Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty Analysis for Mean Flow Velocity and Discharge Measurements using Floats based on Large-Scale Experiments

  • Hydraulic Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The uncertainty of flow measurements obtained by the float method is evaluated following the international organization for standardization (ISO) 748 guideline. However, the standard uncertainty of an average flow rate has not been considered and the quantitative uncertainty has never been computed for flow measurements made using the float method. Therefore, in this study, a stream-scale experiment was performed to estimate the standard uncertainty of the mean flow velocity by considering the flow velocity uncertainty of floats. The results demonstrated that the standard uncertainty of the mean flow velocity measured by a surface float was 15.30%, while that measured by a rod float having a 50-cm draft was 11.05%. Through these results, the measurement uncertainty of discharge was evaluated according to the GUM (guide for the expression of uncertainty in measurement) method. The measurement uncertainty was then evaluated considering the standard uncertainty of the mean flow velocity. The measurement uncertainty of the discharge was increased by 3.4% as compared with that calculated without considering the standard uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki, K. (1932). “On correction of coefficient of the measured velocity of float, especially of float rod, to the mean velocity of flow in a vertical.” Proc. The Japan Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 105–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. W. and Anderson, I. E. (1963). “Accuracy of current meter measurement.” Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despax, A., Perret, C., Garçon, R., Hauet, A., Belleville, A., Le Coz, J., and Favre, A. C. (2016). “Considering sampling strategy and cross-section complexity for estimating the uncertainty of discharge measurements using the velocity-area method.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 533, pp. 128–140, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, I. and Kunita, Y. (2011). “Application of aerial LSPIV to the 2002 flood of the Yodo River using a helicopter mounted high density video camera.” Journal of Hydro-environment Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 323–331, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2011.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herschy, R. W. (1971).“The magnitude of errors at flow measurement stations.” Water Resources Board, United Kingdom, pp. 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschy, R. W. (2002). “The uncertainty in a current meter measurement.” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 13, Nos. 5–6, pp. 281–284, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(02)00047-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. H, Kim, C. Y, Jung, S. W., and Kim, W. (2006). Improvement the methods of discharge computation from float measurement. Korea Water Resources Association 2006 Convention, Jeju, Korea, pp. 852–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 748 (2007). Hydrometry: Measurement of liquid flow in open channels using current-meters or floats, ISO 748, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 1088 (2007). Hydrometry — velocity-area methods using current-meters — Collection and processing of data for determination of uncertainties inflow measurement, ISO 1088, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO, IEC, OIML, BIPM (1995). Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, GUM 1995, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kim, D., Son, G., and Kim, S. (2015). “Accuracy analysis of velocity and water depth measurement in the straight channel using ADCP.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 367–377, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA2015.48.5.367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W., Yoon, K. S., Lee, E. R, Kim, C. Y, Kim, D. G, Cha, J. H., and Park, E. H. (2004). Water measurement manual in river. Technical Report 1, Sustainable Water Resources Research Center, Daejeon, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Coz, J., Renard, B., Bonnifait, L., Branger, E, and Le Boursicaud, R. (2014). “Combining hydraulic knowledge and uncertain gaugings in the estimation of hydrometric rating curves: A Bayesian approach.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 509, pp. 573–587, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Coz, J., Camenen, B., Peyrard, X., and Dramais, G. (2012). “Uncertainty in open-channel discharges measured with the velocity-area method.” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 26, pp. 18–29, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.05.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. H., Kim, U. G., and Kim, Y. S. (1997). “Practical aspects of microwave surface velocity meter applied to measurements of stream discharges.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 671–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. J., Kim, W., Kim, C. Y, and Kim, D. G (2007). “Measurement of discharge by stationary method using ADCPs.” Korea Society of Civil Engineers 2007 Convention, Daegu, Korea, pp. 1249–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. J., Kim, W., Kim, C. Y, and Kim, D. G (2009). “Measurement of velocity and discharge in natural streams with the electronic float system.” Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 29, No. 4B, pp. 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. J., Kim, D. G, Kwon, S. I., and Kim, W. (2010). “Inter-comparison of accuracy of discharge measurement methods — A case study performed in the Dalcheon River downstream of the Goesan dam.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 43, No. 12, pp. 1039–1050, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2010.43.12.1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Ho, H. C, Marian, M., and Wu, C. H. (2014). “Uncertainty in open channel discharge measurements acquired with streampro ADCP.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 509, pp. 101–114, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marian, M., Lee, K., and Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L. (2012). “Standardized uncertainty analysis for hydrometry: A review of relevant approaches and implementation examples.” Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 643–667, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.675064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niliei, Y., and Sakai, T. (2007). “ADCP measurements of vertical flow structure and coefficients of float in flood flows.” Proc. Conf. on International Association for Hydraulic Research, Venice, Italy, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niliei, Y. and Sakai, T. (2010). “Coefficients of float in actual rivers under flooding conditions.” Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (1994). Guide to hydrological practices: Data acquisition and processing, analysis, forecasting and other application, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No.2017RlA2B4007131).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Un Ji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, M., Yoon, B. & Ji, U. Uncertainty Analysis for Mean Flow Velocity and Discharge Measurements using Floats based on Large-Scale Experiments. KSCE J Civ Eng 23, 3364–3371 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-2002-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-2002-1

Keywords

Navigation