Skip to main content
Log in

Neuropsychological Tests are Poor at Assessing the Frontal Lobes, Executive Functions, and Neurobehavioral Symptoms of Traumatically Brain-Injured Patients

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frontal lobes play a major role in the regulation of our emotions and behavior, planning, decision making, social conduct, actions, and executive functions. They are quite vulnerable to damage when an individual sustains a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Patients who sustain damage to their frontal lobes may not complain of any cognitive or neurobehavioral symptoms. They often do not show any abnormalities on standardized neuropsychological tests, particularly when the anterior and ventral areas of their frontal lobes are damaged. When these patients are observed in unstructured, novel, or complex real-world settings, they frequently exhibit cognitive difficulties, neurobehavioral symptoms, and problems with their executive functions. Since standardized neuropsychological tests are generally poor at assessing these problems and symptoms, neuropsychologists may not be aware of these problems if they have never observed these patients function in real-world settings or have never interviewed the significant others of these patients. As a consequence, neuropsychologists should not rely solely on the quantitative test data of these patients since it may provide inaccurate and misleading information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, M. L., Feldman, R. G., & Willis, A. L. (1974). The “subcortical dementia” of progressive supranuclear palsy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 37, 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. P., Benson, D. F., & Stuss, D. T. (1989). Frontal lobes and language. Brain and Language, 37, 656–691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. W. & Tranel, D. (1989). Awareness of disease states following cerebral infarction, dementia, and head trauma: Standarized assessment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 327–339.

  • Askin-Edgar, S., White, K. E., & Cummings, J. L. (2004). Neuropsychiatric aspects of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementing illnesses. In S. C. Yudofsky & R. E. Hales (Eds.), Essentials of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences (pp. 421–456). Washington: American Psychiatric.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barch, D. M., & Buckner, R. L. (2003). Memory. In R. B. Schiffer, S. M. Rao, & B. S. Fogel (Eds.), Neuropsychiatry (2nd ed., pp. 426–443). New York: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, P. C., Ong, B., & Ponsford, J. (2005). Measuring executive dysfunction in an acute rehabilitation setting: Using the dysexecutive questionnaire (DEX). Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 376–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, D. F. (1994). The neurology of thinking. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, E. D. (1988). Frontal lobe damage and neuropsychological assessment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 279–297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, T. M., & Sautter, S. W. (1993). Route-finding: A measure of everyday executive functioning in the head-injured adult. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. E., Anderson, I., Furst, C. J., & Namerow, N. S. (1989). Behavioral assessment in neuropsychological rehabilitation: A method for measuring vocational-related skills. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. E., Rorsman, I., Hill, J. M., & Tuma, R. (1993). The effects of frontal brain impairment on fluency: Simple and complex paradigms. Neuropsychology, 7, 519–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychological Review, 13(4), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaytor, N., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Burr, R. (2006). Improving the ecological validity of executive functioning assessment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 217–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cicerone, K. D., & DeLuca, J. (1990). Neuropsychological predictors of head injury rehabilitation outcome (abstract). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripe, L. I. (1996). The ecological validity of executive function testing. In R. J. Sbordone & C. Long (Eds.), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing (pp. 129–146). Delray Beach: St. Lucie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. L. (1993). Frontal–subcortical circuits and human behavior. Archives of Neurology, 50(8), 873–880.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. L. (1995). Anatomic and behavioral aspects of frontal–subcortical circuits. In: J. Grafman, K. J. Holyoak, & F. Boller (Eds.), Structure and function of the human pre-frontal cortex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 1–13.

  • Damasio, A. R. (1985). The frontal lobes. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 409–460). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., U.S. 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).

  • Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis–Kaplan executive function system. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, K. A., & Robertson, C. (1985). The effect of Parkinson’s disease on the ability to maintain a mental set. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 48, 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Brief rating inventory of executive function: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J., & Malloy, P. F. (2001). Frontal system behavior scale: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J., Stout, J. C., & Malloy, P. F. (1999). Assessing frontal lobe behavioral syndromes with the Frontal Lobe Personality Scale. Assessment, 6(3), 269–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grafman, J., Litivan, I., Gomez, C., & Chase, T. N. (1990). Frontal lobe functioning in progressive supranuclear palsy. Archives of Neurology, 47, 553–558.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isquith, P. K., Roth, R. M., & Gioia, G. A. (2005). Behavior rating inventory of executive function—adult version. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankovic, J., & De Leon, M. L. (2003). Basal ganglia and behavioral disorders. In R. B. Schiffer, S. M. Rao, & B. S. Foge (Eds.), Neuropsychiatry (2nd ed., pp. 934–946). New York: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R. (1997). Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and clinical neuroscience (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufer, D. I., & Cummings, J. L. (1997). Dementia and delirium: An overview. In T. E. Feinberg & M. J. Farah (Eds.), Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology (pp. 499–520). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, A. J., & Smith, E. (1983). Cognitive deficits in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 106, 257–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, B., Katz, D. I., Dade, L., & Black, S. E. (2002). Novel approaches to the assessment of frontal damage and executive deficits in traumatic brain injury. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 448–465). New York: Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1982). Problems assessing the executive functions. International Journal of Psychology, 17, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1997). Principles of neuropsychological assessment. In T. E. Feinberg & M. J. Farah (Eds.), Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology (pp. 43–54). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, E. R., Smith, E. M., & Lees, A. J. (1985). Cognitive deficits in the Steele–Richardson–Olzwewski syndrome (progressive supranuclear palsy). Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 48, 1234–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mega, M. S., & Cummings, J. L. (1994). Frontal subcortical circuits and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 6(4), 358–370.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesulam, M. M. (1986). Frontal cortex and behavior: Editorial. Annals of Neurology, 19, 320–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. S., Finn, S. E., & Eyde, L. D. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of the evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shanick, G. J., & O’Shanick, A. M. (1994). Personality and intellectual changes. In J. M. Silver, S. C. Yudofsky, & R. E. Hales (Eds.), Neuropsychiatry of traumatic brain injury (pp. 163–188). Washington: American Psychiatric.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1955). The distribution according to age of a psychologic measure dependent upon organic brain functions. Journal of Gerontology, 10, 338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sbordone, R. J. (1996). Ecological validity: Some critical issues for the neuropsychologist. In R. J. Sbordone & C. J. Long (Eds.), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing (pp. 15–41). Orlando: St. Lucie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbordone, R. J. (1997). The ecological validity of neuropsychological testing. In A. M. Horton, D. Wedding, & J. Webster (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook, vol. 1: Foundations and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 365–392). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbordone, R. J. (2000). The executive functions of the brain. In G. Groth-Marnat (Ed.), Neuropsychological assessment in clinical practice: A guide to test interpretation and integration (pp. 437–456). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbordone, R. J., & Guilmette, T. J. (1999). Ecological validity: Prediction of everyday and vocational functioning from neuropsychological test data. In J. J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology (pp. 227–254). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbordone, R. J., Seyranian, G. D., & Ruff, R. M. (1998). Are the subjective complaints of brain-injured patients reliable? Brain Injury, 12(6), 505–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sbordone, R. J., Seyranian, G. D., & Ruff, R. M. (2000). The use of significant others to enhance the detection of malingers from traumatic brain-injured patients. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 465–477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sbordone, R. J., Saul, R. E., Purisch, A. D. (2007). Neuropsychology for Psychologists, Health Care Professionals, and Attorneys. 3rd edition. Boca Raton: Florida

  • Silver, J. M., Hales, R. E., & Yudofsky, S. C. (2002). Neuropsychiatric aspects of traumatic brain injury. In S. C. Yudofsky & R. E. Hales (Eds.), American psychiatric press textbook of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences (3rd ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, J. M., Hales, R. E., & Yudofsky, M. D. (2004). Neuropsychiatric aspects of traumatic brain injury. In S. C. Yudofsky & R. E. Hales (Eds.), Essentials of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences (pp. 241–292). Washington: American Psychiatric.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation. An integrated neuropsychological approach. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, E., Sherman, E., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuss, D. T., & Benson, D. F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. A. (1993). Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment: Do neuropsychological indexes predict performance in everyday activities? Applied and Preventive Psychology, 2, 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., & Burgess, P. W. (1996). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. L., & Liossi, C. (2006). The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 429–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, O. L. (1966). Psychological deficits associated with frontal lobe lesions. International Journal of Neurology, 5, 395–402.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Sbordone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sbordone, R.J. Neuropsychological Tests are Poor at Assessing the Frontal Lobes, Executive Functions, and Neurobehavioral Symptoms of Traumatically Brain-Injured Patients. Psychol. Inj. and Law 3, 25–35 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-010-9068-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-010-9068-x

Keywords

Navigation