Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of combustion, smoke, and toxicity characteristics of flame-retardant and fiber-optic cables used in nuclear power plants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combustion, smoke emission, and toxic gas emission characteristics of four types of flame-retardant cables and two types of fiber-optic cables were investigated. The thickness, flame retardancy, and volatile components of the polymeric materials constituting the cables mainly influenced their released heat and smoke emissions. The volatile components increased the magnitude of the first peak of heat release and shortened the interval between the time to ignition and first heat release. The thickness and flame retardancy caused the formation of a char layer, which caused the peak values associated with the secondary heat release and smoke production. Fiber-optic cables with zero halogens exhibited a lower flame retardancy than that of the flame-retardant cables as they were completely pyrolyzed early but emited small amounts of smoke and toxic gases. By considering trade-off between flame retardancy and toxicity, the improvements in fire protection strategies and amendment of cable design criteria are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NPP :

Nuclear power plant

FR :

Flame-retardant

CCT :

Cone calorimeter test

TTI :

Time to ignition

HRR :

Heat release rate

THR :

Total heat release

SPR :

Smoke production rate

TSP :

Total amount of smoke production

FR-C :

Flame-retardant class 1E

FR-NC :

Flame-retardant non-class 1E

ZH-OF :

Zero halogen optic fiber

TI :

Toxicity index

PHRR :

Peak of HRR

tPHRR :

Time to PHRR

Δ t P-I :

Time difference between TTI and first tPHRR

PSPR :

Peak of SPR

tPSPR :

Time to PSPR

References

  1. G. Vinod et al., Insights from fire PSA for enhancing NPP safety, Nucl. Eng. Des., 238 (9) (2008) 2359–2368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. H. Jee, C. K. Moon and H. T. Kim, Performance-based fire fighting strategies for confined fire zones in nuclear power plants, Prog. Nucl. Energy, 62 (2013) 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Seguchi et al., Degradation of cable insulation material by accelerated thermal radiation combined ageing, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 22 (6) (2015) 3197–3206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Gong, Q. Xie and X. Huang, Fire behaviors of flame-retardant cables, part I: decomposition, swelling and spontaneous ignition, Fire Saf. J., 95 (2018) 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O. Keski-Rahkonen and J. Mangs, Electrical ignition sources in nuclear power plants: statistical, modelling and experimental studies, Nucl. Eng. Des., 213 (2–3) (2002) 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IEEE 383-1974, IEEE Standard for Type Test of Class 1E Electric Cables, Field Splices, and Connections for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, IEEE Standard Association (1974).

  7. J. M. Daly, IEEE 1202 flame testing of cables for use in cable tray, Conference Record of 1991 Annual Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference (1991) 100–104.

  8. T. V. Santhosh et al., An approach for reliability prediction of instrumentation and control cables by artificial neural networks and Weibull theory for probabilistic safety assessment of NPPs, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 170 (2018) 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. H. Kim et al., Influence of thermal aging on the combustion characteristics of cables in nuclear power plants, Energies, 14 (7) (2021) 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. A. Barnes, A. F. Matheson and T. J. O. Neill, A comparative study of the fire performance of halogenated and non-halogenated materials for cable applications part 1 tests on cables, Fire and Materials, 20 (1) (1996) 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Kaczorek-Chrobak and K. Fangrat, Combustible material content vs fire properties of electric cables, Energies, 13 (23) (2020) 6172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Kaczorek-Chrobak and K. Fangrat, Influence of constructional-material parameters on the fire properties of electric cables, Energies, 12 (23) (2019) 4569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Magalie et al., Fire behaviour of electrical cables in cone calorimeter: influence of cables structure and layout, Fire Saf. J., 99 (2018) 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. C. Wu et al., Case study on prevention of fire hazards in coating epoxy-based FRP work with illumination, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 23 (2) (2010) 346–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. X. Huang et al., Burning behavior of cable tray located on a wall with different cable arrangements, Fire Mater, 43 (1) (2019) 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Rigollet et al., OECD/NEA PRISME Project Application Report, Nuclear Safety NEA/CSNI/R(2012)14, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012).

  17. L. Audouin et al., OECD PRISME project: fires in confined and ventilated nuclear-type multi-compartments — overview and main experimental results, Fire Saf. J., 62 (PART B) (2013) 80–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Huang et al., Improved model for estimating sidewall effect on the fire heat release rate of horizontal cable tray, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 149 (2021) 831–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ISO 5660-1:2015, Reaction-to-Fire Tests — Heat Release, Smoke Production and Mass Loss Rate — Part 1: Heat Release Rate (Cone Calorimeter Method) and Smoke Production Rate (Dynamic Measurement), International Organization for Standardization (2015).

  20. IEC 60331:2018, Tests for Electric Cables under Fire Conditions — Circuit Integrity, International Electrotechnical Commission (2018).

  21. UL 1685, UL Standard for Safety Vertical-Tray Fire-Propagation and Smoke-Release Test for Electrical and Optical-Fiber Cables, 3rd Edition, Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., North-brook (2007).

  22. ISO 5659-2:2017, Plastics — Smoke Generation — Part 2: Determination of Optical Density by a Single-Chamber Test, International Organization for Standardization (2017).

  23. IEC TS 61034-2:1991/AMD1:1993, Amendment 1 — Measurement of Smoke Density of Electric Cables Burning under Defined Conditions — Part 2: Test Procedure and Requirements, International Electrotechnical Commission (1993).

  24. NES 713: Issue 3, Determination of the Toxicity Index of the Products of Combustion from Small Specimens of Materials, Naval Engineering Standards, UK Ministry of Defence (2013).

  25. ISO 1182:2020, Reaction to Fire Tests for Products — Non-Combustibility Test, International Organization for Standardization (2020).

  26. ISO 19702:2015, Guidance for Sampling and Analysis of Toxic Gases and Vapours in Fire Effluents Using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, International Organization for Standardization (2015).

  27. H. H. Liang and M. C. Ho, Toxicity characteristics of commercially manufactured insulation materials for building applications in Taiwan, Constr. Build. Mater, 21 (6) (2007) 1254–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. J. Seo et al., Investigation into the toxicity of combustion products for CR/EPR cables based on aging period, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 34 (4) (2020) 1785–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. L. Ahmed et al., Fire reaction properties of polystyrene-based nanocomposites using nanosilica and nanoclay as additives in cone calorimeter test, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 132 (3) (2018) 1853–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. A. Hanna et al., Studies on the flammability of polypropylene/ammonium polyphosphate and montmorillonite by using the cone calorimeter test, Open Chem., 16 (1) (2018) 108–115.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. X. Chen et al., TG — FTIR characterization of volatile compounds from flame retardant polyurethane foams materials, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 100 (2013) 186–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. B. Schartel and T. R. Hull, Development of fire-retarded materials-interpretation of cone calorimeter data, Fire Mater, 31 (5) (2007) 327–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Kaynak and E. Ibibikcan, Contribution of nanoclays to the flame retardancy of polyethylene-based cable insulation materials with aluminum hydroxide and zinc borate, J. Fire Sci., 32 (2) (2014) 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. H. J. Kruger et al., Cone calorimeter study of polyethylene flame retarded with expandable graphite and intumescent fire-retardant additives, J. Fire Sci., 32 (6) (2014) 498–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. X. Zheng and P. A. Cusack, Tin-containing layered double hydroxides: synthesis and application in poly (vinyl chloride) cable formulations, Fire Mater, 37 (1) (2013) 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. G. Gallina et al., Application of cone calorimeter for the assessment of class of flame retardants for polypropylene, Fire Mater, 22 (1) (1998) 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. T. R. Hull, A. Witkowski and L. Hollingbery, Fire retardant action of mineral fillers, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 96 (8) (2011) 1462–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. B. S. Zhang et al., Effects of insulating material ageing on ignition time and heat release rate of the flame retardant cables, Procedia Eng., 211 (2018) 972–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Chen et al., Correlation analysis of heat flux and cone calorimeter test data of commercial flame-retardant ethylenepropylene-diene monomer (EPDM) rubber, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 123 (1) (2016) 545–556.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. O. Grexa and H. Lübke, Flammability parameters of wood tested on a cone calorimeter, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 74 (3) (2001) 427–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. B. H. Lee et al., Evaluating the flammability of wood-based panels and gypsum particleboard using a cone calorimeter, Constr. Build. Mater, 25 (7) (2011) 3044–3050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. A. P. Mouritz, Z. Mathys and A. G. Gibson, Heat release of polymer composites in fire, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 37 (7) (2006) 1040–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. E. Jin and Y. J. Chung, Fire risk assessment of cypress wood coated with metal oxide and metal silicate flame retardant using cone calorimeter, J. Fire Sci., 38 (6) (2020) 504–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. B. Li, Influence of polymer additives on thermal decomposition and smoke emission of poly (vinyl chloride), Polym. Degrad. Stab., 82 (3) (2003) 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. T. R. Hull et al., Factors affecting the combustion toxicity of polymeric materials, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 92 (12) (2007) 2239–2246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. A. Schnipper and L. Smith-hansen, Reduced combustion efficiency of chlorinated compounds, resulting in higher yields of carbon monoxide, Fire Mater, 19 (1995) 61–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. S. A. Molyneux, A. A. Stec and T. R. Hull, The correlation between carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide in fire effluentsof flame retarded polymers, Fire Saf. Sci., 11 (2014) 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. B. H. Hun et al., A study on the fire characterization of foam block using cone-calorimeter and FTIR, Fire Sci. Eng., 31 (6) (2017) 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  49. S. R. Turns, An Introduction to Combustion Concepts and Applications, 3rd Edition, Mc Graw Hill (2012) 573–574.

  50. E. D. Weil, S. Levchik and P. Moy, Flame and smoke retardants in vinyl chloride polymers — commercial usage and current developments, J. Fire Sci., 24 (3) (2006) 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. S. V. Levchik and E. D. Weil, Combustion and fire retardancy of aliphatic nylons, Polym. Int., 49 (10) (2000) 1033–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. A. Bissonier et al., An experimental investigation of the combustion of technical tetrachlorobenzene in a laboratory scale incinerator, Combust. Flame, 129 (3) (2002) 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Y. Chi et al., Influence of chlorine on methane oxidation, J. Environ. Sci., 21 (9) (2009) 1315–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. H. Y. Jang and C. H. Hwang, Methodology for DB construction of input parameters in FDS-based prediction models of smoke detector, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 34 (12) (2020) 5327–5337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KOFONS) using financial resources granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) of the Republic of Korea [grant number 1705002]. This work was also supported by an Incheon National University Research Grant (2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Chul Lee.

Additional information

Min Chul Lee received his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology in 2003 and his Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Seoul National University in 2014. He is currently a Professor at Incheon National University and Head of the Combustion and Fire Engineering Laboratory. He has worked on a number of joint government and industry projects to develop the next generation of low-emission, fuel-flexible gas turbine combustors and fire safety technologies.

Min Ho Kim received his M.S. in Safety Engineering from Incheon National University. His research interest is combustion and fire safety engineering.

Seok Hui Lee performed her M.S. course in Safety Engineering from Incheon University. Her research interest is fire safety engineering and fire dynamics simulator.

Seung Yeon Jeong performed her M.S. course in Safety Engineering from Incheon National University. Her research interest is combustion and fire safety engineering and consequence analysis.

Sang Kyu Lee received his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Kookmin University in 1997. He is currently a Principal Researcher at KINS (Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety). He has also been an R&D project manager related to fire protection in the nuclear field.

Ju Eun Lee received her M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from Seoul National University in 2017. She is currently a Senior Researcher at KINS (Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety). She is involved in regulatory work in the field of fire protection for nuclear power plants.

Ji Hyun Kwark received his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 1998 and 2004 from Pusan National University, respectively. He has been working for Fire Insurers Laboratories of Korea since 2004. His research interests are fire dynamics and fire protection equipments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M.H., Lee, S.H., Jeong, S.Y. et al. Investigation of combustion, smoke, and toxicity characteristics of flame-retardant and fiber-optic cables used in nuclear power plants. J Mech Sci Technol 37, 987–999 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0138-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0138-x

Keywords

Navigation