Skip to main content
Log in

Damage assessment for buried structures against internal blast load

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The soil-structure interaction (SSI) decoupling is applied to simplify buried structure against internal blast load as spring effect. Shear failure, bending failure and combined failure modes are considered based on five transverse velocity profiles for the rigid-plastic structural element. The critical equations for shear and bending failure are derived respectively. Pressure-impulse diagrams are accordingly developed to assess damage of the buried structures against internal blast load. Comparison is done to show influences of soil-structure interaction and shear-to-bending strength ratio of a structural element. A case study is conducted to show the application of damage assessment to a reinforced concrete beam element of buried structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith P D, Hetherington J G. Blast and Ballistic Loading of Structures [M]. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. TM5-855-1 Fundamentals of Protective Design for Conventional Weapons [M]. Washington DC, 1986. 111.

  3. Li Q M, Meng H. Pressure-impulse diagram for blast loads based on dimensional analysis and single-degree-of-freedom model [J]. J Eng Mech, 2002, 128(1): 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Q M, Meng H. Pulse loading shape effects on pressure-impulse diagram of elastic plastic structures [J]. Int J Mech Sci, 2002, 44(9): 1985–1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fallah A S, Louca L A. Pressure-impulse diagrams for elastic-plastic-hardening and softening single-degree-of-freedom models subjected to blast loading [J]. Int J Impt Eng, 2007, 34(4): 823–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campidelli M, Viola E. An analytical-numerical method to analyze single degree of freedom models under airblast loading [J]. J Solid and Vibr, 2007, 302(1/2): 260–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma G W, Shi H J, Shu D W. P-I diagram method for combined failure modes of rigid-plastic beams [J]. Int J Impt Eng, 2007, 34(6): 1081–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Technical Manual(TM5-1300). Structures to Resist the Effects of the Accidental Explosions [M]. Department of the Army, Navy and Airforce, Washington DC, USA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Auckpath S, Peter J B, Tuncer B E. Laboratory evaluation of the soil stiffness gauge (ssg) [C]. In: Transportation Research Board 81th Annual Meeting. Washington DC, January 13–17, 2002. 02-3608.

  10. Krauthammer T. Blast mitigation technologies: Developments and numerical considerations for behavior assessment and design [C]. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Structures under Shock and Impact. SUSI, Melbourne, Australia, 1998: 1–10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guowei Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, G., Huang, X. & Li, J. Damage assessment for buried structures against internal blast load. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 14, 353–357 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-008-0060-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-008-0060-4

Keywords

Navigation