Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of low-intensity ultrasound on cell proliferation and reproductivity

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasound has been widely used in clinics. Cellular responses to low-intensity ultrasound are parameter-dependent. Proper parameter setting is vital to its exact use. To get guidelines for parameter setting, lowintensity ultrasound stimulation on the proliferation and reproductivity of HepG2 and 3T3 cells in vitro was examined with a 1.06 MHz-generator by changing the parameters(including intensity, pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle)in a wide range. Cell viability and reproductivity at different time after sonication were measured by 3- (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide(MTT)and colony formation assay to indicate timerelated proliferation. The results illustrate that ultrasound irradiation at 0.4–0.8 W/cm2 and high pulse repetition frequency(100 Hz)can facilitate cell proliferation, while above 0.8 W/cm2 would resist it. The extent of resistance closely correlated with duty cycle and pulse repetition frequency. Resistance effect at low pulse repetition frequency(1 Hz)is greater than that at high pulse repetition frequency(100 Hz)and not time-related. The influence of high pulse repetition frequency is time-accumulated, indicating cellular process involved. These findings would provide valuable guidelines for the application of low-intensity ultrasound in stem cell transformation and tissue engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaminski G A. Computational studies of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis complex formation with caspase-9 and a small antagonist [J]. J Chem Theory Comput, 2008, 4(5):847–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Juffermans L J M, van Dijk A, Jongenelen C A M et al. Ultrasound and microbubble-induced intra and intercellular bioeffects in primary endothelial cells [J]. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2009, 35(11):1917–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heckman J D, Ryaby J P, McCabe J et al. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low intensity pulsed ultrasound [J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1994, 76(1):26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kristiansen T K, Ryaby J P, McCabe J et al. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1997, 79(7):961–973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olkkua A, Leskinen J J, Lammi M J et al. Ultrasoundinduced activation of Wnt signaling in human MG-63 osteoblastic cells [J]. Bone, 2010, 47(2):320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutten S, Nolte P A, Korstjens C M et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound increases bone volume, osteoid thickness and mineral apposition rate in the area of fracture healing in patients with a delayed union of the osteotomized fibula [J]. Bone, 2008, 43(2):348–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Uglow M G, Peat R A, Hile M S et al. Low-intensity ultrasound stimulation in distraction osteogenesis in rabbits [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, 417:303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mukai S, Ito H, Nakagawa Y et al. Transforming growth factor-beta(1)mediates the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in chondrocytes [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2005, 31(12):1713–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Z J, Huckle J, Francomano C A et al. The influence of pulsed low-intensity ultrasound on matrix production of chondrocytes at different stages of differentiation: An explants study [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28: 1547–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kopakkala-Tani M, Leskinen J J, Karjalainen H M et al. Ultrasound stimulates proteoglycan synthesis in bovine primary chondrocytes [J]. Biorheology, 2006, 43(3/4): 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nishikori T, Ochi M, Uchio Y et al. Effects of lowintensity pulsed ultrasound on proliferation and chondroitin sulfate synthesis of cultured chondrocytes embedded in Atelocollagen® gel [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 59(2):201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parvizi J, Parpura V, Greenleaf J F et al. Calcium signaling is required for ultrasound-stimulated aggrecan synthesis by rat chondrocytes [J]. J Orthop Res, 2002, 20(1):51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu H C, Fong Y C, Chang C S et al. Ultrasound induces cyclooxygenase-2 expression through integrin, integrinlinked kinase, Akt, NFkappa B and p300 pathway in human chondrocytes [J]. Cell Signal, 2007, 19:2317–2328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feril Jr L B, Kondo T, Cui Z G et al. Apoptosis induced by the sonomechanical effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in a human leukemia cell line [J]. Cancer Lett, 2005, 221(2):145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng Y, Tian Z M, Wan M X et al. Low-intensity ultrasound induced apoptosis in human gastric carcinoma cells [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2008, 14:4873–4879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feng Y, Tian Z M, Wan M X. Bioeffects of low-intensity ultrasound in vitro apoptosis, protein profile alteration, and potential molecular mechanism [J]. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2010, 29(6):963–974.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hassan M A, Furusawa Y, Zhao Q L et al. Differential cytotoxicity and sonosensitization by sanazole: Effect of cell type and acoustic parameters [J]. J Med Ultrasonics, 2011, 38(2):65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhong W, Sit W H, Wan J M F et al. Sonoporation induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in human promyelocytic leukemia cells [J]. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2011, 37(12):2149–2159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feril Jr L B, Tachibana K, Kondo T et al. Hypotoniainduced cell swelling enhances ultrasound-induced mechanical damage to cancer cells [J]. J Med Ultrasonics, 2010, 37(1):3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kondo T, Yoshida T, Ogawa R et al. Low-intensity ultrasound adjuvant therapy: Enhancement of doxorubicininduced cytotoxicity and the acoustic mechanisms involved [J]. Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2009, 36(2):61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo S, Sun X, Cheng J et al. Apoptosis of THP-1 macrophages induced by protoporphyrin IX-mediated sonodynamic therapy [J]. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2013, 8:2239–2246.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vaughan N M, Grainger J, Bader D L et al. The potential of pulsed low intensity ultrasound to stimulate chondrocytes matrix synthesis in agarose and monolayer cultures [J]. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2010, 48(12):1215–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Buldakov M A, Hassan M A, Zhao Q L et al. Influence of changing pulse repetition frequency on chemical and biological effects induced by low-intensity ultrasound in vitro [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2009, 16(3):392–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pan H, Zhou Y, Izadnegahdar O et al. Study of sonoporation dynamics affected by ultrasound duty cycle [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2005, 31(6):849–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lim K, Kim J, Seonwoo H et al. In vitro effects of lowintensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation on the osteogenic differentiation of human alveolar bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells for tooth tissue engineering [J]. Bio Med Research International, 2013, 2013: 269–724.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rubin J, Biskobing D, Fan X et al. Pressure regulates osteoclast formation and MCSF expression in marrow culture [J]. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 1997, 170(1):81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang N, Butler J P, Ingber D E et al. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton [J]. Science, 1993, 260(5111):1124–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biomedical Detecting Techniques and Instruments, School of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Chunmei Yang  (杨春梅), Xuehui Jiang  (蒋学慧) & Kang Du  (杜 康)

  2. Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China

    Qiliang Cai  (蔡启亮)

Authors
  1. Chunmei Yang  (杨春梅)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xuehui Jiang  (蒋学慧)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kang Du  (杜 康)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qiliang Cai  (蔡启亮)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunmei Yang  (杨春梅).

Additional information

Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin(No. 12JCYBJC18300).

Yang Chunmei, born in 1972, female, Dr, associate Prof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Jiang, X., Du, K. et al. Effects of low-intensity ultrasound on cell proliferation and reproductivity. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 22, 125–131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-016-2614-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-016-2614-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation