig. 2a, b). The in situ spectroscopy and theoretical calculation results indicated that the synergetic effect between Zn and Zr sites in the ZnO–ZrO2 solid solution catalyst contributed to the outstanding methanol synthesis performance. A MoS2 nanosheet catalyst with rich sulfur vacancies developed by Deng and coworkers  was able to achieve CO2 hydrogenation to methanol at a low reaction temperature (180 °C) but with a methanol selectivity of 94.3% at a CO2 conversion rate of 12.5% and a stable performance during a long-term test for over 3 000 h.
Formic Acid (Formate)
Formic acid usually presents as formate in practical production from CO2 hydrogenation, as thermodynamics can efficiently shift the reaction equilibrium in the forward direction (CO2 + H2 → HCOOH; HCOOH + OH– → HCOO– + H2O). CO2 hydrogenation to formate is generally achieved via bicarbonate hydrogenation in alkaline environments, but it suffers from high activation energy because of the considerable thermodynamic stability of the bicarbonate intermediate. Huang and coworkers  proposed a revised route for direct hydrogenation of CO2 to formate using a Schiff-base-modified Au catalyst, with a turnover number (TON) of 14 470 at 90 °C and 8 MPa. The in situ DRIFTS and density functional theory (DFT) calculation results indicated an unusual CO2 activation pathway involving a weakly bonded carbamate zwitterion intermediate formed through the Lewis base adduct of CO2. However, this reaction pathway only occurred with hydrogen lacking a Lewis base center in a polar solvent, such as water and methanol, used in this work. Huang and coworkers  further applied atomically dispersed catalysts to CO2 hydrogenation to formate. A single Ir atom catalyst was prepared using a porous organic polymer with aminopyridine functionalities. It exhibited excellent performance for formate production, with a TON as high as 6784 at 120 °C and 8 MPa (Fig. 2c). Recycling experiments indicated that the catalytic activity did not decrease even after four uses (Fig. 2d). The catalytic mechanism was similar to that of a homogeneous mononuclear Ir pincer complex catalyst.
Methane and CO
CO2 hydrogenation to methane (methanation) and CO (RWGS) are usually two parallel processes, depending on the catalytic materials and reaction conditions. The produced methane via CO2 methanation can serve as the principal component of synthetic natural gas, whereas the produced CO via RWGS can be integrated into syngas conversion systems . Extensive studies on catalysis have been devoted to controlling selectivity toward methane versus CO at a considerable CO2 conversion for given applications .
Among the metals (e.g., Ni, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ir, Co, Fe, and Cu) used for CO2 methanation catalysts, Ni and Ru are the most active ones [30,31,32,33]. As non-noble metal catalysts, Ni-based catalysts hold great promise for practical methanation application. However, catalytically active Ni species are prone to sintering and deactivation because CO2 methanation is a strongly exothermic reaction. An important strategy for dealing with this issue is to modulate the strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) between Ni NPs and oxides [34,35,36,37,38,39]. Pan and coworkers  determined that CO2 methanation performance was remarkably suppressed and CO was the only product when Ni NPs were supported by conventional anatase (a-TiO2) because of the SMSI-induced formation of a reduced TiOx overlayer around the Ni NPs at high temperature (500 °C). By contrast, pretreating the a-TiO2 support with NH3 and H2 switched the selectivity from CO to methane with one order of magnitude increase in CO2 conversion (Fig. 2e). The reduction pretreatments generated a large amount of Ti3+ species in the a-TiO2 support, which could weaken the SMSI and suppress the formation of the TiOx overlayer, leading to more Ni surface sites accessible to the reactants. As SMSI was first widely recognized for Pt group metals on reducible oxide supports, the growth of the TiOx overlayer was also observed in TiO2-supported Ru and Ir NP catalysts for CO2 methanation [32, 40, 41]. Huang and coworkers  demonstrated the increase of the grown TiOx overlayer around Ir NPs with the increase in the reduction pretreatment temperature, along with the selectivity shift from methane to CO (Fig. 2f). Recently, Fu and coworkers reported the growth of a MoO3−x layer over Ru NPs in CO2 hydrogenation reaction gas and at a low temperature (250 °C), but its selectivity followed the aforementioned trend that the presence of an oxide layer overturned the major product from methane to CO, with the selectivity of both being close to unity .
As discussed previously, CO production via RWGS is also likely even with the most active methanation catalysts (e.g., Ni and Ru). Huang and coworkers  theoretically investigated the origin of such selectivity changes. They demonstrated that the C–O bond scission of the main intermediates (e.g., HCOO–, –COOH, and M–CO) was a key factor that determined methane/CO selectivity, which was correlated with the difference between the dissociation barrier and the desorption energy of metal carbonyls. With this knowledge, one can improve CO selectivity by decreasing the coordination number of supported metals or using metals at the lower right corner of the transition metal series. This theory likely explains the preferred formation of CO versus methane over TiO2-supported metals with low loadings [43, 44] and Au-based catalysts .
CO2 Hydrogenation to C2+ Products
The synthesis of C2+ products with two or more carbon atoms from direct CO2 hydrogenation via C–C coupling and carbon chain growth is attractive, as these products have a high energy density and can be used as basic chemicals for polymer synthesis or liquid fuels for transportation. Similar to CO hydrogenation, CO2 hydrogenation also suffers from low selectivity toward specific C2+ products [46,47,48,49]. Here, we discuss selective CO2 hydrogenation to several subgroups of C2+ products, including light olefins, aromatics, gasoline, and higher alcohols (e.g., ethanol). Because the pathway involved in the growth of the carbon chain for any given C2+ product contains many successive reaction steps, tandem catalysis, which utilizes more than one catalyst to promote two or more mechanistically distinct reaction steps , has been used as a promising strategy for achieving high selectivity.
Light olefins (C2=–C4=), including ethylene, propylene, and butylene, are essential chemicals for the production of polymer materials, which are conventionally produced from steam cracking of naphtha and dehydrogenation of light alkanes. Light olefins can also be produced from CO2 hydrogenation via a modified Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) pathway. However, the selectivity of C2–C4 hydrocarbons (including olefins and paraffins) is limited by the Anderson–Schulz–Flory (ASF) distribution (typically < 58%) . For instance, modifying FTS catalysts (e.g., Fe) with structural and electronic promoters (e.g., Na and Mn) can only achieve a selectivity of < 50% for light olefins in hydrocarbons at a CO2 conversion of approximately 40% [51, 52]. Thus, obtaining high selectivity toward light olefins while suppressing the production of alkane and CO (via RWGS) from CO2 hydrogenation is challenging.
A concept of catalyst design for a bifunctional oxide–zeolite system proposed by Bao and coworkers  has been demonstrated to effectively surpass the ASF distribution limit. This concept is also applicable to CO2 hydrogenation. Pan and coworkers  reported a bifunctional catalyst composed of ZnO–Y2O3 oxide and SAPO-34 zeolite, which achieved selective CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins with a selectivity of 83.9% in hydrocarbons at a CO2 conversion rate of 27.6% at 390 °C. Li and coworkers  developed a ZnZrO/SAPO tandem catalyst composed of ZnO–ZrO2 solid solution and Zn-modified SAPO-34 zeolite. With this catalyst, light olefins were produced from CO2 hydrogenation with a selectivity as high as over 80% in hydrocarbons and a suppressed CO selectivity of 47% at a CO2 conversion rate of 12.6% at 380 °C (Fig. 3a, b). The tandem catalysis mechanism involved the formation of CHxO* species via CO2 hydrogenation over the ZnO–ZrO2 solid solution and the transformation of migrated CHxO* species to light olefins over the Zn-modified SAPO-34 zeolite.
Aromatics (CnH2n − 6) are compounds that contain at least one benzene ring. Benzene, toluene, and xylenes of aromatic compounds are important bulk chemicals. Generally, aromatics are industrially derived from petroleum. Liu and coworkers  proposed a route for the synthesis of aromatics directly from CO2 hydrogenation. They reported a ZnAlOx/H-ZSM-5 catalyst with an aromatic selectivity of 73.9% and a low methane selectivity of 0.4% among carbon products (excluding CO) at a CO2 conversion rate of 9.1% (Fig. 3c). This catalyst also showed good stability during a test for 100 h (Fig. 3d). Mechanistic studies indicated that methanol and dimethyl ether were formed via hydrogenation of formate species over ZnAlOx sites, migrated to H-ZSM-5 sites, and subsequently converted into olefins and aromatics. When replacing H-ZSM-5 with Si-H-ZSM-5 in the tandem catalyst, 58.1% p-xylene in xylenes could be achieved. Li and coworkers  developed a ZnZrO/ZSM-5 tandem catalyst, which achieved an aromatic selectivity of 73% at a CO2 conversion rate of 14% and a suppressed CO selectivity of 44%. Sun and coworkers  combined a Na-Fe3O4 CO2-FTS catalyst with ZSM-5 zeolites with rich Brønsted acid sites as a tandem catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to aromatics. This catalyst achieved a selectivity of 75% for light aromatics, and p-xylene accounted for as high as 72% of xylenes. A tandem catalysis process comprising CO2 methanation and methane aromatization with two connected reactors  was also demonstrated for CO2 hydrogenation to aromatics, with a benzene production rate of 0.68 µmol/(g min) at a high CO2 conversion rate of 92%.
Long-chain hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (C5–C11) can also be produced via direct CO2 hydrogenation. Using this route, Sun and coworkers [60,61,62,63] conducted numerous studies using multifunctional composite catalysts composed of CO2-FTS catalysts and zeolites. They developed a Na-Fe3O4/HZSM-5 catalyst that could achieve direct CO2 conversion into gasoline with a selectivity of up to 78% in hydrocarbons and only a small amount of methane (4%) at a CO2 conversion rate of 22% under industrially relevant conditions (Fig. 3e) . Three types of active sites (Fe3O4, Fe5C2, and acid sites) at appropriate proximity to the multifunctional catalyst cooperatively catalyzed the tandem and synergetic catalytic conversion of CO2 into long-chain gasoline fractions. The multifunctional catalyst also showed remarkable stability for 1000 h and held great promise as a potential industrial catalyst for CO2 conversion into liquid fuels (Fig. 3f). Recently, Sun and coworkers further combined the Na-Fe3O4 CO2-FTS catalyst with two zeolites (SAPO-11 and ZSM-5) in single-bed, dual-bed, and triple-bed arrangements for the production of gasoline with a high fraction of multibranched isoparaffins . The triple-bed configuration composed of Na-Fe3O4, SAPO-11, and ZSM-5 achieved a gasoline selectivity of 71.7% in hydrocarbons at a CO2 conversion rate of 31.2%, with an isoparaffin selectivity as high as 38.2%, corresponding to a research octane number (RON) value of 91.7.
CO2 conversion into ethanol has been realized using modified methanol synthesis or FTS catalysts. Over alkali-metal-modified methanol catalysts, methanol production is still high, leading to unsatisfactory ethanol selectivity. Over modified Fe-based or Co-based FTS catalysts, alcohol production follows the ASF distribution with a typical ethanol selectivity of approximately 35%. Thus, achieving high ethanol selectivity remains a challenge. Huang and coworkers  designed a bifunctional Ir1–In2O3 single-atom catalyst, which showed an excellent ethanol selectivity of > 99% and an initial turnover frequency (TOF) of 481 h−1 (Fig. 3g, h). Characterizations and DFT calculations indicated that isolated Ir sites in combination with adjacent oxygen vacancies forming Lewis acid–base pairs could activate CO2 to produce *CO intermediates over Ir sites. By contrast, In2O3 was an active catalyst for methanol synthesis and produced CH3O* intermediates. Ethanol could be formed over this bifunctional single-atom catalyst by coupling *CO and CH3O* adjacent sites. Recently, Huang and coworkers  developed a K0.2Rh0.2/β-Mo2C single-atom catalyst, which exhibited an ethanol selectivity of 72.1% at 150 °C.
Other CO2 Conversion Routes
Apart from hydrogenation, CO2 can also be converted and utilized through other important routes. The dry reforming of methane with CO2 provides an attractive route to simultaneously convert the two greenhouse gases into syngas . Current studies mainly focus on the stability issue at a high reaction temperature, for instance, developing robust Ru/MgAl2O4 and Ni/h-BN catalysts [67, 68]. As a weak oxidant, CO2 is also able to assist the dehydrogenation of light alkanes, including ethane, propane, and isobutane, during which CO2 is reduced to CO [69,70,71]. Thermochemical splitting of CO2 into CO and O2 utilizing concentrated solar energy is also a promising route for CO2 reduction . The catalytic function of metal species (e.g., IrOx and Pd) that can activate CO2 is still necessary in the CO2 splitting reaction even at high temperatures [73, 74]. Some nonreductive CO2 conversion routes can also produce valuable fine chemicals, such as organic carbonates [75, 76], cyclic carbonates [77,78,79,80], carboxylic acids [81, 82], and amides, via the N-formylation reaction .
Electrocatalytic CO2 Conversion
The conversion of CO2 into chemicals and fuels via electrocatalysis can directly couple CO2 utilization and the storage of renewable energy. Although the co-conversion of CO2 with other molecules (e.g., N2) has also been demonstrated , currently, the main electrocatalytic conversion route is still electrocatalytic CO2 reduction or CO2 electrolysis . Here, it should be noted that there is no strict difference between CO2 electroreduction and CO2 electrolysis. CO2 electroreduction is usually preferred by the catalysis community, whereas CO2 electrolysis is often used by the electrochemistry community. Rather than using H2 produced by water electrolysis in thermocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation reactions, the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction utilizes active hydrogen species directly derived from water activation to achieve the reduction of CO2. Compared with thermal catalysis, it can drive electrocatalytic CO2 reduction under mild conditions, e.g., room/low temperatures (< 100 °C) and ambient pressures. By contrast, high-temperature CO2 electrolysis is used in some application scenarios, such as O2 production for space missions on Mars in the 1960s and direct electrolysis of high-temperature flue gas containing highly concentrated CO2.
High-Temperature CO2 Electrolysis to CO and Syngas
Figure 4a shows the energy demand for CO2 electrolysis to CO (CO2 → CO + 1/2O2) at different temperatures . As the enthalpy change (∆H) is constant regardless of temperature, the electrical energy demand (∆G) decreases, whereas the heat demand (T∆S) increases with the increase in the reaction temperature. Therefore, a high-temperature CO2 electrolysis process heated with industrial waste heat and Joule heat inside an electrolysis cell can effectively lower the electrical energy consumption. Thermodynamic analysis indicates that the formation of CO and/or syngas becomes more favorable at high temperatures compared with other CO2 reduction products. High-temperature CO2 electrolysis is usually conducted in solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) using oxygen-ion-conducting or proton-conducting solid oxides as electrolytes at high operating temperatures (up to 1000 °C). Different electrode reactions occur at cathodes and anodes when oxygen ions or protons are used as ion carriers. SOECs using proton-conducting electrolytes can work at low-to-intermediate temperatures (400 to 700 °C), at which reduced products, such as hydrocarbons, can also be generated from the point of view of thermodynamics. Because of the poor stability of proton-conducting electrolytes under CO2 electrolysis conditions, to date, most studies have been conducted using oxygen-ion-conducting SOECs [87, 88]. When CO2 and water are co-fed to SOECs, the final product can be syngas with different H2/CO ratios, even hydrocarbons (e.g., methane and ethylene) with the aid of other metal catalysts for syngas conversion [88, 89].
The state-of-the-art cathode material for CO2 electrolysis in SOECs is yttria-stabilized zirconia-supported Ni (Ni/YSZ). However, the Ni/YSZ cathode suffers from carbon deposition, grain coarsening, and Ni oxidation under the reaction conditions (i.e., CO2 atmosphere and high temperature), leading to poor stability [90, 91]. Recently, mixed ionic and electronic conductors, such as perovskite oxides (ABO3), have been used as alternative cathode materials because of their good redox stability and high carbon deposition resistance; however, they show inferior CO2 electrolysis performance compared with the Ni/YSZ cathode. The performance of perovskite oxides has been improved by element doping [92,93,94,95,96], anchoring single-metal sites on the surface , constructing catalytically active oxide–oxide interfaces via infiltration [98, 99] and metal–oxide interfaces via metal decoration , and in situ exsolution of metal NPs [101,102,103,104]. The in situ exsolution treatment can produce many metal–alloy NPs (e.g., Rh, Pd, Pt, Fe, Ni, Co, FeNi, CoFe, and RuFe) on perovskite surfaces under reducing environments; however, the number of NPs is low because of the sluggish diffusion of B-site dopant cations in the bulk perovskite. Through repeated redox treatments, Wang and coworkers  promoted the exsolution of RuFe alloy NPs on Sr2Fe1.4Ru0.1Mo0.5O6−δ (SFRuM) perovskite. The dynamic exsolution and redissolution processes of the RuFe alloy NPs were imaged by in situ secondary electron scanning transmission electron microscopy at 600 to 850 °C in a 10-Pa H2 or O2 atmosphere. The density of exsolved RuFe alloy NPs was as high as approximately 21,000 µm−2 after four redox cycles, whereas the NP size did not change (Fig. 4b). The in situ grown RuFe@SFRuM interface after four redox cycles increased the current density of CO2 electrolysis (approximately 0.65 A/cm2) by 74.6% and contributed to high stability for 1000 h at 1.2 V and 800 °C (Fig. 4c, d). Zhu and coworkers  reported the in situ dispersion of an Au layer used as a current collector to Au NPs (down to 2 nm) at 800 °C by applying high cell voltages. During this transformation, Au/YSZ was reconstructed into nano-Au/Zr–suboxide interfaces, which resulted in a decrease in the polarization resistance by a factor of 75, along with a 38-fold improvement in CO2 electrolysis current density (Fig. 4e, f).
Low-Temperature Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction
Low-temperature electrocatalytic CO2 reduction occurs at room temperature to low temperature (< 100 °C) using liquid water and/or vapor as a reactant. Table 2 lists the standard potentials of CO2 electroreduction for various products. The CO2 electroreduction reaction is thermodynamically not that difficult, but it is hindered by the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Moreover, CO2 electroreduction involves multiple proton and electron transfer steps, leading to highly complex reaction pathways toward a variety of products, including CO, formic acid (formate), methane, methanol, ethylene, ethanol, acetate acid (acetate), and n-propanol. Therefore, selectivity control is a core aspect of CO2 electroreduction studies, particularly for reduced and C2+ products. In terms of practical applications, high selectivity toward given products should be obtained at an industrial current density, with considerable stability.
Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to CO and Formic Acid (Formate)
CO and formate are the most widely reported C1 products from CO2 electroreduction. Although Hori’s seminal works [106, 107] in the 1980s have classified bulk metals into several groups in terms of major products, such as CO, formate, hydrocarbons, or H2, remarkable differences can be observed in nanostructured metal catalysts [108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117]. For instance, Pd is an active metal for HER, and bulk Pd mainly produces H2 in CO2 electroreduction; however, Pd NPs show impressive performance for CO2 electroreduction to CO or formate, both with a Faradaic efficiency of > 90%, depending on the applied electrode potentials (Fig. 5a). This selectivity switch can be rationalized by potential-induced and intermediate-induced active phase transition under the reaction conditions [8, 118, 119]. The CO production over Pd NPs can be further improved by alloying Pd with second metals [120, 121]. Notably, the electrochemical promotion of the catalysis effect was also observed in CO2 hydrogenation to formate over Pd NPs in the liquid phase under ambient conditions . Inspired by the concept of nanoconfinement catalysis proposed by Bao , Wang and coworkers  developed an Au(Ag)-CeOx catalyst with abundant metal–oxide interfaces. In situ scanning tunneling microscopy and X-ray photoemission spectroscopy results indicated that these interfaces enhanced CO2 adsorption and hydrogenation to the initial *COO and *COOH intermediates, thus leading to high Faradaic efficiency and partial current density for CO production (Fig. 5b). Another important example is using single Ni atom catalysts [124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132] instead of Ni bulk or NPs that are good HER catalysts. Wang and coworkers  developed nickel–nitrogen (Ni–N) sites embedded within porous carbon with a Ni loading of up to 5.44 wt% through pyrolysis of Zn/Ni bimetallic zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. This catalyst achieved a high CO current density of 71.5 mA/cm2, corresponding to a TOF of 10,087 h−1 with a CO Faradaic efficiency of more than 92% in an H-cell (Fig. 5c, d). The atomically dispersed Ni–N sites are coordinatively unsaturated and can suppress the HER . Heteroatom-doped carbon materials have also been used for CO2 electroreduction to CO [133,134,135]. Apart from the catalysts themselves, the reaction conditions, such as electrolyte composition and temperature, also play important roles in determining selectivity [136,137,138].
In addition to the unique Pd catalysts [8, 118, 119], formate can also be produced using a series of catalysts, such as Bi, Sn, and Pb compounds [139,140,141,142,143], Cu alloy with Sn and In [144,145,146], and single-atom alloy catalysts . Wang and coworkers  reported an in situ reconstructed hierarchical Sn-Cu/SnOx core/shell (Sn2.7Cu) catalyst, which achieved a current density of 406.7 mA/cm2 at − 0.70 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) and high stability at 243.1 mA/cm2 for 40 h at − 0.55 V versus RHE in a flow cell. Xiao and coworkers  developed a single-atom Pb-alloyed Cu catalyst (Pb1Cu) that can exclusively convert CO2 into formate with approximately 96% Faradaic efficiency at more than 1 A/cm2. Formate production occurred over the modulated Cu sites rather than the isolated Pb sites in the Pb1Cu catalyst, following an HCOO* pathway. The production of a pure formic acid solution at 100 mA/cm2 for 180 h was further demonstrated with the Pb1Cu catalyst in a 3-cm2 electrode device using a proton-conducting solid electrolyte.
Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Methane
Methane, as a fully reduced C1 product, is usually produced using Cu catalysts at negative potentials . However, some non-Cu catalytic materials can also reduce CO2 to methane. Wang and coworkers  demonstrated a cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPc) and zinc–nitrogen–carbon (Zn–N–C) tandem catalyst that can efficiently convert CO2 into methane. The methane production rate of CoPc/Zn–N–C was over 100 times higher than that of CoPc or Zn–N–C alone (Fig. 5e). This catalyst decoupled complicated methane pathways over single active sites (for Cu catalysts) into a two-step tandem reaction. CO2 was reduced to CO over CoPc; then, CO diffused onto Zn–N–C for further hydrogenation to methane.
Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to C2+ Products
Compared with C1 products, C2+ products, such as ethylene, ethanol, and n-propanol, have higher energy density and broader availability. The formation of these products involves C–C coupling, a key topic in fundamental catalysis research. More importantly, selectivity control after the C–C coupling step would determine the product distribution among C2+ products [150,151,152,153,154,155,156]. The highly selective production of a specific single C2+ product relies on the proper mechanistic understanding of full reaction pathways. The oxidation state of Cu has been considered to play a critical role in the formation of C2+ products, with the Cu+ species being the most catalytically active because of the presence of Cu0/Cu+ interfaces [157,158,159,160]. Wang and coworkers  designed a Cu–CuI composite catalyst with abundant Cu0/Cu+ interfaces by physically mixing commercial Cu NPs and CuI powders. This catalyst achieved a remarkable partial current density of 591 mA/cm2 for C2+ products at − 1.0 V versus RHE in a flow cell (Fig. 5f). The high-rate C2+ generation was attributed to the presence of residual Cu+ and adsorbed iodine species, which could facilitate CO adsorption and subsequent C–C coupling. Although the total C2+ Faradaic efficiency could reach 71% at such a high current density, further efforts should be made to improve the selectivity toward a single C2+ product, such as ethylene and ethanol.
Tandem Catalysis Mechanism in Catalytic CO2 Conversion Reactions
The selective generation of highly reduced products, such as hydrocarbons and oxygenate, via catalytic CO2 conversion is not only desirable but also challenging because of multiple electron–proton transfer steps during these reactions. Tandem catalysis has been demonstrated as an emerging and promising strategy in CO2 conversion into highly reduced products . In principle, a tandem catalyst with two or more catalytically active sites is expected to break the linear scaling relationship of the adsorption of key intermediates, resulting in remarkably improved selectivity toward specific products . As mentioned previously, Wang and coworkers  fabricated a CoPc/ZnN4 tandem catalyst (Fig. 6a), in which CO2 was reduced to CO over CoPc and the generated CO diffused onto the ZnN4 site for subsequent hydrogenation to methane. This tandem effect is also applied to promote the formation of C2 products (e.g., ethylene) when combining CO-producing sites with Cu sites into a single catalyst (Fig. 6b), for instance, Cu/Ag  and Cu/Ni–N–C . In thermocatalytic CO2 conversion, tandem catalysis plays a vital role in generating highly reduced and multicarbon products [54,55,56,57, 60, 165,166,167]. Generally, the oxide component of these tandem catalysts accounts for the formation of C1 intermediates (e.g., *CO and *CHxO), whereas the zeolite component catalyzes C–C coupling to form light olefins, aromatics, gasoline, and higher alcohols (Fig. 6c).
Development of CO2 Electrolyzers at Industrial Current Densities
Beyond catalyst design, the rational design of efficient CO2 electrolyzers is also of great importance for scaling up CO2 electroreduction toward practical applications. The electrolyzers should be operated at industrial current densities (> 200 mA/cm2), which could be achieved using the gas diffusion electrode configuration that breaks the limitation of CO2 solubility. Flow and membrane electrode assembly (MEA) cells are the two main CO2 electrolyzers [168, 169], of which MEA electrolyzers hold great promise because of their low iR drop, compact structure, improved stability, and high full cell energy efficiency (from electrical energy to chemical energy). With such electrolyzers, it is likely to only feed CO2 and pure water as reactants without using any liquid electrolyte solution . Wang and coworkers  developed a 4-cm2 alkaline MEA CO2 electrolyzer working at industrial current densities (Fig. 7a), which achieved a total Faradaic efficiency of 80% for CO2 electroreduction over commercial Cu NPs at 350 mA/cm2 with an energy efficiency of approximately 30% under optimized reaction conditions (Fig. 7b, c). The scale-up demonstration with a geometric electrode size of 100 cm2 at the laboratory level has been achieved by Wang and coworkers. With the continuous technological improvement of the electrode structure, ion exchange membrane, and electrolyzer, current density (CO2 reduction rate) and energy efficiency are expected to significantly increase . To increase single-pass CO2 conversion, large-area electrolyzers and stacks should be assembled, and this has been investigated by some groups .
Although the anion exchange membrane-based (alkaline) MEA electrolyzer holds great promise, it encounters a basic problem in low-temperature CO2 electrolysis, i.e., carbonate formation [174, 175]. CO2 reacts with surface OH− ions produced during electrolysis to form carbonate (CO32−/HCO3−). Carbonate would precipitate in salt form to block catalyst surfaces, which reduces electrode hydrophobicity, leading to flooding. Moreover, carbonate can transfer to the anode through the anion exchange membrane, thereby leading to significant carbon loss and a low CO2 utilization efficiency [176, 177]. Possible strategies for dealing with the carbonate issue are to use a cation exchange membrane, bipolar membrane, and solid electrolyte buffer layer [168, 169, 178,179,180]. This leads to an emerging direction, i.e., acid CO2 electrolysis that has been demonstrated to suppress carbonate formation [181,182,183,184]. Moreover, the use of a two-step tandem conversion process, i.e., CO2 electrolysis to CO in SOECs and CO electrolysis to C2+ (e.g., ethylene and ethanol) in MEA electrolyzers, is feasible . This tandem process also highlights the full use of individual advantages of high-temperature electrolysis (for the desired CO2 activation) and low-temperature electrolysis (for the desired deep reduction of carbon intermediates). Another promising two-step CO2–to–C2+ conversion process is to connect an acidic MEA electrolyzer and an alkaline MEA electrolyzer in sequence, which combines the advantage of acidic CO2 electrolysis (free of carbonate formation) and alkaline CO electrolysis (improved C2+ production).
Photo(electro)catalytic CO2 Conversion
The conversion of CO2 and water into chemicals and fuels via solar-driven photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis (PEC) with the aid of an efficient photocathode, which mimics the natural photosynthetic process, is generally known as artificial photosynthesis. The products of photocatalytic and PEC CO2 reduction mainly include CO, methane, and ethylene [9, 186,187,188,189]. To date, semiconductor materials have been widely used to fabricate photocathodes for photocatalytic and PEC CO2 reduction; however, the solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency is still unsatisfactory for practical applications. To improve the performance of photocatalytic/PEC CO2 reduction, the construction of heterostructure photocathodes comprising multiple components is an important approach. Li and coworkers  developed an Au/p-GaN plasmonic heterostructure photocatalyst for selective and unassisted gas phase photocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO under visible-light illumination. A metal/insulator/semiconductor configuration with a nanometer-thick aluminum oxide layer between Au/Cu NPs and p-GaN could remarkably improve the CO production rate (Fig. 8a). Zong and coworkers  reported a sandwich-like organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite-based photocathode for PEC CO2 reduction to CO. The photocathode decorated with carbon encapsulation and a cobalt phthalocyanine molecular catalyst exhibited a high photocurrent density of − 15.5 mA/cm2 at − 0.11 V versus RHE under air mass (AM) 1.5 G illumination with a stable CO Faradaic efficiency of more than 80% for 25 h (Fig. 8b). Unbiased PEC CO2 reduction in tandem with an amorphous Si photoanode achieved a total solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency of 3.85%.
The recent progress in the conversion of CO2 into valuable chemicals and fuels (e.g., CO, formic acid, methanol, methane, ethanol, acetic acid, propanol, light olefins, aromatics, and gasoline) via thermal catalysis, electrocatalysis, and photo(electro)catalysis has been reviewed, with an emphasize on highlighting some representative studies. The structure–performance correlations of typical catalysts used in these reactions have been revealed by combined advanced in situ spectroscopy and microscopy characterizations and DFT calculations. The control in activity, selectivity, and stability in future catalysis research at a fundamental level should aim at addressing issues facing practical applications. To reduce the cost of downstream separation and purification processes, catalytic selectivity toward a single CO2 reduction product/fraction should be further improved at an industrially relevant CO2 conversion rate with considerable stability in the future. Such selectivity control can be achieved by designing new catalytic materials and developing new CO2 conversion routes with coupling multiple external fields (e.g., light, thermal, electrical, and magnetic). From the view of fundamental research, catalysts should be characterized in their working state during CO2 conversion reactions using in situ/operando methods with high temporal and spatial resolutions and sufficient surface sensitivity to gain a proper understanding of their structure–performance correlations.
The scale-up of some catalytic CO2 conversion routes has been demonstrated at the industrial level in China and around the world, e.g., the liquid sunshine demonstration project in Lanzhou, China, which synthesizes methanol from CO2 hydrogenation coupled with photovoltaic-driven water electrolysis; the pilot project of direct CO2 hydrogenation to gasoline in Jining, China; the high-temperature SOEC CO2 electrolysis demonstration by the company of Haldor Topsøe; and low-temperature CO2 electrolysis demonstration by the company Siemens. This exciting industrial progress encourages the research community to further join forces to scale-up other important catalytic CO2 conversion routes, such as CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins and aromatics and tandem CO2 electrolysis (CO2–CO–ethylene) in connected SOEC and MEA electrolyzers as well as connected acidic and alkaline MEA electrolyzers.
Artz J, Müller TE, Thenert K et al (2018) Sustainable conversion of carbon dioxide: an integrated review of catalysis and life cycle assessment. Chem Rev 118(2):434–504
Burkart MD, Hazari N, Tway CL et al (2019) Opportunities and challenges for catalysis in carbon dioxide utilization. ACS Catal 9(9):7937–7956
Tackett BM, Gomez E, Chen JG (2019) Net reduction of CO2 via its thermocatalytic and electrocatalytic transformation reactions in standard and hybrid processes. Nat Catal 2(5):381–386
Ling YF, Ma QL, Yu YF et al (2021) Optimization strategies for selective CO2 electroreduction to fuels. Trans Tianjin Univ 27(3):180–200
Gao P, Li SG, Bu XN et al (2017) Direct conversion of CO2 into liquid fuels with high selectivity over a bifunctional catalyst. Nat Chem 9(10):1019–1024
Cai T, Sun HB, Qiao J et al (2021) Cell-free chemoenzymatic starch synthesis from carbon dioxide. Science 373(6562):1523–1527
Xu LY, Wang QX, Lin LW et al (1997) Production of light olefins from CO2 hydrogenation over Fe/silicalite-2 catalysts I. Catalytic reactivity and reaction mechanism. J Nat Gas Chem 6(2):111–120
Gao DF, Zhou H, Wang J et al (2015) Size-dependent electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 over Pd nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 137(13):4288–4291
Tang LQ, Chen RT, Meng XG et al (2018) Unique homo-heterojunction synergistic system consisting of stacked BiOCl nanoplate/Zn-Cr layered double hydroxide nanosheets promoting photocatalytic conversion of CO2 into solar fuels. Chem Commun 54(40):5126–5129
Yang F, Deng DH, Pan XL et al (2015) Understanding nano effects in catalysis. Natl Sci Rev 2(2):183–201
Su X, Yang XF, Huang YQ et al (2019) Single-atom catalysis toward efficient CO2 conversion to CO and formate products. Acc Chem Res 52(3):656–664
Shih CF, Zhang T, Li JH et al (2018) Powering the future with liquid sunshine. Joule 2(10):1925–1949
Tian P, Wei YX, Ye M et al (2015) Methanol to olefins (MTO): from fundamentals to commercialization. ACS Catal 5(3):1922–1938
Liang BL, Ma JG, Su X et al (2019) Investigation on deactivation of Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(21):9030–9037
Sha F, Han Z, Tang S et al (2020) Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol over non-Cu-based heterogeneous catalysts. Chemsuschem 13(23):6160–6181
Yu JF, Yang M, Zhang JX et al (2020) Stabilizing Cu+ in Cu/SiO2 catalysts with a shattuckite-like structure boosts CO2 hydrogenation into methanol. ACS Catal 10(24):14694–14706
Wang WW, Qu ZP, Song LX et al (2020) CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Cu/CeO2 and Cu/ZrO2 catalysts: tuning methanol selectivity via metal-support interaction. J Energy Chem 40:22–30
Wang WW, Qu ZP, Song LX et al (2020) An investigation of Zr/Ce ratio influencing the catalytic performance of CuO/Ce1-xZrxO2 catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to CH3OH. J Energy Chem 47:18–28
Wang WW, Qu ZP, Song LX et al (2020) Probing into the multifunctional role of copper species and reaction pathway on copper-cerium-zirconium catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol using high pressure in situ DRIFTS. J Catal 382:129–140
Wang JJ, Lu SM, Li J et al (2015) A remarkable difference in CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on Pd nanoparticles supported inside and outside of carbon nanotubes. Chem Commun 51(99):17615–17618
Xu JH, Su X, Liu XY et al (2016) Methanol synthesis from CO2 and H2 over Pd/ZnO/Al2O3: catalyst structure dependence of methanol selectivity. Appl Catal A Gen 514:51–59
Wang JJ, Li GN, Li ZL et al (2017) A highly selective and stable ZnO-ZrO2 solid solution catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Sci Adv 3(10):e1701290
Han Z, Tang CZ, Sha F et al (2021) CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on ZnO-ZrO2 solid solution catalysts with ordered mesoporous structure. J Catal 396:242–250
Han Z, Tang CZ, Wang JJ et al (2021) Atomically dispersed Ptn+ species as highly active sites in Pt/In2O3 catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation. J Catal 394:236–244
Hu JT, Yu L, Deng J et al (2021) Sulfur vacancy-rich MoS2 as a catalyst for the hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Nat Catal 4(3):242–250
Wang JJ, Meeprasert J, Han Z et al (2022) Highly dispersed Cd cluster supported on TiO2 as an efficient catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Chin J Catal 43(3):761–770
Liu QG, Yang XF, Li L et al (2017) Direct catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 to formate over a Schiff-base-mediated gold nanocatalyst. Nat Commun 8:1407
Shao XZ, Yang XF, Xu JM et al (2019) Iridium single-atom catalyst performing a quasi-homogeneous hydrogenation transformation of CO2 to formate. Chem 5(3):693–705
Pan XL, Jiao F, Miao DY et al (2021) Oxide-zeolite-based composite catalyst concept that enables syngas chemistry beyond Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Chem Rev 121(11):6588–6609
Su X, Xu JH, Liang BL et al (2016) Catalytic carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methane: a review of recent studies. J Energy Chem 25(4):553–565
Lin QQ, Liu XY, Jiang Y et al (2014) Crystal phase effects on the structure and performance of ruthenium nanoparticles for CO2 hydrogenation. Catal Sci Technol 4(7):2058–2063
Xu JH, Su X, Duan HM et al (2016) Influence of pretreatment temperature on catalytic performance of rutile TiO2-supported ruthenium catalyst in CO2 methanation. J Catal 333:227–237
Gao LJ, Fu Q, Wei MM et al (2016) Enhanced nickel-catalyzed methanation confined under hexagonal boron nitride shells. ACS Catal 6(10):6814–6822
Pan QS, Peng JX, Sun TJ et al (2014) Insight into the reaction route of CO2 methanation: promotion effect of medium basic sites. Catal Commun 45:74–78
Pan QS, Peng JX, Wang S et al (2014) In situ FTIR spectroscopic study of the CO2 methanation mechanism on Ni/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2. Catal Sci Technol 4(2):502–509
Gao J, Jiang Q, Liu YF et al (2018) Probing the enhanced catalytic activity of carbon nanotube supported Ni-LaOx hybrids for the CO2 reduction reaction. Nanoscale 10(29):14207–14219
Li J, Lin YP, Pan XL et al (2019) Enhanced CO2 methanation activity of Ni/anatase catalyst by tuning strong metal-support interactions. ACS Catal 9(7):6342–6348
Ye RP, Liao L, Reina TR et al (2021) Engineering Ni/SiO2 catalysts for enhanced CO2 methanation. Fuel 285:119151
Liao L, Chen LD, Ye RP et al (2021) Robust nickel silicate catalysts with high Ni loading for CO2 methanation. Chem Asian J 16(6):678–689
Zhang YR, Zhang Z, Yang XF et al (2020) Tuning selectivity of CO2 hydrogenation by modulating the strong metal–support interaction over Ir/TiO2 catalysts. Green Chem 22(20):6855–6861
Zhang YR, Yan WJ, Qi HF et al (2022) Strong metal-support interaction of Ru on TiO2 derived from the co-reduction mechanism of RuxTi1-xO2 interphase. ACS Catal 12(3):1697–1705
Xin H, Lin L, Li RT et al (2022) Overturning CO2 hydrogenation selectivity with high activity via reaction-induced strong metal-support interactions. J Am Chem Soc 144(11):4874–4882
Chen XD, Su X, Su HY et al (2017) Theoretical insights and the corresponding construction of supported metal catalysts for highly selective CO2 to CO conversion. ACS Catal 7(7):4613–4620
Li XY, Lin J, Li L et al (2020) Controlling CO2 hydrogenation selectivity by metal-supported electron transfer. Angew Chem Int Ed 59(45):19983–19989
Zhang XB, Han SB, Zhu BE et al (2020) Reversible loss of core–shell structure for Ni–Au bimetallic nanoparticles during CO2 hydrogenation. Nat Catal 3(4):411–417
Guo LS, Sun J, Ji XW et al (2018) Directly converting carbon dioxide to linear α-olefins on bio-promoted catalysts. Commun Chem 1:11
Liang BL, Duan HM, Sun T et al (2019) Effect of Na promoter on Fe-based catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to alkenes. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(1):925–932
Han Y, Fang CY, Ji XW et al (2020) Interfacing with carbonaceous potassium promoters boosts catalytic CO2 hydrogenation of iron. ACS Catal 10(20):12098–12108
Yao RW, Wei J, Ge QJ et al (2021) Monometallic iron catalysts with synergistic Na and S for higher alcohols synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation. Appl Catal B Environ 298:120556
Lohr TL, Marks TJ (2015) Orthogonal tandem catalysis. Nat Chem 7(6):477–482
Wei J, Sun J, Wen ZY et al (2016) New insights into the effect of sodium on Fe3O4-based nanocatalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins. Catal Sci Technol 6(13):4786–4793
Liang BL, Sun T, Ma JG et al (2019) Mn decorated Na/Fe catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins. Catal Sci Technol 9(2):456–464
Jiao F, Li JJ, Pan XL et al (2016) Selective conversion of syngas to light olefins. Science 351(6277):1065–1068
Li J, Yu T, Miao DY et al (2019) Carbon dioxide hydrogenation to light olefins over ZnO-Y2O3 and SAPO-34 bifunctional catalysts. Catal Commun 129:105711
Li ZL, Wang JJ, Qu YZ et al (2017) Highly selective conversion of carbon dioxide to lower olefins. ACS Catal 7(12):8544–8548
Ni YM, Chen ZY, Fu Y et al (2018) Selective conversion of CO2 and H2 into aromatics. Nat Commun 9:3457
Li ZL, Qu YZ, Wang JJ et al (2019) Highly selective conversion of carbon dioxide to aromatics over tandem catalysts. Joule 3(2):570–583
Wei J, Yao RW, Ge QJ et al (2021) Precisely regulating Brønsted acid sites to promote the synthesis of light aromatics via CO2 hydrogenation. Appl Catal B Environ 283:119648
Zhu PF, Sun J, Yang GH et al (2017) Tandem catalytic synthesis of benzene from CO2 and H2. Catal Sci Technol 7(13):2695–2699
Wei J, Ge QJ, Yao RW et al (2017) Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel. Nat Commun 8:15174
Wei J, Yao RW, Ge QJ et al (2018) Catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 to isoparaffins over Fe-based multifunctional catalysts. ACS Catal 8(11):9958–9967
Noreen A, Li MQ, Fu YJ et al (2020) One-pass hydrogenation of CO2 to multibranched isoparaffins over bifunctional zeolite-based catalysts. ACS Catal 10(23):14186–14194
Wei J, Yao RW, Han Y et al (2021) Towards the development of the emerging process of CO2 heterogenous hydrogenation into high-value unsaturated heavy hydrocarbons. Chem Soc Rev 50(19):10764–10805
Ye X, Yang CY, Pan XL et al (2020) Highly selective hydrogenation of CO2 to ethanol via designed bifunctional Ir1-In2O3 single-atom catalyst. J Am Chem Soc 142(45):19001–19005
Ye X, Ma JG, Yu WG et al (2022) Construction of bifunctional single-atom catalysts on the optimized β-Mo2C surface for highly selective hydrogenation of CO2 into ethanol. J Energy Chem 67:184–192
Yao SD, Gu LJ, Sun CY et al (2009) Combined methane CO2 reforming and dehydroaromatization for enhancing the catalyst stability. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(2):713–718
Zhang JC, Ge BH, Liu TF et al (2020) Robust ruthenium-saving catalyst for high-temperature carbon dioxide reforming of methane. ACS Catal 10(1):783–791
Dong JH, Fu Q, Li HB et al (2020) Reaction-induced strong metal-support interactions between metals and inert boron nitride nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 142(40):17167–17174
Wang YH, Zhang ZX, Lei LJ et al (2021) Defect-dependent selective C-H/C–C bond cleavage of propane in the presence of CO2 over FeNi/ceria catalysts. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9(51):17301–17309
Wang JP, Liu M, Li JJ et al (2022) Elucidating the active-phase evolution of Fe-based catalysts during isobutane dehydrogenation with and without CO2 in feed gas. ACS Catal 12(10):5930–5938
Jeong MH, Lee DH, Moon JW et al (2022) Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and subsequent CO2 activation on Ce-incorporated FeTiOx metal oxides. Chem Eng J 433:134621
Jiang QQ, Chen ZP, Tong JH et al (2017) Direct thermolysis of CO2 into CO and O2. Chem Commun 53(6):1188–1191
Jiang QQ, Chen ZP, Tong JH et al (2016) Catalytic function of IrOx in the two-step thermochemical CO2-splitting reaction at high temperatures. ACS Catal 6(2):1172–1180
Li H, Goldbach A, Li WZ et al (2008) CO2 decomposition over Pd membrane surfaces. J Phys Chem B 112(39):12182–12184
Zhao GD, Zhang Y, Zhang HY et al (2015) Direct synthesis of propylene carbonate from propylene and carbon dioxide catalyzed by quaternary ammonium heteropolyphosphatotungstate-TBAB system. J Energy Chem 24(3):353–358
Chen YD, Wang H, Qin ZX et al (2019) TixCe1–xO2 nanocomposites: a monolithic catalyst for the direct conversion of carbon dioxide and methanol to dimethyl carbonate. Green Chem 21(17):4642–4649
Wang WL, Wang YQ, Li CY et al (2017) State-of-the-art multifunctional heterogeneous POP catalyst for cooperative transformation of CO2 to cyclic carbonates. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(6):4523–4528
Jayakumar S, Li H, Tao L et al (2018) Cationic Zn-porphyrin immobilized in mesoporous silicas as bifunctional catalyst for CO2 cycloaddition reaction under cocatalyst free conditions. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:9237–9245
Chen J, Zhong MM, Tao L et al (2018) The cooperation of porphyrin-based porous polymer and thermal-responsive ionic liquid for efficient CO2 cycloaddition reaction. Green Chem 20(4):903–911
Liu L, Jayakumar S, Chen J et al (2021) Synthesis of bifunctional porphyrin polymers for catalytic conversion of dilute CO2 to cyclic carbonates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(25):29522–29531
Wu ZL, Sun L, Liu QG et al (2017) A Schiff base-modified silver catalyst for efficient fixation of CO2 as carboxylic acid at ambient pressure. Green Chem 19(9):2080–2085
Wu ZL, Liu QG, Yang XF et al (2017) Knitting aryl network polymers-incorporated Ag nanoparticles: a mild and efficient catalyst for the fixation of CO2 as carboxylic acid. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(11):9634–9639
Wang GQ, Jiang M, Ji GJ et al (2020) Bifunctional heterogeneous Ru/POP catalyst embedded with alkali for the N-formylation of amine and CO2. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(14):5576–5583
Chen C, Zhu XR, Wen XJ et al (2020) Coupling N2 and CO2 in H2O to synthesize urea under ambient conditions. Nat Chem 12(8):717–724
de Luna P, Hahn C, Higgins D et al (2019) What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364(6438):eaav3506
Song YF, Zhang XM, Xie K et al (2019) High-temperature CO2 electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells: developments, challenges, and prospects. Adv Mater 31(50):e1902033
Zhan ZL, Zhao L (2010) Electrochemical reduction of CO2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells. J Power Sources 195(21):7250–7254
Zhang XM, Song YF, Wang GX et al (2017) Co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in high-temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells: recent advance in cathodes. J Energy Chem 26(5):839–853
Xie K, Zhang YQ, Meng GY et al (2011) Direct synthesis of methane from CO2/H2O in an oxygen-ion conducting solid oxide electrolyser. Energy Environ Sci 4(6):2218
Yan JB, Chen H, Dogdibegovic E et al (2014) High-efficiency intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolyzer cells for the conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. J Power Sources 252:79–84
Song YF, Zhou ZW, Zhang XM et al (2018) Pure CO2 electrolysis over an Ni/YSZ cathode in a solid oxide electrolysis cell. J Mater Chem A 6(28):13661–13667
Zhou YJ, Zhou ZW, Song YF et al (2018) Enhancing CO2 electrolysis performance with vanadium-doped perovskite cathode in solid oxide electrolysis cell. Nano Energy 50:43–51
Hu SQ, Zhang LX, Liu HY et al (2019) Detrimental phase evolution triggered by Ni in perovskite-type cathodes for CO2 electroreduction. J Energy Chem 36:87–94
Hu SQ, Zhang LX, Liu HY et al (2019) Alkaline-earth elements (Ca, Sr and Ba) doped LaFeO3-δ cathodes for CO2 electroreduction. J Power Sources 443:227268
Hu SQ, Zhang LX, Cai LL et al (2020) Iron stabilized 1/3 A-site deficient La–Ti–O perovskite cathodes for efficient CO2 electroreduction. J Mater Chem A 8(40):21053–21061
Liu QX, Song YF, Li RT et al (2021) A vanadium-doped BSCF perovskite for CO2 electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(38):19814–19821
Zhou YJ, Lin L, Song YF et al (2020) Pd single site-anchored perovskite cathode for CO2 electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nano Energy 71:104598
Zhang XM, Song YF, Guan F et al (2018) Enhancing electrocatalytic CO2 reduction in solid oxide electrolysis cell with Ce0.9Mn0.1O2−δ nanoparticles-modified LSCM-GDC cathode. J Catal 359:8–16
Lv HF, Zhou YJ, Zhang XM et al (2019) Infiltration of Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 nanoparticles on Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6-δ cathode for CO2 electroreduction in solid oxide electrolysis cell. J Energy Chem 35:71–78
Feng WC, Song YF, Zhang XM et al (2020) Platinum-decorated ceria enhances CO2 electroreduction in solid oxide electrolysis cells. ChemSusChem 13(23):6290–6295
Lv HF, Lin L, Zhang XM et al (2019) In situ exsolved FeNi3 nanoparticles on nickel doped Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6–δ perovskite for efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction. J Mater Chem A 7(19):11967–11975
Lv HF, Lin L, Zhang XM et al (2020) In situ investigation of reversible exsolution/dissolution of CoFe alloy nanoparticles in a co-doped Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6-δ cathode for CO2 electrolysis. Adv Mater 32(6):e1906193
Lv HF, Liu TF, Zhang XM et al (2020) Atomic-scale insight into exsolution of CoFe alloy nanoparticles in La0.4Sr0.6Co0.2Fe0.7Mo0.1O3−δ with efficient CO2 electrolysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 59(37):15968–15973
Lv HF, Lin L, Zhang XM et al (2021) Promoting exsolution of RuFe alloy nanoparticles on Sr2Fe1.4Ru0.1Mo0.5O6-δ via repeated redox manipulations for CO2 electrolysis. Nat Commun 12:5665
Zhang LX, Li XB, Lu JM et al (2021) In situ dispersed nano-Au on Zr-suboxides as active cathode for direct CO2 electroreduction in solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nano Lett 21(16):6952–6959
Hori Y, Kikuchi K, Suzuki S (1985) Production of CO and CH4 in electrochemical reduction of CO2 at metal electrodes in aqueous hydrogencarbonate solution. Chem Lett 14(11):1695–1698
Hori Y, Kikuchi K, Murata A et al (1986) Production of methane and ethylene in electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at copper electrode in aqueous hydrogencarbonate solution. Chem Lett 15(6):897–898
Jiang XL, Cai F, Gao DF et al (2016) Electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide over reduced nanoporous zinc oxide. Electrochem Commun 68:67–70
Gao DF, Cai F, Wang GX et al (2017) Nanostructured heterogeneous catalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 3:39–44
Yan CC, Lin L, Gao DF et al (2018) Selective CO2 electroreduction over an oxide-derived gallium catalyst. J Mater Chem A 6(40):19743–19749
Gao DF, Yan CC, Wang GX et al (2018) Pd/C catalysts for CO2 electroreduction to CO: Pd loading effect. J Electrochem 24(6):757–765
Yu Q, Guo CX, Ge JY et al (2020) Morphology controlling of silver by plasma engineering for electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. J Power Sources 453:227846
Lin XZ, Ma WG, Sun KJ et al (2021) [AuAg26(SR)18S] −: open shell structure and high faradaic efficiency in electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO. J Phys Chem Lett 12(1):552–557
Ye K, Liu TF, Song YP et al (2021) Tailoring the interactions of heterogeneous Ag2S/Ag interface for efficient CO2 electroreduction. Appl Catal B Environ 296:120342
Gao DF, Li HF, Wei PF et al (2022) Electrochemical synthesis of catalytic materials for energy catalysis. Chin J Catal 43(4):1001–1016
Gao DF, Liu TF, Wang GX et al (2021) Structure sensitivity in single-atom catalysis toward CO2 electroreduction. ACS Energy Lett 6(2):713–727
Zang YP, Wei PF, Li HF et al (2022) Catalyst design for electrolytic CO2 reduction toward low-carbon fuels and chemicals. Electrochem Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-022-00140-y
Gao DF, Zhou H, Cai F et al (2017) Switchable CO2 electroreduction via engineering active phases of Pd nanoparticles. Nano Res 10(6):2181–2191
Gao DF, Zhou H, Cai F et al (2018) Pd-containing nanostructures for electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction. ACS Catal 8(2):1510–1519
Yin Z, Gao DF, Yao SY et al (2016) Highly selective palladium-copper bimetallic electrocatalysts for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO. Nano Energy 27:35–43
Cai F, Gao DF, Si R et al (2017) Effect of metal deposition sequence in carbon-supported Pd-Pt catalysts on activity towards CO2 electroreduction to formate. Electrochem Commun 76:1–5
Cai F, Gao DF, Zhou H et al (2017) Electrochemical promotion of catalysis over Pd nanoparticles for CO2 reduction. Chem Sci 8(4):2569–2573
Gao DF, Zhang Y, Zhou ZW et al (2017) Enhancing CO2 electroreduction with the metal-oxide interface. J Am Chem Soc 139(16):5652–5655
Yan CC, Li HB, Ye YF et al (2018) Coordinatively unsaturated nickel–nitrogen sites towards selective and high-rate CO2 electroreduction. Energy Environ Sci 11(5):1204–1210
Yang HB, Hung SF, Liu S et al (2018) Atomically dispersed Ni(i) as the active site for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat Energy 3(2):140–147
Lin L, Li HB, Yan CC et al (2019) Synergistic catalysis over iron-nitrogen sites anchored with cobalt phthalocyanine for efficient CO2 electroreduction. Adv Mater 31(41):e1903470
Zhang Z, Ma C, Tu YC et al (2019) Multiscale carbon foam confining single iron atoms for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO. Nano Res 12(9):2313–2317
Ma SS, Su PP, Huang WJ et al (2019) Atomic Ni species anchored N-doped carbon hollow spheres as nanoreactors for efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction. ChemCatChem 11(24):6092–6098
Liu S, Yang HB, Hung SF et al (2020) Elucidating the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction over a model single-atom nickel catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 59(2):798–803
Ding CM, Feng CC, Mei YH et al (2020) Carbon nitride embedded with transition metals for selective electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Appl Catal B Environ 268:118391
Ren XY, Liu S, Li HC et al (2020) Electron-withdrawing functional ligand promotes CO2 reduction catalysis in single atom catalyst. Sci China Chem 63(12):1727–1733
Yao PF, Li TY, Qiu YL et al (2021) N-doped hierarchical porous carbon derived from bismuth salts decorated ZIF8 as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for CO2 reduction. J Mater Chem A 9(1):320–326
Liu S, Yang HB, Su X et al (2019) Rational design of carbon-based metal-free catalysts for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction: a review. J Energy Chem 36:95–105
Yao PF, Qiu YL, Zhang TT et al (2019) N-doped nanoporous carbon from biomass as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for the CO2 reduction reaction. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(5):5249–5255
Cheng CF, Shao JQ, Wei PF et al (2021) Nitrogen and boron co-doped carbon spheres for carbon dioxide electroreduction. ChemNanoMat 7(6):635–640
Gao DF, Wang J, Wu HH et al (2015) pH effect on electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 over Pd and Pt nanoparticles. Electrochem Commun 55:1–5
Jiang XL, Li HF, Yang YY et al (2020) pH dependence of CO2 electroreduction selectivity over size-selected Au nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 55(28):13916–13926
Lin L, Li HB, Wang Y et al (2021) Temperature-dependent CO2 electroreduction over Fe-N-C and Ni-N-C single-atom catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed 60(51):26582–26586
Zhong HX, Qiu YL, Zhang TT et al (2016) Bismuth nanodendrites as a high performance electrocatalyst for selective conversion of CO2 to formate. J Mater Chem A 4(36):13746–13753
Su PP, Xu WB, Qiu YL et al (2018) Ultrathin bismuth nanosheets as a highly efficient CO2 reduction electrocatalyst. ChemSusChem 11(5):848–853
Zhang TT, Qiu YL, Yao PF et al (2019) Bi-modified Zn catalyst for efficient CO2 electrochemical reduction to formate. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(18):15190–15196
Shi YM, Ji Y, Long J et al (2020) Unveiling hydrocerussite as an electrochemically stable active phase for efficient carbon dioxide electroreduction to formate. Nat Commun 11:3415
Li ZJ, Cao A, Zheng Q et al (2021) Elucidation of the synergistic effect of dopants and vacancies on promoted selectivity for CO2 electroreduction to formate. Adv Mater 33(2):e2005113
Ye K, Zhou ZW, Shao JQ et al (2020) In situ reconstruction of a hierarchical Sn-Cu/SnOx core/shell catalyst for high-performance CO2 electroreduction. Angew Chem Int Ed 59(12):4814–4821
Ye K, Cao A, Shao JQ et al (2020) Synergy effects on Sn-Cu alloy catalyst for efficient CO2 electroreduction to formate with high mass activity. Sci Bull 65(9):711–719
Shao JQ, Wang Y, Gao DF et al (2020) Copper-indium bimetallic catalysts for the selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Chin J Catal 41(9):1393–1400
Zheng TT, Liu CX, Guo CX et al (2021) Copper-catalysed exclusive CO2 to pure formic acid conversion via single-atom alloying. Nat Nanotechnol 16(12):1386–1393
Qiu YL, Zhong HX, Zhang TT et al (2017) Copper electrode fabricated via pulse electrodeposition: toward high methane selectivity and activity for CO2 electroreduction. ACS Catal 7(9):6302–6310
Lin L, Liu TF, Xiao JP et al (2020) Enhancing CO2 electroreduction to methane with a cobalt phthalocyanine and zinc-nitrogen-carbon tandem catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 59(50):22408–22413
Chen RX, Su HY, Liu DY et al (2020) Highly selective production of ethylene by the electroreduction of carbon monoxide. Angew Chem Int Ed 59(1):154–160
Ma WC, Xie SJ, Liu TT et al (2020) Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol through hydrogen-assisted C–C coupling over fluorine-modified copper. Nat Catal 3(6):478–487
Ji YL, Chen Z, Wei RL et al (2022) Selective CO-to-acetate electroreduction via intermediate adsorption tuning on ordered Cu–Pd sites. Nat Catal 5(4):251–258
Gao DF, Arán-Ais RM, Jeon HS et al (2019) Rational catalyst and electrolyte design for CO2 electroreduction towards multicarbon products. Nat Catal 2(3):198–210
Arán-Ais RM, Scholten F, Kunze S et al (2020) The role of in situ generated morphological motifs and Cu(i) species in C2+ product selectivity during CO2 pulsed electroreduction. Nat Energy 5(4):317–325
Sang JQ, Wei PF, Liu TF et al (2022) A reconstructed Cu2P2O7 catalyst for selective CO2 electroreduction to multicarbon products. Angew Chem Int Ed 61(5):e202114238
Li HF, Wei PF, Gao DF et al (2022) In situ Raman spectroscopy studies for electrochemical CO2 reduction over Cu catalysts. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 34:100589
Velasco-Vélez JJ, Chuang CH, Gao DF et al (2020) On the activity/selectivity and phase stability of thermally grown copper oxides during the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. ACS Catal 10(19):11510–11518
Xiao H, Goddard WA 3rd, Cheng T et al (2017) Cu metal embedded in oxidized matrix catalyst to promote CO2 activation and CO dimerization for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(26):6685–6688
Timoshenko J, Bergmann A, Rettenmaier C et al (2022) Steering the structure and selectivity of CO2 electroreduction catalysts by potential pulses. Nat Catal 5(4):259–267
Gao DF (2022) Revealing structure-selectivity correlations in pulsed CO2 electrolysis via time-resolved operando synchrotron X-ray studies. Nano Res. 15(8):6860–6861
Li HF, Liu TF, Wei PF et al (2021) High-rate CO2 electroreduction to C2+ products over a copper-copper iodide catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 60(26):14329–14333
Zhu YT, Cui XY, Liu HL et al (2021) Tandem catalysis in electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction. Nano Res 14(12):4471–4486
Huang JF, Mensi M, Oveisi E et al (2019) Structural sensitivities in bimetallic catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction revealed by Ag-Cu nanodimers. J Am Chem Soc 141(6):2490–2499
Wang XL, de Araújo JF, Ju W et al (2019) Mechanistic reaction pathways of enhanced ethylene yields during electroreduction of CO2-CO co-feeds on Cu and Cu-tandem electrocatalysts. Nat Nanotechnol 14(11):1063–1070
Xu D, Yang HQ, Hong XL et al (2021) Tandem catalysis of direct CO2 hydrogenation to higher alcohols. ACS Catal 11(15):8978–8984
Liu XL, Wang MH, Yin HR et al (2020) Tandem catalysis for hydrogenation of CO and CO2 to lower olefins with bifunctional catalysts composed of spinel oxide and SAPO-34. ACS Catal 10(15):8303–8314
Ma ZQ, Porosoff MD (2019) Development of tandem catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to olefins. ACS Catal 9(3):2639–2656
Gao DF, Cai F, Xu QQ et al (2014) Gas-phase electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide using electrolytic cell based on phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole membrane. J Energy Chem 23(6):694–700
Gao DF, Wei PF, Li HF et al (2021) Designing electrolyzers for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Acta Phys-Chim Sin 37(5):2009021
Yin ZL, Peng HQ, Wei X et al (2019) An alkaline polymer electrolyte CO2 electrolyzer operated with pure water. Energy Environ Sci 12(8):2455–2462
Wei PF, Li HF, Lin L et al (2020) CO2 electrolysis at industrial current densities using anion exchange membrane based electrolyzers. Sci China Chem 63(12):1711–1715
Wakerley D, Lamaison S, Wicks J et al (2022) Gas diffusion electrodes, reactor designs and key metrics of low-temperature CO2 electrolysers. Nat Energy 7(2):130–143
Endrődi B, Kecsenovity E, Samu A et al (2019) Multilayer electrolyzer stack converts carbon dioxide to gas products at high pressure with high efficiency. ACS Energy Lett 4(7):1770–1777
Rabinowitz JA, Kanan MW (2020) The future of low-temperature carbon dioxide electrolysis depends on solving one basic problem. Nat Commun 11:5231
Ozden A, García de Arquer FP, Huang JE et al (2022) Carbon-efficient carbon dioxide electrolysers. Nat Sustain 5(7):563–573
Larrazábal GO, Strøm-Hansen P, Heli JP et al (2019) Analysis of mass flows and membrane cross-over in CO2 reduction at high current densities in an MEA-type electrolyzer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(44):41281–41288
Ma M, Clark EL, Therkildsen KT et al (2020) Insights into the carbon balance for CO2 electroreduction on Cu using gas diffusion electrode reactor designs. Energy Environ Sci 13(3):977–985
Siritanaratkul B, Forster M, Greenwell F et al (2022) Zero-gap bipolar membrane electrolyzer for carbon dioxide reduction using acid-tolerant molecular electrocatalysts. J Am Chem Soc 144(17):7551–7556
Kim JY, Zhu P, Chen FY et al (2022) Recovering carbon losses in CO2 electrolysis using a solid electrolyte reactor. Nat Catal 5(4):288–299
Fujinuma N, Ikoma A, Lofland SE (2020) Highly efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction to CO with one-pot synthesized co-pyridine-derived catalyst incorporated in a nafion-based membrane electrode assembly. Adv Energy Mater 10(39):2001645
Huang JE, Li FW, Ozden A et al (2021) CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products in strong acid. Science 372(6546):1074–1078
Monteiro MCO, Dattila F, Hagedoorn B et al (2021) Absence of CO2 electroreduction on copper, gold and silver electrodes without metal cations in solution. Nat Catal 4(8):654–662
Monteiro MCO, Philips MF, Schouten KJP et al (2021) Efficiency and selectivity of CO2 reduction to CO on gold gas diffusion electrodes in acidic media. Nat Commun 12:4943
Gu J, Liu S, Ni WY et al (2022) Modulating electric field distribution by alkali cations for CO2 electroreduction in strongly acidic medium. Nat Catal 5(4):268–276
Ozden A, Wang YH, Li FW et al (2021) Cascade CO2 electroreduction enables efficient carbonate-free production of ethylene. Joule 5(3):706–719
Wang Y, Zhang ZZ, Zhang LN et al (2018) Visible-light driven overall conversion of CO2 and H2O to CH4 and O2 on 3D-SiC@2D-MoS2 heterostructure. J Am Chem Soc 140(44):14595–14598
Hou TT, Luo NC, Cui YT et al (2019) Selective reduction of CO2 to CO under visible light by controlling coordination structures of CeOx-S/ZnIn2S4 hybrid catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 245:262–270
Gao W, Bai XW, Gao YY et al (2020) Anchoring of black phosphorus quantum dots onto WO3 nanowires to boost photocatalytic CO2 conversion into solar fuels. Chem Commun 56(56):7777–7780
Wang Y, Shang XT, Shen JN et al (2020) Direct and indirect Z-scheme heterostructure-coupled photosystem enabling cooperation of CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation. Nat Commun 11:3043
Li RG, Cheng WH, Richter MH et al (2021) Unassisted highly selective gas-phase CO2 reduction with a plasmonic Au/p-GaN photocatalyst using H2O as an electron donor. ACS Energy Lett 6(5):1849–1856
Zhang HF, Chen Y, Wang H et al (2020) Carbon encapsulation of organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite toward efficient and stable photo-electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Adv Energy Mater 10(44):2002105
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA1501503), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22002155, 22125205, 92045302), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB17020200), the CAS Youth Innovation Promotion (Y201938), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2021-MS-022) and the High-Level Talents Innovation Project of Dalian City (2020RQ038).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, D., Li, W., Wang, H. et al. Heterogeneous Catalysis for CO2 Conversion into Chemicals and Fuels. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 28, 245–264 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-022-00326-x
- CO2 conversion
- CO2 hydrogenation
- CO2 electroreduction