Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy approach to determining priority preorders of water resources projects

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the criteria set related to the priority preorders of water resources projects is introduced. A fuzzy multiple criteria group decision-making model is established, which incorporates quantitative analysis, judgments, experience and preferences of decision-makers. The model is used in practice to determine the priority preorders of five water resources projects, and the results show that the best choice can supply more new employment, domestic water and irrigation water, and has better quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LeMoine G, Subramanian A, Xie M et al. Guide to the Formulating of Water Resources Strategy [R]. No. 263, The World Bank, Technical Paper, 1994

  2. Karnib A. An approach to elaborate priority preorders of water resources projects based on multi-criteria evaluation and fuzzy sets analysis[J]. Water Resources Management, 2004, 18(1): 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luo Zhihui, Chen Huiyuan, Feng Shangyou. The study on multi-objective optimization method for cascade water power development[J]. Journal of Water Conservancy, 1998,1: 29–32(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kindler J. Planning and Decision-Making Frame Work, Environmentally Sound Water Management [M]. Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Loucks D P, Stedinger J R, Haith D A. Water Resources System Planning and Analysis [M]. The Southeast Book Company, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Louie P W, Yeh W W G, Hsu N. Multi-objective water resources management planning[J]. J Water Resour Plan Managt, 1984, 110(1): 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seckler D. The New Era of Water Resources Management: From “Dry” to “Wet” Water Savings[R]. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, 1996.

  8. Bardossy A, Duckstein L, Bogardi I. Combination of fuzzy numbers representing expert opinions[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1993, 57(2): 173–181.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu H M, Chen C T. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 79(3): 279–285.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee Hsuan Shih. Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002, 132(3): 303–315.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Shouyu. Fuzzy System Decision-Making Theory and Its Application [M]. Dalian University of Technology Press, Dalian, 1994(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen Shouyu. Non-structured decision making analysis and fuzzy optimum seeking theory for multi-objective systems[J]. Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, 1996, 4(2): 835–842(in Chinese).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Shouyu. Fuzzy Set Theory and Application [M]. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 1998(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingjie Liu  (刘英杰).

Additional information

LIU Yingjie, born in 1978, female, doctorate student.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Feng, P. Fuzzy approach to determining priority preorders of water resources projects. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 15, 121–125 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-009-0021-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-009-0021-6

Keywords

Navigation