Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of coal-based dimethyl ether and diesel as vehicle fuels from well to wheel in China

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, a life cycle model of coal-based vehicle fuels (CBVFs) including coal-based dimethyl ether (CBDME) and coal-based diesel (CBD) is established. Their primary energy consumption (PEC) and global warming potential (GWP) from well to wheel including feedstock extraction, fuel production, fuel consumption in vehicle and energy transportation are calculated and compared. Results show that the life cycle PEC and GWP of CBD pathway are 1.17 and 1.34 times as CBDME pathway. Based on the above results, CBDME will become a choice with great potential to replace conventional petroleum-based diesel (CPBD) in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleisch T, McCarthy C, Basu A, et al. A new clean diesel technology: Demonstration of ULEV emissions on a Navistar diesel engine fueled with dimethyl ether [J]. SAE Trans, 1995, 104(4): 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). Guidelines for life cycle assessment: A code of practice [M]. Brussels: SETAC, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GB/T 19754-2005, Heavy hybrid electricity vehicle, experimental method of energy consumption [S].

  4. Zhang L, Huang Z, Zhou X P, et al. Energy consumption simulation of urban bus fueled with dimethyl ether [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2007, 29: 71–74 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook [R]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2004 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yang J X, Xu C, Wang R S. Methodology of life cycle assessment for product [M]. Beijing: Weather Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu W G, Yu X S. Power generation technology and potential analysis of coal bed methane in coal mine area in China [J]. Electric Power, 2004, 37: 17–20 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Federal Energy Technology Center, U.S. Department of Energy. Baseline design/economics for advanced fischer-tropsch technology [Z]. Pittsburgh: Federal Energy Technology Center, U.S. Department of Energy, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gerald N C, Sheldon J K, Samuel S. T. Simulation models and designs for advanced fischer-tropsch technology [C]//Coal Liquefaction and Gas Conversion Contractors Review Conference. Pittburgh: [s.n.], 1995: 269–282.

  10. Zhang Z M, Men Z W. Technology of direct and indirect coal liquefaction to produce fuel oil [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2003, 33: 58–60 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li D S. Analysis and evaluation on technology of oil making from coal [J]. Coal Chemical Industry, 2003, 30(1): 17–23 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Zhang  (张 亮).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Huang, Z. Comparison of coal-based dimethyl ether and diesel as vehicle fuels from well to wheel in China. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 14, 210–214 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-009-0210-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-009-0210-4

Key words

CLC number

Navigation