Skip to main content
Log in

Engineering design optimization based on intelligent response surface methodology

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An intelligent response surface methodology (IRSM) was proposed to achieve the most competitive metal forming products, in which artificial intelligence technologies are introduced into the optimization process. It is used as simple and inexpensive replacement for computationally expensive simulation model. In IRSM, the optimal design space can be reduced greatly without any prior information about function distribution. Also, by identifying the approximation error region, new design points can be supplemented correspondingly to improve the response surface model effectively. The procedure is iterated until the accuracy reaches the desired threshold value. Thus, the global optimization can be performed based on this substitute model. Finally, we present an optimization design example about roll forming of a “U” channel product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mackerle J. Finite element analyses and simulations of sheet metal forming processes [J]. Engineering Computations, 2004, 21(7–8): 891–940.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Li K Y, Yam L H. An optimization design method for large scale structures [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1998, 165(1–4): 273–289.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwabacher, Ellman M T, Hirsh H. Learning to set up numerical optimizations of engineering designs [J]. Ai Edam-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 1998, 12(2): 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fouskakis D, Draper D. Stochastic optimization: a review [J]. International Statistical Review, 2002, 70(3): 315–349.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Box G E P, Draper N R. Empirical model-building and response surfaces [C]// Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical statistics. Applied Probability and Statistics. New York: Wiley. xiv, 1987: 669.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fan S K S. Computational schema on ridge analysis [J]. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 1999, 28(3): 767–783.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Pawlak Z. Al and intelligent industrial applications: The rough set perspective [J]. Cybernetics and Systems, 2000, 31(3): 227–252.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Benoit G. Data discretization for novel relationship discovery in information retrieval [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53(9): 736–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heislitz F. Simulation of roll forming process with the 3-D FEM code PAM-STAMP [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1996, 59(1–2): 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-hui Song  (宋国辉).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, Gh., Wu, Y. & Li, Cx. Engineering design optimization based on intelligent response surface methodology. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 13, 285–290 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0285-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0285-3

Key words

CLC number

Navigation