Abstract
Green brand advocacy, a unique phenomenon wherein regular customers champion environmentally conscious businesses, constitutes a vital extension of pro-environmental goals. This research extends prior research in green marketing by investigating the interplay between environmental activists and brands. Specifically, this research delves into the influence of attributing human-like qualities to nature and specific emotions evoked by nature on green brand advocacy in the scope of environmental activism. The research adopts the Simulation Theory to frame five pivotal concepts: nature anthropomorphism, ecological injustice, nature love, green trust, and green brand advocacy. Employing purposive sampling, this research gathered data from 303 environmental activists in Indonesia. A two-step analysis, utilizing the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via SPSS and AMOS software, was conducted to interpret the data. This research yields several theoretical contributions: firstly, nature anthropomorphism indirectly affects green brand advocacy through its positive relationship with ecological injustice and nature love. Secondly, this research uncovers that green trust negatively moderates the relationship between ecological injustice and green brand advocacy, emphasizing the need to effectively manage green trust to foster pro-environmental behaviors. The findings also carry noteworthy managerial implications: Businesses targeting environmental activists should customize their marketing content to align with activists’ anthropomorphic perspective of nature. However, businesses must also consider the potential adverse effects of green trust in their green marketing campaigns. Therefore, a balanced approach is advised, focusing on cultivating customer trust while promoting eco-friendly products. Overall, this research sheds light on the determinants influencing green brand advocacy in the context of environmental activism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelrazek, N. A., & El-Bassiouny, N. (2023). Online brand advocacy for sustainable brands: A study in an emerging market. Management and Sustainability: An Arab Review, 2(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-06-2022-0029
Agarwal, J., & Malhotra, N. K. (2019). Reflections on the state-of-the-art in ‘ethics and morality in customer-brand relationships’: Directions for future research. Journal of Business Research, 95, 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.057
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2016). Anthropomorphism. In: Routledge International Handbook of Consumer Psychology, 1st edn., (pp. 618–636). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727448
Ahmadi, A., & Ataei, A. (2022). Emotional attachment: A bridge between brand reputation and brand advocacy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-11-2021-0579
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783
Bligh, M. C. (2017). Leadership and trust. In Leadership Today (pp. 21–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31036-7_2
Chairy, C., & Syahrivar, J. (2020). You reap what you sow: The role of karma in green purchase. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1), 1798066. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1798066
Chan, A. A. H. (2012). Anthropomorphism as a conservation tool. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(7), 1889–1892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0274-6
Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0223-9
Chuah, S. H. W., El-Manstrly, D., Tseng, M. L., & Ramayah, T. (2020). Sustaining customer engagement behavior through corporate social responsibility: The roles of environmental concern and green trust. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121348
D’Uggento, A. M., Piscitelli, A., Ribecco, N., & Scepi, G. (2023). Perceived climate change risk and global green activism among young people. Statistical Methods and Applications, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-023-00681-6
Eddy, T. J., Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Povinelli, D. J. (1993). Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x
Effah, E. A., & Hinson, R. E. (2022). Green brand equity in an emerging economy: Ghana in perspective. Green Marketing in Emerging Economies: A Communications Perspective, 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82572-0_9
Elhoushy, S., & Jang, S. (2023). How to maintain sustainable consumer behaviours: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12905
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
Farooq, R. (2016). Role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 13(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2015-0037
Fennell, D. A., & Sheppard, V. (2021). Tourism, animals and the scales of justice. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(2–3), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1768263
Genoveva, G., & Syahrivar, J. (2020). Green lifestyle among Indonesian millennials: A comparative study between Asia and Europe. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 8(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2020.12.007
Goyes, D. R., & Sollund, R. (2018). Animal abuse, biotechnology and species justice. Theoretical Criminology, 22(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618787179
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Haryono, S. C. (2021). Mystical kinship of creation: A Foundation of eco-spirituality for interreligious ecological movements. International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy and Theology, 2(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.47043/ijipth.v2i1.12
Hegi, K. E., & Bergner, R. M. (2010). What is love? An empirically-based essentialist account. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(5), 620–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510369605
Hornsey, M. J., Chapman, C. M., & Oelrichs, D. M. (2022). Why it is so hard to teach people they can make a difference: Climate change efficacy as a non-analytic form of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 28(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1893222
Horowitz, A. C., & Bekoff, M. (2007). Naturalizing anthropomorphism: Behavioral prompts to our humanizing of animals. Anthrozoös, 20(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216650
Huang, C., & Guo, R. (2021). The effect of a green brand story on perceived brand authenticity and brand trust: The role of narrative rhetoric. Journal of Brand Management, 28, 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00213-7
Hughes, J. D. (1982). Gaia: Environmental problems in chthonic perspective. Environmental Review, 6(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/3984156
Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056
Kang, S., & Hur, W. M. (2012). Investigating the antecedents of green brand equity: A sustainable development perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(5), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.281
Knowlton, E. C. (1920). The goddess nature in early periods. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 19(2), 224–253. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27701000. Accessed 1 May 2023
Kwak, H., Puzakova, M., & Rocereto, J. F. (2017). When brand anthropomorphism alters perceptions of justice: The moderating role of self-construal. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(4), 851–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.04.002
Lanfranchi, M., Giannetto, C., & Rotondo, F. (2017). Environmental strategy in business: Green marketing communication. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 4(3), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.12775/JCRL.2017.019
Lee, J., Bhatt, S., & Suri, R. (2018). When consumers penalize not so green products. Psychology and Marketing, 35(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21069
Lee, E. J., Choi, H., Han, J., Kim, D. H., Ko, E., & Kim, K. H. (2020). How to “nudge” your consumers toward sustainable fashion consumption: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.050
Lin, P. C., & Huang, Y. H. (2012). The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values. Journal of Cleaner Production, 22(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.002
Manfredo, M. J., Urquiza-Haas, E. G., Carlos, A. W. D., Bruskotter, J. T., & Dietsch, A. M. (2020). How anthropomorphism is changing the social context of modern wildlife conservation. Biological Conservation, 241, 108297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108297
McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 20(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.20.1.93.17291
Nguyen-Viet, B. (2023). The impact of green marketing mix elements on green customer based brand equity in an emerging market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 15(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-08-2021-0398
Olson, E. L. (2022). Advocacy bias in the green marketing literature: Where seldom is heard a discouraging word. Journal of Business Research, 144, 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.052
Paço, A., & Gouveia Rodrigues, R. (2016). Environmental activism and consumers’ perceived responsibility. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(4), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12272
Pahlevi, M. R., & Suhartanto, D. (2020). The integrated model of green loyalty: Evidence from eco-friendly plastic products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120844
Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R., Woods, S., Hall, L., & Zoll, C. (2005). Learning by feeling: Evoking empathy with synthetic characters. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3–4), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839510590910165
Papista, E., & Dimitriadis, S. (2019). Consumer–green brand relationships: Revisiting benefits, relationship quality and outcomes. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 28(2), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2016-1316
Parris, C. L., Hegtvedt, K. A., Watson, L. A., & Johnson, C. (2014). Justice for all? Factors affecting perceptions of environmental and ecological injustice. Social Justice Research, 27(1), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0200-4
Pelau, C., Dabija, D. C., & Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106855
Perkins, H. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004
Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405
Pfattheicher, S., Sassenrath, C., & Schindler, S. (2016). Feelings for the suffering of others and the environment: Compassion fosters proenvironmental tendencies. Environment and Behavior, 48(7), 929–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515574549
Pulkki, J., Dahlin, B., & Värri, V. M. (2017). Environmental education as a lived-body practice? A contemplative pedagogy perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12209
Quinn, F., Castéra, J., & Clément, P. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of the environment: Anthropocentrism, non-anthropocentrism, anthropomorphism and the place of nature. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1076767
Reid-Bowen, P. (2016). Goddess as nature: Towards a philosophical thealogy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315585338
Riek, L. D., Rabinowitch, T. C., Chakrabarti, B., & Robinson, P. (2009). How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 245–246). https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514158
Saeed, M., & Shafique, I. (2021). Green customer-based brand equity and green purchase consumption behaviour: The moderating role of religious commitment. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 13284–13303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01210-1
Salam, S. C. (2017). Foster trust through competence and integrity. The Blackwell Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behaviour, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164047.ch19
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
Shanton, K., & Goldman, A. (2010). Simulation theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.33
Strähle, J., & Gräff, C. (2017). The role of social media for a sustainable consumption. In Green Fashion Retail (pp. 225–247). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2440-5_12
Syahrivar, J., Kusuma, K., Pahlevi, R. A., Wei, Y., Chairy, C., & Genoveva, G. (2022). No longer look down: Investigating second-hand clothing purchase in Indonesia. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00341-7
Tam, K. P. (2022). Gratitude to nature: Presenting a theory of its conceptualization, measurement, and effects on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101754
Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001
Tjosvold, D., Wan, P., & Tang, M. M. (2016). Trust and managing conflict: Partners in developing organizations. In Building Trust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations (pp. 53–74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31475-4_4
White, R. (2013). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880723
Widjojo, H., & Gunawan, S. (2020). Indigenous tradition: An overlooked encompassing-factor in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2019.1579752
Williams, M. O., Whitmarsh, L., & Chríost, D. M. G. (2021). The association between anthropomorphism of nature and pro-environmental variables: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 255, 109022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109022
Wu, H. C., & Cheng, C. C. (2017). What drives green advocacy? A case study of leisure farms in Taiwan. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 33, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.10.008
Yang, L. W., Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2020). The 3 C’s of anthropomorphism: Connection, comprehension, and competition. Consumer Psychology Review, 3(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1054
Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.026
Yuhua, X. (2002). Shu: Naxi nature goddess archetype. Gender, Technology and Development, 6(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2002.11910060
Zhang, J., & Fu, B. (2023). Eco-civilization: A complementary pathway rooted in theory and practice for global sustainable development. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01902-8
Funding
No funding to be reported.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Syahrivar, J., Manurung, S.P., Genoveva, G. et al. Advocating for mother nature: the roles of anthropomorphism, nature-evoked emotions and trust. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-023-00390-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-023-00390-6