Skip to main content
Log in

Differential mode of denitrification by Pseudomonas sp. KY1 using molasses as a carbon source

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

A new kinetic model that combines Monod kinetics and a constant denitrification rate is proposed to predict bacterial nitrate removal in groundwater. The model, which was developed with an indigenous bacterium Pseudomonas sp. KY1 isolated from a nitrate-contaminated site using molasses as a carbon source, takes into account the dual-mode substrate utilization pattern depending on the degradability of the compounds that constitute molasses. At the early stage of a batch reactor study with various C/N ratios, the nitrate reduction and molasses degradation was likely to be associated with microbial growth, while at the later stage of the total 48 hr of the study, a significant nitrate reduction occurred without substantial cell growth and molasses degradation. The new model was able to simulate the differential substrate utilization pattern, which could not be explained by either Monod kinetics or a constant denitrification rate model. Although further validation using other types of substrates and inoculums should follow, the new model shows the potential to accurately predict the denitrification kinetics in a heterogeneous carbon substrate system with minimum input parameter determination requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carlson, D. E. (1971). Nitrogen Removal and Identification for Water Quality Control, OWRR project No. 4040, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, W.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, C. A. and Ingraham, J. L. (1983). “Comparison of denitrification by Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Paracoccus denitrificans.” Applied Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 1247–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, M. H. and Harremoës, P. (1977). “Biological denitrification of sewage: Literature review.” Progress in Water Technology, Vol. 8, Nos. 4–5, pp. 509–556, DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1344-6.50039-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A., Sharp, R. R., Hiebert, R., and James, G. (2003). “Subsurface biofilm barriers for the containment and remediation of contaminated groundwater.” Bioremediation Journal, Vol. 7, Nos. 3–4, pp. 151–164, DOI: 10.1080/713607982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Her, J.-J. and Huang, J.-S. (1995). “Influences of carbon source and C/N ratio on nitrate/nitrite denitrification and carbon breakthrough.” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 45–51, DOI: 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00113-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, K. M., Lloyd, J. W., and Lerner, D. N. (1991). “Review of natural and artificial denitrification of groundwater.” Water Research, Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 1099–1111, DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90203-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzelbach, W. and Schäfer, W. (1991). “Numerical modeling of natural and enhanced denitrification processes in aquifers.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 1123–1135, DOI: 10.1029/91WR00474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornaros, M., Zafiri, C., and Lyberatos, G. (1996). “Kinetics of denitrification by Pseudomonas denitrificans under growth conditions limited by carbon and/or nitrate or nitrite.” Water Environment Research, Vol. 68, No. 5, pp. 934–945, DOI: 10.2175/106143096X127947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korean Ministry of Environment (2010). “Management Result of National Groundwater Monitoring Wells in 2010 (in Korean).” Office of Soil and Groundwater, Korean Ministry of Environment, Gwacheon, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovárová-Kovar, K. and Egli, T. (1998). “Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single-substrate-controlled growth to mixedsubstrate kinetics.” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 646–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. S., Lee, K., Shin, D., Choi, J. H., Kim, Y. J., and Nam, K. (2010). “Denitrification by a heterotrophic denitrifier with an aid of slowly released molasses.” Journal of Soils and Groundwater Environment, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manassaram, D. M., Backer, L. C., and Moll, D. M. (2006). “A review of nitrates in drinking water: Maternal exposure and adverse reproductive and developmental outcome.” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 114, No. 3, pp. 320–327, DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhon, D., Cokgor, E. U., Insel, G., Kaharan, O., and Katipoglu T. (2009). “Validity of Monod kinetics at different sludge ages–peptone biodegradation under aerobic conditions.” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, No. 23, pp. 5678–5686, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittmann, B. E. and McCarty P. L. (2001). Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications, McGraw-Hill: New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivett, M. O., Buss, S. R., Morgan, P., Smith, J. W. N., and Bemment, C. D. (2008). “Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: A review of biogeochemical controlling processes.” Water Research, Vol. 42, No. 16, pp. 4215–4232, DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrinde, J. R. and Bhagat, S. K. (1982). “Industrial wastes as carbon sources in biological denitrification.” Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 370–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1990). National Pesticide Summary–Summary Results of EPA’s National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water Wells, Office of Water, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanrolleghem, P. A., Sin, G., and Gernaey, K. V. (2004). “Transient response of aerobic and anoxic activated sludge activities to sudden substrate concentration changes.” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 277–290, DOI: 10.1002/bit.20032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.-H., Baltzis, B. C., and Lewandowski, G. A. (1995). “Fundamental denitrification kinetic studies with Pseudomonas denitrificans.” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 26–41, DOI: 10.1002/bit.260470105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Environmental Federation (2010). Nutrient Removal. WEF MOP 34. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdowson, M. A., Molz, F. J., and Benefield, L. D. (1988). “A numerical transport model for oxygen- and nitrate-based respiration linked to substrate and nutrient availability in porous media.” Water Resource Research, Vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 1553–1565, DOI: 10.1029/ WR024i009p01553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zart, D. and Bock E. (1998). “High rate of aerobic nitrification and denitrification by Nitrosomonas eutropha grown in a fermentor with complete biomass retention in the presence of gaseous NO2 or NO.” Archives of Microbiology, Vol. 169, No. 4, pp. 282–286, DOI: 10.1007/s002030050573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zissi, U. S., Kornaros, M. E., and Lyberatos, G. C. (1999). “Kinetics of p-aminoazobenzene degradation by Bacillus subtilis under denitrifying conditions.” Water Environment Research, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 323–331, DOI: 10.2175/106143098X121770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyoungphile Nam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K., Choi, Y., Lee, B.S. et al. Differential mode of denitrification by Pseudomonas sp. KY1 using molasses as a carbon source. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 2097–2105 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0780-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0780-2

Keywords

Navigation