Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Application of hybrid recurrent Laguerre-orthogonal-polynomial NN control in V-belt continuously variable transmission system using modified particle swarm optimization

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 16 January 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Because a V-belt continuously variable transmission system driven by Permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) has many nonlinear and time-varying characteristics, the linear control design with better control performance has to execute a complex and time consuming procedure. To reduce this difficulty and raise robustness of system under the occurrence of the uncertainties, a hybrid recurrent Laguerre-orthogonal-polynomial Neural network (NN) control system which has online learning ability to respond to the system’s nonlinear and time-varying behavior is proposed in this study. This control system consists of an inspector control system, a recurrent Laguerre- orthogonal-polynomial NN control with adaptive law and a recouped control with estimated law. Moreover, the adaptive law of online parameter in the recurrent Laguerre-orthogonal-polynomial NN is derived using Lyapunov stability theorem. Two optimal learning rates of the parameters based on modified Particle swarm optimization (PSO) are proposed to achieve fast convergence. Finally, to verify the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme, comparative studies are demonstrated by experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. C. Y. Tseng, L. W. Chen, Y. T. Lin and J. Y. Li, A hybrid dynamic simulation model for urban scooters with a mechanical-type CVT, IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Qingdao, China (2008) 519–519.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Y. Tseng, Y. F. Lue, Y. T. Lin, J. C. Siao, C. H. Tsai and L. M. Fu, Dynamic simulation model for hybrid electric scooters, IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Seoul, Korea (2009) 1464–1469.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Guzzella and A. M. Schmid, Feedback linearization of spark-ignition engines with continuously variable transmissions, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 3 (1) (1995) 54–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Kim and G. Vachtsevanos, Fuzzy logic ratio control for a CVT hydraulic module, Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Intelligent Control, Rio, Greece (2000) 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Carbone, L. Mangialardi, B. Bonsen, C. Tursi and P. A. Veenhuizen, CVT dynamics: Theory and experiments, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 42 (4) (2007) 409–428.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Sattler, Efficiency of metal chain and V-belt CVT, Proc. of the International Conference on Continuously Variable Power Transmissions, Eindhoven, Netherlands (1999) 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Carbone, L. Mangialardi and G. Mantriota, The influence of pulley deformations on the shifting mechanisms of MVBCVT, ASME-J. of Mechanical Design, 127 (1) (2005) 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Srivastava and I. Haque, A review on belt and chain continuously variable transmissions (CVT): Dynamics and control, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 44 (1) (2009) 19–41.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. D. W. Novotny and T. A. Lipo, Vector Control and Dynamics of AC Drives, Oxford University Press, New York, USA (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Krishnan, Electric motor drives: Modeling, analysis, and control, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. J. Lin, Real-time IP position controller design with torque feedforward control for PM synchronous motor, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 4 (3) (1997) 398–407.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. S. Narendra and K. Parthasarathy, Identification and control of dynamical system using neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1 (1) (1990) 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. S. Sastry, G. Santharam and K. P. Unnikrishnan, Memory neural networks for identification and control of dynamical systems, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5 (3) (1994) 306–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Grino, G. Gembrano and C. Torras, Nonlinear system identification using additive dynamic neural networks–two on-line approaches, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, 47 (2) (2000) 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Sadeghi and H. Askarinejad, Application of neural networks in evaluation of railway track quality condition, JMST, 26 (1) (2012) 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Ramakrishnan and R. Arumugam, Optimization of operating parameters and performance evaluation of forced draft cooling tower using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN), JMST, 26 (5) (2012) 1643–1650.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. H. Pao, Adaptive Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (1989).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. H Pao and S. M. Philips, The functional link net and learning optimal control, Neurocomputing, 9 (2) (1995) 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. C. Patra, R. N. Pal, B. N. Chatterji and G. Panda, Identification of nonlinear dynamic systems using functional link artificial neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics B, 29 (2) (1999) 254–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Dehuri and S. B. Cho, A comprehensive survey on functional link neural networks and an adaptive PSOBP learning for CFLNN, Neural Computing and Applications, 19 (2) (2010) 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. C. Patra, C. Bornand and P. K. Meher, Laguerre neural network-based smart sensors for wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Singapore (2009) 832–837.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. C. Patra, P. K. Meher and G. Chakraborty, Development of Laguerre neural-network-based intelligent sensors for wireless sensor networks, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 60 (3) (2011) 725–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. W. S. Chow and Y. Fang, A recurrent neural-networkbased real-time learning control strategy applying to nonlinear systems with unknown dynamics, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 45 (1) (1998) 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. A. Brdys and G. J. Kulawski, Dynamic neural controllers for induction motor, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10 (2) (1999) 340–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. X. D. Li, J. K. L. Ho and T. W. S. Chow, Approximation of dynamical time-variant systems by continuous-time recurrent neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, 52 (10) (2005) 656–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. H. Lu and C. C. Tsai, Adaptive predictive control with recurrent neural network for industrial processes: an application to temperature control of a variable-frequency oilcooling machine, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55 (3) (2008) 1366–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. F. Hsu, Intelligent position tracking control for LCM drive using stable online self-constructing recurrent neural network controller with bound architecture, Control Engineering Practice, 17 (6) (2009) 714–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, USA, 4 (1995) 1942–1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Goldberg, The design of innovation: Lessons from and for competent genetic algorithms, Norwell, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, USA (2002).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Clerc and J. Kennedy, The particle swarm-Explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (1) (2002) 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P. J. Angeline, Evolutionary optimization verses particle swarm optimization: Philosophy and the performance difference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1447 (1998) 600–610.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart, A modified particle swarm optimizer, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, Alaska, USA (1998) 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Y. del Valle, G. K. Venayagamoorthy, S. Mohagheghi, J. C. Hernandez and R. G. Harley, Particle swarm optimization: basic concepts, variants and applications in power systems, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 12 (2) (2008) 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. R. Akbari and K. Ziarati, A rank based particle swarm optimization algorithm with dynamic adaptation, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 235 (8) (2011) 2694–2714.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. E. Zitzler, K. Deb and L. Thiele, Comparison of multi objective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results, Evolutionary Computation, 8 (2) (2000) 173–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. R. C. Eberhart and Y. Shi, Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization, Proc. of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’ 00), La Jolla, California, USA (2000) 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. C. Eberhart and Y. Shi, Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization, Proc. of the 7th International Conference Evolutionary Programming VII, Diego, California, USA (1998) 611–616.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Y. Zhang, X. Xiong, C. Chen and X. Huang, A particle swarm optimization based on dynamic parameter modification, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 40–41 (2011) 201–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Y. Zhang, X. Xiong and Q. D. Zhang, An improved selfadaptive PSO algorithm with detection function for multimodal function optimization problems, Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2013) Article ID 716952.

    Google Scholar 

  40. T. Y. Sun, C. C. Liu, S. J. Tsai, S. T. Hsieh and K.Y. Li, Cluster guide particle swarm optimization (CGPSO) for underdetermined blind source separation with advanced conditions, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 15 (6) (2011) 798–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. C. H. Lin and C. P. Lin, The hybrid RFNN control for a PMSM drive system using rotor flux estimator, International J. of Power Electronics, 4 (1) (2012) 33–48.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. C. H. Lin, P. H. Chiang, C. S. Tseng, Y. L. Liu and M. Y. Lee, Hybrid recurrent fuzzy neural network control for permanent magnet synchronous motor applied in electric scooter, 6th International Power Electronics Conference, Sapporo, Japan (2010) 1371–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  43. C. H. Lin, Hybrid recurrent wavelet neural network control of PMSM servo-drive system for electric scooter, International J. of Control, Automation and Systems, 12 (1) (2014) 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. C. H. Lin, A novel hybrid recurrent wavelet neural network control of PMSM servo-drive system for electric scooter, Turkish J. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 22 (4) (2014) 1056–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. C. H. Lin, Novel adaptive recurrent Legendre neural network control for PMSM servo-drive electric scooter, ASME-J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 137 (1) (2015) 011010–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. C. H. Lin, PMSM servo drive for V-belt continuously variable transmission system using hybrid recurrent Chebyshev NN control system, J. of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 10 (1) (2015) 408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. J. G. Ziegler and N. B. Nichols, Optimum settings for automatic controllers, Transactions ASME, 64 (1942) 759–768.

    Google Scholar 

  48. K. J. Astrom and T. Hagglund, PID controller: Theory, design, and tuning, Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  49. T. Hagglund and K. J. Astrom, Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for PI control, Asian J. of Control, 4 (4) (2002) 364–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. T. Hagglund and K. J. Astrom, Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for PI control-part II: the frequency response method, Asian J. of Control, 6 (4) (2004) 469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. J. J. E. Slotine and W. Li, Applied nonlinear control, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA (1991).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. K. J. Astrom and B. Wittenmark, Adaptive control, Addison-Wesley, New York, USA (1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, National United University, Miaoli, 360063, Taiwan

    Chih-Hong Lin

Authors
  1. Chih-Hong Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Hong Lin.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Junzhi Yu

Chih-Hong Lin received his B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering for National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C., in 1989 and 1991, respectively. He received his Ph. D. in Electrical Engineering from Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li, Taiwan, R.O.C., in 2001. He is currently an associate Professor in the electrical engineering, National United University, Miao Li, Taiwan, R.O.C. His research interests are in power electronics, motor drive and control.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, CH. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Application of hybrid recurrent Laguerre-orthogonal-polynomial NN control in V-belt continuously variable transmission system using modified particle swarm optimization. J Mech Sci Technol 29, 3933–3952 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0839-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0839-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation