Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic operation of a membrane-based vacuum dehumidification system by finite selectivity of the membrane

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water vapor can be selectively separated from humid indoor air using membrane-based vacuum dehumidification (MVD). This non-vapor compression dehumidification system is an alternative to conventional air conditioning systems because water vapor separation through the membrane is an isothermal process. Some researchers have analyzed the dehumidification performance of MVD and proposed the most efficient structure for a membrane with infinite selectivity. In this study, finite selectivity was considered, and an additional vacuum pump was installed on the basic MVD structure. The cyclic operation performance of the revised MVD was calculated and optimized according to the vacuum compressor performance. Consequently, the cyclic average dehumidification COP was maximized on a specific compression ratio. The higher the water vapor selectivity, the higher the maximum values, and the lower the marginal compression ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Area of membrane (m2)

h fg :

Enthalpy of vaporization (kJ/kg)

k :

Specific heat ratio (-)

M :

Molecular mass (kg/kmol)

m :

Mass (kg)

:

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

m 0 :

Clearance ratio (-)

P :

Pressure (kPa)

P a :

Partial pressure of air (kPa)

P v :

Maximum vacuum pressure of vacuum pump (kPa)

P w :

Partial pressure of water vapor (kPa)

\({\dot Q_{lat}}\) :

Latent heat removed per unit time (kW)

r p :

Compression ratio (-)

RH :

Relative humidity (%)

T :

Temperature (K)

t :

Time (s)

V :

Volume of membrane mass exchanger (m3)

V max :

Compressor total volume (m3)

V 0 :

Clearance volume (m3)

V :

Pumping speed (m3/s)

v :

Specific volume (m3/kg)

:

Power consumption (kW)

α :

Selectivity (-)

β :

Permeance (kg/s·kPa·m2)

η isen :

Vacuum compressor isentropic efficiency (-)

η v :

Clearance volume efficiency (-)

a :

Air

amb :

Ambient condition

cv :

Control volume

DH :

Dehumidification

d :

Discharge

s :

Suction

vc :

Vacuum compressor

vp :

Vacuum pump

w :

Water

References

  1. J. Litardo, C. D. Pero, L. Molinaroli, F. Leonforte and N. Aste, Sustainable active cooling strategies in hot and humid climates-A review and a practical application in Somalia, Building and Environment (2022) 109338.

  2. B. Goetzler et al., Grid-Interactive Efficient Buildings Technical Report Series: Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC); Water Heating; Appliances; and Refrigeration, National Renewable Energy Lab. (2019) doi:https://doi.org/10.2172/1577967.

  3. H. Lim, J. Lee, S. Choi, S. Kim, M. Jung, J. Lim and M. Kim, Performance simulation of membrane heat pumps based on vacuum membrane dehumidification system, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 34(2) (2020) 941–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Savings Potential and RD&D Opportunities for Commercial Building HVAC Systems, U.S. Department of Energy (2017).

  5. L. Chen, C. Wu and F. Sun, Cooling load versus COP characteristics for an irreversible air refrigeration cycle, Energy Conversion and Management, 39(1–2) (1998) 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Lim, S. Choi, Y. Cho, S. Kim and M. Kim, Comparative thermodynamic analysis of membrane-based vacuum air dehumidification systems, Applied Thermal Engineering, 179 (2020) 115676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Chen and L. Norford, Energy performance of next-generation dedicated outdoor air cooling systems in low-energy building operations, Energy and Buildings, 209 (2020) 109677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. M. Robeson, Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 62(2) (1991) 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. M. Geise, H. B. Park, A. C. Sagle, B. D. Freeman and J. E. McGrath, Water permeability and water/salt selectivity trade-off in polymers for desalination, Journal of Membrane Science, 258(1–2) (2011) 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. H. Li, T. F. Yang, J. B. Jhang, W. K. Li and W. M. Yan, Physical characteristics analysis and performance comparison of membranes for vacuum membrane dehumidifiers, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 26 (2021) 101213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. D. Bui, F. Chen, A. Nida, K. J. Chua and K. C. Ng, Experimental and modeling analysis of membrane-based air dehumidification, Separation and Purification Technology, 114 (2015) 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Lee, H. S. Kim, D. Ku, J. Lim, M. Jung, S. Kim, S. Jeong, M. Kim and Y. S. Seo, Experimental study on the water selective dense membrane under an absolute pressure difference with simplified test method, Applied Sciences, 11(4) (2021) 1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Xing, Y. Rao, W. TeGrotenhuis, N. Canfield, F. Zheng, D. W. Winiarski and W. Liu, Advanced thin zeolite/metal flat sheet membrane for energy efficient air dehumidification and conditioning, Chemical Engineering Science, 104 (2013) 596–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. KS C 9306:2017, Air Conditioners, Korean Standard (2017).

  15. J. G. Wijmans and R. W. Baker, The solution-diffusion model: a review, Journal of Membrane Science, 107(1–2) (1995) 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. W. Lemmon et al., NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties, REFPROP 9.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2010).

  17. H. P. Bloch and J. J. Hoefner, Reciprocating Compressors: Operation and Maintenance, Elsevier (1996).

  18. U. S. Powle and S. Kar, Investigations on pumping speed and compression work of liquid ring vacuum pumps, Vacuum, 33(5) (1983) 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2021. The authors also appreciate the grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (No. NRF-2019R1A2C1088694) and from the Korea Institute of Energy Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minsung Kim.

Additional information

Donik Ku is a graduate student of Intelligent Energy and Industry at Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. He received his B.S. as a Mechanical Energy Major in the School of Energy Systems Engi-neering from Chung-Ang University in 2021. His research interests include mem-brane-based vacuum dehumidification systems.

Soojin Bae is a graduate student of Intelligent Energy and Industry at Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. She received her B.S. as a Mechanical Energy Major in the School of Energy Systems Engineering from Chung-Ang University in 2022. Her research is focused on experimental validation of membrane performance.

Soyeon Kim is a Ph.D. student of Department of Intelligent Energy and Industry at Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. She received her B.S. and M.S. as a Mechanical Energy Major in the School of Energy Systems Engineering from Chung-Ang University in 2019 and 2021. Her research interests include fine-dust removal with electrospray for exhaust gas treatment and factory energy management systems with machine learning.

Minkyu Jung is a graduate student of Department of Intelligent Energy and Industry at Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. He received his B.S. as a Mechanical Energy Major in the School of Energy Systems Engineering from Chung-Ang University in 2020. His research interests include fine-dust removal with electrospray for exhaust gas treatment and image processing of electrospray with machine vision.

Sanghun Jeong is a graduate student of Department of Intelligent Energy and Industry at Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. He received his B.S. as a Mechanical Energy Major in the School of Energy Systems Engineering from Chung-Ang University in 2021. His research interests include factory energy management system (FEMS) with machine learning and fault detection and diagnosis of thermal systems.

Gijeong Seo is an undergraduate student of School of Energy Systems Engineering at Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. He is planning on proceed to graduate school at the same University in 2020. His research interests include factory energy management system (FEMS) with machine learning.

Minsung Kim is a Professor of School of Energy Systems Engineering at Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Seoul National University in 1996, 1998, and 2002. Formerly, he was involved in Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), Daejeon, Korea and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg MD, USA. His research interests include environmental engineering, heat pump applications, and big data analysis of energy systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ku, D., Bae, S., Kim, S. et al. Cyclic operation of a membrane-based vacuum dehumidification system by finite selectivity of the membrane. J Mech Sci Technol 37, 2087–2094 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0344-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0344-6

Keywords

Navigation