Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid collaborative optimization based on selection strategy of initial point and adaptive relaxation

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two problems in Collaborative optimization (CO): (1) the local optima arising from the selection of an inappropriate initial point; (2) the low efficiency and accuracy root in inappropriate relaxation factors. To solve these problems, we first develop the Latin hypercube design (LHD) to determine an initial point of optimization, and then use the non-linear programming by quadratic Lagrangian (NLPQL) to search for the global solution. The effectiveness of the initial point selection strategy is verified by three benchmark functions with some dimensions and different complexities. Then we propose the Adaptive relaxation collaborative optimization (ARCO) algorithm to solve the inconsistency between the system level and the disciplines level, and in this method, the relaxation factors are determined according to the three separated stages of CO respectively. The performance of the ARCO algorithm is compared with the standard collaborative algorithm and the constant relaxation collaborative algorithm with a typical numerical example, which indicates that the ARCO algorithm is more efficient and accurate. Finally, we propose a Hybrid collaborative optimization (HCO) approach, which integrates the selection strategy of initial point with the ARCO algorithm. The results show that HCO can achieve the global optimal solution without the initial value and it also has advantages in convergence, accuracy and robustness. Therefore, the proposed HCO approach can solve the CO problems with applications in the spindle and the speed reducer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Kroo, S. Altus, R. Braun, P. Gage and I. Sobieski, Multidisciplinary optimization methods for aircraft preliminary design, 5th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City, Florida, USA (1994) 697–707.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Balling and M. R. Rawlings, Collaborative optimization with disciplinary conceptual design, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 20 (3) (2000) 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. W. Olivier, A. Jeremy and J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, State-of-the-art and future trends in multidisciplinary design optimization, 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Waikiki (2007) 2467–2487.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Braun, P. Gage, I. Kroo and I. Sobieski, Implementation and performance issues in collaborative optimization, 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, USA (1996) 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. M. Alexandrov and R. M. Lewis, Analytical and computational properties of distributed approaches to MDO, 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, USA (2000) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.V. DeMiguel and W. Murray, An analysis of collaborative optimization methods, 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, USA (2000) 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. P. Sobieski and I. M. Kroo, Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation, AIAA J., 38 (10) (2000) 1931–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Zhao and W. C. Cui, On the development of Bi-level integrated system collaborative optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 43 (1) (2011) 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. W. Hu, S. Azarm and A. Almansoori, New approximation assisted multi-objective collaborative robust optimization (new AA-McRO) under interval uncertainty, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 47 (1) (2013) 19–35.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Y.-H. Jeon, S. Jun, S. Kang and D.-H. Lee, Systematic design space exploration and rearrangement of the MDO problem by using probabilistic methodology, JMST, 26 (9) (2012) 2825–2836.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Z. Huang, Y. Tao and Y. Liu, Multidisciplinary collaborative optimization using fuzzy satisfaction degree and fuzzy sufficiency degree model, Soft Computing, 12 (10) (2008) 995–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B.-S. Jang, Y.-S. Yang, H.-S. Jung and Y.-S. Yeun, Managing approximation models in collaborative optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 30 (1) (2005) 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. O. Stanley and P. Hajela, Genetic algorithm based collaborative optimization of a tilt rotor configuration, 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Austin, Texas, USA (2005) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Lee, D.-H. Lee, K.-H. Kim, T. C. Park, B. J. Lim and Y.-S. Kang, Multi-disciplinary design optimization and performance evaluation of a single stage transonic axial compressor, JMST, 27 (11) (2013) 3309–3318.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Q. Song and B. K. Xia, Particle swarm collaborative optimization algorithm based on velocity angle, J. of Computer Applications, 27 (11) (2007) 2824–2825.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. D. Roth and I. M. Kroo, Enhanced collaborative optimization: A decomposition-based method for multidisciplinary design, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences/Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, New York, USA (2008) 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Xiao, H. B. Qiu, L. Gao, X. Y. Shao and X. Z. Chu, An enhanced collaborative optimization methodology for multidisciplinary design optimization, 2010 International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies, Sanya, China (2010) 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. M. Zadeh, J. Roshanian and M. R. Farmani, Particle swarm optimization for multi-objective collaborative multidisciplinary design optimization, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., Orlando, FL, United States (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Hajela, Soft computing in multidisciplinary aerospace design-new directions for research, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38 (1) (2002) 10–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. X. P. Du and W. Chen, Collaborative reliability analysis under the framework of multidisciplinary systems design, Optimization and Engineering, 6 (1) (2005) 63–84.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. N. M. Alexandro and R. M. Lewis, Analytical and computational aspects of collaborative optimization for multidisciplinary design, AIAA J., 40 (2) (2002) 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K.-S. Jeon, J.-W. Lee and J.-H. Choi, Efficient system optimization techniques through subspace decomposition and response surface refinement, AIAA Paper, AIAA-2002-0321 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. X. Li, W. J. Li and C. A. Liu, Geometric analysis of collaborative optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 35 (4) (2008) 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Y. Li, M. X. Ma, Y. W. Jin and R. Lliu, Improved multidisciplinary collaborative optimization with global stability, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 15 (12) (2009) 2363–2369 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. B. Guo and S. K. Zeng, Research on adaptive collaborative optimization method, System Engineering and Electronics, 31 (5) (2009) 1108–1112 (in Chinese).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Ratnaweera, S. K. Halgamuge and H. C. Watson, Selforganizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with timevarying acceleration coefficients, IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 8 (3) (2004) 240–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. W. Y. Gong, Z. H. Cai and X. Charles, DE/BBO: A hybrid differential evolution with biogeography-based optimization for global numerical optimization, Soft Computing, 15 (4) (2010) 645–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. X. Yao, Y. Liu and G. Lin, Evolutionary programming made faster, IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 3 (2) (1999) 82–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Geatbx, Example Functions (Single and multi-objective functions) 2 Parametric Optimization, http://www.geatbx.com/docu/fcnindex-01.html.

  30. R. S. Sellar, S. M. Batill and J. E. Renaud, Response surface based concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design, AIAA Paper, AIAA-1996-0714 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. G. Guo, P. J. Wang and P. Tian, Optimization design of CNC machine tool spindle based on genetic algorithm, J. of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 32 (6) (2011) 850–853 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. W. Li, W. X. Deng, H. L. Gao, M. H. Xu and S. Chen, Study on parameters optimization in numerical machining of stainless steel based on MATLAB, 4th International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing, Shenzhen, China (2010) 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  33. W. X. Li, Engineering optimization design with MATLAB, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China (2010) (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  34. K. Srinivas, Evaluation of methods for multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO), Phase I, NASA/CR-1998-208716 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimin Ji.

Additional information

Recommended by Editor Haedo Jeong

Aimin Ji is a professor of the College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, China. His research interests include digital design and manufacturing, CAD/CAE integration, multidisciplinary design optimization, etc.

Xu Yin received his M.S. in the College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering at Hohai University, China. His main research interests include collaborative optimization and intelligent algorithms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, A., Yin, X. & Yuan, M. Hybrid collaborative optimization based on selection strategy of initial point and adaptive relaxation. J Mech Sci Technol 29, 3841–3854 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0830-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0830-6

Keywords

Navigation