Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting parental intentions behind public school selection using the theory of planned behaviour

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to address the following education policy issue in Australia: Declining student enrolment figures in the Public sector over the 25 year period (1979–2004). This sees a growing concern that school administrators and marketers may be addressing the wrong needs of parents choosing a Public primary school. Therefore, this paper is to introduce the use of a behavioural theory, Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) (Ajzen Decision Processes 50:179-211, 1991) for shedding some light to better understand and predict parents’ behavioural intentions in selecting a Primary school for their child. Direct measures were used to predict behavioural intentions and indirect measures were used to gain insight into specific beliefs underlying parental school choice. Questionnaire items were taken from a prior elicitation study (Goh Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 6(2):99-108, 2009). Results from direct measures reveal that only attitudes and subjective norms significantly predicted behavioural intentions. Perceived difficulties did not add any significant predictive value in the regression equation. Results suggest that direct measures explained approximately 67% variance of behavioural intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham C, Sheeran P (2003) Acting on intentions: the role of anticipate regret. Br J Soc Psychol 42:495–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Dorsey, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Org Behav Human Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Driver B (1992) Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to leisure choice. J Leis Res 24(3):207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Maden T (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioural control. J Exp Soc Psychol 22:453–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage C, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40:471–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2004). Schools, Australia, Cat. No. 4221.0, ABS, Canberra

  • Bagley C (1996) Black and white unite or flight? The racialised dimension of schooling and parental choice. Br Educ Res J 22(5):569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R, Kimmel S (1995) A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal–directed behaviours. Br J Soc Psychol 34:437–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosetti L (2004) Determinants of school choice: understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. J Educ Policy 19(4):387–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowe R, Ball S, Gerwirtz S (1993) Captured by the discourse? Issues and concern in researching ‘parental choice’. Br J Sociol Educ 15(1):63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussell H (1997) Choosing a primary school: the impact of social class on consumer behaviour, Proceedings of the 1997 Annual Conference of AMA (MEG), Manchester Metropolitan University

  • Chan D, Fishbein M (1993) Determinants of college women’s intentions to tell their partners to use condoms. J Appl Soc Psychol 23:1455–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A, Snell M (2000) Parental preferences and choice of school. Appl Econ 32:803–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courneya K, Hellsten L (1998) Personality correlates of exercise behaviour, motives, barriers and preferences: an application of the five-factor model. Pers Individ Differ 24:625–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings T, Worley C (1997) Organization development and change, 6th edn. West Publishing, Cincinatti

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Rigaux P (1974) Perception of marital roles in decision processes. J Consum Res 1(1):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Denessen E, Driessena G, Sleegers P (2005) Segregation by choice? A study of group–specific reasons for school choice. J Educ Policy 20(3):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East J (1993) Investment decisions and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. J Econ Psychol 14:337–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echols F, Wilms J (1995) Reasons for school choice in Scotland. J Educ Policy 10(2):143–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazekas A, Senn C, Ledgerwood D (2001) Predictors of intention to use condoms among university women: an application and extension of the theory of planned behaviour. Can J Behav Sci 33(2):103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Crash M, Kim J (1988) Mail survey response rate: a meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opin Q 52(4):467–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz S, Ball SJ, Bowe R (1995) Markets, choice and equity in education. Open university Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin G, Kok G (1996) The Theory of Planned Behaviour: a review of its applications to health related behaviours. Am J Health Promot 11:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh E (2009) Public education and parents: eliciting salient beliefs using the theory of planned behaviour as a qualitative research framework. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 6(2):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldring E, Hausman C (1999) Reasons for parental choice of urban schools. J Educ Policy 14(5):469–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter J (1991) Which school? A study of parents’ choice of secondary school. Educ Res 33(1):31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson C, Bisset M (2005) Gender and school choice: factors influencing parents when choosing single sex or co-educational independent schools for their children. Camb J Educ 35(2):195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston K, White K (2003) Binge drinking: a test of the role of group norms in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Psychol Health 18(1):63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley J, Evans M (2004) Choice between government, catholic and independent schools—culture and community rather than class. Australian Social Monitor 7(2):31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleitz B, Weiher G, Tedin K, Matland R (2000) Choice, charter schools and household preferences. Soc Sci Q 81(3):846–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalwani A, Mehta S, Tiong T (1999) Family roles in the selection of schools in multiracial Singapore: an examination of demographic differences. J Prof Serv Mark 19(2):73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer A, Ginis K (2005) The importance of subjective norms for people who care what others think of them. Psychol Health 20(1):53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le A, Miller P (2003) Choice of school in Australia: determinants and consequences. Aust Econ Rev 36(1):55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra N, Hall J, Shaw M, Oppenheim P (2002) Marketing research: an applied orientation. 2nd ed

  • Moan I, Rise J, Andersen M (2005) Predicting parents’ intentions not to smoke indoors in the presence of their children using an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Psychol Health 20(3):353–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualls W (1982) Changing sex roles—Its impact upon family decision making. Adv Consum Res 9(1):267–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall D, Wolff J (1994) The time interval in the intention–behaviour relationship: meta-analysis. Br J Soc Psychol 33:405–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson H, Beazley R, Delaney M, Al E (1997) Factors influencing condom use among students attending high school in Nova Scotia. Can J Hum Sex 6(3):185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Buckley J (2002) What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the internet. Educ Eval Policy Anal 24(2):133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran P, Orbell S (1998) Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour: roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms. J Appl Soc Psychol 29:2107–2142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran P, Orbell S (1999) Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour: roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms. J Appl Soc Psychol 29:2107–2142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran P, Norman P, Conner M (2001) Can the Theory of Planned Behaviour explain patterns of health behaviour change? Health Psychol 20(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard B, Hartwick J, Warshaw P (1988) The Theory of Reasoned Action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J Consum Res 15(3):325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson I (1992) The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. J Consum Res 19(1):105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford M (1996) Marital influence in the decision-making process for services. J Serv Mark 10(1):6–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton S (1998) Predicting and explaining intentions and behaviour: how well are we doing? J Appl Soc Psychol 28(15):1317–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick B, Fidell L (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarkianinen A, Sundqvist S (2005) Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. Br Food J 107(11):808–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis H (1994) Culture and social behaviour. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Putte B (1991) 20 years of the theory of reasoned action of Fishbein and Ajzen: A meta analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Weiher G, Tedin K (2002) Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. J Policy Anal Manage 21(1):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West A, David M, Hailes J, Ribbens J (1995) Parents and the process of choosing secondary schools: implications for schools. Educ Manage Adm 23(1):28–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Blue Mountains International Hotel Management School, 1 Chambers Road, Leura, NSW, 2780, Australia

    Edmund Goh

Authors
  1. Edmund Goh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmund Goh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goh, E. Predicting parental intentions behind public school selection using the theory of planned behaviour. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 8, 97–110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-011-0066-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-011-0066-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation