Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity of a vehicle ride to the suspension bushing characteristics

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sensitivity of the ride characteristics of a road vehicle to the mechanical characteristics of the bushings used in its suspension is discussed here. First, the development and computational implementation, on a multibody dynamics environment, of a constitutive relation to model bushing elements associated with mechanical joints is presented. Bushings are made of a rubber type of material, which presents a nonlinear and viscoelastic relationship between the forces and moments and their corresponding displacements and rotations. Suitable bushing models for vehicle multibody models must be accurate and computationally efficient, leading to more reliable models. The bushing is modeled in a multibody code as an arrangement of springs that penalize the motion between the bodies connected. In the methodology proposed here, a finite element model of the bushing is developed in the framework of a finite element (FE) code to obtain the curves of displacement/rotation versus force/moment for different loading cases. The basic ingredients of the multibody model are the same vectors and points relations used to define kinematic constraints in any multibody formulation. Spherical, cylindrical and revolute bushing joints are developed and implemented in this work, since the methodology is demonstrated through the ride over bumps, at different speeds, of two multibody models of a road vehicle: one with perfect kinematic joints, for the suspension sub-systems; the other with bushing joints, riding. Then, sensitivities of different vehicle kinematic responses to the characteristics of the bushings used in the suspension are evaluated, by using numerical sensitivities. Based on the sensitivity analysis, indications on how to modify the vehicle response by modifying the bushing characteristics are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Nikravesh, Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Flores, J. Ambrósio, J. Pimenta Claro and H. Lankarani, Kinematics and Dynamics of Multibody Systems with Imperfect Joints: Models and Case Studies, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, (2008).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Park and P. Nikravesh, Effect of steering-housing rubber bushings on the handling responses of a vehicle. SAE Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars, 106(6) (1998) 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Kang, J. Yun, J. Lee and T. Tak, Elastokinematic Analysis and Optimization of Suspension Compliance Characteristics, Proceedings of Steering and suspensions technology, SAE Paper 970104, SAE International, Warrendale, USA, (1997) 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Kadlowec, A. Wineman and G. Hulbert, Elastomer bushing response: Experiments and finite element modeling. Acta Mechanica, 163 (2003) 25–38.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Ledesma, Z. Ma, G. Hulbert and A. Wineman, A nonlinear viscoelastic bushing element in multibody dynamics, Computational Mechanics, 17 (1996) 287–296.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Ambrosio and P. Verissimo, Improved bushing models for vehicle dynamics, Multibody System Dynamics, to be published (2009).

  8. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, ABAQUS User’s Manual, Pawtucket, Massachusetts, USA, (1999).

  9. P. Verissimo, Improved Bushing Models for Vehicle Dynamics, MSc. Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Hafka and H. Adelman, Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis, Structural Optimization, 1 (1989) 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Tortorelli and P. Michaleris, Design Sensitivity Analysis: Overview and Review, Inverse Problems in Engineering, 1 (1994) 71–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Kirshnaswami and M. Bhatti, A general approach for design sensitivity analysis of constrained dynamic systems, ASME Paper 84-DET-132 (1984).

  13. J. Ambrósio, M. Augusta Neto and R. Leal, Optimization of a complex flexible multibody systems with composite materials, Multibody Systems Dynamics, 18(2) (2007) 117–144.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Gonçalves, Rigid and Flexible Multibody Systems Optimization for Vehicle Dynamics, PhD Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Ambrósio.

Additional information

Jorge A.C. Ambrósio received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Arizona in 1991, being currently Professor at the Mechanical Engineering Department of Instituto Superior Técnico at the Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal. He is the author of several books and a large number of papers in international journals in the areas of multibody dynamics, vehicle Dynamics, crashworthiness and biomechanics. He has been responsible for several international projects in railway dynamics, biomechanics and passive safety. Currently he is the Editor-in-Chief of Multibody System Dynamics and member of the editorial boards of several international journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ambrósio, J., Verissimo, P. Sensitivity of a vehicle ride to the suspension bushing characteristics. J Mech Sci Technol 23, 1075–1082 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0344-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0344-1

Keywords

Navigation