Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the applicability of flow measurement by using non-contact observation methods in open channels

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

River discharge is one of the important hydraulic data to evaluate and manage the regional water resources. Estimating river discharge is generally based on field measurements. The measurement data are then applied to construct water level-discharge rating curves. However, it is sometimes difficult to obtain accurate discharge data due to the high uncertainty of flow. A commonly used technique is the propeller-type flowmeters (PTF), which average the results of 1-, 2-, or 3-point methods to obtain a vertical mean velocity. In this study, three types of flowmeters were employed to compare the accuracy of flow measured. The devices were calibrated using a tow tank testing: PTF, acoustic Doppler profiler (ADP), and radar surface velocimeter (RSV). To assess the applicability of the non-contact observation method, a series of 16 experiments in channels were conducted. Surface velocity measurement using the RSV was compared with the measurements obtained by PTF. The relationship between measured surface velocity of RSV and measured vertical mean velocity of PTF was established. The results show that the RSV can effectively estimate the river discharge in the open channel flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Absi, R. (2011). An ordinary differential equation for velocity distribution and dip-phenomenon in open channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research IAHR, 49(1), 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechie, A. J., & Wu, C. (2014). An entropy-based surface velocity method for estuarine discharge measurement. Water Resources Research, 50, 6106–6128. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binesh, N., & Bonakdari, H. (2016). Evaluating mathematical models for velocity distribution and dip phenomenon in rectangular open channels. Computations and Materials in Civil Engineering, 1(2), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonakdari, H., Larrarte, F., Lassabatere, L., & Joannis, C. (2008). Turbulent velocity profile in fully-developed open channel flows. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 8, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callede, J., Kosuth, P., Guyot, J. L., & Guimaraes, V. S. (2000). Discharge determination by acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCP): a moving bottom error correction method and its application on the river Amazon at Obidos. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 45(6), 911–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, F. J., Yang, H. T., & Chen, Y. C. (2002). Artificial neural network for simulating the location of maximum velocity in smooth steep open channel flow. Journal of Taiwan Water Conservation, 50(1), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. C., & Chiu, C. L. (2004). A fast method of flood discharge measurement. Hydrological Processes, 18(9), 1671–1684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. C., Kuo, J. T., Yang, H. C., Yu, S. R., & Yang, H. C. (2007). Discharge measurement during high flow. Journal of Taiwan Water Conservation, 55(4), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. C., Yang, H. C., Kuo, J. T., & Kuo, T. M. (2008). Discharge measurement by using the flow tracker during low flow. Journal of Taiwan Water Conservation, 56(3), 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitale, S. V. (1974). Discharge measurement-technology and data analysis. Hydraulics of alluvial streams, central board of irrigation and power, a status report 3, (pp. 13–24), New Delhi.

  • Chiu, C. L. (1988). Entropy and 2-D velocity distribution in open channel. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 114(7), 738–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. L. (1989). Velocity distribution in open-channel flow. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 115(5), 576–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, M. S., Huang, H. H., Lu, Z. M., Song, C. H., & Su, J. M. (2010). Application of non-contact measurement system for river discharge. Journal of Taiwan Water Conservation, 58(3), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, J. E., Spicer, K. R., Cheng, R. T., Haeni, F. P., Melcher, N. B., & Thurman, E. M. (2000). Measuring stream discharge by non-contact methods: a proof-of-concept experiment. Geophysical Research Letters, 27(4), 553–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, J. E., Cheng, R. T., Haeni, F. P., Melcher, N., Spicer, K. R., Hayes, E., Plant, W., Hayes, K., Teague, C., & Barrick, D. (2006). Use of radars to monitor stream discharge by noncontact methods. Water Resources Research, 42(W07422). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004430.

  • Dal Sasso, S. F., Pizarro, A., Samela, C., Mita, L., & Manfreda, S. (2018). Exploring the optimal experimental setup for surface flow velocity measurements using PTV. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190, 460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6848-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deodhar, M. J. (2009). Elementary engineering hydrology. India: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R. H. (1985). Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, I., Muste, M., & Kruger, A. (1998). Large-scale particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 36(3), 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukami, K., Yamaguchi, T., Iamura, H., & Tashiro, Y. (2008). Current status of river discharge observation using non-contact current meter for operational use in Japan. Alupua’a: World Environ and Water Resour Congres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genç, O., Ardıçlıoğlu, M., & Ağıralioğlu, N. (2015). Calculation of mean velocity and discharge using water surface velocity in small streams. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 41, 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeni, F. P., Buursink, M. L., Costa, J. E., Melcher, N. B., Cheng, R. T., & Plant, W. J. (2000). Ground-penetrating radar methods used in surface-water discharge measurements. Proc of the Eighth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Queensland, Australia, (pp. 494–500).

  • Harpold, A. A., Mostaghimi, S., Vlachos, P. P., Brannan, K. M., & Dillaha, T. A. (2006). Stream discharge measurement using a large-scale particle image velocimetry (LSPIV) prototype. Transactions of the ASABE, 49(6), 1791–1805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Y. S., Lien, H. P., & Lin, B. S. (2000). Review and improvement study on the utilization of flow rate measurement facilities in the Taoyuan open channel irrigation system. Journal of Taiwan Water Conservation, 48(2), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Y. S., Cai, J. F., Chou, H. C., & Lai, C. H. (2007). Measuring the performance of a Price and propeller current meter. Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation, 38(2), 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, E. F., Schwarz, G. E., Thibodeaux, K. G., & Turcios, L. M. (2001). Price current-meter standard rating development by the U.S. Geological Survey. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 127(4), 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, N. W. (1993). Field measurement of soil erosion and runoff. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W. S. (1976). Laser Doppler velocimetry. Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Engineering, 22(1), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita, R. (1984). Present status and future prospects of river flow analysis by the aerial photograph. Proceedings of JSCE, 345, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita, R., Utami, T., & Ueno, T. (1992). Flood analysis by the picture processing of aerial photographs–on the parallel cycloidal flow in the Agano River. Proceedings of Hydraulic Engineering, 36, 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2004). Evaluation of rating relation for Price current meter. Journal of Taiwan Water Conservation, 52(1), 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. C. (2003). Development of non-contact methods for water surface velocity and river discharge measurements. Dissertation, University of National Cheng Kung.

  • Lee, M. C., & Lai, C. J. (2000). Estimating river cross-section and discharge by remote sensed surface velocities. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, 20(4), 777–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. L., & Wang, X. L. (2010). Application of electric wave current-meter in hydrological monitoring of three-river source region in Qinghai province. Yangtze River, 41(4), 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. C., Leu, J. M., Lai, C. J., & Chan, H. C. (2006). Application of the remote sensing technology for river discharge. Journal of Taiwan Water Conservation, 54(3), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, J. M., Lai, C. J., Huang, W. C., & Lee, M. C. (2006). Studying of irrigation canal discharge measurement by using local image remote sensing system. Journal of Taiwan Water Conservation, 54(3), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohrmann, A., Cabrera, R., & Krans, N. C. (1994). Acoustic-Doppler velocimeter (ADV) for laboratory use. In C. A. Pugh (Ed.), Fundamentals and advancements in hydraulic measurements and experimentation. New York: ASCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment, D. R. (1993). Handbook of hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjang, N. (2008). Calculated surface velocity coefficients for prismatic open channels by three-dimensional hydraulic modeling. Ph.D. Thesis, Irrigation Engineering, Utah State Univ.

  • Mohanty, L. (2013). Velocity distribution in trapezoidal meandering channel. M.S. Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela.

  • Montes, S. (1998). Hydraulics of open channel flow. Reston: ASCE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muenchow, A., Coughran, C. S., Hendershott, M. C., & Winant, C. (1995). Performance and calibration of an acoustic Doppler current profiler towed below the surfaces. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 12, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezu, I. (2005). Open-channel flow turbulence and its research prospect in the 21st century. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131(4), 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezu, I., & Rodi, W. (1986). Open-channel flow measurement with a laser Doppler anemometer. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 112(5), 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, W. J., Keller, W. C., Hayes, K., & Spicer, K. (2005). Streamflow properties from time series of surface velocity and stage. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131(8), 657–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantz, S. E. et al. (1982a). Measurement and computation of stream flow: volume 1. Measurement of stage and discharge. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2175. U.S. government printing office, Washington.

  • Rantz, S. E. et al. (1982b). Measurement and computation of stream flow: volume 2. Computation of discharge. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2175. U.S. government printing office, Washington.

  • Schlichting, H. (1987). In J. Kestin (Ed.), Boundary layer theory (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. (2002). Discharge measurements using a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler. USGS Open-File Report 01-01 Sacramento, California.

  • Staubli, T. (1988). In Muller (Ed.), Propeller-type current meter. Discharge and velocity measurements (pp. 95–100). Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X., Shiono, K., Chandler, J. H., Rameshwaran, P., Sellin, R. H. J., & Fujita, I. (2010). Discharge estimation in small irregular river using LSPIV. Water Management, 163(WM5), 247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauro, F., Piscopia, R., & Grimaldi, S. (2017). Streamflow observations from cameras: large-scale particle image velocimetry or particle tracking velocimetry? Water Resources Research, 53, 10374–10394. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USBR, U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation (1997). Water measurement manual. Water Resources Publications Inc., Highlands Ranch, Colo.

  • USBR, U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation (2001). Water measurement manual. Revised Reprinted. Washington, DC.

  • USGS. (1968). Selected techniques in water resources investigations. Washington: U.S. government printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, T. L. (2002). Performance limits of width-contracted flumes. Estes Park: EWRI/IAHR Conference on Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, T. L., Clemmens, A. J., Replogle, J. A. , & Bos, M. G. (2000). Winflume-windows-based software for the design of long-throated measuring flumes. The 4th Decennial National Irrigation Symposium. 14-16, Phoenix, Arizona.

  • Wahl, T. L., Clemmens, A. J., Bos, M.G., & Replogle, J. A. (2002). Tools for design, calibration, construction and use of long-throated flumes and broad-crested weirs. USCID/EWRI Conference on Energy, Climate, Environment and Water. 1-10, San Luis Obispo, California.

  • Wang, C. Y., Lu, J. Y., Su, C. C., Ferng, D. Z., & Hsu, S. K. (1998). Application of acoustic Doppler profiler to discharge measurement of rivers in Taiwan. Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation, 29(1), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitbrecht, V., Kühn, G., & Jirka, G. H. (2002). Large scale PIV-measurements at the surface of shallow water flows. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 13, 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, T., & Niizato, K. (1994). Flood discharge observation using radio current meter. Proceedings of JSCE, 497, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J., Wang, E. P., Sun, D. P., & Dong, Z. H. (2011). Experimental study on distribution properties of velocity in rectangular open channel. Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation, 38(5), 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. C., & Chen, Y. C. (2013). Discharge estimation of the Shin-Yuan canal using indirect method, 11, 217-225. Paddy and Water Environment, 11, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-011-0309-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Engineering Research Center, Chungli, Taiwan, 320, Republic of China

    Feng-Wen Chen

  2. Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 106, Republic of China

    Chen-Wuing Liu

Authors
  1. Feng-Wen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chen-Wuing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen-Wuing Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, FW., Liu, CW. Assessing the applicability of flow measurement by using non-contact observation methods in open channels. Environ Monit Assess 192, 289 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8226-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8226-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation