Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fostering organizational change through co-production. Insights from an Italian experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even though public service co-production is achieving a growing popularity among scholars and practitioners, there is limited evidence on its implications and consequences. To contribute in filling such a gap, this paper investigates the role of public service co-production in fostering organizational change. A descriptive case study approach was taken, concerning a group co-production experience targeted to the reorganization of primary school meal services in the Municipality of Quarrata, a medium-sized town established in Central Italy. A step-by-step approach was implemented to realize the full potential of public service co-production. Direct and indirect stakeholders were concomitantly involved in the reorganization of school meal services. Service co-production paved the way for several positive outcomes, including: increased user satisfaction, cost savings, greater social and environmental sustainability, and lower water footprint. The research findings suggested that public sector organizations need to perform as enablers of the co-producers’ sleeping resources, enacting a self-nourishing cycle of public value co-creation. The enhancement of the co-producing skills that are available in the community is a fundamental ingredient of the recipe for more effective and smooth processes of organizational change. This is one of the first attempts to examine the role of service co-production in promoting organizational change in public sector organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford, J. (1998). A public management road less travelled: Clients as co-producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(4), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, G., Sorrentino, M. and Brudney, J. L. (2017). Co-creation and co-production in the school meals service: Framing the role of laypeople, paper presented at the IIAS study group on the ‘co-production of public services’, Washington, DC, 6–7 June, 2017.

  • Badii, M. (2013). Traditional food heritage in contemporary Tuscany. Local networks and global policies around the Zolfino bean. Ethnologies, 35(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batalden, M., Batalden, P., Margolis, P., Seid, M., Armstrong, G., Opipari-Arrigan, L., & Hartung, H. (2016). Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Quality and Safety, 25(7), 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2003). Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas, 23(4), 1119–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2013). We’re all in this together: harnessing user and community co-production of public outcomes. Birmingham: Institute of Local Government Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E., & Parrado, S. (2015). Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy, 44, 1), 1–1),23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-production and co-creation. Engaging citizens in public services. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallone, M. and Palumbo, R. (2018). “Turnà a ‘ndomà”: When public service co-production meets territorial Identity Paper presented at the 21st Excellence in Services International Conference (EISIC). Paris, August, 30th-31st 2018.

  • Ciasullo, M. V., Cosimato, S., Palumbo, R., & Storlazzi, A. (2017a). Value co-creation in the health service ecosystems: The enabling role of institutional arrangements. International Business Research, 10(12), 222–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciasullo, M. V., Palumbo, R., & Troisi, O. (2017b). Reading public service co-production through the lenses of requisite variety. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coen, L., & Kearns, N. (2013). Co-producing innovation or innovating co-production? Responding to the contact needs of non-resident parents in the Republic of Ireland. Child & Family Social Work, 18(2), 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, C. (2011). Using nutrition education and cooking classes in primary schools to encourage healthy eating. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 4(2), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2008). Case study methodology in business research. Burlington, MA: Elsevier

  • Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (2016a). Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change. Chicago, IL: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (2016b). Co-productive policy design. In C. Durose & L. Richardson (Eds.), Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change (pp. 33–52). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2014). Restoring trust through the co-production of public services: A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review, 16(3), 424–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugini, M., Bracci, E., & Sicilia, M. (2016). Co-production in the public sector experiences and challenges. Cham: SpringerBriefs in Applied Science and Technology.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, F., Brunori, G., Di Iacovo, F., & Innocenti, S. (2014). Co-producing sustainability: Involving parents and civil Society in the Governance of school meal services. A case study from Pisa, Italy. Sustainability, 6(4), 1643–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. B. A., Pinto, F. B., & Ferraz, I. N. (2005). Electronic participatory budgeting (e-PPB): Increasing people participation in the decision-making process. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 1(4), 504–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, J., & Speed, E. (2012). Varieties of co-production in public services: Time banks in a UK health policy context. Critical Policy Studies, 6(4), 402–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, E., & Serpieri, R. (2014). Italian education beyond hierarchy. Governance, evaluation and headship. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg, E. (2006). Food for future citizens. School meal culture in Sweden. Food. Culture and Society, 9(3), 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. F., & Buzby, J. C. (2002). Several strategies may lower plate waste in school feeding programs. Food Review, 25(2), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, P. A. (2004). Case study research. In K. B. deMarrais & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 217–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, M., & Olsen, S. O. (2011). Co-production and time use. Influence on product evaluation. Appetite, 56(1), 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgøy, I. and Homme, A. (2017). Increasing parental participation at school level: A ‘citizen to serve’ or a ‘customer to steer’? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, published on-line ahead of print on July, 3th 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1343625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A., & Grayson, K. (2008). The intersecting roles of consumer and producer: A critical perspective on co-production, co-creation and Prosumption. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 963–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991). Illustrative case studies. In M. C. Jackson (Ed.), Systems methodology for the management sciences. Contemporary systems thinking (pp. 215–235). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, M., & Andersen, S. C. (2013). Coproduction and equity in public service delivery. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 704–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement. A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, S., & Nabatchi, T. (2018). Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation. Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 231–239). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa, K., Peery, A., Harris, N. G., & Shovelin, K. (2001). Food literacy partners program: A strategy to increase community food literacy. Topics in Clinical Nutrition, 16(4), 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobstein, T., & Baur, L. A. (2005). Policies to prevent childhood obesity in the European Union. European Journal of Public Health, 15(6), 576–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1006–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magno, F. and Cassia, F. (2011). Are citizens always right? Investigating why citizens’ inputs are not always beneficial to public services co-production. In: 14 th Toulon-Verona Conference "Organizational Excellence in Services" (pp. 655–665), Alicante, September 1st-3rd, 2011.

  • Mikkelsen, B. E. (2013). Can school meal provision contribute to the reduction of social inequalities in health and improve learning outcomes? The case of Denmark and Sweden. In V. Barnekow, B. B. Jensen, C. Currie, A. Dyson, N. Eisenstadt, & E. Melhuish (Eds.), Improving the lives of children and young people: Case studies from Europe (pp. 18–28). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretto, L., & Renzato, M. (2017). A socio-natural standpoint to understand coproduction of water, energy and waste services. Urban Research and Practice, 10(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (2008). Greening the realm: Sustainable food chains and the public plate. Regional Studies, 42(9), 1237–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. and Sonnino, R. (2005). Catering for Sustainability. The Creative Procurement of School Meals in Italy and the UK. Cardiff: The Regeneration Institute.

  • Morgan, K., & Sonnino, R. (2007). Empowering consumers: The creative procurement of school meals in Italy and the UK. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(1), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham, C. (2008). Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy & Society, 7(2), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuamcharoen, S. and Dhirathiti, N. S. (2017) A case study of the co-production approach to the implementation of education for sustainable development in Thailand. Policy Futures in Education, Published on-line ahead of print on November, 14th 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317739487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordanini, A., & Pasini, P. (2008). Service co-production and value co-creation: The case for a service-oriented architecture (SOA). European Management Journal, 26(5), 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: Are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P., & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. and Ostrom, E. (1977). Public Goods and Public Choices. In: Savas, E. (Ed.), Alternatives for Delivering Public Services, Toward Improved Performance (pp. 7–49). Boulder, CO: Westview.

  • Palumbo, R. (2015). Una contestualizzazione del concetto di co-produzione al caso dei servizi pubblici: una rassegna critica della letteratura internazionale. Azienda Pubblica, 28(2), 137–161

  • Palumbo, R. (2016). Contextualizing co-production of health care: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(1), 72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, R., Annarumma, C., Adinolfi, P., & Musella, M. (2016). The missing link to patient engagement in Italy: The role of health literacy in enabling patients. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 30(8), 1183–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, R., Annarumma, C., Adinolfi, P., Vezzosi, S., Troiano, E., Catinello, G., Manna, R. (2017). Crafting and applying a tool to assess food literacy: Findings from a pilot study, Trends in Food Science & Technology, published on-line ahead of print on July, 4th 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.07.002, 67, 173, 182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as Coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrado, S., Van Ryzin, G. G., Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services. Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V. (2014). Collective action and the sustainability of co-production. Public Management Review, 16(3), 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plé, L., & Cáceres, R. C. (2010). Not always co-creation: Introducing interactional co-destruction. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 430–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, D.O. (2012), Co-Production and Network Structure in Public Education In Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T. and Verschuere, B. (Eds.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector, and Co-Production (pp. 145–168), Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

  • Risku-Norja, H., & Løes, A. K. (2017). Organic food in food policy and in public catering: Lessons learned from Finland. Organic Agriculture, 7(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, J., Moon, J.-M., & Cunningham, M. (2017). The relationship of school-based parental involvement with student achievement: A comparison of principal and parent survey reports from PISA 2012. Educational Studies, 43(2), 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnino, R. (2009). Quality food, public procurement, and sustainable development: The school meal revolution in Rome. Environment and Planning A, 41(2), 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen, T., Nabatchi, T., & Brand, D. (2016). Introduction: Special issue on the coproduction of public services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, W. (1997). Introduction to case study. The Qualitative Report, 3(2), Retrieved on line from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-2/tellis1.html.

  • Thomas, H. M. C., & Irwin, J. D. (2011). Cook it up! A community-based cooking program for at-risk youth: Overview of a food literacy intervention. BMC Research Notes, 4, 495. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, E., Raine, K., Mrklas, K., Prowse, R., Hoed, D., Watson-Jarvis, K., Loewen, J., Gorham, M., Ricciardi, C., Tyminski, S., & Elliott, C. (2017a). Promoting children’s health: Toward a consensus statement on food literacy. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 108(2), 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, E., Lane, D., & Elliott, C. (2017b). Defining food literacy: A scoping review. Appetite, 116(1), 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vezzosi, S., Carruci, M., & Picciolli, P. (2014). Traditional food systems harmony in Tuscany. World Nutrition, 5(10), 870–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidgen, H. A., & Gallegos, D. (2014). Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite, 76(1), 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2011). Why education researchers should take school food seriously. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Procter, R., Hinder, S., & Greenhalghs, T. (2015). Co-production in practice: How people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services. Implementation Science, 10(75), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40(3), 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocco Palumbo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palumbo, R., Vezzosi, S., Picciolli, P. et al. Fostering organizational change through co-production. Insights from an Italian experience. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 15, 371–391 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-018-0205-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-018-0205-7

Keywords

Navigation