Skip to main content
Log in

Construction on Aerodynamic Surrogate Model of Stratospheric Airship

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stratospheric airship can stay at an altitude of 20 km for a long time and carry various loads to achieve long-term stable applications. Conventional stratospheric airship configuration mainly includes a low-resistance streamline hull and inflatable “X”-layout fins that realize the self-stabilization. A fast aerodynamic predictive method is needed in the optimization design of airship configuration and the flight performance analysis. In this paper, a predictive surrogate model of aerodynamic parameters is constructed for the stratospheric airship with “X” fins based on the neural network. First, a geometric shape parameterized model, and a flow field parameterized model were established, and the aerodynamic coefficients of airships with different shapes used as the training and test samples were calculated based on computational fluid dynamics (SA turbulence model). The improved Bayesian regularized neural network was used as the surrogate model, and 20 types of airships with different shapes were used to test the effectiveness of network. It showed that the correlation coefficients of Cx, Cy, Cz, CMx, CMy, CMz were 0.928 7, 0.991 7, 0.991 9, 0.958 2, 0.986 1, 0.984 2, respectively. The aerodynamic coefficient distribution contour at different angles of attack and sideslip angles is used to verify the reliability of the method. The method can provide an effective way for a rapid estimation of aerodynamic coefficients in the airship design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a for :

Bow length

a cs :

Cylindrical section length

c :

Relative thickness of airfoil

c t :

Fins’ tip chord length

C Mx, C My, C Mz :

Aerodynamic moment coefficients

C p :

Pressure coefficient

C x, C y, C z :

Aerodynamic coefficients

d :

Fins’ half-span length

R slen :

Slenderness ratio

L :

Length of airship, m

n 1 :

Bow index

n 2 :

Stern index

r C :

Correlation coefficient

u, v, w :

Velocities, m/s

V :

Volume of airship, m3

X :

Real location, m

x f :

Fins’ installation position

α att :

Angle of attack, (◦)

α sid :

Sideslip angle

α t :

Total angle of attack, (◦)

θ :

Meridian, (◦)

ρ :

Airflow density, kg/m3

φ :

Fins’ leading edge sweep angle, (◦)

References

  1. ZHENG W, YANG Y. Airship flight mechanics and control [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. LI F, YE Z Y. Aerodynamic configuration: Design of new type buoyancy-lifting airship [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2016 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. ZHAO D, LIU D X, SUN K W, et al. Research status, technical difficulties and development trend of stratospheric airship [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(1): 45–56 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. WANG X L, SHAN X X. Aerodynamic estimation for stratosphere airship [J]. Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics, 2006, 27(2): 295–304 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. LIU P, FU G, ZHU L, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of airship Zhiyuan-1 [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2013, 18(6): 679–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. JONES S P, DELAURIER J D. Aerodynamic estimation techniques for aerostats and airships [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1983, 20(2): 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LIU Z L. On the Calculation methods of aerodynamic force and moment in airship modeling [D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2019 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. MENG J H, LI M N, ZHANG L C, et al. Aerodynamic performance analysis of hybrid air vehicles with large Reynolds number [J]. Unmanned Systems Technology, 2020, 3(1): 38–47 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. JIAO L C, YANG S Y, LIU F, et al. Seventy years beyond neural networks: Retrospect and prospect [J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2016, 39(8): 1697–1716 (in Chinese).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. LOPEZ-GARCIA T B, CORONADO-MENDOZA A, DOMÍNGUEZ-NAVARRO J A. Artificial neural networks in microgrids: A review [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 95: 103894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. TAO J, SUN G, GUO L Q, et al. Application of a PCA-DBN-based surrogate model to robust aerodynamic design optimization [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(6): 1573–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. CHEN H, QIAN W Q, HE L. Aerodynamic coefficient prediction of airfoils based on deep learning [J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 294–299 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  13. WANG C, WANG G D, BAI P. Machine learning method for aerodynamic modeling based on flight simulation data [J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(3): 488–497 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  14. ZHANG Z C, GAO T Y, ZHANG L, et al. Aeroheating agent model based on radial basis function neural network [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 524167 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows [C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV: AIAA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. FUNK P, LUTZ T, WAGNER S. Experimental investigations on hull-fin interferences of the LOTTE airship [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2003, 7(8): 603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. POMPONI J, SCARDAPANE S, UNCINI A. Bayesian neural networks with maximum mean discrepancy regularization [J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 453: 428–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. HEYDECKER B G, WU J. Identification of sites for road accident remedial work by Bayesian statistical methods: An example of uncertain inference [J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2001, 32(10/11): 859–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. SUN Z, CHEN Y, LI X Y, et al. A Bayesian regularized artificial neural network for adaptive optics forecasting [J]. Optics Communications, 2017, 382: 519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. HORNIK K, STINCHCOMBE M, WHITE H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators [J]. Neural Networks, 1989, 2(5): 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. CHEN M. Principles and examples of MATLAB neural network [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2013 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  22. LIU J P, ZHAO B T, QIAN W F, et al. Modeling and prediction of particle cutoff size of cyclone separator based on BP neural network [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(2): 671–677 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoliang Wang  (王晓亮).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61733017 and 52175103), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 18ZR1419000)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, P., Wang, X. Construction on Aerodynamic Surrogate Model of Stratospheric Airship. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 27, 768–779 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-022-2494-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-022-2494-6

Key words

CLC number

Document code

Navigation