Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical study of quasi-static crack growth problems based on extended finite element method

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extended finite element method (XFEM) is a numerical method for modeling discontinuities within a classical finite element framework. Based on the algorithm of XFEM, the major factors such as integral domain factor and mesh density which all influence the calculation accuracy of stress intensity factor (SIF) are discussed, and the proper parameters to calculate the SIF are given. The results from the case analysis demonstrate that the crack path is the most sensitive to the crack growth increment size, and the crack path is not mesh-sensitive. A reanalysis method for the XFEM has been introduced. The example presented shows that there is a significantly reduced computational cost for each iteration of crack growth achieved by using the reanalysis method and the reanalysis approach has increasing benefits as the mesh density increases or the value of crack growth increments size decreases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu Z J, Wong L N Y. Frictional crack initiation and propagation analysis using the numerical manifold method [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2012, 39: 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Branco R, Antunes F V. Finite element modelling and analysis of crack shape evolution in mode-I fatigue middle cracked tension specimens [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(10): 3020–3037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu S, Fang S. Modeling cohesive cracks with meshless method [J]. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 2009, 18(8): 721–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wen P H, Aliabadi M H. Dual boundary element method for modelling curved crack paths [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2012, 176(1): 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Belytschko T, Black T. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 45: 601–620.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 46(1): 131–150.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Réthoré J, Roux S, Hild F. Mixed-mode crack propagation using a hybrid analytical and extended finite element method [J]. Comptes Rendus Mecanique, 2010, 338: 121–126.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordeliy E, Peirce A. Coupling schemes for modeling hydraulic fracture propagation using the XFEM [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 253: 305–322.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu Q Z. On enrichment functions in the extended finite element method [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 91: 186–217.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Z L, Menouillard T, Belytschko T. An XFEM/spectral element method for dynamic crack propagation [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2011, 169(2): 183–198.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleming M, Chu Y A, Moran B, et al. Enriched element-free Galerkin methods for crack tip fields [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1997, 40(8): 1483–1504.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Osher S, Sethian J A. Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1988, 79(1): 12–49.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Stolarska M, Chopp D L, Moës N, et al. Modelling crack growth by level sets in the extended finite element method [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 51: 943–960.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sukumar N, Prèvost J H. Modeling quasi-static crack growth with the extended finite element method. Part I. Computer implementation [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2003, 40(26): 7513–7537.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu B, Li Z. Static reanalysis of structures with added degrees of freedom [J]. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 22: 269–281.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Pais M J, Yeralan S N, Davis T A, et al. An exact reanalysis algorithm using incremental Cholesky factorization and its application to crack growth modeling [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 91: 1358–1364.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Ventura G, Budyn E, Belytschko T. Vector level sets for description of propagating cracks in finite elements [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2003, 58: 1571–1592.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xian-qi Luo  (罗先启).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Basic Research Program (973) of China (No. 2011CB013505) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51279100)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Ax., Luo, Xq. Numerical study of quasi-static crack growth problems based on extended finite element method. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 19, 736–746 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-014-1557-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-014-1557-8

Key words

CLC number

Navigation