Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting indoor PM2.5/PM10 concentrations using simplified neural network models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neural network models were presented for prediction of indoor concentrations of particulate matters (PMs). Indoor PM concentrations are generally determined by the outdoor concentration, the indoor generation rate, and the air change rate of a building. In this study, indoor PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations were modelled in a single office room installed with a portable air purifier (AP) and a heat recovery ventilator (HRV), using three different neural network models with various input variables. The relative importance of individual input variables indicated that as opposed to PM10, PM2.5 is more affected by outdoor origin than indoor source. This is generally consistent with previous findings explaining that the main source of PM2.5 is outdoor environment, whereas that for PM10 is indoor human activities. The simplified models can be easily applied in practice based on the CO2 concentration measured in a room and the outdoor PM concentration data acquired from public data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. M. Valenti, HAART is cost-effective and improves outcomes, AIDS Read, 11(5) (2001) 260–262.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. E. Klepeis et al., The national human activity pattern survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants, J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol, 11(3) (2001) 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. O. Anderson, J. G. Thundiyil and A. Stolbach, Clearing the air: a review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health, J. Med. Toxicol, 8(2) (2012) 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Monn et al., Particulate matter less than 10 µm (PM10) and fine particles less than 25 µm (PM25): relationships between indoor, outdoor and personal concentrations, Sci. Total Environ., 208(1-2) (1997) 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. R. Martins and G. Carrilho da Graça, Impact of PM25 in indoor urban environments: a review, Sustain. Cities Soc., 42 (2018) 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Vimalanathan and T. Ramesh Babu, The effect of indoor office environment on the work performance, health and well-being of office workers, J. Environ. Heal. Sci. Eng., 12(1) (2014) 113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. He, Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses, Atmos. Environ., 38(21) (2004) 3405–3415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. M. Long, H. H. Suh and P. Koutrakis, Characterization of indoor particle sources using continuous mass and size monitors, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 50(7) (2000) 1236–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Braniš, P. Řezáčová and M. Domasová, The effect of outdoor air and indoor human activity on mass concentrations of PM10, PM25, and PM1 in a classroom, Environ. Res., 99(2) (2005) 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Elbayoumi et al., Multivariate methods for indoor PM10 and PM25 modelling in naturally ventilated schools buildings, Atmos. Environ., 94 (2014) 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Al-Hubail and A.-S. Al-Temeemi, Assessment of school building air quality in a desert climate, Build. Environ., 94 (2015) 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Hussein et al., Characterization, fate, and re-suspension of aerosol particles (03–10 µm): the effects of occupancy and carpet use, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 15(6) (2015) 2367–2377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Sangiorgi et al., Indoor airborne particle sources and semi-volatile partitioning effect of outdoor fine PM in offices, Atmos. Environ., 65 (2013) 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. He, L. Morawska and L. Taplin, Particle emission characteristics of office printers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41(17) (2007) 6039–6045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Wensing et al., Ultra-fine particles release from hardcopy devices: sources, real-room measurements and efficiency of filter accessories, Sci. Total Environ., 407(1) (2008) 418–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. J. Koivisto et al., Impact of particle emissions of new laser printers on modeled office room, Atmos. Environ., 44(17) (2010) 2140–2146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Licina, Y. Tian and W. W. Nazaroff, Emission rates and the personal cloud effect associated with particle release from the perihuman environment, Indoor Air, 27(4) (2017) 791–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Y. H. Chao, T. C. W. Tung and J. Burnett, Influence of different indoor activities on the indoor particulate levels in residential buildings, Indoor Built Environ., 7(2) (1998) 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Li et al., Household concentrations and personal exposure of PM25 among urban residents using different cooking fuels, Sci. Total Environ., 548–549 (2016) 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Thatcher, Deposition, resuspension, and penetration of particles within a residence, Atmos. Environ., 29(13) (1995) 1487–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Chen, S. C. M. Yu and A. C. K. Lai, Modeling particle distribution and deposition in indoor environments with a new drift-flux model, Atmos. Environ., 40(2) (2006) 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Goyal and M. Khare, Indoor air quality modeling for PM10, PM25, and PM10 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building, Environ. Monit. Assess., 176(1-4) (2011) 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. T. Tran et al., Indoor particle dynamics in schools: determination of air exchange rate, size-resolved particle deposition rate and penetration factor in real-life conditions, Indoor Built Environ., 26(10) (2017) 1335–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Hussein and M. Kulmala, Indoor aerosol modeling: basic principles and practical applications, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. Focus, 8(1) (2008) 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Wei et al., Machine learning and statistical models for predicting indoor air quality, Indoor Air, 29(5) (2019) 704–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Challoner, F. Pilla and L. Gill, Prediction of indoor air exposure from outdoor air quality using an artificial neural network model for inner city commercial buildings, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 12(12) (2015) 15233–15253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Elbayoumi, N. A. Ramli and N. F. Fitri Md. Yusof, Development and comparison of regression models and feedforward backpropagation neural network models to predict seasonal indoor PM25-10 and PM25 concentrations in naturally ventilated schools, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 6(6) (2015) 1013–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O. M. Ibrahim, A comparison of methods for assessing the relative importance of input variables in artificial neural networks, The J. Applied Sciences Research, 9(11) (2013) 5692–5700.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. R. Ferro, R. J. Kopperud and L. M. Hildemann, Elevated personal exposure to particulate matter from human activities in a residence, J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., 14(S1) (2004) S34–S40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. G. Alam et al., Uncertainties in neural network model based on carbon dioxide concentration for occupancy estimation, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 31(5) (2017) 2573–2580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. H. Rahman and H. Han, Occupancy estimation based on indoor CO2 concentration: comparison of neural network and bayesian methods, Int. J. Air-Conditioning Refrig., 25(3) (2017) 1750021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1D1A1 B01009625) and by Global scholarship of Kookmin University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hwataik Han.

Additional information

Muhammad Hatta received his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Kookmin University in 2020. He joined the TEE (Thermal Environmental Engineering) Lab in Kookmin University after he received his M.E. degree from University of Riau, Indonesia in 2017. Currently, he is working for an IoT company in South Korea. His main research interest lies in developing a predictive model for industrial machinery using machine learning.

Hwataik Han received B.S. and M.S. from Seoul National University and Ph.D. degree from University of Minnesota in 1988. Currently, he is a Professor in Kookmin University. He is a registered PE at Minnesota State Board of AELSLAGID. He served as the President of SAREK in 2014 and the Editorin-Chief of KACA (Korea Air Cleaning Association) since 2005. He organized the Indoor Air 2020 Conference as the President. Now, he is a fellow of ASHRAE and of SAREK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatta, M., Han, H. Predicting indoor PM2.5/PM10 concentrations using simplified neural network models. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 3249–3257 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0645-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0645-6

Keywords

Navigation