Abstract
This paper examined the flexural behavior of large concrete specimens (300 × 300 × 1100 mm) under different strain rate. Four strain rates were examined: 10−6, 10−5, 10−4, and 10−3 s−1. The changes of flexural strength, dynamically increased factor, as well as elastic modulus in response to different strain rates were well addressed. The results show that increasing strain rate led to more flattened surfaces of the specimens, In addition, more aggregates found to be broken on the fractured surface. The elastic modulus and flexural strength of the concrete were positively correlated to the strain rate. Nevertheless, the increase in elastic modulus was approximately half of the percentage of increase in flexural strength. There was no clear change for the Poisson’s ratio in response to the change in strain rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, E. and Sobuz, H. R. (2011). “Flexural and time-dependent performance of palm shell aggregate concrete beam.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 859–865.
Bieniawski, Z. T. and Bernede, M. J. (1979). “Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials: Part 1. Suggested method for determining deformability of rock materials in uniaxial compression.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 138–140.
Chen, X., Wu, S., Zhou, J., Chen, Y., and Qing, A. (2013). “Effect of testing method and strain rate on stress-strain behavior of concrete.” ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 1752–1761.
Chinese Standard GB175-2007 (2007). Common portland cement, Beijing, P.R. China.
Harris, D. W., Mohorovic, C. E., and Dolen, T. (2000). “Dynamic properties of mass concrete obtained from cores.” ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 290–296.
Kim, W. and Jeong, J. P. (2011). “Non-bernoulli-compatibility truss model for RC members subjected to combined action of flexure and shear.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 101–108.
Malvar, L. J. and Ross, C. A. (1998). “Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension.” ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 95, No. 6, pp. 735–739.
Reinhardt, H. W., Cornelissen, H. A. W., and Hordijk, D. A. (1986). “Tensile tests and failure analysis of concrete.” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 11, pp. 2462–2477.
Tang, T. and Saadatmanesh, H. (2003). “Behavior of concrete beams strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer laminates under impact loading.” ASCE Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 209–218.
Yun, T. (2011). “Generalized numerical computation method of the convolution integral for rate-dependent asphalt concrete mixtures.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 257–260.
Zhang, X. X., Yu, R. C., Ruiz, G., Tarifa, M., and Camara, M. A. (2010). “Effect of loading rate on crack velocities in HSC.” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 359–370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Zhou, J. & Yan, Y. A note on the flexural behavior of concrete under different loading rates. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 664–666 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0081-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0081-3