Skip to main content
Log in

Target robot for active safety evaluation of ADAS vehicles

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active safety features and functions are built into a vehicle to automatically detect collision risks and prevent the occurrence of collisions. These functions are difficult to validate by using the traditional safety assessment methods. Therefore, evaluation methods and systems are developed for testing active safety systems. We developed a system for evaluating the active safety of advanced driver assistance system vehicles. This system consisted of an unmanned robot with a height of 100 mm and cloaked under a target dummy vehicle, which was made of balloons. This setup enabled the robot to pass through the underside of the test vehicle. In this manner, the evaluation system and test vehicle avoided possible damage during the collision test. The evaluation system could generate vehicular paths by using a differential global positioning system to enact a collision scenario for the assessment of the active safety function. Actual vehicle experiments were conducted to verify the system via the collision scenarios established by the Euro new car assessment program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ITF, Road Safety Annual Report 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/irtad-2017-en (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, http://www.molit.go.kr/USR/WPGE0201/m_35402/DTL.jsp.

  3. K. Bengler, K. Dietmayer, B. Farber, M. Maurer, C. Stiller and H. Winner, Three decades of driver assistance systems:Three decades of driver assistance systems: Review and future perspectives, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 6 (4) Winter (2014) 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Vahidi and A. Eskandarian, Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 4 (3) (2003) 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Kang, W. Kim, J. Lee and K. Yi, Design, implementation, and test of skid steering-based autonomous driving controller for a robotic vehicle with articulated suspension, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 24 (3) (2010) 793–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. H. Lee, H. G. Park, S. H. Lee, K. S. Yoon and K. S. Lee, An adaptive cruise control system for autonomous vehicles, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 14 (3) (2013) 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Son, Y. Lee and M. Kim, Impact of traffic environment and cognitive workload on older drivers’ behavior in simulated driving, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 12 (1) (2011) 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Widyotriatmo, B. Hong and K. Hong, Predictive navigation of an autonomous vehicle with nonholonomic and minimum turning radius constraints, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 23 (2) (2009) 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Yoon and B. Kim, Vehicle position estimation using nonlinear tire model for an autonomous vehicle, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30 (8) (2016) 3461–3468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Korea New Car Assessment Program, http://www.kncap.org.

  11. Assessment of Integrated Vehicle Safety Systems for Improved Vehicle Safety, http://www.assess-project.eu (2009).

  12. Euro NCAP AEB test Protocol 2.0.1, TEST PROTOCOL–AEB Systems, https://www.euroncap.com/en (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. X. Z. Han, H. J. Kim, H. C. Moon, H. J. Woo, J. H. Kim and Y. J. Kim, Development of a path generation and tracking algorithm for a Korean auto-guidance tillage tractor, Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 38 (1) (2013) 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Thrun, M. Montemerio, H. Dahlkamp, D. Stavens, A. Aron, J. Diebel, P. Fong, J. Gale, M. Halpenny, G. Hoffmann, K. Lau, C. Oakley, M. Palatucci, V. Pratt and P. strang, Stanley: The robot that won the DARPA Grand Challenge, Journal of Field Robotics, 23 (9) (2006) 661–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Kozłowski and D. Pazderski, Modeling and control of a 4-wheel skid-steering mobile robot, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 14 (2004) 477–496.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport and the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (Project No.: 18TLRP-B117133-03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayil Jeong.

Additional information

Recommended by Editor Hyung Wook Park

Yeonggeol Park received his B.S. degree from the Department of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University, Seoul, South Korea in 2007. He earned his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Department of Mechanics and Design, Kookmin University in 2009 and 2017, respectively. His current research interests include evaluation for advanced driving automotive safety systems.

Seohang Lee received his B.S. degree from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kookmin University, Seoul, South Korea in 2017. He has been a Ph.D. candidate at Kookmin University since 2017. His research interests include the development of mobile robots for advanced driving automotive safety

Myoungyeon Park received his B.S. degree from the Department of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University, Seoul, South Korea in 2015. He received his M.S. degrees from the Department of Mechanics and Design in Kookmin University in 2017. He has been a Ph.D. candidate in Kookmin University since 2019.

Jaekon Shin received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Inha University, Korea and Ajou University, Korea in Electronics Engineering in 1987 and 2001, respectively. He earned his Ph.D. degree from the Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering at Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea in 2015. He was with Hyundai Motor Company as a Senior Engineer from 1986 to 1993. Since then, he has been working as a Senior Researcher at the Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute. He is the head of the Automated Vehicle Research Division. His research interests include evaluation and rulemaking of EMC, electronic control systems, and automated vehicles.

Jayil Jeong received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, in 1995, 1997, and 2002, respectively. He was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Johns Hopkins University in the United States from 2003 to 2006. Since then, he has been a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering in Kook-min University, Seoul, Korea. His current research interests include safety evaluation systems for automated vehicles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, Y., Lee, S., Park, M. et al. Target robot for active safety evaluation of ADAS vehicles. J Mech Sci Technol 33, 4431–4438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0839-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0839-3

Keywords

Navigation